The Democrat Mid-Term Massacre of 2018 is Going To Be AMAZING!!!

[Yamcha]

It isn't a state that is voting, it is American citizens.  I'm comfortable with 1 vote per citizen. That my vote counts less than yours because we live in different zip codes isn't fair.

So there is no point in a Union of States. Gotcha.

[Yamcha]

oh dear,

[polychronopolous]

It isn't a state that is voting, it is American citizens.  I'm comfortable with 1 vote per citizen. That my vote counts less than yours because we live in different zip codes isn't fair.

Maybe u and Uncle Rico can get together on that time machine.

Drop him off in 1984 and u keep going back a little bit further to hash it out with those guys who came up with the idea.

[chaos]

It isn't a state that is voting, it is American citizens.  I'm comfortable with 1 vote per citizen. That my vote counts less than yours because we live in different zip codes isn't fair.

How do we know that? Do you honestly believe illegal immigrants didn't vote? Or how many people do you think voted more than once?

[Agnostic007]

So there is no point in a Union of States. Gotcha.

and that made no sense

[Agnostic007]

 

How do we know that? Do you honestly believe illegal immigrants didn't vote? Or how many people do you think voted more than once?

 

[Dos Equis]

THE NUMBERS ARE IN, AND IT’S LOOKING PRETTY BAD FOR SENATE DEMS IN NOVEMBER
07/10/2018
Vandana Rambaran | Contributor

Democrats are in for an uphill battle in November’s midterm elections as they struggle to overtake the GOP-led Senate, according to an Axios and SurveyMonkey poll of key states released Tuesday.

Although Democrats only need to pick up two seats to gain the majority in the Senate, they are struggling to control 10 states already held by Democratic senators. These states are now predominantly red states with voters who are strong supporters of President Donald Trump. They include Indiana, Missouri, Montana and North Dakota, all of which Trump won in 2016, while his Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton couldn’t even win over 40 percent of voters in any of those states, according to a Politico report.

Chances of flipping most states where Republican senators are up for reelection seems slim, with states like Nebraska, Utah and Wyoming most likely a solid GOP win, according to polling data by RealClearPolitics. Democrats’ only hope will be to replace GOP Sen. Jeff Flake from Arizona as he retires with one of their own, while simultaneously defeating GOP Sen. Dean Heller in Nevada. (RELATED: Republicans Are Pumped To Vote In Midterm Elections, Poll Results Show)

Midterm prediction polls show that in an effort to add two seats to Democrats’ existing 26, they will likely lose races in Nevada, Florida and Indiana, which will squash any chances of overtaking Republicans in the Senate races, according to the Axios and SurveyMonkey poll. The poll surveyed 12,677 registered voters from June 11 to July 2 with a margin of error of five percent.

The poll suggests that 49 percent of voters would vote for GOP Gov. Rick Scott over Democratic Sen. Bill Nelson in Florida, 52 percent would vote for GOP Rep. Kevin Cramer over Democratic Sen. Heidi Heitkamp in North Dakota, and 49 percent would vote for Republican Mike Braun against Democratic Sen. Joe Donnelly in Indiana.

http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/10/numbers-senate-democrats-election/

[Soul Crusher]

Big Blue Bellyflop: Polls Show Democrats Losing Bid to Capture U.S. Senate
brietbart ^ | 07/10/2018 | John Nolte
Posted on 7/11/2018, 8:59:05 AM by ChicagoConservative27

The latest batch of Axios/Survey Monkey polls shows that Democrats are in real danger of losing three U.S. Senate seats, which means they have no chance of capturing that chamber in 2018. In order to take control of the Senate, Democrats must hold on to all 10 seats currently up for grabs in states President Trump won in 2016. On top of that, they must snatch two seats from incumbent Republicans.

According to these polls, Democrat incumbents in Florida, North Dakota, and Indiana are losing to their Republican challengers by three, five, and two points, respectively.

Another endangered Democrat incumbent, the increasingly embattled Claire McCaskill, is only ahead by two points in Missouri.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...

[polychronopolous]

New Poll Has Bad News For Dems On Hispanics



A majority of Americans, including 62 percent of Hispanics, feel they are better off with President Donald Trump in office than former President Barack Obama, according to a mid-year ePoll put out by Emerson College on Monday.

When asked their feelings on whether they are better off or worse off financially under a Trump economy, 42 percent of voters said they believe they are better off while only 26 percent feel they are worse off.


Perceptions of the current financial situation varied by party and race, according to the poll. Of Hispanics polled, 62 percent said they believe they are better off under Trump, and 21 percent feel they are worse off. African Americans had a reverse perspective, with 30 percent feeling they are better off and 40 percent feeling they are worse off under Trump.

