You think bone structure has any role in how heavy compound movements like seated dumbbell rows affect one person's joints versus another?
Like for example I was watching The hodge twins working out with the 80's or something like that and this older dude, probably 20 years or so their senior was repping the 110's like it was nothing. He was your typical endo with the little bit of a gut, doesn't really care about the mirror and probably has spent his whole life in the gym, just going in and moving heavier weight.
I wonder if those types have more leeway physiologically with the heavier stuff than an ecto who just busts his ass consistently in the gym, gets alot stronger but probably needs to back off the heavier weights at an earlier age simply because of bone structure?
yes, ac joint type 1,2 or 3 is very important factor, no doubt, esp on impingement, im no doctor, but a doctor explained that to me in layman terms, its very simple to understand.
the type 3 ac will cause problems eventualy if one trains + on gear, i went off gear and have much improved painless rom now.
its not ecto endo meso etc, everyone is a mix, shoulder is first and foremost ac joint type, ok one could claim inner socket has nothing to do with that, but it does.
impingement is ,when theres too little room in the joint and everything is inflamed, due to bone touching bone.
leads to all kinds of stuff, inflamed biceps tendon etc.from the impingement, going further in training is asking for disaster.
take care of the shoulder, chances are even post surgery,itll never be the same.
look at anatomic model,not ust skeleton,but how the joints and muscle flow there and are attached, if thats messed up,its shot-done.
