Author Topic: Colorado huh?  (Read 917 times)

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 32639
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Colorado huh?
« on: July 17, 2021, 08:17:02 AM »
Judge is just putting the "!" on the prior loss.

---
Judge slams a pair of pro-Trump lawyers for 'just repeating stuff' the former president 'is lying about' after dismissing election fraud case.

A Colorado judge gave a scathing rebuke to a pair of lawyers after he dismissed their case challenging the results of the 2020 election, suggesting they were just parroting former President Donald Trump's talking points.

Lawyers Gary Fielder and Ernest John Walker filed a class-action suit in December last year, claiming to represent the voting rights of 160 million Americans. They accuse a slew of high-profile politicians and tech CEOs of thwarting a Trump election victory with China and Iran's help, according to court documents seen by Insider.

The pair have bankrolled their case via a crowdfunding page calling it "the largest civil rights class-action lawsuit in history."

The case was dismissed in April, one of the numerous failed attempts to implicate voting technology company Dominion Voting Systems in an alleged plot to steal the election for Joe Biden.

But Federal Judge N. Reid Neureiter found the case so frivolous that he called Fielder and Walker in for a hearing Friday to ask them if they had been used "as a propaganda tool" for Trump.

"Did that ever occur to you? That, possibly, [you're] just repeating stuff the president is lying about?" Neureiter said, referring to Trump.


Fielder and Walker argued that they filed the case in good faith, and plan to re-file the case despite the threat of sanction from Neureiter.

Theirs is one of several cases that appears to be heavily influenced by evidence-free claims by the former president, despite none of them having succeeded in court.

It also named Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan, Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger, and Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer as defendants in a loosely-woven series of allegations of Democratic bias and unconstitutional modifications of electoral law.

It asks damages of $1,000 for every registered voter in the US.

Neureiter asked the lawyers if they had thoroughly investigated the case's claims, such as that Dominion Voting Systems' machines had allowed Chinese and Iranian tampering.

Two days before Walker and Fielder filed their case, then-Attorney General Bill Barr announced that the FBI had seen no evidence of widespread voter fraud. In November, Chris Krebs, then-director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, publicly stated that the election was the "most secure in American history."

Neureiter compiled a list of factors that a "non-frivolous" lawsuit should be ready to consider, including Barr and Krebs' statements. He told the lawyers that they should have been a "red light for you, at least a flashing yellow light,."

Fielder and Walker did not immediately respond to Insider's request for comment.

IroNat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36445
  • Even Vince Lombardi and Bill Belichick got fired.
Re: Colorado huh?
« Reply #1 on: July 17, 2021, 02:59:37 PM »
These cases will be resolved in Trump's favor sometime in 2022 and Biden will be removed from office and Trump will be called back from Palm Beach to take the throne.


LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 32639
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: Colorado huh?
« Reply #2 on: July 18, 2021, 07:03:14 AM »
These cases will be resolved in Trump's favor sometime in 2022 and Biden will be removed from office and Trump will be called back from Palm Beach to take the throne.



Did Q change the date from August 2021?   Hmmmm.....

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 32639
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: Colorado huh?
« Reply #3 on: December 02, 2022, 09:58:21 AM »
Well?  Nothing to add to this verified case of election fraud?  Sure is awfully quiet now.... oh maybe because it is Republicans that did it?   ::)

---
A former elections manager who prosecutors say assisted in a security breach of voting equipment in a Colorado county pleaded guilty on Wednesday under a plea agreement that requires her to testify against her former boss.

Sandra Brown is one of two employees accused of helping Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters allow a copy of a hard drive to be made during an update of election equipment last year in search of proof of the false conspiracy theories spun by former President Donald Trump.

Brown, 45, pleaded guilty to attempting to influence a public servant, a felony, and official misconduct, a misdemeanor, but will not be sentenced until right after she testifies at Peters' trial next year so her performance on the witness stand can be considered.

"There were things going on that I should have questioned and I didn't," Brown told Judge Matthew Barrett.

In August, Peters' chief deputy, Belinda Knisley, also pleaded guilty under a deal that required her to testify against Peters. She only pleaded guilty to misdemeanor counts and was immediately sentenced to two years of unsupervised probation.

Peters gained national prominence by promoting conspiracy theories about voting machines and lost a bid to become the Republican candidate for Colorado's secretary of state, who oversees elections, earlier this year. She is charged with three counts of attempting to influence a public servant, criminal impersonation, two counts of conspiracy to commit criminal impersonation, one count of identity theft, first-degree official misconduct, violation of duty and failing to comply with the secretary of state.

She has dismissed the allegations, calling them politically motivated, and has pleaded not guilty.

According to Brown's arrest affidavit, Knisley worked to get a security badge for a man Peters said she was hiring in the clerk's office. Peters then used it to allow another, unauthorized person inside the room to make a copy of the election equipment hard drive during the May 2021 election equipment update, it said. Brown was present when the copy was made and conspired to misrepresent the identity of the person using the badge, it said.

Brown contacted the secretary of state's office asking for permission for an administrative assistant to be allowed to attend the update but knew that person was really a computer expert who would not have been allowed to attend, District Attorney Dan Rubinstein told Judge Matthew Barrett during Brown's plea hearing. The credential for that expert was then used by another person to get in the room and make a copy of the hard drive, he said. That person has not been charged.
---


IroNat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36445
  • Even Vince Lombardi and Bill Belichick got fired.
Re: Colorado huh?
« Reply #4 on: December 02, 2022, 02:21:28 PM »
Conspiracy from the highest reaches of banking.

