Alyssa Milano - liberal crack pot. Holy F !

[Soul Crusher]

Skip to comments.

Alyssa Milano Tweets About 'Being' A Minority, Gets Scorched For Her 'White Privilege'
DailyWire ^ | 03-10-19 | EMILY ZANOTTI
Posted on 3/10/2019, 3:18:28 PM by Steve1999

On Friday, Alyssa Milano decided to weigh in on International Women's Day, declaring herself an ally to all the downtrodden minorities and the poor, unfortunate souls left behind and oppressed by modern society, only instead of simply expressing her support for the underrepresented, she claimed to actively identify with them.She started out with a very woke idea: congratulating transgender women on International Women's Day. But when a detractor asked if she was transgender — a comment apparently meant as an insult — Milano responded by insisting that yes, she "is" transgender. In fact, she said, she "is" everything.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailywire.com ...

[Humble Narcissist]

James Woods is probably ripping her on Twitter as she speaks.

[chaos]

Drugs Liberals are bad, mm'kay

[Soul Crusher]

To think she was once a cute teen idol.

[IroNat]

I'm confused about this trans crap.

Is a transgender woman a man who became a woman or a woman who becomes a man?

Do they stand or sit when they take a leak?

How does it work?

[SOMEPARTS]

I'm confused about this trans crap.

Is a transgender woman a man who became a woman or a woman who becomes a man?

Do they stand or sit when they take a leak?

How does it work?

Yes to all.

[The Scott]

Milano is like all libtards in that she is something of a "Zelilg", which is to say a "human chameleon".  Just look at Hillary when she speaks to black people.  She tries to sound "black".  A "Zelig".

While a leopard most definitely cannot change it's spots, a liberal will change itself to fit it's surroundings to the extent of selling it's soul and worse.   They will do anything for a vote.

"Zelig" was a mockumentary film by the pervert known as Woody Allen, wherein he played a man so lonely, so desperate for acceptance that he would actually change not only his outward appearance but every aspect of himself to match those he was with in order to be "accepted" by them.  The film was thought provoking but otherwise unremarkable. To me.

It is the definition of a liberal politician to be a "Zelig".

[Humble Narcissist]

Milano is like all libtards in that she is something of a "Zelilg", which is to say a "human chameleon".  Just look at Hillary when she speaks to black people.  She tries to sound "black".  A "Zelig".

While a leopard most definitely cannot change it's spots, a liberal will change itself to fit it's surroundings to the extent of selling it's soul and worse.   They will do anything for a vote.

"Zelig" was a mockumentary film by the pervert known as Woody Allen, wherein he played a man so lonely, so desperate for acceptance that he would actually change not only his outward appearance but every aspect of himself to match those he was with in order to be "accepted" by them.  The film was thought provoking but otherwise unremarkable. To me.

It is the definition of a liberal politician to be a "Zelig".

It's amazing that this technique actually works on people as it is so obviously fake as Hell.

[Soul Crusher]

Skip to comments.

Alyssa Milano Apologizes for Claiming to Be a Trans Gay Disabled Immigrant Lesbian of Color
pjmedia.com ^ | March 12, 2019 | By Stephen Green
Posted on 3/12/2019, 5:48:12 PM by Red Badger

Another day, another celebrity going off the deep end on Twitter.

Zachary Leeman reports that "Actress and Democrat activist Alyssa Milano sent out what was arguably the most bizarre tweet on International Women’s Day." Bizarre? Sure. But let's not forget "nonsensical," and for those who are concerned with such matters, "valor-stealing from the genuinely intersectional."

That's a thing, or at least it is now.

The former Charmed star tweeted, in full, "I’m trans. I’m a person of color. I’m an immigrant. I’m a lesbian. I’m a gay man. I’m the disabled. I’m everything. And so are you, Kirk. Don’t be afraid of what you don’t know or understand. No one wants to hurt you. We are all just looking for our happily ever after."

I suspect some will find it more easily than others.

It shouldn't require saying, but Milano is not actually the six-way winner of the Intersectional Victimhood Olympics. She's an extremely attractive woman with a successful career in an industry more cutthroat than most. If Milano has felt the Boot of Oppression at any time in the last 20 years, it was probably Gucci and she was probably wearing it.

I'm just old enough to remember when actors, at least the most-loved ones, were entertainers. That is, they had a public persona which conformed to their on-screen presence, and they maintained that persona 100% while in public.

Cary Grant never stopped being Archibald Alec Leach in private, but he was always Cary Grant on the screen, big or small. Johnny Carson was a cold, shy man in real life, but five nights a week on The Tonight Show, he was unflappable and boisterously, boyishly charming. Frank Sinatra was, in Moe Greene's famous phrasing, banging cocktail waitresses two at a time, but on stage, he was the world's foremost interpreter of romantic love songs.

