Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Benny B on October 12, 2012, 06:37:44 AM

Title: Thirsting for an Answer
Post by: Benny B on October 12, 2012, 06:37:44 AM
At last night's debate, we saw the essence of The Romney-Ryan Strategy: doubling down on widely, repeatedly debunked attacks.
Title: Re: Thirsting for an Answer
Post by: MCWAY on October 12, 2012, 12:42:07 PM
At last night's debate, we saw the essence of The Romney-Ryan Strategy: doubling down on widely, repeatedly debunked attacks.


At last night's debate, we saw Biden make a fool of himself. And with three of four post-debate polls, giving Ryan the nod, that's pretty much been confirmed.

Most laughable of all is none of Biden's buffoonery has helped Obama recover from that @$$-beating he took one bit, as he's plunging in the polls, to the point where four major states that were once "lean Obama" have now gone "toss-up".

A Suffolk polling company is pulling chocks, claiming Obama has pretty much lost Florida, Virginia, and North Carolina.
Title: Re: Thirsting for an Answer
Post by: POB on October 12, 2012, 12:46:22 PM
At last night's debate, we saw Biden make a fool of himself. And with three of four post-debate polls, giving Ryan the nod, that's pretty much been confirmed.

Most laughable of all is none of Biden's buffoonery has helped Obama recover from that @$$-beating he took one bit, as he's plunging in the polls, to the point where four major states that were once "lean Obama" have now gone "toss-up".

A Suffolk polling company is pulling chocks, claiming Obama has pretty much lost Florida, Virginia, and North Carolina.


Settle down, it's still early. You prob thought GB was gonna beat IND last week to when they were up 21-3, and whoever has the lead here is nowhere near as far ahead...
Title: Re: Thirsting for an Answer
Post by: funk51 on October 12, 2012, 12:47:24 PM
ceo with 7000 workers says if obama wins there will be lay-offs. :( :( :( :( :(
Title: Re: Thirsting for an Answer
Post by: MCWAY on October 12, 2012, 12:50:23 PM
Settle down, it's still early. You prob thought GB was gonna beat IND last week to when they were up 21-3, and whoever has the lead here is nowhere near as far ahead...

I don't care about either the Packers or the Colts. And, last time I checked, it was the liberals who have been trying FOR MONTHS to proclaim that this race is over and Obama has it locked.

That was the narrative.....BEFORE the first presidential debate. Once Romney slapped the lips off Obama's face, the complexion completely changed. Biden has done ZILCH to change that, as evidence by Obama's plunging poll numbers (state and nationwide). Same goes for those bogus unemployment numbers.

If he doesn't get it in gear for at least one of the next debates, if Romney dismembers him AGAIN, it could be all over but the crying for Team Obama.
Title: Re: Thirsting for an Answer
Post by: funk51 on October 12, 2012, 12:50:30 PM
At last night's debate, we saw the essence of The Romney-Ryan Strategy: doubling down on widely, repeatedly debunked attacks.

democrats=political party with bad ideas. republican party=  no ideas these words were never truer. why do we have to choose the lesser of two evils . where have you gone FDR..... ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Thirsting for an Answer
Post by: POB on October 12, 2012, 12:59:47 PM
I don't care about either the Packers or the Colts. And, last time I checked, it was the liberals who have been trying FOR MONTHS to proclaim that this race is over and Obama has it locked.

That was the narrative.....BEFORE the first presidential debate. Once Romney slapped the lips off Obama's face, the complexion completely changed. Biden has done ZILCH to change that, as evidence by Obama's plunging poll numbers (state and nationwide). Same goes for those bogus unemployment numbers.

If he doesn't get it in gear for at least one of the next debates, if Romney dismembers him AGAIN, it could be all over but the crying for Team Obama.

Sorry you only support "winning campaigns" and support the 1-3 bucs :D
Title: Re: Thirsting for an Answer
Post by: Benny B on October 12, 2012, 11:25:30 PM
democrats=political party with bad ideas. republican party=  no ideas these words were never truer. why do we have to choose the lesser of two evils . where have you gone FDR..... ;D ;D ;D
The same issues FDR championed in his time are STILL being championed by today's democrat party. The repubes are the party looking to dismantle Social Security and other programs of The New Deal.

So in essence, your first statement was nonsensical and subsequently contradicted by your admiration of FDR.
Title: Re: Thirsting for an Answer
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 12, 2012, 11:30:01 PM
The same issues FDR championed in his time are STILL being championed by today's democrat party. The repubes are the party looking to dismlantle Social Security and other programs of The New Deal.

So in essence, your first statement was nonsensical and subsequently contradicted by your admiration of FDR.

