Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Sherief Shalaby on November 14, 2012, 01:58:08 AM
-
put him beside nasser :o ;D
seriously nasser in 96 carried huge amounts of hard muscles,.. may be the biggest in the history of the sport, even bigger than markus in 2002 and of course much better in shape.. also bigger than ronnie in 2003 who was at nearly 300 pounds not as dry and hard as nasser in 96..
-
flat from the side hahahhahhahhaaaa...
-
from the front it was not even close between him and the others..
-
8)
-
and from the back he held his own against 2 of the best backs in the history of the sport..
-
uncrowned mr. o, no doubt
-
uncrowned mr. o, no doubt
X2222222222222
-
nasser 96 was peak nasser for sure
-
Thing is Nasser and Dillet weighed roughly the same. And Dillet had a better shape-more aesthetically balanced. Nasser just looked like a big mound of muscle.
Also, compared to a 96 Ronnie yes he was bigger---but with the back shots, you can see that Nasser's detail stopped at mid back---and wasn't as deep as Dorian's or Ronnie's.
Also, that video has a different contrast than real life. Due to this, it makes any detail stand out and look more impressive than it is. When the reality is, the detail is not as impressive. It's an illusion.
-
Thing is Nasser and Dillet weighed roughly the same. And Dillet had a better shape-more aesthetically balanced. Nasser just looked like a big mound of muscle.
Also, compared to a 96 Ronnie yes he was bigger---but with the back shots, you can see that Nasser's detail stopped at mid back---and wasn't as deep as Dorian's or Ronnie's.
Also, that video has a different contrast than real life. Due to this, it makes any detail stand out and look more impressive than it is. When the reality is, the detail is not as impressive. It's an illusion.
lol at saying dillet had a better shape than nasser..
and i didn't say his back was better here than dorian or ronnie,.. i said he held his own against the 2 best backs ever..
-
Anyone in those pics would run away with the Olympia crown right now...not hating on Phil or Kai, but those guys looked a million times better back then.
-
Nasser el Sonbaty at his BEST - German GP 1996.
Amazing bodybuilder.
-
i saw nasser back in 96 guest posing in jersey n he was prolly the most massive bodybuilder i ever seen. he was offseason weighing about 320 or so
-
To the OP: Does Nasser shave his balls, or do you prefer to suck on them when hairy?
-
lol at saying dillet had a better shape than nasser..
and i didn't say his back was better here than dorian or ronnie,.. i said he held his own against the 2 best backs ever..
Everybody knows that Dillet had a better shape than Nasser. Small waist, rounder, fuller muscles.
Nasser was just a big dude, even Milos commented on him, saying that bodybuilding was about the biggest, just weigh the person and the biggest slab of meat would win. But, it ain't all about that.
Nasser was good, but his best wasn't enough to win at Dorian's or Ronnie's best...not even Flex's best.
And that is telling.
-
why not post the video, instead of carefully selected pics, and let us see for ourselves. ;)
-
Nasser does look huge, freaky huge
Dillet looks better except from the back
Nassers back looks better there, but not close to Yates or prime Ronnie
-
Now that's big.
Monstah.
-
Everybody knows that Dillet had a better shape than Nasser. Small waist, rounder, fuller muscles.
Nasser was just a big dude, even Milos commented on him, saying that bodybuilding was about the biggest, just weigh the person and the biggest slab of meat would win. But, it ain't all about that.
Nasser was good, but his best wasn't enough to win at Dorian's or Ronnie's best...not even Flex's best.
And that is telling.
as you yourself said in your previous post nasser and paul were the same weight and according to you now everybody knows that paul had a better shape rounder bla bla bla... so why do you think nasser was always beating him???.. in all fairness at their very best i see nasser better in all poses..
-
why not post the video, instead of carefully selected pics, and let us see for ourselves. ;)
i really didnt do any selection and you can post any pic. you want from the GP 96.. nasser was really phenomenal.. as for the videos share whatever you want.. i will try to find that one of him with ronnie and levrone..
-
here is the video gronk..
-
paul dillet is with no doubt at all the guy who put on the most muscle at this leanness level on a human frame ever.
dillet is a tiny tiny boned man,tiny waist nasser is blocky.
dillet is a true monstrosity
had some "flaws", but definitely deserved mr olympia title more than some yates with teared of arm muscles.
to be fair the biggest i saw dillett was in 1994 and he was in a good condition.. in 96 he presented one of his best shapes but i think was a little smaller than in 94.. but nasser in 96 was CLEARLY bigger and thicker than paul from all angles and in all parts.. as for muscles shape and proportions between different parts i really see no comparison.. dillet had monstrous shoulders and arms and very good legs and calves but his torso was not the same level as his limbs.. it was not thick or wide enough to go with them..
-
gronk has vanished after the video lol..
-
and here we are talking about one of dillett's best but when he was not at his best like at the AC 97 he looked very flat and small beside nasser although nasser here was not as big as in 96..
-
gronk has vanished after the video lol..
The video didn't show him against yates or nasser, just Levrone and early coleman.
-
The video didn't show him against yates or nasser, just Levrone and early coleman.
against yates or who??.. ::)
also didnt you see before levrone a better bb than nasser??..
