ha ha ha ha, you are one pathetic little dipshit. You love to insult others and gang up when it's 4 on 1 but can't stand when you get a taste of your own medicine.
SemenHole, considering that you have lied, tempered with pictures, manipulated semantics to try to prove your point and made openly racist innuendo, you're in no position to criticize me in any way, shape or form.
Dorian at 287 lbs was not even close to being the same condition as 03 Ronnie. The heaviest Dorian ever competed at was 275 lbs and we saw how horrible he looked.
Oh please, Dorian had a visible christmas-tree at 305 lbs and he would look worse than that at 18 lbs? And I know the picture you're talking about. Dorian is not under stage lights, has no oil on and you're comparing him to an onstage Coleman?
how's my quote irrelevant? You claimed Ronnie was "a sponge of fat and water" at the 03 Mr. Olympia. This is in direct contradiction to Mike Matarrazzo who said Ronnie looked dense.
Why is Coleman's 2003 physique not considered a standard of conditioning? There's a quote from Shawn Perrine saying that Dorian in those black-and-whites and Ronnie at the 2001 ASC had the most dense muscle mass ever. Ronnie at the 2003 Olympia looked soft. The only good pic of him is that one of the crab shot. I saw the video and he looks like garbage from the back and from the sides - due to the gut. Again, I'm still waiting for the quote stating that Ronnie 2003 Olympia had better conditioning than Dorian. I'm still waiting.
silly me, what was I thinking? I've only graduated with a 4-yr degree in exercise physiology and seen the insides of a human up close. Of course a guy who gets paid to operate a camera knows more about anatomy than me.
Again, what the hell has knowing how to perform exercises to do with evaluating physiques? Waht has anatomy to do with anything? Are you saying that you can judge physques better than he can because you can name the muscles of the Human body? There is no logic in your argument whatsoever.
SUCKMYMUSCLE