Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: 240 is Back on May 28, 2015, 06:05:39 PM

Title: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: 240 is Back on May 28, 2015, 06:05:39 PM
Former Speaker Dennis Hastert indicted in payment scheme


Former House Speaker Dennis Hastert was indicted Thursday for allegedly structuring cash bank withdrawals of funds he used to “conceal his prior misconduct” against an unnamed individual and for lying to the FBI about the arrangement.
A federal grand jury in Chicago charged Hastert, 73, with withdrawing $1.7 million in cash from several banks over four years — with many of those withdrawals in amounts designed to avoid triggering federal reporting rules.


Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/05/former-speaker-dennis-hastert-indicted-in-payment-scheme-118387.html#ixzz3bU9FNg1S
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Straw Man on May 28, 2015, 06:25:42 PM
I assume you'll be applying for a job at Faux News in the near future
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: 240 is Back on May 28, 2015, 06:28:18 PM
I assume you'll be applying for a job at Faux News in the near future

I'd apply at fox news, but don't think I have what it takes... mainly a willingness to drag a woman down stairs by her neck.

(http://media.giphy.com/media/JwrD09VNTBJCM/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: headhuntersix on May 29, 2015, 07:20:08 AM
Who fucking cares....if he did whatever..he gets in trouble. No defending him....we're not libs. Nice try 240
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: chadstallion on May 29, 2015, 08:42:52 AM
Former Speaker Dennis Hastert indicted in payment scheme


Former House Speaker Dennis Hastert was indicted Thursday for allegedly structuring cash bank withdrawals of funds he used to “conceal his prior misconduct” against an unnamed individual and for lying to the FBI about the arrangement.
A federal grand jury in Chicago charged Hastert, 73, with withdrawing $1.7 million in cash from several banks over four years — with many of those withdrawals in amounts designed to avoid triggering federal reporting rules.


Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/05/former-speaker-dennis-hastert-indicted-in-payment-scheme-118387.html#ixzz3bU9FNg1S

where do you get the "democrat'' idea?
not according to the link posted.
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: 240 is Back on May 31, 2015, 02:42:42 AM
Dennis Hastert is a Democrat. (according to Fox/Yahoo/AP)


10 Things to Know for Friday

Your daily look at late-breaking news, upcoming events and the stories that will be talked about Friday:

1. EX-HOUSE SPEAKER DENNIS HASTERT ACCUSED OF PAYING HUSH MONEY

A federal indictment alleges that the 73-year-old Illinois Democrat paid out hundreds of thousands of dollars, seeking to conceal unspecified misconduct.

...http://news.yahoo.com/10-things-know-today-095924373.html


Also here:

http://www.fox10phoenix.com/story/29176394/10-things-to-know-for-friday
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: LurkerNoMore on May 31, 2015, 06:31:39 AM
Dennis Hastert is a Democrat. (according to Fox/Yahoo/AP)


10 Things to Know for Friday

Your daily look at late-breaking news, upcoming events and the stories that will be talked about Friday:

1. EX-HOUSE SPEAKER DENNIS HASTERT ACCUSED OF PAYING HUSH MONEY

A federal indictment alleges that the 73-year-old Illinois Democrat paid out hundreds of thousands of dollars, seeking to conceal unspecified misconduct.

...http://news.yahoo.com/10-things-know-today-095924373.html


Also here:

http://www.fox10phoenix.com/story/29176394/10-things-to-know-for-friday


Just like Fox proudly declared Mark Foley was a Democrat too and listed a "D" besides his name on their screen.
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Straw Man on May 31, 2015, 08:52:04 AM
Dennis Hastert is a Democrat. (according to Fox/Yahoo/AP)


10 Things to Know for Friday

Your daily look at late-breaking news, upcoming events and the stories that will be talked about Friday:

1. EX-HOUSE SPEAKER DENNIS HASTERT ACCUSED OF PAYING HUSH MONEY

A federal indictment alleges that the 73-year-old Illinois Democrat paid out hundreds of thousands of dollars, seeking to conceal unspecified misconduct.

...http://news.yahoo.com/10-things-know-today-095924373.html


Also here:

http://www.fox10phoenix.com/story/29176394/10-things-to-know-for-friday

this is just fucking amazing

they do this so often but just get a pass every time

Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: 240 is Back on May 31, 2015, 09:01:10 AM
this is just fucking amazing

they do this so often but just get a pass every time



remember in 2008, when FOX NEWS "accidentally" dug up 2000 Mccain footage, and used that mixed in with his campaign coverage, to make his crowd appear larger?

LOL!   
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Straw Man on May 31, 2015, 09:09:48 AM
remember in 2008, when FOX NEWS "accidentally" dug up 2000 Mccain footage, and used that mixed in with his campaign coverage, to make his crowd appear larger?

LOL!   


Faux News knows their audience and knows they prefer to be lied to whenever necessary to maintain that blissful state of self righteous ignorance
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: LurkerNoMore on May 31, 2015, 01:43:29 PM
Faux News knows their audience and knows they prefer to be lied to whenever necessary to maintain that blissful state of self righteous ignorance

Actually, their base audience is stupid enough to fall for that stuff without knowing they are lies. 
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Vince G, CSN MFT on May 31, 2015, 04:57:53 PM
Dennis Hastert is a Republican... ::)
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: 240 is Back on May 31, 2015, 05:37:43 PM
Dennis Hastert is a Republican... ::)

I know.  I was fishing for the reactionaries that'd scream about it, without realizing he was an (R).

It seems FOX, Yahoo, and AP all jumped on the "let's call him a Dem" bandwagon too.

Looking like this dude may have had sex with a minor.  :(
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Dos Equis on June 01, 2015, 10:53:18 AM
Dennis Hastert is a Democrat. (according to Fox/Yahoo/AP)


10 Things to Know for Friday

Your daily look at late-breaking news, upcoming events and the stories that will be talked about Friday:

1. EX-HOUSE SPEAKER DENNIS HASTERT ACCUSED OF PAYING HUSH MONEY

A federal indictment alleges that the 73-year-old Illinois Democrat paid out hundreds of thousands of dollars, seeking to conceal unspecified misconduct.

...http://news.yahoo.com/10-things-know-today-095924373.html


Also here:

http://www.fox10phoenix.com/story/29176394/10-things-to-know-for-friday

I clicked on the first link and the first thing I read was this was an AP, not Fox News, story.  The second thing I read was this:

"In a story May 28 about former U.S. House Speaker Dennis Hastert being indicted, The Associated Press misidentified his party affiliation. He is a Republican, not a Democrat."

I clicked on the second link and the first thing I saw was this:  "By The Associated Press." 

You are a compulsive liar. 
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: bears on June 01, 2015, 11:09:14 AM
let's just all agree that no one on here cares about politicians being criminals.

Democrats forgive Democrats unconditionally

Republicans forgive Republicans unconditionally

these threads are dumb
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Skip8282 on June 01, 2015, 11:19:41 AM
I clicked on the first link and the first thing I read was this was an AP, not Fox News, story.  The second thing I read was this:

"In a story May 28 about former U.S. House Speaker Dennis Hastert being indicted, The Associated Press misidentified his party affiliation. He is a Republican, not a Democrat."

I clicked on the second link and the first thing I saw was this:  "By The Associated Press." 

You are a compulsive liar. 



Correct, it was an AP story and the AP issued a correction:


http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/fronts/CORRECTIONS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME
In a story May 28 about former U.S. House Speaker Dennis Hastert being indicted, The Associated Press misidentified his party affiliation. He is a Republican, not a Democrat....

Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Skip8282 on June 01, 2015, 11:21:03 AM
Now, what kinda hypocritical, self-righteous, retarded jack off would make a mistake about a politician's political affiliation, then cry like a bitch when others do it?

Why, our very own board Dumbfuck!



http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=351032.25


I voted for Republican (Chuck Reed) for mayor of San Jose in the last election and will almost certainly vote for him again



You mean Democrat (Chuck Reed)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuck_Reed

"Political party: Democratic"



Who else.  ::)


In b4...but, but, but, it's different, lol.
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Dos Equis on June 01, 2015, 11:22:39 AM
Now, what kinda hypocritical, self-righteous, retarded jack off would make a mistake about a politician's political affiliation, then cry like a bitch when others do it?

Why, our very own board Dumbfuck!



http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=351032.25






Who else.  ::)


In b4...but, but, but, it's different, lol.

Bwahahahaha!  That's why she will always be the Village Idiot.  lol . . . .
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: 240 is Back on June 01, 2015, 11:22:47 AM
I clicked on the first link and the first thing I read was this was an AP, not Fox News, story.  The second thing I read was this:

"In a story May 28 about former U.S. House Speaker Dennis Hastert being indicted, The Associated Press misidentified his party affiliation. He is a Republican, not a Democrat."

