Holy Crap look at Ronnie 99!

[NarcissisticDeity]

Suckmyasshole has claimed that Flex 99 had better conditioning than Ronnie 99..

 

LOL:

what is it with these moronic nuthuggers claiming Ronnie was so soft in 99?

LOL

 

Hulkster you really don't have the faintest idea on what great conditioning is and isn't Ronnie was harder in the hams & glutes in 98 thats why he won , 1999 same problem areas with Flex as usual

you're forced to keep on saying Ronnie was harder & drier in 99 than 98 because your THINK its his best showing and NO ONE , no one with any crediblity agrees with you. 99 isn't viewed as his best showing for that very reason , it doesn't mean he didn't deserve to win , it doesn't mean he didn't look better it just means his density & dryness aren't the same as the year earlier . but you're now bound to this stupid statement and you can't admit the obvious out of fear of being proven wrong again and looking stupid , but don't fret you're wrong and you look like an idiot  

I'm still waiting for ANY credible source that points to the 1999 Mr Olympia as Ronnie's best showing .......

[NarcissisticDeity]

Ronnie was there and said he was better than the year before the very next day:

http://www.dennisbweis.com/Articles/Colman.html

you cant dismiss it HD.

Ronnie was NOT 15 pounds heavier than 98 thats just nonsense

[NarcissisticDeity]

lol look at that desperate idiot HypcriticDiety.

he thinks posting those shots proves Peter's misinformation LOL

 

I love your meltdowns its so easy to get you revved up lol

[Hulkster]

Ronnie was NOT 15 pounds heavier than 98 thats just nonsense

LOL HD claims to know more than Ronnie Coleman LOL

 

[Hulkster]

notice HD demonstrates his lack of command of the english language.

ronnie said ALMOST 15 pounds heavier

but HD cant read or understand so...

[NarcissisticDeity]

notice HD demonstrates his lack of command of the english language.

ronnie said ALMOST 15 pounds heavier

but HD cant read or understand so...

almost means 14+ pounds Ronnie was 264+ pounds in 1999? 

[Hulkster]

almost means 14+ pounds Ronnie was 264+ pounds in 1999? 

LOL 14 pounds - see what I mean..

the quote is 15 pounds not 14..

you need hooked  on phonics ND lol

 

[NarcissisticDeity]

LOL HD claims to know more than Ronnie Coleman LOL

 

and you claim to know more than Ronnie , McGough , Perine , Team Flex , Lee Priest , Dorian Yates , Bev Francis , Shawn Ray

kid I will own you at every turn because you're ignorant about competitive bodybuilding

[NarcissisticDeity]

LOL 14 pounds - see what I mean..

the quote is 15 pounds not 14..

you need hooked  on phonics ND lol

 

dummy he was ALMOST 15 pounds heavier which is a LIE and almost means NOT quite 15 so that means 14+ pounds heavier than 1998 and seeing he was 250 pounds in 1998 that would make him 264+ pounds in 1999 which again is you guessed it a LIE

see fail as usual 

[NarcissisticDeity]

Hulkster I'm still waiting for the credible quotes saying 99 is his best showing , where are they? 

if what you say is true that he was 257 pounds with equal if not better conditioning than 1998 and 2001 surely this would be his best showing , more muscle at equal conditioning is always better

where are they? they should be rolling in left & right lol

[benjamin pearson]

he looks great there

[NarcissisticDeity]

he looks great there

He does look great a deserving winner

[benjamin pearson]

He does look great a deserving winner

do you hate ronnie or simply think dorian is better? 

[NarcissisticDeity]

do you hate ronnie or simply think dorian is better? 

I don't hate Ronnie . I just think Yates would beat him and either way it would be close.

[benjamin pearson]

I thnk yates is a better bb as well...... though ronnie at his prime was amazing

[Brutal_1]

great calves

Yeah...if he had calves he could've done half as well as Matarazzo did

[NeoSeminole]

ha ha ha, I bet ND feels like an idiot now.

Ronnie Coleman - 1999 Mr. Olympia Victory Seminar

"Those hard sessions allowed me to pack on some extra muscle mass. I was almost 15 pounds heavier than last year, with a little bit better conditioning than last year."

http://www.dennisbweis.com/Articles/Colman.html

Ronnie said he had better conditioning in 99 than 98. So it must be true.

[Zaphod]

Isn't there a thread for this? 

[dearth]

I love how you have your head up colemans ass.

LOL I love how ALL the pics and ALL the videos show he was harder in 99

but ND dismisses them all LOL

 

[NarcissisticDeity]

ha ha ha, I bet ND feels like an idiot now.

