Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: SuperSupplements on March 13, 2014, 06:18:57 PM
-
Anybody got the game if so what do you think of it?
-
Planning on getting the PC version.
Reviews are all pretty positive, can't wait to play it.
-
Was waiting for it to come out. Didn't know it had. Will get for PC.
-
looks like a good game but not the call of duty "killer" or system seller microsoft hoped it could be
E
-
It's coming out for PC. I thought it was an Xbox One exclusive for now?
-
Yeah it's a pretty badass game.
-
looks like a good game but not the call of duty "killer" or system seller microsoft hoped it could be
E
How can you tell after one day?
-
How can you tell after one day?
Because he worships at the alter of Call of Duty.
Really I wouldnt even compare the 2 games, only similarity is their both FPS.
-
Because he worships at the alter of Call of Duty.
Really I wouldnt even compare the 2 games, only similarity is their both FPS.
Yeah-people are prone to dick riding.
If you liked Quake back in the day or Unreal Tournament you'll dig this game. It should only get better as well with these new systems ability to improve frame rate and such throughout the life cycle of the game.
It's a must get for XBOX One owners for sure.
-
I thought this was a thread about Cialis.
-
How can you tell after one day?
ign hyped it up for months and gave it an 8.9, that's a "great" on their scale but giving that score is more than enough proof it's not as good as advertised
for it to overtake call of duty it would have to be completely groundbreaking, it's not
i watched some videos on it and considered picking up the titanfall bundle but this just looks like a typical shooter with robots instead of soldiers
E
-
Because he worships at the alter of Call of Duty.
Really I wouldnt even compare the 2 games, only similarity is their both FPS.
and you're a medal of honor fan boy, which is the poor mans cod
i love black ops 2, wasn't a big fan of the multiplayer on the others
E
-
ahhh... it's a videogame.
I think I have one of those medal of honor games... or call of duty or something.
I think the video game stuff has passed me by.. it seems boring as fuck to me now. 7mins into the game and I'm done.
except ufc 3... i'll play that for an hour when there's nothing on Netflix. lol
-
Yeah-people are prone to dick riding.
It's a must get for XBOX One owners for sure.
Its just a pity Microsoft didn't innovate hardware wise to give us games above 720p
http://www.gizmag.com/xbox-one-playstation-4-performance/29749/
http://au.ign.com/wikis/xbox-one/Xbox_One_Hardware_Specs
-
Watched some streams of it on twitch, nothing impressive really
-
and you're a medal of honor fan boy, which is the poor mans cod
i love black ops 2, wasn't a big fan of the multiplayer on the others
E
lol, totally, because saying I liked the last Moh games more than their CoD counterparts and saying the CoD series went to shit after MW1 makes me a total fanboy.
Then we have you, who actually argues that CoD is better because more people buy it.
as per usual for you, literally zero self awareness or logic and off the cuff emotional responses. Good job.
-
Titanfall is a rip off, 60 dollars for a game that is only multi player and no single player campaign it should be 40 dollars
-
ign hyped it up for months and gave it an 8.9, that's a "great" on their scale but giving that score is more than enough proof it's not as good as advertised
for it to overtake call of duty it would have to be completely groundbreaking, it's not
i watched some videos on it and considered picking up the titanfall bundle but this just looks like a typical shooter with robots instead of soldiers
E
IGN? Lol!
They didn't expect it to take over CoD - it's not multiplatform.
But anyway, I loved CoD, but even I realize the franchise is dying. Just looked at sales and multiplayer online numbers - in fact it's not even number one on XBL.
Typical shooter? Not even close. And there are no robots. Give it a try.
-
are there any vehicles to drive aside of the robots?
sounds like another battlefield to me.
-
lol, totally, because saying I liked the last Moh games more than their CoD counterparts and saying the CoD series went to shit after MW1 makes me a total fanboy.