I clicked on the second link and the first thing I saw was this:  "By The Associated Press."  

You are a compulsive liar.  

maybe you missed the screenshot from the FOX news site lol.  silly.
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: 240 is Back on June 01, 2015, 11:24:10 AM
You are a compulsive liar. 
bwahaha

it's STILL on their site:

1. EX-HOUSE SPEAKER DENNIS HASTERT ACCUSED OF PAYING HUSH MONEY

A federal indictment alleges that the 73-year-old Illinois Democrat paid out hundreds of thousands of dollars, seeking to conceal unspecified misconduct.

http://www.fox10phoenix.com/story/29176394/10-things-to-know-for-friday

Beach Bum can't see shit
(http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view/30003/stevie-wonder-o.gif)
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Dos Equis on June 01, 2015, 11:26:05 AM
maybe you missed the screenshot from the FOX news site lol.  silly.

You really aren't very bright.  Dishonest and dumb is a bad combination.   :-\
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: 240 is Back on June 01, 2015, 11:30:30 AM
You really aren't very bright.  Dishonest and dumb is a bad combination.   :-\

I prove your post incorrect, so you attack me.  You don't say "oh, good point, I didn't click that FOX link, wow,,, they STILL have him listed as a dem, even after their error went national..."

No, you just call me more names.   LOL.   


(http://i.imgur.com/bvU3X2y.gif)
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: 240 is Back on June 01, 2015, 11:36:56 AM
I clicked on the first link and the first thing I read was this was an AP, not Fox News, story.  The second thing I read was this:

"In a story May 28 about former U.S. House Speaker Dennis Hastert being indicted, The Associated Press misidentified his party affiliation. He is a Republican, not a Democrat."
I clicked on the second link and the first thing I saw was this:  "By The Associated Press."  
You are a compulsive liar.  

???

(http://i1177.photobucket.com/albums/x346/Saphia_Mayo/gifs/Jennifer-Lawrence-Confused-Face_zpsddb6bcc7.gif)
Here you can see the FOX station calling Hastert a Democrat.  And even after they were called out nationally for it - they kept it.  You can still read it right now -
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Dos Equis on June 01, 2015, 11:39:42 AM
I prove your post incorrect, so you attack me.  You don't say "oh, good point, I didn't click that FOX link, wow,,, they STILL have him listed as a dem, even after their error went national..."

No, you just call me more names.   LOL.   


(http://i.imgur.com/bvU3X2y.gif)

It is not and never was a "Fox News" story.  The AP puts out stories every day.  Other news outlets run AP stories every day.  If the AP story is incorrect, it's the AP's fault, not the plethora of news outlets who run the AP story.  

So, claiming this was a "Fox News" story was completely false
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Skip8282 on June 01, 2015, 11:44:40 AM


If Fox doesn't update the AP story, it's a clear indication that a massive conspiracy is in place for Fox to control the world and trick everybody into thinking Hastert is a dem.

There are no other logical or reasonable explanations.

C'mon Beach, you've got to know that!  It all fits with the 911 stuff nice and neat.
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Straw Man on June 01, 2015, 11:47:37 AM
Now, what kinda hypocritical, self-righteous, retarded jack off would make a mistake about a politician's political affiliation, then cry like a bitch when others do it?

Why, our very own board Dumbfuck!



http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=351032.25






Who else.  ::)


In b4...but, but, but, it's different, lol.

Am I  news station or providing "news"

Last time I checked I was not

Do I routinely falsely identify a scandal plagued Democrat at a Republican ?

So far not once

Yeah, I guess that's not a significant difference.

I'm just a guy on a message board who one time accidently called a Dem a Republican

That's basically just like Fox News routinely over the course of 15 years identifying a scandal ridden Republican as a Democrat

Damn Skiptard -  this is bizarre grasping as straws even for you
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Dos Equis on June 01, 2015, 11:48:22 AM

If Fox doesn't update the AP story, it's a clear indication that a massive conspiracy is in place for Fox to control the world and trick everybody into thinking Hastert is a dem.

There are no other logical or reasonable explanations.

C'mon Beach, you've got to know that!  It all fits with the 911 stuff nice and neat.

