Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Roger Bacon on April 05, 2014, 06:39:56 PM

Title: Benghazi
Post by: Roger Bacon on April 05, 2014, 06:39:56 PM
New testimony from former CIA deputy director Michael Morell insinuates he was protecting Hillary and Obama? ???

The real coverup though, is what was going on at that embassy? ???

Why cant anyone track down some of these attackers and interrogate them? Shouldn't be to hard to find them?


Sorry about all the question marks... lol
Title: Re: Benghazi
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 07, 2014, 05:43:27 AM
gun running to terrorists
Title: Re: Benghazi
Post by: dario73 on April 07, 2014, 05:59:32 AM
Oh, but the president and his idiots claimed that there wasn't a scandal. Not a smidgen of corruption. When he says it's over, it means it should be over. ::)
Title: Re: Benghazi
Post by: 240 is Back on April 07, 2014, 08:52:23 AM
gun running to terrorists

that's quite an accusation right there.  I think Glen Beck said the same thing.

That's just a conspiracy theory, however. 
Title: Re: Benghazi
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 07, 2014, 08:55:50 AM
that's quite an accusation right there.  I think Glen Beck said the same thing.

That's just a conspiracy theory, however. 

As opposed to what?  a Fake ID ring where they create fake Hawaiian BC and records?
Title: Re: Benghazi
Post by: 240 is Back on April 07, 2014, 08:59:22 AM
As opposed to what?  a Fake ID ring where they create fake Hawaiian BC and records?

Also a conspiracy theory. 

Really, a CT is anything that runs contrary to the official govt story.  And officially, Benghazi wasn't running guns or keeping prisoners there.  The embassy was peacefully minding their own biz when hundreds of crazy bad guys attacked them for no reason at all, aside from the fact they hate our freedoms.

By the rules of getbig, this should be on the conspiracy board.   Your claims are theories of some grand conspiracy.  And we know why they're always false - Nobody could keep quiet about it, our govt isn't that smart, we just wouldn't do that, etc etc. 
Title: Re: Benghazi
Post by: Straw Man on April 07, 2014, 01:39:34 PM
New testimony from former CIA deputy director Michael Morell insinuates he was protecting Hillary and Obama? ???

The real coverup though, is what was going on at that embassy? ???

Why cant anyone track down some of these attackers and interrogate them? Shouldn't be to hard to find them?


Sorry about all the question marks... lol

great post as usual

no links, or even any quotes
Title: Re: Benghazi
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 07, 2014, 03:47:11 PM
great post as usual

no links, or even any quotes


So why did O-T W I N K try to cover it up?
Title: Re: Benghazi
Post by: Straw Man on April 07, 2014, 04:36:41 PM
So why did O-T W I N K try to cover it up?

feel free to post some legitimate proof of any cover up (hint - if you're just going tonpost your usual horse shit then don't waste your time)
Title: Re: Benghazi
Post by: 240 is Back on April 07, 2014, 05:40:18 PM
So why did O-T W I N K try to cover it up?
'
weak logic here.  I could argue he didn't want an international incident with hundreds of people shot up, less than 2 months before election day.  Romney would have been able to rub in "see, al-Q is still alive", which while a totally asinine argument, would have worked on the 90 IQ dog whistle folks.

Now, if there was any truth to the claims of "secret prison that the bad guys were willing to engage in a 7 hour gun battle to rescue", thne by golly, show us, 33, or you sound like Glen beck - wild accusations with zero proof.  Or, if you feel they were running guns, making them a sexy target for bad guys that like guns, show us evidence.

This is getbig, man.  if youre gonna make a claim, link something.
Title: Re: Benghazi
Post by: blacken700 on April 07, 2014, 05:49:21 PM
Benghazi.  Benghazi Benghazi