Bum, if I recall correctly, you've insisted that homosexuality is a lifestyle choice. If so, it follows logically that there would be ways to condition or de-condition that choice.
So what are the rolling eyes for?
Among other reasons:
1. I find it amusing that people who probably don't have a son (a straight one anyway) or kids at all criticize a child rearing expert.
2. I read the entire article and it is a great read. Makes sense to me.
3. I've read Dr. Dobson's books and I think he is a wonderful psychologist.
4. I particularly like this expert, which is a real eye opener IMO:
What do we know about this disorder? Well first, it is a disorder, despite the denials of the American Psychiatric Association. Great political pressure was exerted on this professional organization by gays and lesbians (some of whom are psychiatrists) to declare homosexuality to be "normal." The debate went on for years. Finally, a decision was made in 1973 to remove this condition from their Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM). It was made not on the basis of science, but was strongly influenced by a poll of APA members, which was initiated and financed by the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force. The vote was 5,834 to 3,810.2. The American Psychological Association soon followed suit.3 Today, psychologists or psychiatrists who disagree with this politically correct interpretation, or even those who try to help homosexuals change, are subjected to continual harassment and accusations of malpractice.So in 1973 3,810 members of the American Psychiatric Association believed homosexuality was a disorder? As they say in Hawaii, "I nevah know." Very interesting.
In summary:
