being good on the mic is one thing, but he's not an exciting fighter to watch.
since his lose to Anderson he's 3 and 3... with a submission over Brian Stann (woopiddy-do.. there's a top 10 fighter, right?), a decision over Bisping (in which even he said he thought he lost... besides, it's Bisping... woopiddy do, again), and a choke over Shogun (another with a benzo/sedative problem, who hasn't been the same fighter since Pride, much less multiple knee injuries).
then he actually makes it to the 2nd round (barely) in the rematch with Anderson, followed by 2 first round ko's.
how does this guy deserve all the title shots he gets?
his other ufc win was over trevor prangley back around '06.. with losses to sobral and horn. (both of whom submitted Chael.. the supposedly great wrestler)... he couldn't finnish dan miller, okami, or marquart and won via decision. (against at least 2 of whom were also PED users)
chael is the skinny Brock Lesnar, except Brock's fights are actually exciting.
he is a very boring fighter lay and pray
but he is very charismatic
the type of athlete that can be a cross over and draw more fans into the sport
a lot of these guys can hardly string a sentence together
like it or not the media side of the business matters as much as the fights