Ronnie Coleman - 1999 Mr. Olympia Victory Seminar

"Those hard sessions allowed me to pack on some extra muscle mass. I was almost 15 pounds heavier than last year, with a little bit better conditioning than last year."

http://www.dennisbweis.com/Articles/Colman.html

Ronnie said he had better conditioning in 99 than 98. So it must be true.

No because its obvious he's not almost 15 pounds heavier that's just not true and what did he say on Pro Bodybuilding Weekly at the close of his Olympia career? when he had time to reflect on all his placings?

" Ronnie what was your best Olympia?

Ronnie : I would have to say my first because my conditioning was spot-on "

So he may have left that after the 99 Olympia it doesn't make it true , and the fact that he was harder and drier in 98 coincides with what the professionals claims , so who is looking stupid now?  

and if that were the case again where are all these quotes confiming that 1999 Mr Olympia was his best showing? lol surely 257 pounds with equal or better conditioning than 250 pounds and 247 pounds means he's better , more muscle and equal conditioning equals better

NO MENTIONS of 99 Olympia being his best , by credible sources that is and NOT someone's internet blog lol

yeah I though so  

[NeoSeminole]

No because its obvious he's not almost 15 pounds heavier that's just not true and what did he say on Pro Bodybuilding Weekly at the close of his Olympia career? when he had time to reflect on all his placings?

oh, so now you know more than Ronnie Coleman? Go home, kiddo. You lost at your own game.

[NarcissisticDeity]

oh, so now you know more than Ronnie Coleman? Go home, kiddo. You lost at your own game.

Great retort  , especially coming from YOU of all people , among your weakest posts you have nothing but felt stupid not posting you you pulled this rabbit out of your hat lol

You on many occasions have poted you know more than Ronnie himself , Yates , IFBB judges , McGough , Bev Francis , etc , etc , etc

see hypocrite and then see failure , you know your way 

I'll be waiting for all these quotes saying the 1999 Mr Olympia is his best showing

[NarcissisticDeity]

Quote Peter McGough Flex Magazine Jan 2001

RONNIE COLEMAN : ( 264lbs As big as a house , but holding water. In '98 , he was shredded and bone dry at 250 pounds. Last year ( 1999 ) he was 257 pounds but NOT as sharp as '98. This year ( 2000 ) at 264 pounds , he's not as sharp as 99 , which would seem to say that Ronnie is better at a lighter weight .

stating the obvious 


Peter McGough Flex Magazine August 2005

Personally, the best physique I ever saw onstage (there was a contender for best-ever that I saw offstage: those crazy photos of sock-footed Dorian Yates taken seven weeks before the 1993 Mr. Olympia) was Ronnie's at the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic. He was cut, full, trim in the waist and a monster (proving that when you're supersharp, you look superbig) at 244 pounds. Ronnie sporting that look would, in my opinion, be unbeatable and would make any criticisms as redundant as a chocolate squat rack.

NO 1999 Mr Olympia here 

Flex Magazine August 2003

Jim Schmatltz on Ronnie chances of winning six Olympias in a row

if he repeats his 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic form, he'll experience the joy of six.

NOT if he repeats his 1999 Mr Olympia form 

Shawn Perine Ironage Dec 11, 2004

As much as I love Haney and my IA champs, I think Ronnie circa '98 or at the 2001 Arnold is pretty much untouchable. Except by Dorian Yates 6 weeks out from the '93 O as photographed by our own KMH. Both men, on those specific occasions carried so much dry muscle mass in good proportion and with good lines that it's almost unfair to compare them to others.

what no circa 1999 Olympia? for a very good reason 

While I’m on record as saying that the best physique I ever saw was Ronnie’s at the 2001 Arnold, he was never drier or harder than Dorian.

no mention of 1999 Olympia I wonder why? 

review of mr. olympia 1999, january 2000, page  90:

257 pounds, a good seven pounds heavier than last year and the clear winner, ALTHOUGH NOT AS BONE DRY OR AS ROCK HARD IN 98.  In comparison to 98, his thighs are enourmous with a greater sweep and his front delts have improved; plus the pec anomaly (gyno) is no longer present.




Hey I've seen this before 

1999 is NOT considered his best showing for a reason and I'll let you dummies speculate why ...next

[Hulkster]

the question HD avoids:

why do you pick and choose which quotes to believe when there are contrary ones posted for all of the ones you keep repeating?

answer hypocrit:

[NarcissisticDeity]

the question HD avoids:

why do you pick and choose which quotes to believe when there are contrary ones posted for all of the ones you keep repeating?

answer hypocrit:

Ironic YOU of all people saying this lol and see above for more of your beat down YOU wont reply to because YOU can't    and where are all these quotes ? and not the ones from YouTube LMMFAO