The poll also found that Trump’s current job approval rating is at 43 percent with disapproval at 50 percent, an improvement from the statistics in Emerson’s January ePoll when the President’s approval was at only 39 percent and disapproval at 52 percent. The poll suggests that Trump’s higher approval rating may be due in part to the current financial situation of voters.

http://amp.dailycaller.com/2018/07/10/emerson-poll-bad-news-for-dems/?__twitter_impression=true

[Coach is Back!]

It’s sure looks that way but I’m not holding my breath. These political leftists are lying, cheating scum, but I guess in light of the last election, the republicans will be even more vigilant

[chaos]

 

Are you saying you don't believe illegal aliens vote? Do you disagree that someone is using a dead persons identity to vote? Are you of the opinion that everybody that votes only does so once?

[Agnostic007]

Are you saying you don't believe illegal aliens vote? Do you disagree that someone is using a dead persons identity to vote? Are you of the opinion that everybody that votes only does so once?

Lets see... Does it happen? Probably so. Is it a real problem. Unlikely

"President Donald Trump has repeatedly, and falsely, claimed millions voted illegally. Yet examination after examination of voter fraud claims reveal fraud is very rare, voter impersonation is nearly non-existent, and much of the problems associated with alleged fraud relates to unintentional mistakes by voters or election administrators. Election officials and leaders of the president’s own party also agree fraud is not widespread.

The Brennan Center's seminal report "The Truth About Voter Fraud" conclusively demonstrated most allegations of fraud turn out to be baseless — and that of the few allegations remaining, most reveal election irregularities and other forms of election misconduct. And numerous other studies have reached the same conclusion."

https://www.brennancenter.org/issues/voter-fraud

[chaos]

Lets see... Does it happen? Probably so. Is it a real problem. Unlikely

"President Donald Trump has repeatedly, and falsely, claimed millions voted illegally. Yet examination after examination of voter fraud claims reveal fraud is very rare, voter impersonation is nearly non-existent, and much of the problems associated with alleged fraud relates to unintentional mistakes by voters or election administrators. Election officials and leaders of the president’s own party also agree fraud is not widespread.

The Brennan Center's seminal report "The Truth About Voter Fraud" conclusively demonstrated most allegations of fraud turn out to be baseless — and that of the few allegations remaining, most reveal election irregularities and other forms of election misconduct. And numerous other studies have reached the same conclusion."

https://www.brennancenter.org/issues/voter-fraud

The 2016 Election
The number of non-citizens who voted in the 2016 election may be significantly higher than in 2008, because:
Trump campaigned on a promise to crack down on illegal immigration, and this may have driven non-citizens to vote against him.
the number of adult non-citizens in the U.S. recorded by the Census Bureau has risen from 19.4 million in 2008 to 21.0 million in 2016.
shortly before the election, Obama publicly stated that election records are not cross-checked against immigration databases and “there is not a situation where the voting rolls somehow are transferred over and people start investigating, et cetera.” This let non-citizens know that they stand little chance of being caught if they vote.
Likewise, early in 2016, the Obama administration supported a court injunction to prevent Kansas, Alabama, and Georgia from requiring people to provide proof of citizenship in order to register to vote.