I could go on, but you get the idea: Entertainers always tried to appear larger than life, even when they weren't.

Today's actors, by and large, are not entertainers. They still seem larger than life in their movies and TV shows, but after-hours they whip out their phones and pull up Twitter to make very public demonstrations of what small, really very tiny people they are.

Perhaps this is more honest than how the stars of old behaved, but for audiences, it's a lot less fun.

[Dos Equis]

Skip to comments.

Alyssa Milano Apologizes for Claiming to Be a Trans Gay Disabled Immigrant Lesbian of Color
pjmedia.com ^ | March 12, 2019 | By Stephen Green
Posted on 3/12/2019, 5:48:12 PM by Red Badger

Another day, another celebrity going off the deep end on Twitter.

Zachary Leeman reports that "Actress and Democrat activist Alyssa Milano sent out what was arguably the most bizarre tweet on International Women’s Day." Bizarre? Sure. But let's not forget "nonsensical," and for those who are concerned with such matters, "valor-stealing from the genuinely intersectional."

That's a thing, or at least it is now.

The former Charmed star tweeted, in full, "I’m trans. I’m a person of color. I’m an immigrant. I’m a lesbian. I’m a gay man. I’m the disabled. I’m everything. And so are you, Kirk. Don’t be afraid of what you don’t know or understand. No one wants to hurt you. We are all just looking for our happily ever after."

I suspect some will find it more easily than others.

It shouldn't require saying, but Milano is not actually the six-way winner of the Intersectional Victimhood Olympics. She's an extremely attractive woman with a successful career in an industry more cutthroat than most. If Milano has felt the Boot of Oppression at any time in the last 20 years, it was probably Gucci and she was probably wearing it.

I'm just old enough to remember when actors, at least the most-loved ones, were entertainers. That is, they had a public persona which conformed to their on-screen presence, and they maintained that persona 100% while in public.

Cary Grant never stopped being Archibald Alec Leach in private, but he was always Cary Grant on the screen, big or small. Johnny Carson was a cold, shy man in real life, but five nights a week on The Tonight Show, he was unflappable and boisterously, boyishly charming. Frank Sinatra was, in Moe Greene's famous phrasing, banging cocktail waitresses two at a time, but on stage, he was the world's foremost interpreter of romantic love songs.

I could go on, but you get the idea: Entertainers always tried to appear larger than life, even when they weren't.

Today's actors, by and large, are not entertainers. They still seem larger than life in their movies and TV shows, but after-hours they whip out their phones and pull up Twitter to make very public demonstrations of what small, really very tiny people they are.

Perhaps this is more honest than how the stars of old behaved, but for audiences, it's a lot less fun.

lol

[loco]

Alyssa Milano's apology for labeling herself as 'trans' and 'disabled' backfires

Alyssa Milano issued a mea culpa for her tweet that many deemed offensive — but she also took aim at the media and her own political party for adding fuel to the fire. Her apology isn’t sitting well with some fans.

“Every time those on the left eat one of our own, the Right sees this as an opportunity to discredit the entire progressive movement,” she added. “And the media covers it.”

Who would have thought Milano and Tucker Carlson would be making similar points this week?

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/alyssa-milanos-apology-labeling-trans-disabled-backfires-playing-victim-185921286.html

[Soul Crusher]

Alyssa Milano's apology for labeling herself as 'trans' and 'disabled' backfires

Alyssa Milano issued a mea culpa for her tweet that many deemed offensive — but she also took aim at the media and her own political party for adding fuel to the fire. Her apology isn’t sitting well with some fans.

“Every time those on the left eat one of our own, the Right sees this as an opportunity to discredit the entire progressive movement,” she added. “And the media covers it.”

Who would have thought Milano and Tucker Carlson would be making similar points this week?

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/alyssa-milanos-apology-labeling-trans-disabled-backfires-playing-victim-185921286.html

These liberal freaks twist themselves into such knots with their cultish religious fanaticism to being a commie - its hilarious to watch.   

[myt1]

These liberal freaks twist themselves into such knots with their cultish religious fanaticism to being a commie - its hilarious to watch.   

They literally as so desperate to show that they are pro everyone and everything, that they in a sense ultimately kill themselves with their kindness. 

What we are seeing with social and msm media right now is both tragic, and hysterical at the same time.   

It's like they built the most amazing free housing/community center for everyone they think is not considered normal, and after the tenants moved in; both the builders and the tenants have started thinking "these walls don't look like they're built right", and  have started tearing the whole place down.

There's a very key part of my last long run-on sentence there.  Can anyone figure out what it is, and please elaborate if you do? (opinions on both sides welcomed)

[Humble Narcissist]

They literally as so desperate to show that they are pro everyone and everything, that they in a sense ultimately kill themselves with their kindness. 