Howard

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15401
Re: Colorado huh?
« Reply #5 on: December 02, 2022, 04:29:37 PM »
Did Q change the date from August 2021?   Hmmmm.....

The revised Q date for Biden's removal from office is Feb 30th, 2023     * save the date ! ;D

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 32639
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: Colorado huh?
« Reply #6 on: August 12, 2024, 05:31:47 PM »
Remember these morons?   I thought someone on here claimed it was "debunked".

And it's not going to stop until they are all held accountable.


---
Former Colorado clerk Tina Peters, hero to election deniers, convicted in election computer breach

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=Former+Colorado+clerk+Tina+Peters%2C+hero+to+election+deniers%2C+convicted+in+election+computer+breach

Former Colorado clerk Tina Peters, a hero to election deniers, was found guilty by a jury on most charges Monday in a breach of her county’s election computer system.

Peters was accused of using someone else’s security badge to give an expert affiliated with My Pillow chief executive Mike Lindell access to the Mesa County election system. Prosecutors said she was seeking fame and became “fixated” on voting problems after becoming involved with those who had questioned the accuracy of the 2020 presidential election results.

The case marked the first prosecution of a local election official over a suspected security breach amid the conspiracy theories that swirled around the 2020 election. It heightened concerns over potential insider threats, in which rogue election workers sympathetic to partisan lies could use their access and knowledge to launch an attack from within.

Peters was convicted of three counts of attempting to influence a public servant, one count of conspiracy to commit criminal impersonation, first-degree official misconduct, violation of duty and failing to comply with the secretary of state.

In closing trial arguments, prosecutor Janet Drake argued that the former clerk allowed a man posing as a county employee to take images of the election system's hard drive before and after a software upgrade in May 2021.

Drake said Peters observed the update so she could become the “hero” and appear at Lindell's symposium on the 2020 presidential election a few months later. Lindell is a prominent promoter of false claims that voting machines were manipulated to steal the election from Donald Trump.

“The defendant was a fox guarding the henhouse. It was her job to protect the election equipment, and she turned on it and used her power for her own advantage,” said Drake, a lawyer from the Colorado Attorney General's Office.

Drake has been working for the district attorney in Mesa County, a largely Republican county near the Utah border, to prosecute the case.
---


LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 32639
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: Colorado huh?
« Reply #7 on: September 06, 2024, 08:49:58 AM »
Well isn't this a shame?  Being held responsible for "evidence" you claim you have but won't disclose.   

Would one you Trumpturds like to help him out?  Or maybe comment on election fraud and interference?   Or just go with the cricket routine as always?

Or maybe comment on why one person is being held accountable for lying and yet El Retardo From Mar-A-Lardo isn't?  Are you contributing to Oltmann's legal fund?

---
Conservative activist Joe Oltmann fined $1,000 a day until he discloses evidence to court

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=Conservative+activist+Joe+Oltmann+fined+%241%2C000+a+day+until+he+discloses+evidence+to+court

Colorado conservative activist Joe Oltmann owes a former Dominion Voting Systems employee $1,000 a day, starting Wednesday, for as long as he continues to withhold evidence of his claims of election rigging.

Oltmann is named as a non-party in a defamation suit filed by Eric Coomer, who was the former director of product security and strategy for Dominion Voting Systems. Apart from this filing, Coomer is suing Oltmann in a defamation and conspiracy lawsuit for claims he made back in 2020.

These claims, made almost four years ago, came in the days following the 2020 election between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump.
---

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 32639
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: Colorado huh?
« Reply #8 on: October 03, 2024, 01:27:52 PM »
So wasn't all this supposed to be fake and "debunked" by our board CTer?   :D :D :D

---
Former County Clerk Gets 9 Years in Prison for Tampering With Voting Machines

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=tina+peters+sentenced

Tina Peters is headed to prison.

The former Mesa County Clerk was sentenced to nine years of incarceration, most of which will be served in the Colorado Department of Corrections.

Her sentencing was handed down in a packed courtroom Thursday that included supporters of Peters, several uniformed sheriff’s deputies and local elected officials. Interested parties also gathered just outside the courtroom, streaming the proceedings on their phones from feet away.

Peters was found guilty by a jury of Mesa County residents in August on seven counts, including four felonies after she helped facilitate unauthorized access to county voting equipment that she was supposed to safeguard.

During Thursday’s hearing, the prosecution argued that Peters should face the maximum penalty for each charge and said Peters should serve time in prison, noting her lack of contrition even after she was found guilty.

“I don’t think anybody in this room would make a straight-faced argument that Mrs. Peters has demonstrated any respect for the law,” 21st Judicial District Attorney Dan Rubinstein said.

Ahead of sentencing, Peters asked 21st Judicial District Judge Matthew Barrett for probation. She said she recognized the jury’s decision but that the jury wasn’t allowed to hear other evidence she wanted to present. That evidence was largely tied to conspiracies about Dominion Voting Machines, which were ruled inadmissible.

As he handed down the sentence, Barrett said Peters is privileged compared to the usual defendants he sees, and that she had not shown remorse. He preceded his sentence with a blistering critique of her actions and attitude, calling her an attention-seeking charlatan peddling snake oil “time and time again.”

“I'm convinced you would do it all over again if you could,” Barrett said. “You’re as defiant a defendant as this court has seen.” 
---