Just watched we need to talk about kevin.
Seriously crazy movie, seems alot of bodybuilders have some of these traits especially you know who.
Why are people so silent about the issue.
(http://cdn.buzznet.com/assets/users16/eversoooosweetx3/default/voldemort-aka-shall-not-named--large-msg-129005342783.jpg)These people are lizards they have no nerlogical empathy, they are soulist and they are everywhere.
A large portion of the worlds most successful people are psychopaths
Test p, tren and mast..my current and favorite stack
Also running 10iu pharm grade gh daily
Just watched we need to talk about kevin.
Seriously crazy movie, seems alot of bodybuilders have some of these traits especially you know who.
Why are people so silent about the issue.
A large portion of the worlds most successful people are psychopathsA large dominant portion are also the most unsuccessful(long term prisoners).
Psychopathy is evolutionarily advantageous. Empathy for the weak and downtrodden has only held back humanities progress.Actually ppaths are shit poor with children, so its actually a huge disadvantage. Not to mention a society of psychopaths would be stuck in the stone ages.
Although I am a compassionate, empathetic person, I enjoyYeah its a good movie one of its main points, is that all this liberal bullshit about people being products of their environment isnt actually built on anything significant.
some pretty dark movies such as Hostel, ect.
I don't have psycho thoughts nor do I dream those types of dreams.
For example- If someone is gay and repressing it; I believe it will
manifest on the subconscious level through dreams.
Thx for posting this movie because I am a movie buff and will
definitely check it out.
Here is a good psychopath movie if you haven't seen it.
It is called Rampage. The whole movie is on youtube.
Trailer...
Link to whole movie...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4hviY-zxkRk (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4hviY-zxkRk)
A large dominant portion are also the most unsuccessful(long term prisoners).Are you fucking kidding, the average so called NORMAL person is terrible with kids. Since the beginning of time our child rearing principles have been disgusting, nothing but constant beating, raping, exploitation, brainwashing etc etc. of our children. The majority of adults still believe it is OK to hit children but not another adult, these are the NORMAL people. And we already live in a society with little empathy. Society is burdened with pathetic, liberal minded people like yourself who constantly defend those not suited to survival in a modern world. There is no place in a hostile, raw environment like our modern world for those that aren't equipped to deal with it. People need to become LESS empathetic, not MORE. You have to be cruel to be kind, something libtards don't understand.
Actually ppaths are shit poor with children, so its actually a huge disadvantage. Not to mention a society of psychopaths would be stuck in the stone ages.
If you understand what they're all about you'll understand a society of any significant depth wouldn't be possible for a society without empathy.
Its highly likely our society has been burdened incredibly by these people.
They are the large part of the reason we have prisons, the reason politicians cannot be trusted, and why economics never works as it should.
Are you fucking kidding, the average so called NORMAL person is terrible with kids. Since the beginning of time our child rearing principles have been disgusting, nothing but constant beating, raping, exploitation, brainwashing etc etc. of our children. And we already live in a society with little empathy. Society is burdened with pathetic, liberal minded people like yourself who constantly defend those not suited to survival in a modern world. There is no place in a hostile, raw environment like our modern world for those that aren't equipped to deal with it. People need to become LESS empathetic, not MORE. You have to be cruel to be kind, something libtards don't understand.Lol I dont think you understand what it means to be a pyscopath.
Lol I dont think you understand what it means to be a pyscopath.
Ironically you dont understand how I have poor empathy myself. I have very little value or regard for the feelings of others. I of course care for others, but dont think for a second I'm soft on people or myself for that matter.
Tough love isnt something a ppath is capable of. They have no concern for their children, there just objects to them.
Ironically beating, raping, expolitation of children is a very common trait among psychopaths.How does this differ from the mainstream population, many of which abuse their children in one way or the other, ultimately even a worse atrocity as many of them think they are doing good.
I indeed understand what a psychopath is, unlike you I see their value and don't take the libtard black and white approach of Liberals Good-Everyone else Bad. Psychopaths serve a much needed counterbalance to the libtards, who paradoxically cause just as much, if not more chaos and destruction with their good intentions.Lol Im a libtard Yet I advocate the forced removal of these people. If you think I dont have a ruthless streak I dont think you understand me very well. I do have a rather strong view of right and wrong, thats usually associated with the right numb nuts. I have a history of people very one sided on my view points, and I truly believe its because I have a superior sense of logic and morality.