So-Called Fact Checks
Some of the nation’s most prominent fact checkers have scoffed at Trump’s assertion that he won the popular vote if illegal votes are deducted.
The Washington Post’s Fact Checker dismissed Trump’s claim as “bogus” and attributed it to “a self-described conservative voter fraud specialist” who has “declined to provide any evidence to back it up, even though reporters have asked.”
The Post’s analysis, written by Glenn Kessler, completely ignored the fact that Trump’s statement is supported to a degree by the 2014 Electoral Studies paper. Kessler is clearly aware of this study, because he quotes its lead author and links to an earlier Post fact check that cites the study. Yet, Kessler doesn’t even hint at what the study shows. Instead, he provides a link that says “we’ve previously given Trump four Pinocchios for making a number of bogus claims about alleged voter fraud.”
Worse still, in both of these fact checks, the Post declares that Trump took the study “out of context.” This is a blatant falsehood, but Kessler says it is so because the lead author of the study wrote that “almost all elections in the US are not determined by non-citizen participation, with occasional and very rare potential exceptions.” This does not in any way contradict Trump, who quoted the authors of the study word-for-word as follows:
Non-citizen votes could have given Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote needed to overcome filibusters in order to pass health-care reform and many other reforms, and other Obama administration priorities. … It is also possible that non-citizen votes were responsible for Obama’s 2008 victory in North Carolina.
Kessler and his fellow Post reporter had good reason to know that these words are accurate and in-context, for the authors of the study wrote them in the Post, and the Fact Checker linked to their article.
PolitiFact, another popular fact checking organization, also published a misleading analysis of this issue. This pertains to the number of non-citizens who are registered to vote, which is another finding from the 2014 Electoral Studies paper. PolitiFact says that “Trump accurately cites the study” but is still wrong, because the study was “rebutted multiple times for the methodology it uses.”
PolitiFact then gives the distinct impression that the people who conducted the study are nobodies who merely wrote an article for the “Monkey Cage” blog of the Washington Post. PolitiFact does this by failing to mention that the study was published in a peer-reviewed academic journal and by failing to cite any credentials of the study or its authors, even though two of them, Jesse Richman and David Earnest, are university professors.
In stark contrast, PolitiFact touts the study’s critics with phrases like “three experts,” “peer-reviewed article,” “a political science professor,” “an election expert,” “an associate policy analyst,” and “experts who actually gathered the underlying data.”
PolitiFact’s analysis provides no indication that anyone in this organization read the body of the original paper, read the authors’ replies to their critics, or judiciously examined any of the attacks on the paper. It simply portrays the authors as unaccomplished and their critics as reliable.
This appeal to authority is especially deceitful given that two of the three “experts who actually gathered the underlying data” have made donations to left-leaning political causes. These are Brian Schaffner and Samantha Luks, who are among the three scholars who wrote the 2015 paper in Electoral Studies that criticized the original paper.
In 2004, Schaffner donated to America Coming Together, a liberal organization “heavily funded by billionaire George Soros” that was “on the cutting edge of national politics.” In 2016, Schaffner gave $250 to Hillary Clinton, and Luks donated to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.
Incidentally, the same federal records show no political donations for the three authors of the original study.
In sum, PolitiFact neglects the actual facts of this complex issue and makes it seem as if this is a case of “the experts” versus people with no credibility. That is not fact-checking but shilling for a particular point of view.
Conclusion
Contrary to the claims of certain major media outlets and fact checkers, a comprehensive analysis of this issue shows that substantial numbers of non-citizens vote illegally in U.S. elections. However, contrary to Trump, the data does not prove that he would have won the popular vote if this fraud did not take place. Instead, it only shows that this is a reasonable possibility

[Princess L]

[Dos Equis]

Oh snap.  lol   

[Princess L]

[Yamcha]

Good Strategy by Democrats

[Soul Crusher]

Good Strategy by Democrats

Trumps biggest ally are his enemies

[chaos]

Good Strategy by Democrats

I'm convinced now, more than ever, the demoncrats are trying to destroy the United States of America.

[Agnostic007]

I'm convinced now, more than ever, the demoncrats are trying to destroy the United States of America.

How so?

[chaos]

How so?

Seriously The fact you would even ask that speaks volumes about you and you ideology.

[Agnostic007]

Seriously The fact you would even ask that speaks volumes about you and you ideology.

I know you are in your group of sycophants and expected that you could just throw that statement out there without any chance of being called on it but here I am asking you why you think the Democrats are trying to destroy the United States. I will certainly understand if you want to back off your statement and admit you thought you were sitting around the campfire with a bunch of fellow clansmen telling racist jokes, but if not then please, elaborate on how the Democrats are trying to destroy America.    

PS. I knew you wouldn't answer the question and say exactly what you posted instead.
 

[chaos]

I know you are in your group of sycophants and expected that you could just throw that statement out there without any chance of being called on it but here I am asking you why you think the Democrats are trying to destroy the United States. I will certainly understand if you want to back off your statement and admit you thought you were sitting around the campfire with a bunch of fellow clansmen telling racist jokes, but if not then please, elaborate on how the Democrats are trying to destroy America.    

PS. I knew you wouldn't answer the question and say exactly what you posted instead.
 

If you're really so party blind that you can't see what bills and laws demoncrats are trying to pass that would erode the very fabric of this country, then there is no hope for you. You are truly lost. Open your mind and do your own research.

And it's Klansmen.

[Agnostic007]

If you're really so party blind that you can't see what bills and laws demoncrats are trying to pass that would erode the very fabric of this country, then there is no hope for you. You are truly lost. Open your mind and do your own research.

And it's Klansmen.

Thanks for that insight and correction on the spelling of klansmen. I get the red line when I type Klansmen indicating a misspelling. I probably just hit auto correct. Did I get sycophants correct?

[Board_SHERIF]

If you're really so party blind that you can't see what bills and laws demoncrats are trying to pass that would erode the very fabric of this country, then there is no hope for you. You are truly lost. Open your mind and do your own research.

And it's Klansmen.

DemoCraps are the peoples enemy, those to dumb or gullible are duped by them.