We don't pass laws in order to minimize problems (even death) in "ANY WAY". We weigh the benefit and the cost.
If we forced men to stop fucking each other in the ass less people would get AIDS. That would lessen the mortality rate of gay men. Should we do that?
so we don't have seat belt laws to minimize death and injury
how about helmet laws for people driving motorcyles
Of course we have drunk driving laws but I don't really see the point because if you really want to drive drunk you're going to find a way. Whats the point
If the law can't stop something 100% and all of the time then the law is worthless
That's why Republican never bother with laws to try to limit abortion. They always make the argument that it's pointless because if you really want to get an abortion you're going to find way.
I cou