Then we have you, who actually argues that CoD is better because more people buy it.
as per usual for you, literally zero self awareness or logic and off the cuff emotional responses. Good job.
it is clear to me and anybody that has played both which is the better game, the fact that you bring this up all the time makes you come off as a fanboy of medal of honor
if one game typically scores an 8 - 9 on metacritic and makes over a billion dollars yearly, and another game comes out maybe every 2 years and scores 6 - 7 on metacritic and makes less than a 100 million, which games sounds better to you? can all of the critics and fans be wrong? it's not like cod can be bought for a cheaper price
if you think cod sucks fine, but it's hard to take you seriously if you think medal of honor is good when it's basically a poor mans version of cod
E
-
it is clear to me and anybody that has played both which is the better game, the fact that you bring this up all the time makes you come off as a fanboy of medal of honor
if one game typically scores an 8 - 9 on metacritic and makes over a billion dollars yearly, and another game comes out maybe every 2 years and scores 6 - 7 on metacritic and makes less than a 100 million, which games sounds better to you? can all of the critics and fans be wrong? it's not like cod can be bought for a cheaper price
if you think cod sucks fine, but it's hard to take you seriously if you think medal of honor is good when it's basically a poor mans version of cod
E
Hahahaha, metacritic and yearly sales... lol.
-
Anybody got the game if so what do you think of it?
Sorry mate, Im a grown man.
-
IGN? Lol!
They didn't expect it to take over CoD - it's not multiplatform.
But anyway, I loved CoD, but even I realize the franchise is dying. Just looked at sales and multiplayer online numbers - in fact it's not even number one on XBL.
Typical shooter? Not even close. And there are no robots. Give it a try.
yes ign the biggest and most respected gaming website, would you prefer for me to link some obscure gaming blog? they always inflate the scores especially for hyped up games, an 8.9 means it's not what they thought it would be
their long term goal is to take over cod with their supposed "revolutionary" gameplay, the sequel is being talked about as being multiplatform
ghosts didn't sell as well because it is a downright awful game but it still sold better than everything except gta 5, they are now broken up into 3 teams and they will develop their own cod game every 3 years for higher quality, it is going nowhere even if sales fall it will still be a top game because it's sales dwarf everything else
what is number 1 on xbl? last i checked it was number 1 along with about 3 other cod games in the top 10 - 20
titan, robot what's the difference? i saw what i saw and this game might be good, it's just not as good as advertised, not good enough to drop 500 just to play it
E
-
Hahahaha, metacritic and yearly sales... lol.
explain to me how medal of honor is better
i think you're the type that just forces yourself to hate whatever is popular
E
-
yes ign the biggest and most respected gaming website, would you prefer for me to link some obscure gaming blog? they always inflate the scores especially for hyped up games, an 8.9 means it's not what they thought it would be
their long term goal is to take over cod with their supposed "revolutionary" gameplay, the sequel is being talked about as being multiplatform
ghosts didn't sell as well because it is a downright awful game but it still sold better than everything except gta 5, they are now broken up into 3 teams and they will develop their own cod game every 3 years for higher quality, it is going nowhere even if sales fall it will still be a top game because it's sales dwarf everything else
what is number 1 on xbl? last i checked it was number 1 along with about 3 other cod games in the top 10 - 20
titan, robot what's the difference? i saw what i saw and this game might be good, it's just not as good as advertised, not good enough to drop 500 just to play it
E
I'll ignore IGN being "the most respected" since I don't want to go off topic. I love CoD, and it will always sell with it's embedded user base, but it's declining with each release. There just isn't the variety. It's the same game over and over. And I like Ghost multi.
I'll focus on the following statement:
i saw what i saw and this game might be good, it's just not as good as advertised,
E
I haven't given it any real critique because I've played exactly 5 MP games. You make definitive statements without having thoroughly experienced a game, or even played it at all. That's why statements like that are meaningless.
-
I got it for the PC. It's pretty good. Heavy on the GPU though. I bought a Nvidia Titan this morning. My 7950 aint cutting the mustard any more. Not at 1440p resolution.
But yea, game is good. Very polished. Will see how long it holds my interest.
