« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Down

Author Topic: whos bigger?  (Read 12190 times)

LuciusFox

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8775
Re: whos bigger?
« Reply #75 on: May 09, 2006, 08:45:26 PM »
Quote from: Doublemonk on May 09, 2006, 07:36:43 PM
The dumbest shit I ever read on this board. And that means alot on getbig. It's not synthol it's a (partial) tear. It's funny, Coleman has a lump on the exact position on his lats, yet I've never read people screaming synthol when seeing it. But when seeing it on Rühl everybody screams synthol.



 Coleman has an identation from a partial tear where his lat inserts. Ruhl has multiple lumps in the middle of his lats ::) Can you say "synthol"? ::)
Logged

badlad

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 330
Re: whos bigger?
« Reply #76 on: May 10, 2006, 03:05:07 AM »
funny...I was always of the opinion that Ruhl's most muscular was the best bar none...but just seeing that comparison shot of Coleman to Ruhl...
well...er...
my opinion was 100% wrong
Logged

gh15

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16991
  • angels
Re: whos bigger?
« Reply #77 on: May 10, 2006, 03:53:57 AM »
only thing ruhl got better than colman is hair on his head...for the 100th time ron can come 250lb to vegas and most likley win it he is the biggest human (muscle wize) that ever walked earth and it's hard to believe any one will be bigger (muscle wize) in the next 10 years
Logged
fallen angel
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Up
« previous next »