Man-caused global warming: greatest scam in history

[El Diablo Blanco]

Man made global warming is a religion to liberals.  They are hysterical zealots.

Funny you used religion in your statement.  The republicans believe without a shadow of a doubt about the myth of Jesus and God without an ounce of proof and just blind faith yet for something like climate change that has tangible facts you can see and feel they call it a myth.  Go figure.

[markofan]

Are people just blind and stupid to not see the issue?  All the smoke from cars, planes and factories is just make believe?  There's days in China where people can't see in front of them from the pollution from the factories.  For the Olympics they shut them all down for two days prior to the opening ceremonies and the skies turned blue, once the Olympics were done they went back to business and the the skies turned cloudy and grey with smoke again.  This is not some myth but real issues you can see with your own eyes and feel with your lungs.  Just look at the horizon of LA, the constant brown and yellow air. 

You are talking about pollution, which is the various particulate matter, most of which is toxic, that issues from auto/diesel exhaust, coal fired power plants that DO NOT have modern scrubbing devices installed or from industrial sources such as steel mills and smelters.  This is all in the developing third world.  THIS IS NOT THE SAME THING AS CO2 EMISSIONS, which the global warming alarmists keep harping on.  CO2 is emitted by all those sources, but it is not a pollutant.

[Kazan]

I believe the biggest impact to global warming is not man made but cow made.  Methane gases they emit is horrible.

[Erik C]

Funny you used religion in your statement.  The republicans believe without a shadow of a doubt about the myth of Jesus and God without an ounce of proof and just blind faith yet for something like climate change that has tangible facts you can see and feel they call it a myth.  Go figure.

I'm an Atheist, and I call the Climate Change/Global Warming "Science," Bull Shit. And the leftist lunatic environmentalists aren't scientists, but political operatives.

There is a difference between saying that the amount of Carbon Dioxide in the air, has risen a bit, is a scientific fact, and making wild eyed projections of what that
means, and falsely calling that "scientific fact."

[Thong Maniac]

You are talking about pollution, which is the various particulate matter, most of which is toxic, that issues from auto/diesel exhaust, coal fired power plants that DO NOT have modern scrubbing devices installed or from industrial sources such as steel mills and smelters.  This is all in the developing third world.  THIS IS NOT THE SAME THING AS CO2 EMISSIONS, which the global warming alarmists keep harping on.  CO2 is emitted by all those sources, but it is not a pollutant.

you dont understand even what global warming is...this is the problem with social media that el diablo pointed out.

the light from the sun bounces off/reflects off those co2 molecules (along with methane, water vapor, ozone, etc). that is WHAT global warming is and how it works. the more of this in our atmosphere, the more reflective warming that occurs.

its not as simple as "my car exhaust wont make the world hotter". thats the sean hannity talking point science you need to throw out. im glad the legit scientific community is working on the problem whether or not Jim Bob Cooter nobody or Sean Hannity "believe" in it.

good point by diablo about neocons blind faith in jesus, but dont you dare show me dem facst of that der global warming trickery. lolz

[_bruce_]

"Weather" true or not - one can always try to minimize pollution.
What is being attacked is not the environment being harmed but the globalists using this to further their agenda.

[The Gov]

The US was warmer in the 1800's than it is now.  The climate always changes... warm to cold, cold to warm.  It's a natural thing and humans have NOTHING to do with it. 

sure the glaciers melting is per norm 

[markofan]

sure the glaciers melting is per norm 

glaciers melt and retreat, then grow and expand all the time.  Some glaciers are now melting, others, that were melting and retreating have reversed and are growing again.  It's an on going process.

[The Gov]

glaciers melt and retreat, then grow and expand all the time.  Some glaciers are now melting, others, that were melting and retreating have reversed and are growing again.  It's an on going process.

sure maybe a few feet, not miles and metric tons worth.

[Erik C]

sure maybe a few feet, not miles and metric tons worth.

During The Medieval Warm Period, just over a thousand years ago, Greenland's glaciers melyed so far back from the sea that the Vikings were able to settle all over the area, and there was plenty of grassland for their animals. A few hundred years later, during what is called "The Little Ice Age," the glaciers grew again pushing the Vikings into the sea. Literally, many miles, and metric tons, in both directions!

Why do Climate Change zealots ignore these facts of recent history about Real Climate Changes? And why did they actually attempt to make these facts go away, with fake statistical studies, because the facts did not go well with their crackpot beliefs? Do you see why intelligent people are calling this Climate Change Panic, Bull Shit?

[Mr Anabolic]

Sure, I bet the 1800 technology was spot on.

Huh?   

Liberals have serious, debilitating mental disease.