What we are seeing with social and msm media right now is both tragic, and hysterical at the same time.   

It's like they built the most amazing free housing/community center for everyone they think is not considered normal, and after the tenants moved in; both the builders and the tenants have started thinking "these walls don't look like they're built right", and  have started tearing the whole place down.

There's a very key part of my last long run-on sentence there.  Can anyone figure out what it is, and please elaborate if you do? (opinions on both sides welcomed)

The American libtards believe socialism hasn't worked yet because THEY haven't tried it yet!  They think they can do socialism right.

[The Scott]

The American libtards believe socialism hasn't worked yet because THEY haven't tried it yet!  They think they can do socialism right.

It was tried in early colonial days.

 

By Alo Konsen - Capitalism, Property Rights, Socialism Sucks - Oct 21, 2008
An early American experiment with socialism

You’ve no doubt heard the well-known story of the first Thanksgiving in Plymouth, Massachusetts. But did you know that what you’ve heard is drastically inaccurate?

According to the writings of William Bradford, the colony’s first governor, the hardships and near-starvation of the entire population occurred because the colonists turned their backs on capitalism. They believed the old lie that an economy based on the concept of “from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs” can actually work. They instituted a socialist system, and found out that socialism causes disaster:

The harvest of 1623 was different. Suddenly, “instead of famine now God gave them plenty,” Bradford wrote, “and the face of things was changed, to the rejoicing of the hearts of many, for which they blessed God.” Thereafter, he wrote, “any general want or famine hath not been amongst them since to this day.” In fact, in 1624, so much food was produced that the colonists were able to begin exporting corn.

What happened?

After the poor harvest of 1622, writes Bradford, “they began to think how they might raise as much corn as they could, and obtain a better crop.” They began to question their form of economic organization.
This had required that “all profits & benefits that are got by trade, working, fishing, or any other means” were to be placed in the common stock of the colony, and that, “all such persons as are of this colony, are to have their meat, drink, apparel, and all provisions out of the common stock.” A person was to put into the common stock all he could, and take out only what he needed.

This “from each according to his ability, to each according to his need” was an early form of socialism, and it is why the Pilgrims were starving. Bradford writes that “young men that are most able and fit for labor and service” complained about being forced to “spend their time and strength to work for other men’s wives and children.” Also, “the strong, or man of parts, had no more in division of victuals and clothes, than he that was weak.” So the young and strong refused to work and the total amount of food produced was never adequate.

To rectify this situation, in 1623 Bradford abolished socialism. He gave each household a parcel of land and told them they could keep what they produced, or trade it away as they saw fit. In other words, he replaced socialism with a free market, and that was the end of famines.

[myt1]

The American libtards believe socialism hasn't worked yet because THEY haven't tried it yet!  They think they can do socialism right.

That's actually a great point too HN, but I was going more for the bolded part here....

"It's like they built the most amazing free housing/community center for everyone they think is not considered normal,....."

In other words their phony support is actually them trying to be the hero for those that they feel need saving....they are beneath them

People with massive bank accounts, and matching egos are trying to be the hero to feed their massive ego....and if a few million people support them in their support on social media...well awesome, bcuz then it feeds their massive ego and bank account even more.   If they can save a few peasants, that's like having another blockbuster hit on their resume. 

It's all bullshit in Hollyweird!  A massive ego and bank account feeding psychological mindfuck of epic proportions is what that place and those "stars" are all about. 

I used to dream about going to CA when I was a kid as a skater punk......now being forced to go there is a fucking nightmare wondering how I'd survive in a land of make believe with no one to trust.  Tragic Kingdom brought to life

[Humble Narcissist]

It was tried in early colonial days.

 

By Alo Konsen - Capitalism, Property Rights, Socialism Sucks - Oct 21, 2008
An early American experiment with socialism

You’ve no doubt heard the well-known story of the first Thanksgiving in Plymouth, Massachusetts. But did you know that what you’ve heard is drastically inaccurate?

According to the writings of William Bradford, the colony’s first governor, the hardships and near-starvation of the entire population occurred because the colonists turned their backs on capitalism. They believed the old lie that an economy based on the concept of “from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs” can actually work. They instituted a socialist system, and found out that socialism causes disaster:

The harvest of 1623 was different. Suddenly, “instead of famine now God gave them plenty,” Bradford wrote, “and the face of things was changed, to the rejoicing of the hearts of many, for which they blessed God.” Thereafter, he wrote, “any general want or famine hath not been amongst them since to this day.” In fact, in 1624, so much food was produced that the colonists were able to begin exporting corn.

What happened?

