Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: alexxx on February 17, 2007, 01:40:18 PM

Title: WHY DO POWERLIFTERS THINK THEY ARE DOING A BENCH PRESS?
Post by: alexxx on February 17, 2007, 01:40:18 PM
When in fact it looks more like a fullbody press with help from gay shirts and mommentum plus crappy form??????
Title: Re: WHY DO POWERLIFTERS THINK THEY ARE DOING A BENCH PRESS?
Post by: The Squadfather on February 17, 2007, 01:41:42 PM
translation=you're angry that you're stuck at 205 for 4 and everybody else in the gym is passing you up.
Title: Re: WHY DO POWERLIFTERS THINK THEY ARE DOING A BENCH PRESS?
Post by: alexxx on February 17, 2007, 01:42:20 PM
translation=you're angry that you're stuck at 205 for 4 and everybody else in the gym is passing you up.

Yeah when I was 16. ::)
Title: Re: WHY DO POWERLIFTERS THINK THEY ARE DOING A BENCH PRESS?
Post by: The Squadfather on February 17, 2007, 01:43:15 PM
Yeah when I was 16. ::)
you're 16?
Title: Re: WHY DO POWERLIFTERS THINK THEY ARE DOING A BENCH PRESS?
Post by: MisterMagoo on February 17, 2007, 02:22:37 PM
When in fact it looks more like a fullbody press with help from gay shirts and momment plus crappy form??????

...because it moves more weight?  ???
Title: Re: WHY DO POWERLIFTERS THINK THEY ARE DOING A BENCH PRESS?
Post by: alexxx on February 17, 2007, 02:26:27 PM
...because it moves more weight?  ???

They should not be allowed to call it a bench press.
Title: Re: WHY DO POWERLIFTERS THINK THEY ARE DOING A BENCH PRESS?
Post by: Condor on February 17, 2007, 02:27:22 PM
translation=you're angry that you're stuck at 205 for 4 and everybody else in the gym is passing you up.

translation=the squad's best lift so far is, in fact, 205 for 4.

immortal truth deception.
Title: Re: WHY DO POWERLIFTERS THINK THEY ARE DOING A BENCH PRESS?
Post by: alexxx on February 17, 2007, 02:28:11 PM
translation=the squad's best lift so far is, in fact, 205 for 4.

immortal truth deception.

lol can you imagine what a disgrace that is.
Title: Re: WHY DO POWERLIFTERS THINK THEY ARE DOING A BENCH PRESS?
Post by: MisterMagoo on February 17, 2007, 02:30:43 PM
They should not be allowed to call it a bench press.

it's laying on a bench, it's pressing weight. you can argue shirted vs raw, but i've never called my best shirted bench my "best bench", for that i refer to my raw.
Title: Re: WHY DO POWERLIFTERS THINK THEY ARE DOING A BENCH PRESS?
Post by: Condor on February 17, 2007, 02:31:09 PM
lol can you imagine what a disgrace that is.

the truth hurts.

It's obvious they are trying to hide a weakness by blaming everyone else for it.
Title: Re: WHY DO POWERLIFTERS THINK THEY ARE DOING A BENCH PRESS?
Post by: alexxx on February 17, 2007, 03:05:53 PM
It should be called arched decline bump press.
Title: Re: WHY DO POWERLIFTERS THINK THEY ARE DOING A BENCH PRESS?
Post by: MisterMagoo on February 17, 2007, 03:38:14 PM
too many syllables. we're powerlifters, not linguists.
Title: Re: WHY DO POWERLIFTERS THINK THEY ARE DOING A BENCH PRESS?
Post by: TheAnimal on February 17, 2007, 03:39:57 PM
It should be called arched decline bump press.
very appropriate
Title: Re: WHY DO POWERLIFTERS THINK THEY ARE DOING A BENCH PRESS?
Post by: JOHN MATRIX on February 17, 2007, 03:52:21 PM
they should call it the arched-bounced-4pairsofspottershands-shirt-assisted-press
Title: Re: WHY DO POWERLIFTERS THINK THEY ARE DOING A BENCH PRESS?
Post by: alexxx on February 17, 2007, 03:53:36 PM
they should call it the arched-bounced-4pairsofspottershands-shirt-assisted-press