[Thong Maniac]

During The Medieval Warm Period, just over a thousand years ago, Greenland's glaciers melyed so far back from the sea that the Vikings were able to settle all over the area, and there was plenty of grassland for their animals. A few hundred years later, during what is called "The Little Ice Age," the glaciers grew again pushing the Vikings into the sea. Literally, many miles, and metric tons, in both directions!

Why do Climate Change zealots ignore these facts of recent history about Real Climate Changes? And why did they actually attempt to make these facts go away, with fake statistical studies, because the facts did not go well with their crackpot beliefs? Do you see why intelligent people are calling this Climate Change Panic, Bull Shit?

why are the sources you read "real" stats, while your opposing sources are "fake" stats? how do you know since you are not part of the scientific or biotech industry who spend their careers and lives focusing on issues like this? will wait for your balanced and logical response. lol, or not, this is a fucking message board with people who think all sorts of silly conspiracys are fact.

let the scientists (on both sides of the research spectrum) handle this. none of us are equipped to figure it out or even debate it. after all, we are wasting time on a thong contest message board. who the fuck are you kidding? "global warming is fake!" ...um cool, feel better now?

[Erik C]

why are the sources you read "real" stats, while your opposing sources are "fake" stats? how do you know since you are not part of the scientific or biotech industry who spend their careers and lives focusing on issues like this? will wait for your balanced and logical response. lol, or not, this is a fucking message board with people who think all sorts of silly conspiracys are fact.

let the scientists (on both sides of the research spectrum) handle this. none of us are equipped to figure it out or even debate it. after all, we are wasting time on a thong contest message board. who the fuck are you kidding? "global warming is fake!" ...um cool, feel better now?

Then explain why The Medieval Warm Period didn't produce any of the terrible results that are being predicted by so called "scientists" now? There were no floods engulfing coastal areas. London had a large population. It stayed above sea level. Rome had about a million citizen then. Again no flood. Yet the Glaciers in Greenland and Scandinavia melted, along with arctic ice. The polar bears didn't die! And the temperatures were higher than now, and even higher than they are predicted to be in a 100 years? And historians refer to the period as The Medieval
Climate Optimum, as it was so kind to human life. People prospered with the warmer weather, and lived well.

I am posting historical facts. Statistics are accumulations of facts, measured mathematically. But statistics can be used politically, to predict false possibilities. As in the quote, "There are lies, Damn lies, and Statistics." Your so called "scientists" are predicting results that have no historically examples, as in facts, to back up their claims for coming disasters. They're just politically motivated  "fortune tellers" predicting "the end is near!"

[Thong Maniac]

Then explain why The Medieval Warm Period didn't produce any of the terrible results that are being predicted by so called "scientists" now? There were no floods engulfing coastal areas. London had a large population. It stayed above sea level. Rome had about a million citizen then. Again no flood. Yet the Glaciers in Greenland and Scandinavia melted, along with arctic ice. The polar bears didn't die! And the temperatures were higher than now, and even higher than they are predicted to be in a 100 years? And historians refer to the period as The Medieval
Climate Optimum, as it was so kind to human life. People prospered with the warmer weather, and lived well.

I am posting historical facts. Statistics are accumulations of facts, measured mathematically. But statistics can be used politically, to predict false possibilities. As in the quote, "There are lies, Damn lies, and Statistics." Your so called "scientists" are predicting results that have no historically examples, as in facts, to back up their claims for coming disasters. They're just politically motivated  "fortune tellers" predicting "the end is near!"

TLDR, got it all out? good. lets chat about thongs again. ill let scientists/academia/biotech solve the global warming issue, not erik C the keyboard warrior and his inside info/facts on BBing message boards lulz

[Erik C]

TLDR, got it all out? good. lets chat about thongs again. ill let scientists/academia/biotech solve the global warming issue, not erik C the keyboard warrior and his inside info/facts on BBing message boards lulz

You'll have to let others do the talking about Climate Change, as you don't have the knowledge to do so intelligently.

[Thong Maniac]

You'll have to let others do the talking about Climate Change, as you don't have the knowledge to do so intelligently.

exactly thanks for making my point. engineers/biotech/scientists/academia who focus on this issue. glad they are working on the issue whether Erik C keyboard battler basement dweller has "the facts" or not.

[FREAKgeek]

  The republicans believe without a shadow of a doubt about the myth of Jesus and God without an ounce of proof and just blind faith yet for something like climate change that has tangible facts you can see and feel they call it a myth.  Go figure.

I'm an agnostic republican, don't lump us all in one category.