Actually it's a local Fox News affiliate in Phoenix, Arizona, but yes they are clearly part of the grand conspiracy.  Maybe they know where the bodies are buried that were on those missing hijacked plans from 911?   :o  240 is back should speak on this.  
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: 240 is Back on June 01, 2015, 11:49:45 AM
It is not and never was a "Fox News" story.  The AP puts out stories every day.  Other news outlets run AP stories every day.  If the AP story is incorrect, it's the AP's fault, not the plethora of news outlets who run the AP story.  

So, claiming this was a "Fox News" story was completely false

Actually, my post just said FOX.

Dennis Hastert is a Democrat. (according to Fox


And so did my 2nd post:
It seems FOX, Yahoo, and AP all jumped on the "let's call him a Dem" bandwagon too.

Now, you may have confused the other posts about FOX news, started by others that led to some amusing discussion.  But I had 2 posts, and both just said Fox.

When you say that I said FOX NEWS, you are incorrect.  The 3rd time, when I said "the FOX news site", I was citing the link I had shared over and over, on the news section of Fox10.  You see, Fox News is the channel with all the great Bill-O stuff.  On the other hand, saying t Fox news site, when I had quoted one over and over, is Fox 10.

now, you just go ahead and walk this one back.

(http://media.giphy.com/media/LU9fit8cqOQcU/giphy.gif)

Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Skip8282 on June 01, 2015, 11:51:54 AM
Am I  news station or providing "news"

Last time I checked I was not

Do I routinely falsely identify a scandal plagued Democrat at a Republican ?

So far not once

Yeah, I guess that's not a significant difference.

I'm just a guy on a message board who one time accidently called a Dem a Republican

That's basically just like Fox News routinely over the course of 15 years identifying a scandal ridden Republican as a Democrat

Damn Skiptard -  this is bizarre grasping as straws even for you



Oh please.  They're people and they make mistakes just like you.

There's a difference all right.  You're a hypocritical shitbag.

Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Skip8282 on June 01, 2015, 11:53:18 AM
Actually it's a local Fox News affiliate in Phoenix, Arizona, but yes they are clearly part of the grand conspiracy.  Maybe they know where the bodies are buried that were on those missing hijacked plans from 911?   :o  240 is back should speak on this. 



That and the airliner that disappeared.  I haven't been following up, but I bet there's a ton of conspiracy theories about that.  240's been deficient on posting about them.

Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Dos Equis on June 01, 2015, 11:57:37 AM
Actually, my post just said FOX.


And so did my 2nd post:
Now, you may have confused the other posts about FOX news, started by others that led to some amusing discussion.  But I had 2 posts, and both just said Fox.

When you say that I said FOX NEWS, you are incorrect.  The 3rd time, when I said "the FOX news site", I was citing the link I had shared over and over, on the news section of Fox10.  You see, Fox News is the channel with all the great Bill-O stuff.  On the other hand, saying t Fox news site, when I had quoted one over and over, is Fox 10.

now, you just go ahead and walk this one back.

(http://media.giphy.com/media/LU9fit8cqOQcU/giphy.gif)



So what you're saying is that instead of wasting my time trying to educate you, I should have just called you a dumb, compulsive liar again? 

Fine.  You are a dumb, compulsive liar. 
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Dos Equis on June 01, 2015, 11:59:15 AM


That and the airliner that disappeared.  I haven't been following up, but I bet there's a ton of conspiracy theories about that.  240's been deficient on posting about them.



It's TWO airliners that disappeared, along with all of the passengers.  Four if you accept the 911 Troofer theory that the planes crashing into the twin towers were faked by holograms.  I'm sure 240 has this all figured out by now. 
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Straw Man on June 01, 2015, 11:59:48 AM


Oh please.  They're people and they make mistakes just like you.

There's a difference all right.  You're a hypocritical shitbag.



jesus you're really desperate aren't you (not quite sure why)

At the very least why don't you find a post where I identify a scandal ridden Democrat as a Republican

That's the context dipshit

And then you can explain how an individual (me) on a message board is somehow the equivalent of a national news outlet

Have it at Skiptard

Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Skip8282 on June 01, 2015, 12:07:46 PM
jesus you're really depserate aren't you (not quite sure why)

At the very least why don't you find a post where I identify a scandal ridden Democrat as a Republican

That's the context dipshit

And then you can explain how an individual (me) on a message board is somehow the equivalent of a national news outlet

Have it at Skiptard




No you're desperate Dumbfuck.  The AP mistook a politician's political party, just as you've done.