Yes they all have a kamali syndrome going on.
Title: Re: WHY DO POWERLIFTERS THINK THEY ARE DOING A BENCH PRESS?
Post by: MisterMagoo on February 17, 2007, 04:53:48 PM
they should call it the arched-bounced-4pairsofspottershands-shirt-assisted-press

bounced despite the fact that a full pause is required in a competition and using any body rebound ("heaving") results in red lights?
Title: Re: WHY DO POWERLIFTERS THINK THEY ARE DOING A BENCH PRESS?
Post by: onlyme on February 17, 2007, 05:30:35 PM
lol can you imagine what a disgrace that is.

The disgrace is the fact that you mentioned "momentum".  What momentum?  They pause at the bottom to prevent momentum.  The shirt yes makes these lifts stupid and to me not very impressive.  RAW is the only way it should be done. 
Title: Re: WHY DO POWERLIFTERS THINK THEY ARE DOING A BENCH PRESS?
Post by: MisterMagoo on February 17, 2007, 05:31:24 PM
The disgrace is the fact that you mentioned "momentum".  What momentum?  They pause at the bottom to prevent momentum.  The shirt yes makes these lifts stupid and to me not very impressive.  RAW is the only way it should be done. 

you still have to acknowledge the amount of strength required for a shirted bench, even if you think it's less "pure" than a raw bench.
Title: Re: WHY DO POWERLIFTERS THINK THEY ARE DOING A BENCH PRESS?
Post by: chris_mason on February 17, 2007, 05:48:18 PM
Alexx, why do you make such silly posts?  You are smarter than this.
Title: Re: WHY DO POWERLIFTERS THINK THEY ARE DOING A BENCH PRESS?
Post by: SteelePegasus on February 17, 2007, 05:53:20 PM
Alexx, why do you make such silly posts?  You are smarter than this.

you give Alexxx too much credit, you are forgetting that he is Canadian.

to be honest I am sorry that we annexed them..
Title: Re: WHY DO POWERLIFTERS THINK THEY ARE DOING A BENCH PRESS?
Post by: JOHN MATRIX on February 17, 2007, 05:56:29 PM
you still have to acknowledge the amount of strength required for a shirted bench, even if you think it's less "pure" than a raw bench.
whats the point? a bench with 'equipment' is not your real strength. why not just use a forklift? 'hey yeah i bench 2300...oh by the way my raw bench is 130 though'.
a real bench press IS a raw bench. whats the point of using shirts just to get a higher number? i just dont get it.
Title: Re: WHY DO POWERLIFTERS THINK THEY ARE DOING A BENCH PRESS?
Post by: onlyme on February 17, 2007, 05:59:30 PM
you still have to acknowledge the amount of strength required for a shirted bench, even if you think it's less "pure" than a raw bench.

Yes I do know.  I just think it has gotten out of hand.  Originally shirts were made for safety.  Now they are made to increase the lifts.  I think bench meets shoudl be done shirtless or the most in a t-shirt
Title: Re: WHY DO POWERLIFTERS THINK THEY ARE DOING A BENCH PRESS?
Post by: Ozzy on February 17, 2007, 06:02:35 PM
Hahaha, I'm gonna go invent a pneumatic bench shirt. The next world record bencher WILL BE WEARING IT! hahahaha


Anyway, I agree, shirts are pointless nowadays.
Title: Re: WHY DO POWERLIFTERS THINK THEY ARE DOING A BENCH PRESS?
Post by: Doublemonk on February 17, 2007, 06:51:19 PM
go read a book about physics. Then I want you to write a two page essay about how you are a dumbfuck for using words you don't know the meaning of, and how it is not possible to bench press without momentum.

