Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Bodybuilding Boards => Positive Bodybuilding Discussion & Talk => Natural Bodybuilding => Topic started by: big L dawg on May 13, 2009, 11:36:47 AM

Title: Is this guy a natural?
Post by: big L dawg on May 13, 2009, 11:36:47 AM
what ya think
Title: Re: Is this guy a natural?
Post by: burn2live on May 13, 2009, 11:50:07 AM
what ya think

I'd doubt it tbh
Title: Re: Is this guy a natural?
Post by: The True Adonis on May 13, 2009, 11:52:25 AM
Mike Tyson used to work with Chad Nichols.


That might put it in a bit of perspective.

However, I would not doubt that Tyson does have some great Natural genetics for power as he has thick bones and a wide waist, perfect for generating force in swift bursts and short distances.
Title: Re: Is this guy a natural?
Post by: Rami on May 13, 2009, 01:44:41 PM
most athletes use GH as it is normally not tested for. they do not draw blood to test other than in the olympics, where they probably only stated they would look for GH. To expensive to test for.
Title: Re: Is this guy a natural?
Post by: Tre on May 13, 2009, 02:08:24 PM

That guy does have a wide waist, which isn't too common among black athletes. 

And yes, I do consider boxers/fighters to be 'athletes'. 
Title: Re: Is this guy a natural?
Post by: gordiano on May 13, 2009, 02:10:19 PM
That guy does have a wide waist, which isn't too common among black athletes. 

And yes, I do consider boxers/fighters to be 'athletes'. 

Of course.
Title: Re: Is this guy a natural?
Post by: wes mantooth on May 13, 2009, 03:15:03 PM


And yes, I do consider boxers/fighters to be 'athletes'. 

why wouldnt they be?
Title: Re: Is this guy a natural?
Post by: Method101 on May 13, 2009, 03:15:37 PM
no.
Title: Re: Is this guy a natural?
Post by: ironneck on May 13, 2009, 03:16:01 PM
so are bbers
Title: Re: Is this guy a natural?
Post by: bodybuilder1234 on May 13, 2009, 04:08:03 PM
Im not really that sure, when he first fought for the heavyweight title I dont think he was roids and he was built like a shitbrick house.

Even at 13 years old he was huge so its clearly evident that Mike was a genetic freak not just for boxing but his physique also.
Title: Re: Is this guy a natural?
Post by: QuakerOats on May 13, 2009, 04:12:09 PM
dude has said that he puts on weight at the drop of a hat, at his rape trial back in 1992 he was like 275 pounds.
Title: Re: Is this guy a natural?
Post by: tweeter on May 13, 2009, 04:26:50 PM
Mike seemed to be much more muscular and cut after getting out of prison than he was in the earlier part of his career. Whether it was because he put on muscle while in prison or through other means, I don't know. But take a look at these two pics...the first is from the Spinks fight in 88 and the second is post-prison.
Title: Re: Is this guy a natural?
Post by: Per Se on May 13, 2009, 04:28:24 PM
why wouldnt they be?

Lol X2....strange thing to say.
Title: Re: Is this guy a natural?
Post by: QuakerOats on May 13, 2009, 04:29:09 PM
Mike seemed to be much more muscular and cut after getting out of prison than he was in the earlier part of his career. Whether it was because he put on muscle while in prison or through other means, I don't know. But take a look at these two pics...the first is from the Spinks fight in 88 and the second is post-prison.
dude he honestly doesn't look much different in those two pics, MAYBE a little bit better abs in the second shot.
Title: Re: Is this guy a natural?
Post by: tweeter on May 13, 2009, 04:29:26 PM
Lol X2....strange thing to say.
Of course they will never match the athleticism of bodybuilders, but they are still athletes in their own right!
Title: Re: Is this guy a natural?
Post by: tweeter on May 13, 2009, 04:32:43 PM
dude he honestly doesn't look much different in those two pics, MAYBE a little bit better abs in the second shot.
Yeah, its not a huge difference by any means. I just noticed it when I was watching a documentary of Tyson. They showed him right after getting out of prison, and that was the biggest and most ripped I had seen him look (even more so than during a fight). Maybe he just worked out all the time while in prison. Here is another pic from earlier in his career that shows he was a little bit softer and smaller.
Title: Re: Is this guy a natural?
Post by: SaltShaker on May 13, 2009, 05:28:05 PM
what ya think
yes, he's a natural moron... yeah i know he made millions and i didnt, but that doesnt mean he didnt fuck up his life by acting stupid
Title: Re: Is this guy a natural?
Post by: tbombz on May 13, 2009, 05:29:37 PM
he wasnt natural he chewed handfulls of halotestin and cheque drops before fights
Title: Re: Is this guy a natural?
Post by: thelamefalsehood on May 13, 2009, 05:29:53 PM
All Cheque Drops and Halotestin
Title: Re: Is this guy a natural?
Post by: jr on May 14, 2009, 01:13:27 AM
The halotestin and cheque drops he chewed before the fight are responsible for his muscular build.
Title: Re: Is this guy a natural?
Post by: ironneck on May 14, 2009, 04:41:42 AM
The halotestin and cheque drops he chewed before the fight are responsible for his muscular build.

The halotestin and cheque drops made him what he was
i read that somewhere
Title: Re: Is this guy a natural?
Post by: spotter on May 14, 2009, 05:05:14 AM
what ya think


He is only natural, when he is off his "Lithium"!!! :-X
Title: Re: Is this guy a natural?
Post by: Johnny_Blaze on January 26, 2011, 08:48:46 PM
Mike seemed to be much more muscular and cut after getting out of prison than he was in the earlier part of his career. Whether it was because he put on muscle while in prison or through other means, I don't know. But take a look at these two pics...the first is from the Spinks fight in 88 and the second is post-prison.

He was older and muscle maturity shows. I guarantee you he also worked out in prison.
Title: Re: Is this guy a natural?
Post by: bigboithetank on October 17, 2013, 06:17:55 PM
You can juice in prison, oh yeah.