Author Topic: A-Rod tested positive for steroids in 2003  (Read 3072 times)

The Showstoppa

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26879
  • Call the vet, cause these pythons are sick!
A-Rod tested positive for steroids in 2003
« on: February 07, 2009, 07:42:24 AM »
Just reported.

JimmyJam1974

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5779
  • "No sir, the ball ain't heavy." - Herschel Walker
Re: A-Rod tested positive for steroids in 2003
« Reply #1 on: February 07, 2009, 07:47:24 AM »
U

The Showstoppa

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26879
  • Call the vet, cause these pythons are sick!
Re: A-Rod tested positive for steroids in 2003
« Reply #2 on: February 07, 2009, 07:47:33 AM »
haha yeah right. I doubt he's ever even done a test seeing as he competes in musclemania.

Not THAT douche.....this douche....


tleilaxutank

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2006
  • If it feels good twitter it
Re: A-Rod tested positive for steroids in 2003
« Reply #3 on: February 07, 2009, 07:48:33 AM »
Big Shock.

The Showstoppa

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26879
  • Call the vet, cause these pythons are sick!
Re: A-Rod tested positive for steroids in 2003
« Reply #4 on: February 07, 2009, 07:49:02 AM »
by whom? links?

Sports Illustrated is reporting it.....just heard it on ESPN as a newsflash....

McFarland

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7930
  • Tastes Like WINNING

MAXX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16945
  • MAGA
Re: A-Rod tested positive for steroids in 2003
« Reply #6 on: February 07, 2009, 07:53:54 AM »
oh sry missread was thinking of that jrod dude :S

EwaBeachBoy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1209
Re: A-Rod tested positive for steroids in 2003
« Reply #7 on: February 07, 2009, 08:03:16 AM »
Im going to add him to my breaking the law thread!!

QuakerOats

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 13621
  • bring amberlamps!!!
Re: A-Rod tested positive for steroids in 2003
« Reply #8 on: February 07, 2009, 08:04:47 AM »
who gives a shit.

The Showstoppa

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26879
  • Call the vet, cause these pythons are sick!
Re: A-Rod tested positive for steroids in 2003
« Reply #9 on: February 07, 2009, 08:11:01 AM »
who gives a shit.

haha, obviously the mainstream sports media.  This will be THE sports story for a couple of months at least.  I bet Bonds is happy.  Takes a little heat off of him.

Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
Re: A-Rod tested positive for steroids in 2003
« Reply #10 on: February 07, 2009, 08:45:18 AM »
Holy Fuck.  The New York media is going to rip him a new asshole, big time.

QuakerOats

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 13621
  • bring amberlamps!!!
Re: A-Rod tested positive for steroids in 2003
« Reply #11 on: February 07, 2009, 08:47:02 AM »
haha, obviously the mainstream sports media.  This will be THE sports story for a couple of months at least.  I bet Bonds is happy.  Takes a little heat off of him.
the media are JEALOUS plain and simple, the guy was born with abilities they only dream about and has a 275 million dollar contract while they go home to their 1800 square foot ranch home and eat hamburger helper for dinner, the weak ALWAYS hate the strong.

DeketheCreep

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2567
  • then does a head stand and spread his ass apart!
Re: A-Rod tested positive for steroids in 2003
« Reply #12 on: February 07, 2009, 08:49:44 AM »
wow he the youngest player to 500 home runs,i see why now hahahah
will they take his MVP that he won in 03 away??

QuakerOats

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 13621
  • bring amberlamps!!!
Re: A-Rod tested positive for steroids in 2003
« Reply #13 on: February 07, 2009, 08:53:37 AM »
wow he the youngest player to 500 home runs,i see why now hahahah
will they take his MVP that he won in 03 away??
the man is a mere 33 years old and already has 553 home runs, 1606 RBI's, a .306 lifetime batting average and is a 3-time MVP.