Title: Re: WHY DO POWERLIFTERS THINK THEY ARE DOING A BENCH PRESS?
Post by: Condor on February 18, 2007, 12:15:23 AM

Chris, I guess nobody told you, Alexxx suffered severe brain damage when he passed through a diseased birth canal.

yes, and you suffered severe organ trama while dribbling down your mother's leg.
Title: Re: WHY DO POWERLIFTERS THINK THEY ARE DOING A BENCH PRESS?
Post by: The Heckler on February 18, 2007, 12:21:25 AM
yes, and you suffered severe organ trama while dribbling down your mother's leg.

"trama"?
Title: Re: WHY DO POWERLIFTERS THINK THEY ARE DOING A BENCH PRESS?
Post by: MisterMagoo on February 18, 2007, 12:23:24 AM
whats the point? a bench with 'equipment' is not your real strength. why not just use a forklift? 'hey yeah i bench 2300...oh by the way my raw bench is 130 though'.
a real bench press IS a raw bench. whats the point of using shirts just to get a higher number? i just dont get it.

whew, home from work. okay, in order to understand why shirted benches have gotten how they are you have to look at their history.

initially shirts and suits were a safety measure. think compression shorts and the equivalent around your shoulders. people noticed you get a few extra pounds out of them, and the tighter you got them (the smaller the size you bought) the more of a boost. naturally, then, the materials got stronger to allow people to get tighter gear. multi-ply and alternate materials evolved in order to aid in the bigger guys, and federations split up to define what they think is "fair". you have raw feds, single ply, double-ply with tricky rules, and a few completely unsanctioned meets where anything goes (but records aren't really recognized there).

me, i think you have two options as a lifter. either go 100% raw (belt only, knee sleeves and wrist wraps for safety), or deck out all the gear you can. the reasoning is simple. if i put an extremely tight single-ply shirt on a small guy with a low bench, he's barely going to be able to touch his max weight in it. that same shirt on a superheavy with a raw bench over 600 isn't going to get shit out of it. proportionately speaking the lighter guy is getting an ENORMOUS boost out of the thing and the bigger guy is getting very little.

thus, allowing everyone to use gear that makes it hard to touch the bar to their chests or squat to parallel is the only way to make things equal. after all, if i put on the kind of shirt gene rychlak wears, i wouldn't be able to do anything. i wouldn't be able to move. if he put mine on, it'd be like wearing a tight t-shirt. you wear the gear that requires your max to acquire legal depth or touching to the chest or whatever. it's a perfectly even playing field.

a bench with a shirt isn't your "real strength", but it's a sport now and people enjoy getting good at it. you might as well tell baseball players to stop wearing gloves or make football players take off their pads. that's just how the game works.

go read a book about physics. Then I want you to write a two page essay about how you are a dumbfuck for using words you don't know the meaning of, and how it is not possible to bench press without momentum.

you should stop thinking that because you took physics 1 in high school it means you can march around acting like you're smart shit. momentum is mass * velocity. thus, a bench press with a pause at the bottom means the bar isn't moving at the beginning of the press, thus it has no initial momentum (and if you need me to explain why that is i'm not sure how to help you).

a bench press with a BOUNCE or something similar, however, has a great deal of initial velocity before the muscles actually take the load, and as a result when you actually start pushing, there IS momentum. and since power is work/time, and work is force*distance, realizing that upward velocity lessens the amount of force necessary to move the mass over the distance which means less work is done, so in this case MOMENTUM is used to lessen the amount of WORK the lifter is doing, which means less POWER.

now, you could play semantics here and say "well i didn't know you only meant initial momentum, you should have been more specific," but i think the better idea is for you to back away and realize that your feeble little attempt to sound educated went down in flames.
Title: Re: WHY DO POWERLIFTERS THINK THEY ARE DOING A BENCH PRESS?
Post by: Condor on February 18, 2007, 12:30:19 AM
"trama"?

actual meaning being "tranny llama," therefore, trama.

Why heckler when you can strangle her?
Title: Re: WHY DO POWERLIFTERS THINK THEY ARE DOING A BENCH PRESS?
Post by: Doublemonk on February 18, 2007, 04:46:05 PM
you should stop thinking that because you took physics 1 in high school it means you can march around acting like you're smart shit.

lol, still can't get over that. Nice assuming. but you are slightly off, hey but just a tiny bit ::).
And I won't comment on the rest you typed as it doesn't change a single thing of what i typed.


now, you could play semantics here and say "well i didn't know you only meant initial momentum, you should have been more specific," but i think the better idea is for you to back away and realize that your feeble little attempt to sound educated went down in flames.