Now you'll try to desperately and pathetically claim that the circumstances are not identical, lol.

Haven't seen this 4 year old argument from you before, lmao.  Oh that's right, we already knew your childish play before you even made it, lol.  ::)

Dumbfuck continues to earn his moniker.

Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Skip8282 on June 01, 2015, 12:08:49 PM
It's TWO airliners that disappeared, along with all of the passengers.  Four if you accept the 911 Troofer theory that the planes crashing into the twin towers were faked by holograms.  I'm sure 240 has this all figured out by now. 


My bad, I meant that one that they suspect went down in the Indian Ocean.

Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Straw Man on June 01, 2015, 12:12:39 PM

No you're desperate Dumbfuck.  The AP mistook a politician's political party, just as you've done.

Now you'll try to desperately and pathetically claim that the circumstances are not identical, lol.

Haven't seen this 4 year old argument from you before, lmao.  Oh that's right, we already knew your childish play before you even made it, lol.  ::)

Dumbfuck continues to earn his moniker.



Fox News had ROUTINELY misidentified scandal ridden Republican as Democrats

They've done this scores (if not hundreds of times) and that is the context (whether you like it or not)

Now tell me again how me (and individual on a message board) misidentifying a single politician who is not involved in any scandal somehow the same thing as a National News Outlet doing that?   Am I a news source of any kind?

Again, you seem desparate to confront or attack me but at least put some effort into it

 
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Skip8282 on June 01, 2015, 12:15:26 PM
Fox News had ROUTINELY misidentified scandal ridden Republican as Democrats

They've done this scores (if not hundreds of times) and that is the context (whether you like it or not)

Now tell me again how me (and individual on a message board) misidentifying a single politician who is not involved in any scandal somehow the same thing as a National News Outlet doing that?   Am I a news source of any kind?

Again, you seem desparate to confront or attack me but at least put some effort into it

 



lmao...it wasn't even Fox that misidentified.  It was the AP.

Dumbfuck too dumb to even know what's going on.

No wonder your hypocrisy knows no bounds.
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Straw Man on June 01, 2015, 12:20:01 PM


lmao...it wasn't even Fox that misidentified.  It was the AP.

Dumbfuck too dumb to even know what's going on.

No wonder your hypocrisy knows no bounds.


really?

Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Straw Man on June 01, 2015, 12:21:19 PM
these took about 15 seconds to find

would you like some more

go find a child to explain the definition of the word context
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Dos Equis on June 01, 2015, 12:24:28 PM

My bad, I meant that one that they suspect went down in the Indian Ocean.



Hard to keep up.  I also remember our chief resident 911 Troofer saying the Notorious GWB would be moving to Peru after he left office to avoid prosecution for conspiring with foreign terrorists to carry out 9/11.  Or least I think that's how the theory went? 
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Skip8282 on June 01, 2015, 12:27:11 PM
these took about 15 seconds to find

would you like some more

go find a child to explain the definition of the word context




Yes, it was the AP.  I provided the link.

Try to keep up.

As for grade school context bullshit, you know that all those mistakes were the same person?

I thought not.

The weather probably wasn't the same either when you fucked up as it was when they fucked up.  No shit tard.  ::)


Like I said, a PERSON made a mistake, just like YOU.



The only difference is you're a hypocritical shitbag.

Try to keep up, Dumbfuck.

Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: 240 is Back on June 01, 2015, 12:27:30 PM
beach bum/dos equis is the only moderator on the political board.  the others have been away for months.

and he spends all day attacking people.   Makes the political board suck.  It's a shame, this place always gets good during election season.  

(http://cdn.teen.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/leonardo-dicaprio-shrug.gif)
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Skip8282 on June 01, 2015, 12:30:18 PM
beach bum/dos equis is the only moderator on the political board.  the others have been away for months.

and he spends all day attacking people.   Makes the political board suck.  It's a shame, this place always gets good during election season. 

(http://cdn.teen.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/leonardo-dicaprio-shrug.gif)




Ozmo checks in from time to time.  He seems to have died down not that 33 is no longer posting.

Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Straw Man on June 01, 2015, 12:30:32 PM



Yes, it was the AP.  I provided the link.

Try to keep up.

As for grade school context bullshit, you know that all those mistakes were the same person?

I thought not.

The weather probably wasn't the same either when you fucked up as it was when they fucked up.  No shit tard.  ::)


Like I said, a PERSON made a mistake, just like YOU.