Who do you and tbombz insist making political asses of yourselves?
Title: Re: Thirsting for an Answer
Post by: Nomad on October 12, 2012, 11:44:05 PM
At last night's debate, we saw Biden make a fool of himself. And with three of four post-debate polls, giving Ryan the nod, that's pretty much been confirmed.

Most laughable of all is none of Biden's buffoonery has helped Obama recover from that @$$-beating he took one bit, as he's plunging in the polls, to the point where four major states that were once "lean Obama" have now gone "toss-up".

A Suffolk polling company is pulling chocks, claiming Obama has pretty much lost Florida, Virginia, and North Carolina.


Yea...i was watchign CNN at the gym and it was funny to see Anderson Cooper talk about how Obama is now at danger loosing his strong swing states, Pennsylvania, Michigan and etc...
Title: Re: Thirsting for an Answer
Post by: Benny B on October 13, 2012, 12:32:55 AM
Who do you and tbombz insist making political asses of yourselves?
::)
When will you realize that I have no interest in having my IQ lowered by communicating with someone as dumb as yourself?
(http://www.briansolis.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/391865576_e416a37655_m.jpg)

Whenever you see me post, Coach? Please do me a favor and go THAT way.  ::)
Title: Re: Thirsting for an Answer
Post by: Bevo on October 13, 2012, 12:39:29 AM
::)
When will you realize that I have no interest in having my IQ lowered by communicating with someone as dumb as yourself?
(http://www.briansolis.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/391865576_e416a37655_m.jpg)

Whenever you see me post, Coach? Please do me a favor and go THAT way.  ::)

Serious question? Nothing to do with politics, why are u so hostile? U seem to have so much frustration and anger built up.

Relax and chill its not so serious

In before the name calling..
Title: Re: Thirsting for an Answer
Post by: Benny B on October 13, 2012, 12:46:39 AM
Serious question? Nothing to do with politics, why are u so hostile? U seem to have so much frustration and anger built up.

Relax and chill its not so serious

In before the name calling..
Thanks for sharing, bro!

Now FUCK OFF.  :-*
Title: Re: Thirsting for an Answer
Post by: Bevo on October 13, 2012, 12:53:08 AM
Thanks for sharing, bro!

Now FUCK OFF.  :-*

 
Guess I struck a nerve  :-\


Times are tough I completely understand my negro friend

Dallas Cowboys aren't doing too good...
Title: Re: Thirsting for an Answer
Post by: Benny B on October 13, 2012, 01:01:20 AM

Guess I struck a nerve  :-\


Times are tough I completely understand my negro friend

Dallas Cowboys aren't doing too good...
LOL
Not even remotely, cracker. And we are not "friends".
YOU are the one under the mistaken impression that I am "angry", when nothing could be further from the truth.  ;)

I don't take this board particularly seriously at all...certainly not enough to affect my mood. I pretty much react to the stupidity I read here the same way Biden reacted to Ryan's lies during their debate. I find it all funny as hell.

Title: Re: Thirsting for an Answer
Post by: POB on October 13, 2012, 01:29:11 AM
Sorry you only support "winning campaigns" and support the 1-3 bucs :D

# owned, McKay taking his ball and going home again... :D
Title: Re: Thirsting for an Answer
Post by: Borracho on October 13, 2012, 02:37:17 AM
At last night's debate, we saw the essence of The Romney-Ryan Strategy: doubling down on widely, repeatedly debunked attacks.


fuck off with your thirsting for an answer bitch
Title: Re: Thirsting for an Answer
Post by: Benny B on October 13, 2012, 03:33:54 AM
fuck off with your thirsting for an answer bitch
LOL
You seem like a highly evolved human being.  ::)
Title: Re: Thirsting for an Answer
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 13, 2012, 04:08:02 AM
Serious question? Nothing to do with politics, why are u so hostile? U seem to have so much frustration and anger built up.

Relax and chill its not so serious

In before the name calling..

Because he can't defend his cut and paste propaganda no matter how many times he's been proven wrong. Personally, I seriously don't think he even understands what he posts,hes just that ignorant.
Title: Re: Thirsting for an Answer
Post by: Krankenstein on October 13, 2012, 05:06:15 AM
Has anyone else tried the Candy Corn flavored Oreos?
Title: Re: Thirsting for an Answer
Post by: MCWAY on October 13, 2012, 08:57:41 AM
Sorry you only support "winning campaigns" and support the 1-3 bucs :D

You just had to go there and pick on my BUCS.  ;D

Yea...i was watchign CNN at the gym and it was funny to see Anderson Cooper talk about how Obama is now at danger loosing his strong swing states, Pennsylvania, Michigan and etc...