-
it is clear to me and anybody that has played both which is the better game, the fact that you bring this up all the time makes you come off as a fanboy of medal of honor
if one game typically scores an 8 - 9 on metacritic and makes over a billion dollars yearly, and another game comes out maybe every 2 years and scores 6 - 7 on metacritic and makes less than a 100 million, which games sounds better to you? can all of the critics and fans be wrong? it's not like cod can be bought for a cheaper price
if you think cod sucks fine, but it's hard to take you seriously if you think medal of honor is good when it's basically a poor mans version of cod
E
we sold 6 million copies of moh 2010, so it did ok. The last one was straight fucking garbage and a horror to work on. Luckily the people responsible will never be calling the shots on a game again.
Titanfall is great but I wish I could play on PC servers with xbox controller only rules.. Can't be bothered with Keyboard and mouse anymore
-
You can play PC with a Xbox One controller. I do.
It's not perfect because it's not "officially" compatible. But it will be later this year.
-
we sold 6 million copies of moh 2010, so it did ok. The last one was straight fucking garbage and a horror to work on. Luckily the people responsible will never be calling the shots on a game again.
Titanfall is great but I wish I could play on PC servers with xbox controller only rules.. Can't be bothered with Keyboard and mouse anymore
I reallt enjoyed 2010, hell I found warfighter enjoyable... I liked the fact that 2010 and Warfighter tried to make a more realistic experience... and I found the multiplayer on warfighter fun as well.. However I only play hardcore mode. I've been playing BF4 recently.
I hated MoH up until 2010... I was a diehard CoD guy from II until MW1... MW2 was the beginning of the downhill slide. Mw III was horrible and its only been getting worse. CoD has been riding on name recognition for years now. I found BlOps 1 as "meh" and BlOps 2 retarded as fuck.
-
explain to me how medal of honor is better
i think you're the type that just forces yourself to hate whatever is popular
E
Not at all, I'm just not the type to blindly follow something and put it on a pedestal because it's popular.
It's literally been the same game, except each following year the story gets more ridiculous, and the multiplayer gets more absurd as they try and re'finish the same game to resell to dumbasses who have to buy each new release and play the same thing over and over.
The last 2 MoH's was more enjoyable to me because it actually tried to be different than the typical CoD style military shooter, they tried to focus on a more realistic experience... It wasnt the same "go down linear path hair meet at chokepoint reflex shooter" MP coupled with "michael bay shit blows up" single player mode. You've been literally paying $60 every year to play the same game, and you defend it because others like yourself still shell out the money and the mags that are PAID BY THE COMPANIES to advertise it give it high ratings.
-
You've been literally paying $60 every year to play the same game, and you defend it because others like yourself still shell out the money and the mags that are PAID BY THE COMPANIES to advertise it give it high ratings.
I love CoD multiplayer and it takes up 90% of my gaming time. But your statement is absolutely true, and it's contributing to the slowdown.
But it's not $60 for a lot - it's $100 per CoD game, since many buy the four map packs that are released throughout the cycle of the game.
And yes, most of the reviews from major sites are bought and paid for.
-
I love CoD multiplayer and it takes up 90% of my gaming time. But your statement is absolutely true, and it's contributing to the slowdown.
But it's not $60 for a lot - it's $100 per CoD game, since many buy the four map packs that are released throughout the cycle of the game.
And yes, most of the reviews from major sites are bought and paid for.
My friend is like that too.. he buys the yearly CoD just because all his friends do and its their "mindless zone out game". He also says the same thing I do (and apparently shares part of your sentiment).
The game peaked after MW1, been downhill ever since. I used to buy all the WoW expansions as well.. but it peaked at Wrath and has been downhill every since as well.
-
Not at all, I'm just not the type to blindly follow something and put it on a pedestal because it's popular.
It's literally been the same game, except each following year the story gets more ridiculous, and the multiplayer gets more absurd as they try and re'finish the same game to resell to dumbasses who have to buy each new release and play the same thing over and over.
The last 2 MoH's was more enjoyable to me because it actually tried to be different than the typical CoD style military shooter, they tried to focus on a more realistic experience... It wasnt the same "go down linear path hair meet at chokepoint reflex shooter" MP coupled with "michael bay shit blows up" single player mode. You've been literally paying $60 every year to play the same game, and you defend it because others like yourself still shell out the money and the mags that are PAID BY THE COMPANIES to advertise it give it high ratings.
