PAUL DILLET and RONNIE COLEMAN posing at arnold classic 1997

[Hulkster]

Damn, Dillets arms must measure over 23".    They're bigger then Colemans.

for sure.

Dillett was 6'4 and huge.

only Ronnie with his 2003 arms could compare to Paul for shear size.

[the shadow]

for sure.

Dillett was 6'4 and huge.

only Ronnie with his 2003 arms could compare to Paul for shear size.

haaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahah paul was 6.2 and not 6.4..lol

[Hulkster]

haaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahah paul was 6.2 and not 6.4..lol

only in the off season

my bad.

[Rudee]

I've only seen 3 professional bodybuilders in person, and Dillett was one of them.   I saw him in the mid 90's in Toronto and he was about 6 feet away from me in shorts.   I was blown away by his massive size, but what stood out most was his calves.  I've never in my life seen a bodybuilder with calves the size of footballs.  His calves are very underrated cause people talk mostly about his upperbody.

[slaveboy1980]

I've only seen 3 professional bodybuilders in person, and Dillett was one of them.   I saw him in the mid 90's in Toronto and he was about 6 feet away from me in shorts.   I was blown away by his massive size, but what stood out most was his calves.  I've never in my life seen a bodybuilder with calves the size of footballs.  His calves are very underrated cause people talk mostly about his upperbody.

did you see him workout?

[Rudee]

did you see him workout?

Nope.

[Parker]

Shawn said he was confused becaused he used more weight than Dillett did. Dillett has said he is more of a pumper. Hell, the man used to play in the CFL, so he was already big.