According to RCP, he already has. Michigan, Pennsylvania, Nevada, Iowa, and New Hampshire have all been moved from "Leans Obama" to "Toss-up", dropping he EC count to 201 to Romney's 181.
Title: Re: Thirsting for an Answer
Post by: Tito24 on October 13, 2012, 09:02:32 AM
Has anyone else tried the Candy Corn flavored Oreos?

sounds great
Title: Re: Thirsting for an Answer
Post by: The Scott on October 13, 2012, 09:14:36 AM
::)
When will you realize that I have no interest in having my IQ lowered by communicating with someone as dumb as yourself?
(http://www.briansolis.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/391865576_e416a37655_m.jpg)

Whenever you see me post, Coach? Please do me a favor and go THAT way.  ::)

You do not have any friends that don't wear dashikis day and night and spout off about "black superiority" and other, do you? 

You are lost in hate.
Title: Re: Thirsting for an Answer
Post by: POB on October 13, 2012, 12:44:52 PM
You just had to go there and pick on my BUCS.  ;D

According to RCP, he already has. Michigan, Pennsylvania, Nevada, Iowa, and New Hampshire have all been moved from "Leans Obama" to "Toss-up", dropping he EC count to 201 to Romney's 181.

Had to use the word "campaign" as well ;D haha
Title: Re: Thirsting for an Answer
Post by: funk51 on October 15, 2012, 12:51:52 PM
The same issues FDR championed in his time are STILL being championed by today's democrat party. The repubes are the party looking to dismantle Social Security and other programs of The New Deal.

So in essence, your first statement was nonsensical and subsequently contradicted by your admiration of FDR.
are you comparing obama to fdr? :( :( :( :( :(
Title: Re: Thirsting for an Answer
Post by: Soul Crusher on October 15, 2012, 02:51:57 PM
At last night's debate, we saw the essence of The Romney-Ryan Strategy: doubling down on widely, repeatedly debunked attacks.



How about we get an answer to Obama's lies on Libya? 

________________________ ________________________ _______


Timeline of Libya Consulate attack reveals administration contradictions

 By Julian Pecquet - 10/14/12 06:00 AM ET





The timeline of events leading up to last month’s deadly attack in Benghazi and the administration’s shifting explanations have become a major problem for Democrats less than a month before Election Day.
 







Already under criticism for linking the assault on the U.S. consulate to an anti-Islam video, the administration raised even more eyebrows Thursday when Vice President Biden said he didn’t know about the U.S. mission’s request for more security. Biden’s statement directly contradicts sworn testimony from State Department officials given just the day before.

 The following is a detailed timeline of events leading to the Sept. 11 attack and what the Obama administration has said since then.

• April 5, 2011: Special envoy Christopher Stevens arrives in the rebel stronghold of Benghazi to forge ties with the forces battling Moammar Gadhafi. President Obama appoints him as ambassador to Libya on May 22, 2012.
 
• February: The U.S. embassy requests — and is granted — a four-month extension, until August, of a Tripoli-based “site security team” composed of 16 special forces soldiers who provide security, medical and communications support to the embassy.
 
• March: State Department Regional Security Officer Eric Nordstrom sends a cable to Washington asking for additional diplomatic security agents for Benghazi, later says he received no response. He does so again in July, with the same result.
 
• April 6: Two fired Libyan security guards throw an IED over the consulate fence.





RELATED ARTICLES
•Gingrich: 'Bigger scandal' than Watergate
•White House pushes back after veep debate
•Stevens's father: Libya should not be ‘campaign issue’

• May 22: An Islamist attack on the Red Cross office in Benghazi is followed by a Facebook post that warns “now we are preparing a message for the Americans.” Another Facebook posting a month later highlights Stevens’ daily runs in Tripoli in an apparent threat.

• June 6: Unknown assailants blow a hole in the consulate’s north gate described by a witness as “big enough for 40 men to go through.” Four days later, the British ambassador’s car is ambushed by militants with a rocket-propelled grenade.

• July: Anti-Islam video “Innocence of Muslims” posted on You Tube.

• Aug. 14: SST team leaves Libya. Team leader Lt. Col. Andy Wood has testified that Stevens wanted them to stay on.

• In the weeks before Sept. 11, Libyan security guards are reportedly warned by family members of an impending attack. On Sept. 8, the Libyan militia tasked with protecting the consulate warns U.S. diplomats that the security situation is “frightening.”

• Sept. 10: Al Qaeda leader Ayman al Zawahiri calls on Libyans to avenge the death of his Libyan deputy, Abu Yahya al Libi, killed in a June drone strike in Pakistan.