Maybe it's just me but you are the one that tries to look educated. I'm "really" impressed by your knowledge of the basic formulas and their connection with each other. Looks like you are the one that took the physics course in high school and now tries to brag with his extended knowledge. But what you fail to realize that with all your mighty knowledge you shared with us on this topic you only explained that the amount of momentum can be altered. But that is beside the point I was making. The only thing I was saying, if a weight is moved momentum is occuring. Nothing more nothing less. But thanks for making a totally irrelevant post about what I said and trying to teach me.
But I apologize if you felt insulted by my post even though I wasn't talking to you. And please don't start an official Doublemonk/Zachg challenge thread about this.  ;)
Title: Re: WHY DO POWERLIFTERS THINK THEY ARE DOING A BENCH PRESS?
Post by: SteelePegasus on February 18, 2007, 06:50:51 PM
"trama"?

lol, "trama" best describes that the adonis principle does to the human body
Title: Re: WHY DO POWERLIFTERS THINK THEY ARE DOING A BENCH PRESS?
Post by: Condor on February 18, 2007, 07:05:19 PM
whew, home from work. okay, in order to understand why shirted benches have gotten how they are you have to look at their history.

initially shirts and suits were a safety measure. think compression shorts and the equivalent around your shoulders. people noticed you get a few extra pounds out of them, and the tighter you got them (the smaller the size you bought) the more of a boost. naturally, then, the materials got stronger to allow people to get tighter gear. multi-ply and alternate materials evolved in order to aid in the bigger guys, and federations split up to define what they think is "fair". you have raw feds, single ply, double-ply with tricky rules, and a few completely unsanctioned meets where anything goes (but records aren't really recognized there).

me, i think you have two options as a lifter. either go 100% raw (belt only, knee sleeves and wrist wraps for safety), or deck out all the gear you can. the reasoning is simple. if i put an extremely tight single-ply shirt on a small guy with a low bench, he's barely going to be able to touch his max weight in it. that same shirt on a superheavy with a raw bench over 600 isn't going to get shit out of it. proportionately speaking the lighter guy is getting an ENORMOUS boost out of the thing and the bigger guy is getting very little.

thus, allowing everyone to use gear that makes it hard to touch the bar to their chests or squat to parallel is the only way to make things equal. after all, if i put on the kind of shirt gene rychlak wears, i wouldn't be able to do anything. i wouldn't be able to move. if he put mine on, it'd be like wearing a tight t-shirt. you wear the gear that requires your max to acquire legal depth or touching to the chest or whatever. it's a perfectly even playing field.

a bench with a shirt isn't your "real strength", but it's a sport now and people enjoy getting good at it. you might as well tell baseball players to stop wearing gloves or make football players take off their pads. that's just how the game works.

you should stop thinking that because you took physics 1 in high school it means you can march around acting like you're smart shit. momentum is mass * velocity. thus, a bench press with a pause at the bottom means the bar isn't moving at the beginning of the press, thus it has no initial momentum (and if you need me to explain why that is i'm not sure how to help you).

a bench press with a BOUNCE or something similar, however, has a great deal of initial velocity before the muscles actually take the load, and as a result when you actually start pushing, there IS momentum. and since power is work/time, and work is force*distance, realizing that upward velocity lessens the amount of force necessary to move the mass over the distance which means less work is done, so in this case MOMENTUM is used to lessen the amount of WORK the lifter is doing, which means less POWER.

now, you could play semantics here and say "well i didn't know you only meant initial momentum, you should have been more specific," but i think the better idea is for you to back away and realize that your feeble little attempt to sound educated went down in flames.

I don't recall Cobb, Ruth, Gehrig, Foxx, Dimaggio, Williams, Mantle, Mays, Aaron or anybody prior to the 80's wearing gloves.  Their numbers are unmatched.  Perhaps you should try a different analogy.