If we'd been allowed to make the true sequel to 2010 and had different leadership it would have been ok, but warfighter (single player) was a piece of shit. The new head of the project fired most of the people who made 2010 great and the rest left in disgust.
It only scraped a 40 meta critic because ea execs finally fired the idiots running the show a month before the beta deadline and allowed the team to scramble to salvage what was left of the game. We worked insane crunch hours to try to fix their mistakes.
-
If we'd been allowed to make the true sequel to 2010 and had different leadership it would have been ok, but warfighter was a piece of shit. The new head of the project fired most of the people who made 2010 great and the rest left in disgust.
It only scraped a 40 meta critic because ea execs finally fired the idiots running the show a month before the beta deadline and allowed the team to scramble to salvage what was left of the game.
Thats interesting. I thought the game had promise.. but it felt like it had been cobbled together in a couple weeks. Interesting to see that was pretty much the case. I felt like they barely scraped the surface of the games engine. They did have some things I loved in the HC modes.. the peak and lean feature I absolutely loved and I'm glad DICE somewhat brought it into BF4. I thought it had a real potential as a tactical shooter, especially playing the HC mode. But It got old REALLY quick, especially with all the problems the game launched with.
-
Thats interesting. I thought the game had promise.. but it felt like it had been cobbled together in a couple weeks. Interesting to see that was pretty much the case. I felt like they barely scraped the surface of the games engine. They did have some things I loved in the HC modes.. the peak and lean feature I absolutely loved and I'm glad DICE somewhat brought it into BF4. I thought it had a real potential as a tactical shooter, especially playing the HC mode. But It got old REALLY quick, especially with all the problems the game launched with.
Ironically we had a better set of single player levels done in the first month of preproduction than the ones the game shipped with. The problem with ea is they hire completely useless high level people who are friends of friends... then give them a whole game cycle to fail.
-
My friend is like that too.. he buys the yearly CoD just because all his friends do and its their "mindless zone out game". He also says the same thing I do (and apparently shares part of your sentiment).
The game peaked after MW1, been downhill ever since. I used to buy all the WoW expansions as well.. but it peaked at Wrath and has been downhill every since as well.
You may know this but I'll post it anyway: The co-founders of Infinity Ward, the developers behind the Modern Warfare franchise were fired by Activison after MW 2 was released which resulted in some nasty litigation. They started a new company called Respawn Entertainment. The first game they've made.......Titanfall.
-
You may know this but I'll post it anyway: The co-founders of Infinity Ward, the developers behind the Modern Warfare franchise were fired by Activison after MW 2 was released which resulted in some nasty litigation. They started a new company called Respawn Entertainment. The first game they've made.......Titanfall.
I knew everything except that Titanfall was their game
-
You may know this but I'll post it anyway: The co-founders of Infinity Ward, the developers behind the Modern Warfare franchise were fired by Activison after MW 2 was released which resulted in some nasty litigation. They started a new company called Respawn Entertainment. The first game they've made.......Titanfall.
Good post
-
Titanfall is much different from call of duty and battlefield you have to play those games to understand you probably will leave a match in titanfall having a good time if you lose or win.
-
You may know this but I'll post it anyway: The co-founders of Infinity Ward, the developers behind the Modern Warfare franchise were fired by Activison after MW 2 was released which resulted in some nasty litigation. They started a new company called Respawn Entertainment. The first game they've made.......Titanfall.
Drops the mic and walks off.
-
Ign most respected site ;D ;D ;D
Well, you know what they say: you can't spell...
Wait, how does it go again?
-
Awesome game. I only play about 5 hours total tho.
-
Titanfall is much different from call of duty and battlefield you have to play those games to understand you probably will leave a match in titanfall having a good time if you lose or win.
This.
In CoD, I play for my stats, k/d ratio, etc...So far, Titanfall is just....fun. You want to dive right in.