The Coach

  • Guest
Re: A-Rod tested positive for steroids in 2003
« Reply #14 on: February 07, 2009, 09:07:02 AM »
Not a surprise at all. If I've said once I'll say it a million times, at least 70% or more in the MLB (or almost any sport) are on something.

polychronopolous

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19041
Re: A-Rod tested positive for steroids in 2003
« Reply #15 on: February 07, 2009, 09:08:44 AM »
Not a surprise at all. If I've said once I'll say it a million times, at least 70% or more of my 9th grade "clients" are on something.

fixed.

The Coach

  • Guest
Re: A-Rod tested positive for steroids in 2003
« Reply #16 on: February 07, 2009, 09:08:55 AM »
BTW, you just know he's going to deny it or say he is now clean.

The Coach

  • Guest
Re: A-Rod tested positive for steroids in 2003
« Reply #17 on: February 07, 2009, 09:09:41 AM »
fixed.

Don't make an ass of yourself.........again!

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: A-Rod tested positive for steroids in 2003
« Reply #18 on: February 07, 2009, 09:10:17 AM »
the media are JEALOUS plain and simple, the guy was born with abilities they only dream about and has a 275 million dollar contract while they go home to their 1800 square foot ranch home and eat hamburger helper for dinner, the weak ALWAYS hate the strong.

Exactly. A-Rod, much like the majority of MLB players, was enhanced. Who gives a shit. Going to see another month of anti-steroid crusades by the media now.  ::)

The_Leafy_Bug

  • Guest
Re: A-Rod tested positive for steroids in 2003
« Reply #19 on: February 07, 2009, 09:10:19 AM »
BTW, you just know he's going to deny it or say he is now clean.
Coach, since you know Rory Leidelmeyer is there any truth to the rumor that Matt Mendenhall was a Pedophile?

polychronopolous

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19041
Re: A-Rod tested positive for steroids in 2003
« Reply #20 on: February 07, 2009, 09:11:11 AM »
Don't make an ass of yourself.........again!
;)

The Coach

  • Guest
Re: A-Rod tested positive for steroids in 2003
« Reply #21 on: February 07, 2009, 09:16:40 AM »
Coach, since you know Rory Leidelmeyer is there any truth to the rumor that Matt Mendenhall was a Pedophile?

What does Rory have to do with Matt besides competing against one another? BTW, I've never heard that about Matt. Post your source or it's your typical lie and false rumor.

The_Leafy_Bug

  • Guest
Re: A-Rod tested positive for steroids in 2003
« Reply #22 on: February 07, 2009, 09:17:54 AM »
What does Rory have to do with Matt besides competing against one another? BTW, I've never heard that about Matt. Post your source or it's your typical lie and false rumor.
Rory said it on NBR. He said Matt Mendenhall had left the state because he was a pedophile. You can check the episode prior to New Years where it is highlighted or find the episode they did with Rory.

Grape Ape

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22255
  • SC è un asino
Re: A-Rod tested positive for steroids in 2003
« Reply #23 on: February 07, 2009, 09:19:21 AM »
I am a huge Yankee fan who has always hated Alex Rodriquez, despite having complete respect for his abilities.  Every year it's something different with this idiot.

I believe QO and BF are right on the money with their comments.

MLB caused this mess by ignoring everything in the late 90s, now they just have to accept it as part of their history and move forward.

But, if ARod's the only name that gets leaked from the 2003 test, it's complete bullshit.  
Y

polychronopolous

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19041
Re: A-Rod tested positive for steroids in 2003
« Reply #24 on: February 07, 2009, 09:21:02 AM »
I am a huge Yankee fan who has always hated Alex Rodriquez, despite having complete respect for his abilities.  Every year it's something different with this idiot.

I believe QO and BF are right on the money with their comments.

MLB caused this mess by ignoring everything in the late 90s, now they just have to accept it as part of their history and move forward.

But, if ARod's the only name that gets leaked from the 2003 test, it's complete bullshit.  

Does this make Mark McGwire's entry into the Hall of Fame any more feasible?