How does this differ from the mainstream population, many of which abuse their children in one way or the other, ultimately even a worse atrocity as many of them think they are doing good.
Lol Im a libtard Yet I advocate the forced removal of these people. If you think I dont have a ruthless streak I dont think you understand me very well. I do have a rather strong view of right and wrong, thats usually associated with the right numb nuts. I have a history of people very one sided on my view points, and I truly believe its because I have a superior sense of logic and morality.This is where you and I differ, I wasn't talking about the extreme cases, I was referring to the majority of child rearing principles that are considered acceptable by the mainstream I consider abuse, hitting, screaming, constant put downs and criticism, blackmailing, controlling, brainwashing etc. The problem is, when so many people perform abusive behaviour it becomes normalised. And I don't know where you got that nonsense about women scoring higher in empathy, you must be reading feminist weekly too much. So, not only are you a libtard, but you're a white knight spreading feminist propaganda all over the place. Anyone with a hint of critical analysis can tell that women are far more ruthless, cunning, abusive, callous and cold than men are. You don't need a study to tell you that, just look around you.
Actually if you look at the research most cases of child abuses come down to the parents having poor empathy.
An empathetic person is usually a natural parent which is why women generally score significantly higher than men on empathy scores.
This is where you and I differ, I wasn't talking about the extreme cases, I was referring to the majority of child rearing principles that are considered acceptable by the mainstream I consider abuse, hitting, screaming, constant put downs and criticism, blackmailing, controlling, brainwashing etc. The problem is, when so many people perform abusive behaviour it becomes normalised. And I don't know where you got that nonsense about women scoring higher in empathy, you must be reading feminist weekly too much. So, not only are you a libtard, but you're a white knight spreading feminist propaganda all over the place. Anyone with a hint of critical analysis can tell that women are far more ruthless, cunning, abusive, callous and cold than men are. You don't need a study to tell you that, just look around you.Women are manipulative and cunning, but its through complete ignorance of there own actions, women put up emotional blinders by being unable to think logically understand the world around them.
Waiting for the elliot rodger movie myselfI think hes more autistic than psychopathic ironically. But youll never get anyone to admit to that.
Actually ppaths are shit poor with children, so its actually a huge disadvantage. Not to mention a society of psychopaths would be stuck in the stone ages.
People who claim they're psychopaths actually just dicks
06-05-14
INDIVIDUALS who score highly in ‘psychopath tests’ are really just unpleasant, it has emerged.
Being a ‘psychopath’ has become a badge of honour for jumped-up pipsqueaks who think they’re business tycoons.
However experts have confirmed that the overlap between psychopath and dickhead traits means they are more likely to be in the latter category.
Psychologist Emma Bradford said: “Idiots want to think they have some super-sexy killer instinct that makes them the same as Christian Bale in American Psycho.
“But if you look at the questions from tawdry online tests, they’re all things like ‘Do you cancel an appointment if something better comes along?’ which could be translated as ‘are you a rude bastard?’.”
Take the Daily Mash ‘Psychopath Or Arsehole?’ test
1. Do you do loads of murders? Yes/no.
2. Do you push into queues at the Post Office? Yes/no.
Answer ‘yes’ to just question 1 – you are a psychopath
Answer ‘yes’ to just question 2 – you are an arsehole
Answer yes to both – you are an arseholepath
The Daily Mash summed up this new gay "are you a psychopath" fad nicely:I really dont get the point of this at all.
http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/society/people-who-claim-theyre-psychopaths-actually-just-dicks-2014050686263 (http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/society/people-who-claim-theyre-psychopaths-actually-just-dicks-2014050686263)
I dont know where your getting on with this abuse shit, in the civilized world its quite rare, unless the parents have mental health problems of there own which is usually the reality.See, you prove my point exactly, abuse in child rearing is so common you are blind to it, it has become normalised too you. When they survey the population, the majority support corporal punishment in regards to children. Almost everyone ignores a mother dragging a kid around the supermarket by an arm and screaming and yelling at the child. Child abuse is invisible, it is not even considered abuse as you say, you think it is rare, when in fact it is a daily occurrence in most households on a daily basis. The reason you don't hear about it is the victim (children) have no social, political or economic power nor the means to express their victimisation. You only hear about it much later when by then most people have rationalized and justified the abuse and paradoxically carry on the same cycle with their own children.