You are talking about pollution, which is the various particulate matter, most of which is toxic, that issues from auto/diesel exhaust, coal fired power plants that DO NOT have modern scrubbing devices installed or from industrial sources such as steel mills and smelters.  This is all in the developing third world.  THIS IS NOT THE SAME THING AS CO2 EMISSIONS, which the global warming alarmists keep harping on.  CO2 is emitted by all those sources, but it is not a pollutant.

What you define as a pollutant is arbitrary. There are plenty of natural processes that are deadly. Look at the Co2 levels on Venus. You wouldn't want to be there. I'm not saying that is what is going to happen here, but I keep an open mind. It's still not understood, and certainly not by the politicians on both sides.

[Kazan]

sure maybe a few feet, not miles and metric tons worth.

So if the glacier is floating in the ocean and melts will the water level rise?

[Erik C]

So if the glacier is floating in the ocean and melts will the water level rise?

No. 90% of an ice berg is already displacing water, as it is underwater. So only the top 10% would make a difference, except that there are micro air bubbles in all glaciers, and that air would escape when the ice melts, further reducing the water amount. That's on top of the fact that when water freezes, it increases in volume, so when it melts it will shrink in volume, resulting in an over all zero effect on water levels, or slightly reducing the global water level.

[El Diablo Blanco]

So if the glacier is floating in the ocean and melts will the water level rise?

Not glaciers but the actual icecaps.

Why are republicans so against a clean world ? Regardless of climate change or not why do they want to pollute the shit out of this planet?  Isn't having clean air and clean water worth more than any monetary profit for already billionaires?  Burning oil and coal polluted the air. Dumping chemicals in water polluted the water. These are facts.  Republicans want to use the guise of climate change being a hoax to pollute the shit out of this world for pure profit.   

[Kazan]

Not glaciers but the actual icecaps.

Why are republicans so against a clean world ? Regardless of climate change or not why do they want to pollute the shit out of this planet?  Isn't having clean air and clean water worth more than any monetary profit for already billionaires?  Burning oil and coal polluted the air. Dumping chemicals in water polluted the water. These are facts.  Republicans want to use the guise of climate change being a hoax to pollute the shit out of this world for pure profit.   

I am not advocating "polluting the shit out of the world", but has anyone wondered why an ice covered island was called Greenland by the Vikings?

[Thong Maniac]

Not glaciers but the actual icecaps.

Why are republicans so against a clean world ? Regardless of climate change or not why do they want to pollute the shit out of this planet?  Isn't having clean air and clean water worth more than any monetary profit for already billionaires?  Burning oil and coal polluted the air. Dumping chemicals in water polluted the water. These are facts.  Republicans want to use the guise of climate change being a hoax to pollute the shit out of this world for pure profit.   

1. environmental regulations hurt big business (white collar repub elite problem)
2. Man can do as he wishes to the planet, since its "gods" land, and god made man to do as he wishes to the planet (this covers the blue collar jesus faction of republicans)

this is what I have noticed why republicans are against any clean air or environmental regs

[Kazan]

The left (dems) say one thing the right (reps) say something else, the truth lies somewhere in between

[Thin Lizzy]

1. environmental regulations hurt big business (white collar repub elite problem)
2. Man can do as he wishes to the planet, since its "gods" land, and god made man to do as he wishes to the planet (this covers the blue collar jesus faction of republicans)

this is what I have noticed why republicans are against any clean air or environmental regs

1. It's everyone's problem. You can't have an economy of scale without big business. Mom&Pop can only make so many IPhones in the back room.

2. Leftists seem to live under the illusion that the planet is a kind and gentle place that is continually being violated by the evil white man, when in reality, nature is very cruel and stingy. It's constantly trying to starve you, drown you, eat you, destroy your house, crush you, burn you, freeze you to death, etc, and not give the slightest bit of a f**k.

[Parker]

Then explain why The Medieval Warm Period didn't produce any of the terrible results that are being predicted by so called "scientists" now? There were no floods engulfing coastal areas. London had a large population. It stayed above sea level. Rome had about a million citizen then. Again no flood. Yet the Glaciers in Greenland and Scandinavia melted, along with arctic ice. The polar bears didn't die! And the temperatures were higher than now, and even higher than they are predicted to be in a 100 years? And historians refer to the period as The Medieval
Climate Optimum, as it was so kind to human life. People prospered with the warmer weather, and lived well.

I am posting historical facts. Statistics are accumulations of facts, measured mathematically. But statistics can be used politically, to predict false possibilities. As in the quote, "There are lies, Damn lies, and Statistics." Your so called "scientists" are predicting results that have no historically examples, as in facts, to back up their claims for coming disasters. They're just politically motivated  "fortune tellers" predicting "the end is near!"

Well, you do know that back then, there were NO HOLES IN THE OZONE LAYER!!!