After the poor harvest of 1622, writes Bradford, “they began to think how they might raise as much corn as they could, and obtain a better crop.” They began to question their form of economic organization.
This had required that “all profits & benefits that are got by trade, working, fishing, or any other means” were to be placed in the common stock of the colony, and that, “all such persons as are of this colony, are to have their meat, drink, apparel, and all provisions out of the common stock.” A person was to put into the common stock all he could, and take out only what he needed.

This “from each according to his ability, to each according to his need” was an early form of socialism, and it is why the Pilgrims were starving. Bradford writes that “young men that are most able and fit for labor and service” complained about being forced to “spend their time and strength to work for other men’s wives and children.” Also, “the strong, or man of parts, had no more in division of victuals and clothes, than he that was weak.” So the young and strong refused to work and the total amount of food produced was never adequate.

To rectify this situation, in 1623 Bradford abolished socialism. He gave each household a parcel of land and told them they could keep what they produced, or trade it away as they saw fit. In other words, he replaced socialism with a free market, and that was the end of famines.

That was centuries ago.  This group of liberal socialists like AOC and Bernie Sanders believe if they were in charge they would be able to pull it off.

[Humble Narcissist]

Alyssa is hot, but comes off as an obvious mindless twit with this pathetic commentary.

In my observation, the outrageous bomb throwers get all the head lines and the reasonable folks get ignored.
Reagan was a great leader because he could compromise on some details WITHOUT selling out his key principles.

The demonization of the "other side" is why politics is so stressful now.
Obviously, each side has an agenda and we'd all love to have things 100% our way.
BUT that's not how of GOV was designed to work.

Let's take off the pink pussy hats and MAGA caps and get to work on stuff that matters.

Politics is now a sport.  Everyone has picked a side and that is not going to change.  The whole point is to defeat your opponent.

[myt1]

Alyssa is hot, but comes off as an obvious mindless twit with this pathetic commentary.

In my observation, the outrageous bomb throwers get all the head lines and the reasonable folks get ignored.
Reagan was a great leader because he could compromise on some details WITHOUT selling out his key principles.

The demonization of the "other side" is why politics is so stressful now.
Obviously, each side has an agenda and we'd all love to have things 100% our way.
BUT that's not how of GOV was designed to work.

Let's take off the pink pussy hats and MAGA caps and get to work on stuff that matters.

Please show me 100+ stories in the last 6 months where a person was refused service on camera, beaten, verbally attacked, and/or killed for wearing a pink or even rainbow colored hat?  Can't do that?  OK, you can add in people that had those things done to them by whites for wearing BLM gear too.  Still can't do it?

One side is doing the majority of demonizing, and always has to the greater extent by far.  The other side has finally had enough of this bullshit, and is finally speaking and voting back.   If the one side that keeps demonizing doesn't realize there is a line in the sand at some point, the other side is going to finally get angry for real..........the one side that demonizes doesn't want to see the other side angry. 

The other side is currently just upset and very frustrated, and that is currently too much to handle for the one side that demonizes.  Something everyone might want to keep in mind

[loco]

Politics is now a sport.  Everyone has picked a side and that is not going to change.  The whole point is to defeat your opponent.

[Humble Narcissist]

Yep,and don't be surprised if the Fed doesn't tank the economy in 2020 so Trump gets booted out.

[Humble Narcissist]

The difference is WINNING in politics = the right to govern.
Thus, winning election isn't the end of the game, BUT the beginning .

The game goes on regardless of who wins.  Trump won the 2016 election and they've been trying to find something to impeach him on ever since.  This will get worse after each election until eventually we'll be looking at Civil War II.

[Humble Narcissist]

Good point and the basic TRUTH of the current political climate.

Speaker Pelosi leads the dems and is 100% correct that they need to focus on improving health care, etc.
IF and only IF the evidence is revealed that Trump is guilty of " high crimes and misdemanors" do we proceed to impeachment .

When the Mueller report is final I hope :

1. The dems will admit he's not guilty IF the evidence doesn't show it.
2. The republicans will admit he's guilty IF the evidence exists.

I'm for TRUTH and Country above petty politics and bias.

That won't happen regardless of the Mueller report.  On a side note, American politics has always been combative there just wern't as many sources of information for everyone to go with.  Jefferson and Adams had a very dirty campaign against each other and I know Teddy Roosevelt did as well every time he ran including when he ran for the Bull Moose Party.

[SOMEPARTS]

https://www.yahoo.com/gma/metoo-activist-alyssa-milano-stands-behind-joe-biden-160020005--abc-news-celebrities.html



 

 

[obsidian]

James Woods is probably ripping her on Twitter as she speaks.

Maybe he ripped her vagina after he saved her horses. That's the least she could do as a thank you. Though her kunt is so loose it probably can't be ripped.