See, you prove my point exactly, abuse in child rearing is so common you are blind to it, it has become normalised too you. When they survey the population, the majority support corporal punishment, the hitting of children. Almost everyone ignores a mother dragging a kid around the supermarket by an arm and screaming and yelling at the child. Child abuse is invisible, it is not even considered abuse as you say, you think it is rare, when in fact it is a daily occurrence in most households on a daily basis. The reason you don't hear about it is the victim (children) have no social, political or economic power nor the means to express their victimisation. You only hear about it much later when by then most people have rationalized and justified the abuse and paradoxically carry on the same cycle with their own children.I think were talking about the difference in degrees.
To you, children's victimization only becomes a problem when it is extreme, ignoring that the reason their are extreme cases is because we tolerate a lot of low grade abuse. And the everyday, socially accepted forms of child abuse is a greater problem to society as it is so prevalent and affects so many people, effectively creating a dysfunctional society of dysfunctional people. With one of the greatest dysfunctions being that they think they are functional when they are not. (Like the ignoring of childhood abuse as acceptable, when clearly it is dysfunctional).
And your suggestion women are more empathetic is spouting feminist propaganda. And you are wrong about women being good with children, as the primary caregivers they do a terrible job and their are many reasons to associate their poor child rearing skills with the level of dysfunction in any given society. Many people think they are things they are not, don't worry, sooner or later you will work it out, but you are most definitely a feminist.
Lol if you think Im a feminist your a fucking idiot. Women are good with children and fucking useless at everything else.
And your suggestion women are more empathetic is spouting feminist propaganda. And you are wrong about women being good with children, as the primary caregivers they do a terrible job and their are many reasons to associate their poor child rearing skills with the level of dysfunction in any given society. Many people think they are things they are not, don't worry, sooner or later you will work it out, but you are most definitely a feminist.What the fuck are you talking about.
I think this may be true for some, but look at these third world shitholes, where dysfunctional people breed like rabbits, many often seriously abused as children. I think the majority of breeders are the dysfunctional and not the other way around.
The shittyness of ppath parents means that they have a greatly reduced chance of passing on their genes. As they have no more interesting in parenting, than regular people have in raising a monkey.
I really dont get the point of this at all.
If the think internet quizzes can possibly mean anything in psychology your a fucking idiot.
I don't "the think" anything about internet quizzes, it was an amusing article about an internet fad. I'm the idiot? I'm not the one trying to have an indepth discussion relating to psychology on a bodybuilding message board full of trolls, you pretentious twat.This part made me laugh out loud. Honestly I do go on many other boards, but only getbig can cut through politeness and politics to talk about this kind of shhit,
What the fuck are you talking about.Feminist don't spout equality at all, what planet are you living on. We already had a word for equality, it's called egalitarian. Feminist spout that they should be entitled and privileged BECAUSE THEY OWN A PUSSY and that it must be done at the expense of the EVIL gender. MEN.
Femisnist spout the nonsense that men are equal with women. The clean slate theory is at the heart of most liberals and feminist viewpoints.
The view that people are born the way they are is a very conservative viewpoint. I believe people are born evil, and I believe a healthy womens neurology is only really fit for child rearing.
Every see a woman right a descent fucking song, memorize sport stats, take up a hobby that isnt based around being social or comfortable.
Im starting to think you dont know what empathy actually means in the modern neurological context.
I think the term "Troll" gets a bad rap. It used to refer to someone who deliberately misrepresented themselves and baited someone fishing for an extreme reaction. Now it just means, I don't like that guy's worldview and what he is saying so I think he is a troll.I think the difference is one who hijacks a discussion for attention, versus one who creates discussion by being controversial.
I think the difference is one who hijacks a discussion for attention, versus one who creates discussion by being controversial.That's a fair point. I don't want to be controversial, but is seems just by possessing common sense these days you are labelled controversial.
That's a fair point. I don't want to be controversial, but is seems just by possessing common sense these days you are labelled controversial.I dont think you understand what empathy means.