-
I'll ignore IGN being "the most respected" since I don't want to go off topic. I love CoD, and it will always sell with it's embedded user base, but it's declining with each release. There just isn't the variety. It's the same game over and over. And I like Ghost multi.
I'll focus on the following statement:
I haven't given it any real critique because I've played exactly 5 MP games. You make definitive statements without having thoroughly experienced a game, or even played it at all. That's why statements like that are meaningless.
just like cod ign gets hate because it's the most popular, ghost multi is horrible and that says it all about your feelings on titanfall
and i knew you would love titanfall before you played it too
E
-
Not at all, I'm just not the type to blindly follow something and put it on a pedestal because it's popular.
It's literally been the same game, except each following year the story gets more ridiculous, and the multiplayer gets more absurd as they try and re'finish the same game to resell to dumbasses who have to buy each new release and play the same thing over and over.
The last 2 MoH's was more enjoyable to me because it actually tried to be different than the typical CoD style military shooter, they tried to focus on a more realistic experience... It wasnt the same "go down linear path hair meet at chokepoint reflex shooter" MP coupled with "michael bay shit blows up" single player mode. You've been literally paying $60 every year to play the same game, and you defend it because others like yourself still shell out the money and the mags that are PAID BY THE COMPANIES to advertise it give it high ratings.
i like black ops 2 the most because it is different than the others, the maps are very well balanced and cool looking too, i think the others (especially ghosts) cater more for people that just camp
i don't see how medal of honor does anything better, and every cod hater references michael bay, please be more original
as for paying to give it high ratings, EA makes medal of honor and they also make madden and fifa which are two of the best selling games every year plus they make battlefield, if anybody can pay off the companies it's EA
E
-
You may know this but I'll post it anyway: The co-founders of Infinity Ward, the developers behind the Modern Warfare franchise were fired by Activison after MW 2 was released which resulted in some nasty litigation. They started a new company called Respawn Entertainment. The first game they've made.......Titanfall.
you should give credit to ign for this post
E
-
just like cod ign gets hate because it's the most popular, ghost multi is horrible and that says it all about your feelings on titanfall
and i knew you would love titanfall before you played it too
E
I don't hate ign at all, just don't read it often,, and I never said I loved titanfall. I've played 7 MP games now, and none with my friends. The jury is still out.
You, on the other hand, are critiquing a game you haven't even played and probably never will.
-
you should give credit to ign for this post
E
Why?
-
I don't hate ign at all, just don't read it often,, and I never said I loved titanfall. I've played 7 MP games now, and none with my friends. The jury is still out.
You, on the other hand, are critiquing a game you haven't even played and probably never will.
it's clear it hasn't met the hype, which was enormous and microsoft can easily "buy" the high ratings so why haven't they?
you're right i may never play it, as of right now i see no reason to buy an xbox one
E
-
Why?
[/quote
because ign mentioned those guys created modern warfare in every titanfall article
E
-
Why?
[/quote
because ign mentioned those guys created modern warfare in every titanfall article
E
It's not like it's a secret. Activision is recent client of the company I work for.
-
guys in this thread didn't know, they would if they weren't "too cool" for ign
E
-
it's clear it hasn't met the hype, which was enormous and microsoft can easily "buy" the high ratings so why haven't they?
you're right i may never play it, as of right now i see no reason to buy an xbox one
E
Nothing is clear, that's the whole point - it's been out two days.
And, if you're not into Titanfall, there is no reason to get an Xbox one. Or a Ps4 at this time either. Microsoft needs to wow at E3.
-
guys in this thread didn't know, they would if they weren't "too cool" for ign
E
Nobody is hating on IGN, just your comment on it being the "most respected".
-
matchmaking sux; no buy.
-
matchmaking sux; no buy.
and this is different from any other fps out there ???
-
and this is different from any other fps out there ???
valve/source FPS have server lists you can customize everything...
-
valve/source FPS have server lists you can customize everything...
:'( sweet jesus
-
It's not like it's a secret. Activision is recent client of the company I work for.
Epic Calvinesque work on the quote function 8)