• Sept. 11: Protesters converge on the U.S. embassy in Cairo, scale its walls and replace the U.S. flag with the Islamist banner. The protests eventually spread to 20 countries around the world. That night, Republican candidate Mitt Romney criticizes an embassy statement denouncing the video before the events unfolding in Libya are known to the world. Late that night, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton says in a statement that “some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet.”

• Sept. 12: Media outlets report that Stevens and three other Americans have been killed in an attack by well-armed militants. Obama denounces an “outrageous and shocking attack” without mentioning the video or terrorism. Reuters reports for the first time that some administration officials believe the assault “bears the hallmarks of an organized attack.”

• Sept. 13: White House spokesman Jay Carney says “the protests we’re seeing around the region are in reaction to this movie.”

• Sept. 14: Carney says the administration had “no actionable intelligence” about a pending attack.

• Sept. 16: Susan Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the UN, does the rounds on the Sunday talk shows and says the video is the “proximate cause” of the assault in Benghazi. “Our current best assessment, based on the information that we have at present, is that, in fact, what this began as, it was a spontaneous — not a premeditated — response to what had transpired in Cairo,” Rice tells ABC. That same day, interim Libyan president Mohamed Magarief insists on CBS that “it was planned, definitely.”

• Sept. 19: National Counterterrorism Center director Matthew Olsen testifies before the Senate Homeland Security Committee that the assault was a “terrorist attack” but goes on to call it an “opportunistic” attack in which armed militants took advantage of an ongoing protest.

• Sept. 20: CBS reports that witnesses in Benghazi say there was no protest prior to the armed assault against the consulate. Magarief tells NBC the same thing on Sept. 26. Also on Sept. 20, Obama at a town hall meeting says: “What we do know is that the natural protests that arose because of the outrage over the video were used as an excuse by extremists to see if they can also directly harm U.S. interests.” Carney declares it “self-evident that what happened in Benghazi was a terrorist attack.” Clinton, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and Deputy Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter brief members of Congress. Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) calls it “the most useless worthless briefing I have attended in a long time.”

• Sept. 21: Clinton says “what happened in Benghazi was a terrorist attack,” highest official until then to say so.

• Sept. 25: In his address to the U.N. General Assembly, Obama doesn’t mention terrorism but makes repeated references to the video. Asked about Clinton’s statement on ABC’s “The View” show, the president skirts the issue by saying: “We’re still doing an investigation,” blames “extremist militias.”
 
• Sept. 27: Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta says it’s “clear that there were terrorists who planned that attack.”
 
• Sept. 28: The Office of the Director of National Intelligence takes responsibility for linking the Benghazi attack to the video. In a statement, spokeswoman Shawn Turner says that initially “there was information that led us to assess that the attack began spontaneously following protests earlier that day at our embassy in Cairo. “We provided that initial assessment to executive branch officials and members of Congress, who used that information to discuss the attack publicly and provide updates as they became available. Throughout our investigation we continued to emphasize that information gathered was preliminary and evolving.”

• Oct. 1: State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland says Clinton stands by Rice after House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Pete King (R-N.Y.) calls for her resignation.
 
• Oct. 3: FBI investigators finally arrive at the crime scene in Benghazi, which has been unsecured for weeks.

• Oct. 6: In a letter to Senate Republicans demanding an explanation for the shifting rhetoric, Rice lays the blame on the intelligence community, says she “relied solely and squarely on the information the intelligence community provided to me and other senior U.S. officials.”

• Oct. 9: Senior State Department officials for the first time acknowledge that there was never any protest in Benghazi during a background call with reporters. They say linking the attack to the video was “not our conclusion,” suggesting they’re blaming intelligence officials.

• Oct. 10: Lt. Col. Andy Wood and Eric Nordstrom testify at a House oversight committee hearing on security lapses in Libya. They say their requests for more security were denied by their superiors in Washington, testimony confirmed by cables made public by chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.).

• Oct. 11: During the vice presidential debate, Biden says, “We weren’t told they wanted more security there.” He also denies responsibility for the administration’s shifting explanation: “The intelligence community told us that. As they learned more facts about exactly what happened, they changed their assessment.”
 
• Oct. 12: After Republicans pounce, the White House says Biden was speaking for himself and the president because such decisions are made by the State Department.
Title: Re: Thirsting for an Answer
Post by: arce1988 on October 15, 2012, 04:41:12 PM
  Tomorrow night
Title: Re: Thirsting for an Answer
Post by: whork on October 16, 2012, 01:27:48 AM
So now you want facts? WTF