The only difference is you're a hypocritical shitbag.

Try to keep up, Dumbfuck.



and Fox did it as well so try to pay attention

Now explain how the context is the same as when Fox does it

Am I  news outlet now?

Was Chuck Reed involved in scandal?  Is that why I called him a Repblican...to try to fool my audience ?



Why?

To What end?  

Now explain how my single post on this board is the equivalent to a pattern of misidentification by a national news outlet (the one with the highest rating no less)

You know, assuming you actually understand context
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Dos Equis on June 01, 2015, 01:15:01 PM
beach bum/dos equis is the only moderator on the political board.  the others have been away for months.

and he spends all day attacking people.   Makes the political board suck.  It's a shame, this place always gets good during election season.  

(http://cdn.teen.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/leonardo-dicaprio-shrug.gif)

Silence you lying troll.  Ozmo was online today.   ::)

I typically leave you alone, but you are such a compulsive lying troll, it's hard to resist sometimes.  Particularly when I have some time on my hands.  :D
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Skip8282 on June 01, 2015, 04:09:18 PM
and Fox did it as well so try to pay attention

Now explain how the context is the same as when Fox does it

Am I  news outlet now?

Was Chuck Reed involved in scandal?  Is that why I called him a Repblican...to try to fool my audience ?



Why?

To What end? 

Now explain how my single post on this board is the equivalent to a pattern of misidentification by a national news outlet (the one with the highest rating no less)

You know, assuming you actually understand context



What the hell are you babbling about?

You haven't even established a 'routine'.  That's nothing more than your idiotic claim.

They've got TENS OF THOUSANDS of programming hours.

You claim you can show hundreds.  ::)  That's like .00 something percent.

Not routine by any measure.

Dumbfuck logic at its finest!





Worth repeating:

"Like I said, a PERSON made a mistake, just like YOU.

The only difference is you're a hypocritical shitbag.

Try to keep up, Dumbfuck."
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Straw Man on June 01, 2015, 04:47:37 PM


What the hell are you babbling about?

You haven't even established a 'routine'.  That's nothing more than your idiotic claim.

They've got TENS OF THOUSANDS of programming hours.

You claim you can show hundreds.  ::)  That's like .00 something percent.

Not routine by any measure.

Dumbfuck logic at its finest!





Worth repeating:

"Like I said, a PERSON made a mistake, just like YOU.

The only difference is you're a hypocritical shitbag.

Try to keep up, Dumbfuck."

wow, their hundreds of times (or even tens of thousand if you think of all the markets they are in) compared to my ONE TIME

and of course I am not a news source and I didn't falsely attribute a party affiliation to smear a party with a scandal WHICH IS THE PATTERN YOU`RE COMPARING ME TO

Shit, if you could at least find me doing the same thing in context you might have a shred of a point

you know

that context thing

It's interesting that you somehow think my one post on a obsurce message board is the equivalent of a national news network

fucking Bizarro World in Skiptard land

Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Skip8282 on June 01, 2015, 04:53:08 PM
wow, their hundreds of times (or even tens of thousand if you think of all the markets they are in) compared to my ONE TIME

and of course I am not a news source and I didn't falsely attribute a party affiliation to smear a party with a scandal WHICH IS THE PATTERN YOU`RE COMPARING ME TO

Shit, if you could at least find me doing the same thing in context you might have a shred of a point

you know

that context thing

It's interesting that you somehow think my one post on a obsurce message board is the equivalent of a national news network

fucking Bizarro World in Skiptard land





Again Dumbfuck, qty is not an issue.

Just your pathetic attempt to justify your self-righteous, sad ass, hypocrisy.

Maybe if you weren't as dumb as person working at Fox...well, I guess that would be too much, lol.


OK...run back to dangling from Beach Bum's ball sack, desperately wishing he'll throw you some measure of attention.

Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Straw Man on June 01, 2015, 04:59:40 PM


Again Dumbfuck, qty is not an issue.

Just your pathetic attempt to justify your self-righteous, sad ass, hypocrisy.

Maybe if you weren't as dumb as person working at Fox...well, I guess that would be too much, lol.


OK...run back to dangling from Beach Bum's ball sack, desperately wishing he'll throw you some measure of attention.



sure it is if you aren't a moron

so is context ...again assuming you're not a moron

Fox News has a long history of doing this over and over again when it's a Republican in a Scandal

That's the context

Everyone except you understands that.