Where I took issue with you was when you casually expressed that women more more empathetic as if it was true. This is clearly feminist propaganda based on MISANDRY. You only need to look around and realise that men go to war, sacrifice their lives, perform dangerous jobs, practise chivalry, study how to eradicate disease and vaccines etc etc all so women and children don't need to suffer. And women have the cheek to suggest they are more empathetic. Why do men do this, 1) because it is in their Nature to protect, to express their empathy and 2), because they know women won't. Women will RARELY put anybody first before themselves, women are selfish creatures, deeply narcissistic, and their narcissism extends to the point of believing they are superior to men, more empathetic, better parents etc etc, when evidence clearly points the other way.
Waiting for the elliot rodger movie myselfAfter watching a bunch of his videos I think its obvious hes far more autistic than anything else.
I dont think you understand what empathy means.Psychopaths are unable to grieve the death of a loved one!
It doesnt simply mean good.
Its a two part process.
Seeing emotions in others, and reacting to the emotions of others.
People like myself, are blind to most subtle expressions of emotion, however I actually have stronger reactions to the pain and suffering of others once Im aware it exists.
PPaths, are fully aware of the emotions of others, however they cant share emotions. A typical sign of Psychopath is the inability to grieve the death of a loved one. Its called emotional poverty they simply cannot connect emotions to other people.
Women react significantly higher on both counts, they perceive emotions and react to them much more strongly.
This doesnt make them good people however as they are unable to think logically, and deal with situations in a reactionary matter.
These people are lizards they have no nerlogical empathy, they are soulist and they are everywhere.
more than a few getbiggers fall under this as well.
A large portion of the worlds most successful people are psychopaths
These people are lizards they have no nerlogical empathy, they are soulist and they are everywhere.
more than a few getbiggers fall under this as well.
Experimentally it was shown that women were more willing to inflict pain upon others. Something like twice more likely than men...
Also most people will follow orders of an authority figure even if it undermines their morals. See Milgram experiment. (again women proven to be more obedient)
All this said would be nice to see some more analysis and discussion about institutional factors! 8)
They are not everywhere you will most likely never meet a bona fide psychopath in your life, closest you'll get is if you're in military or watching certain politicians or world leaders on TV. Sociopaths are everywhere and not a big deal they just leech off people and ruin friendships while not giving a fuck.Legal profession attracts them, I have a civil case running currently and my Barrister I believe is a psychopath. Either that or he is just a professional arsehole. Rudest, most arrogant, uncaring man I have ever met. Would pimp out your grandmother and laugh about it. I can't stand the man, I get chills when I am around him, always combative, argumentative and a complete drain. You come away from a meeting with him and feel sick in the stomach. I really do despise the man.
The Daily Mash summed up this new gay "are you a psychopath" fad nicely:
http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/society/people-who-claim-theyre-psychopaths-actually-just-dicks-2014050686263 (http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/society/people-who-claim-theyre-psychopaths-actually-just-dicks-2014050686263)
what dosages?Frank is getting excited! lol
They are not everywhere you will most likely never meet a bona fide psychopath in your life, closest you'll get is if you're in military or watching certain politicians or world leaders on TV. Sociopaths are everywhere and not a big deal they just leech off people and ruin friendships while not giving a fuck.Call em whatever, my bet is these people are responsible for alot of hit and runs, opportunistic rapes, etc etc.
Legal profession attracts them, I have a civil case running currently and my Barrister I believe is a psychopath. Either that or he is just a professional arsehole. Rudest, most arrogant, uncaring man I have ever met. Would pimp out your grandmother and laugh about it. I can't stand the man, I get chills when I am around him, always combative, argumentative and a complete drain. You come away from a meeting with him and feel sick in the stomach. I really do despise the man.
I always wanted to see a psych experiment that demonstrated bias on the part of those who build tests and interpret the results. Fwiw.
Things like Milgram are slanted to shock. They're not worthless but the fact that these types of experiments are presented and accepted as some great insight into human behavior says more about the endeavour of psychology than it does about people imo.
Maybe I just have a pathological need to be a contrary asshole but I get the sense with these sorts of things that they're measuring jelly in a container they constructed and then declaring triumphantly that the jelly's dimensions have been uncovered. By 'science.'