Then there is quantity as in over and over again, year after year, same context every time

That's what 240 was getting at when he made the title of this thread

Everyone understands that

Here is another "honest mistake" by those people over at Faux News

note the pattern...note the context

basically just like me falsely calling Chuck Reed a Republican....right?

Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Skip8282 on June 01, 2015, 05:03:47 PM
sure it is if you aren't a moron

so is context ...again assuming you're not a moron

Fox News has a long history of doing this over and over again when it's a Republican in a Scandal

That's the context

Everyone except you understands that.

Then there is quantity as in over and over again, year after year, same context every time

That's what 240 was getting at when he made the title of this thread

Everyone understands that

Here is another "honest mistake" by those people over at Faux News

note the pattern...note the context

basically just like me falsely calling Chuck Reed a Republican....right?






No retard...the context is you've got some .00% of the time they make a mistake.  For all we know each mistake could have been made by ONE person.

The context is you fucked up.

The context is you crying like a retarded, hypocritical bitch.

Try to keep up Dumbfuck.
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Straw Man on June 01, 2015, 05:09:25 PM



No retard...the context is you've got some .00% of the time they make a mistake
.  For all we know each mistake could have been made by ONE person.

The context is you fucked up.

The context is you crying like a retarded, hypocritical bitch.

Try to keep up Dumbfuck.

sorry you're too stupid to understand the context

you seem like the only one who can't figure it out

The fact that Faux New repeatedly shows Repubs caught in scandals ad Dems is a running gag.

I dont' know if you're playing dumb or you are truly this dumb (seriously - I can't tell at this point)



Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Skip8282 on June 01, 2015, 05:32:58 PM
sorry you're too stupid to understand the context

you seem like the only one who can't figure it out

The fact that Faux New repeatedly shows Repubs caught in scandals ad Dems is a running gag.

I dont' know if you're playing dumb or you are truly this dumb (seriously - I can't tell at this point)








Makes sense here.

Dumbfuck too stupid to know a politician's political affiliation, but goes around calling others stupid.

lmao.

Keep trying Dumbfuck.

Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Straw Man on June 01, 2015, 05:38:00 PM



Makes sense here.

Dumbfuck too stupid to know a politician's political affiliation, but goes around calling others stupid.

lmao.

Keep trying Dumbfuck.



I forgot about Ted Stevens

Do you see the pattern yet Skiptard?
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Skip8282 on June 01, 2015, 05:40:15 PM
I forgot about Ted Stevens

Do you see the pattern yet Skiptard?




Wow...now you're up to like .001003% now.

Good job Dumbfuck.  Find some more for us and get that percentage a little higher.

Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Straw Man on June 01, 2015, 05:52:35 PM



Wow...now you're up to like .001003% now.

Good job Dumbfuck.  Find some more for us and get that percentage a little higher.



LOL pretending (one can only hope for your sake) that the pattern and context still eludes you

Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Skip8282 on June 01, 2015, 06:00:02 PM
LOL pretending (one can only hope for your sake) that the pattern and context still eludes you





C'mon Dumbfuck.  Remember it's ROUTINE.  You should have no problem posting THOUSANDS.

Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Straw Man on June 01, 2015, 06:04:17 PM


C'mon Dumbfuck.  Remember it's ROUTINE.  You should have no problem posting THOUSANDS.



are there thousand of Republican congressmen involved in scandals Skiptard?

are there even thousands of Republican congressmen Skiptard?
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Skip8282 on June 01, 2015, 06:07:39 PM
are there thousand of Republican congressmen involved in scandals Skiptard?

are there even thousands of Republican congressmen Skiptard?





C'mon Dumbfuck.  Remember it's ROUTINE.  You should have no problem posting THOUSANDS.


Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Straw Man on June 01, 2015, 06:16:28 PM



great way to avoid the question Skiptard.

so in your adled mind if you can't have "thousands" of examples it is just not possible for your simple mind to discern a pattern from the examples you've been given.
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Skip8282 on June 01, 2015, 06:18:44 PM
great way to avoid the question Skiptard.

so in your adled mind if you can't have "thousands" of examples it is just not possible for your simple mind to discern a pattern from the examples you've been given.






C'mon Dumbfuck.  Remember it's ROUTINE.  You should have no problem posting THOUSANDS.


Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Straw Man on June 01, 2015, 06:25:19 PM




repeating the same shit over an over?

are there thousand of Republican congressmen involved in scandals Skiptard?

are there even thousands of Republican congressmen Skiptard?

great way to avoid the question Skiptard.

so in your adled mind if you can't have "thousands" of examples it is just not possible for your simple mind to discern a pattern from the examples you've been given.
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Skip8282 on June 01, 2015, 06:28:29 PM
repeating the same shit over an over?






C'mon Dumbfuck.  Remember it's ROUTINE.  You should have no problem posting THOUSANDS.


Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Straw Man on June 01, 2015, 06:31:27 PM



yes, we get it Skiptard

It's just not possible to see any pattern whatsover in the examples that were given

you would need "thousands" in order to establish a pattern

Faux News LOVES disphits like you

and now for the obligatory cut and paste

are there thousand of Republican congressmen involved in scandals Skiptard?

are there even thousands of Republican congressmen Skiptard?

great way to avoid the question Skiptard.

so in your adled mind if you can't have "thousands" of examples it is just not possible for your simple mind to discern a pattern from the examples you've been given.
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Skip8282 on June 01, 2015, 06:34:29 PM
yes, we get it Skiptard

It's just not possible to see any pattern whatsover in the examples that were given

you would need "thousands" in order to establish a pattern

Faux News LOVES disphits like you

and now for the obligatory cut and paste






C'mon Dumbfuck.  Remember it's ROUTINE.  You should have no problem posting THOUSANDS.


Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Straw Man on June 01, 2015, 06:41:53 PM
you're making  a great case hear Skiptard

Do you think anyone else can see a pattern with Faux News and Republicans in Scandal (hint - check the title of this thread)

If others can most definitely see the pattern so one has to wonder why you can't

Is just just profound stupidity or something else (perhaps some past head trauma)?

Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Skip8282 on June 01, 2015, 06:52:21 PM
you're making  a great case hear Skiptard

Do you think anyone else can see a pattern with Faux News and Republicans in Scandal (hint - check the title of this thread)

If others can most definitely see the pattern so one has to wonder why you can't

Is just just profound stupidity or something else (perhaps some past head trauma)?





Wow...some other libtards agree with you, lmao.




C'mon Dumbfuck.  Remember it's ROUTINE.  You should have no problem posting THOUSANDS.


Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Straw Man on June 01, 2015, 06:53:32 PM


Wow...some other libtards agree with you, lmao.



and yet no one seems to agree with you

I wonder why?
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Skip8282 on June 01, 2015, 06:54:19 PM
and yet no one seems to agree with you

I wonder why?


Still dodging, bobbing, and weaving.




C'mon Dumbfuck.  Remember it's ROUTINE.  You should have no problem posting THOUSANDS.


Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Straw Man on June 01, 2015, 06:56:56 PM

Still dodging, bobbing, and weaving.



dodging what

I've answered the question and reposted

we've also clearly established, by your own admission, that you see no pattern whatsover in Faux New falsey portraying scandal ridden Republicans as Democrats

You just don't see it

Have I summed up your belief accurately?
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Skip8282 on June 01, 2015, 06:57:42 PM
dodging what

I've answered the question and reposted

we've also clearly established, by your own admission, that you see no pattern whatsover in Faux New falsey portraying scandal ridden Republicans as Democrats

You just don't see it

Have I summed up your belief accurately?





C'mon Dumbfuck.  Remember it's ROUTINE.  You should have no problem posting THOUSANDS.




Like pulling teeth, lol.
Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Skip8282 on June 01, 2015, 07:00:39 PM
Alright, unlike you, I've got a real life and it's time to go.

In b4 you're twat ass accuses me of running away, lol.

Run along and make some more unsubstantiated allegations and cry like a hypocritical bitch.

It's been fun slapping you around.  Don't worry....I'll be back.

Have a good night.



Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: Straw Man on June 01, 2015, 07:03:59 PM
Alright, unlike you, I've got a real life and it's time to go.

In b4 you're twat ass accuses me of running away, lol.

Run along and make some more unsubstantiated allegations and cry like a hypocritical bitch.

It's been fun slapping you around.  Don't worry....I'll be back.

Have a good night.


The only thing you've slapped around is yourself (something I suspect you're quite used to doing)

Title: Re: Another Democrat Indicted. Typical.
Post by: ritch on June 01, 2015, 11:00:20 PM
can't spell "rat" without "democrat"
hahaha, I don't even know what the parties stand for to be honest. Which one is cool with weed smokers?

I like dem one's.