Legal profession attracts them, I have a civil case running currently and my Barrister I believe is a psychopath. Either that or he is just a professional arsehole. Rudest, most arrogant, uncaring man I have ever met. Would pimp out your grandmother and laugh about it. I can't stand the man, I get chills when I am around him, always combative, argumentative and a complete drain. You come away from a meeting with him and feel sick in the stomach. I really do despise the man.
Are you fucking kidding, the average so called NORMAL person is terrible with kids. Since the beginning of time our child rearing principles have been disgusting, nothing but constant beating, raping, exploitation, brainwashing etc etc. of our children. The majority of adults still believe it is OK to hit children but not another adult, these are the NORMAL people. And we already live in a society with little empathy. Society is burdened with pathetic, liberal minded people like yourself who constantly defend those not suited to survival in a modern world. There is no place in a hostile, raw environment like our modern world for those that aren't equipped to deal with it. People need to become LESS empathetic, not MORE. You have to be cruel to be kind, something libtards don't understand.
Psychopaths are unable to grieve the death of a loved one!
Yet they felt love. (It's possible they didn't grieve because the dead person wasn't a loved one afterall) I always considered grief for someone's passing a very selfish act. Why is the individual upset, they didn't die,someone else did. Are they upset because they no longer receive benefit from the relationship? Surely they can't be upset for the dead person, they can't feel anything,they are dead. So, grieving for someone passed is a selfish act, the grief ois all about the individuals loss,he feels sad for himself. And surely the grief stricken knows we all die, so why be sad over something inevitable, beyond their control, unless you had selfish motives, losing the benefit you derived from that relationship. So grief over someone passing is nothing more than self pity and hardly an indication of an emotionally healthy individual. If anything it highlights the deep selfishness of human nature.
And Women reacting significantly higher to emotions in others doesn't lead to the conclusion they feel more empathy. Because of the fact women are more self interested (narcissistic) they just may well be the case that women are just more fearful of what they see befalling others; perhaps because what befalls others might well befall themselves. In other words, their greater emotional responses might simply represent a greater concern for themselves and the fact women are generally more fearful.
You just keep rehashing well worn feminist propaganda that is only believed by white knights (men who hate their dicks and would prefer to be a woman) or feminazis. If you analyze it critically you all see it's about demonising MEN, the evil gender. Sadly, you are seeing the issue through a feminist lens and that will hinder your ability to be objective and so miss the ways in which men try to alleviate suffering indicating an empathetic worldview. I can't blame you though, as the West is predominantly feminist with more and more men being raised in such a manner and not even aware of their own self hatred and worship of the feminine.
after reading this thread, it seems that you have many traits aligned with a ppath. its in your writings in many ways. much of your debate is going off on tangents about other issues not related to the original discussion, and many of your examples are just purely speculation..and pretty bad ones at that. (like the children examples).Oh, boy. Did you just invite a rambling, sociopathic reply, or what? ;D
you seem to have a desire to prove the other wrong- for intellectual superiority or something, when in fact he has a much tighter, rational and succinct position with no evidence of outlandish claims.
in addition some of your statements which are presented as fact, are just opinion, and not supported by fact. and finally, rather than debate, you outright attack the poster.
These people are lizards they have no nerlogical empathy, they are soulist and they are everywhere.
more than a few getbiggers fall under this as well.
Just because someone has no empathy and is emotionally empty doesn't mean he/her are bad or evil. They can still choose to pretend to be human and live a life of condescending righteousness.Politicians and Wall Streeters assemble!
Just because someone has no empathy and is emotionally empty doesn't mean he/her are bad or evil. They can still choose to pretend to be human and live a life of righteousness.They can but usually only by accident. The being righteous usually fails because they lack the internal control. Theyre at best highly hypocritical which is a trait you often see in the church.
after reading this thread, it seems that you have many traits aligned with a ppath. its in your writings in many ways. much of your debate is going off on tangents about other issues not related to the original discussion, and many of your examples are just purely speculation..and pretty bad ones at that. (like the children examples).
you seem to have a desire to prove the other wrong- for intellectual superiority or something, when in fact he has a much tighter, rational and succinct position with no evidence of outlandish claims.
in addition some of your statements which are presented as fact, are just opinion, and not supported by fact. and finally, rather than debate, you outright attack the poster.
Just because someone has no empathy and is emotionally empty doesn't mean he/her are bad or evil. They can still choose to pretend to be human and live a life of righteousness.