-
same tour the english round..
-
against yates or who??.. ::)
also didnt you see before levrone a better bb than nasser??..
Overall, no doubt. One contest doesn't make a career.
Nasser looked great there, best he's ever looked. That is a weird video though, and that's probably the only contest I've ever seen where the lighting makes the white guys look better than the black guys
-
Overall, no doubt. One contest doesn't make a career.
Nasser looked great there, best he's ever looked. That is a weird video though, and that's probably the only contest I've ever seen where the lighting makes the white guys look better than the black guys
so firstly i was posting selected pics and no videos and now the videos are weird ::).. what is your next excuse gronk??..
no one contest can make a great career but anyway this has nothing to do with nasser who was always on at his best for more than 5 years..
-
:)
-
so firstly i was posting selected pics and no videos and now the videos are weird ::).. what is your next excuse gronk??..
no one contest can make a great career but anyway this has nothing to do with nasser who was always on at his best for more than 5 years..
I just said he looks great, his best ever.
But that is a weird video, the contrast and aspect is all jacked up.
relax tiny
-
and from the back he held his own against 2 of the best backs in the history of the sport..
No he doesn't
-
No he doesn't5
Sherief has been pushing that bullshit for 5 years, trying to get some traction.
-
as you yourself said in your previous post nasser and paul were the same weight and according to you now everybody knows that paul had a better shape rounder bla bla bla... so why do you think nasser was always beating him???.. in all fairness at their very best i see nasser better in all poses..
Because Paul couldn't pose worth shit and had a shitty back.
Paul had a better structure, and shape...Hell, he had a better shape than Dorian, but Dorian blew him away in terms of back detail, conditioning, etc.
Shape and structure are only part of the equation, only Flex or Cormier could really get away with being a tad soft...and really, it was Flex out of the two whose shape carried him to more wins.
Dillet at his best vs Nasser at his best would be a good comparison. It could go either way.
-
Because Paul couldn't pose worth shit and had a shitty back.
Paul had a better structure, and shape...Hell, he had a better shape than Dorian, but Dorian blew him away in terms of back detail, conditioning, etc.
Shape and structure are only part of the equation, only Flex or Cormier could really get away with being a tad soft...and really, it was Flex out of the two whose shape carried him to more wins.
Dillet at his best vs Nasser at his best would be a good comparison. It could go either way.
I think Nasser beats him, best to best.
Dillet was a freak of nature, probably the most impressive specimen ever, just looking at him standing there.
But he never came in in the type of conditon needed to win shows, Nasser was always in shape.
and his flaws were atrocious...he looked like a fucking retard onstage and his back was worse than nassers
-
just like branch is massive...nasser was too.
both a steaming pile of turd.
lumps of muscle stacked on top of itself.
there were and have been, since, better BODYBUILDERS.
the key to both not winning is a massive midsection...
-
Did someone use a microwave to take these pictures? Great picture quality.
-
just like branch is massive...nasser was too.
both a steaming pile of turd.
lumps of muscle stacked on top of itself.
there were and have been, since, better BODYBUILDERS.
the key to both not winning is a massive midsection...
does anyone care what this guy says ???
-
I think Nasser beats him, best to best.
Dillet was a freak of nature, probably the most impressive specimen ever, just looking at him standing there.
But he never came in in the type of conditon needed to win shows, Nasser was always in shape.
and his flaws were atrocious...he looked like a fucking retard onstage and his back was worse than nassers
I'd say Nasser USUALLY came in shape. Later in his career it was a crapshoot.
-
I'd say Nasser USUALLY came in shape. Later in his career it was a crapshoot.
I'm talking about his prime years. Nasser from 98 on completely fell apart, palumboism and synthol are a bad combination ;D
-
I'm talking about his prime years. Nasser from 98 on completely fell apart, palumboism and synthol are a bad combination ;D
Ah, roger that.
-
what i mean is this.
if they both died and some butcher would peel their muscles off the bones, muscle for muscle, thered be more meat in size and weight from dillets corpse.
nasser would be all stomach weight.
nasser was bigger in all parts even arms and shoulders which were paul's best and biggest parts.. check the pic. well..
as for the butcher thing i think nasser would taste better ;D
-
nasser was bigger in all parts even arms and shoulders which were paul's best and biggest parts.. check the pic. well..
as for the butcher thing i think nasser would taste better ;D
No he wasn't, that's one pic, Dillet had bigger arms and shoulders than Nasser, Nasser had to abuse SEO to get his arms over 19 inches.
-
Because Paul couldn't pose worth shit and had a shitty back.
Paul had a better structure, and shape...Hell, he had a better shape than Dorian, but Dorian blew him away in terms of back detail, conditioning, etc.
Shape and structure are only part of the equation, only Flex or Cormier could really get away with being a tad soft...and really, it was Flex out of the two whose shape carried him to more wins.
Dillet at his best vs Nasser at his best would be a good comparison. It could go either way.
no because it was always going to nasser's way 8).. in 96 both were at their best or very close and nasser beat him 7 times, 6 if you dont want to count the olympia..
-
why did nasser get dq'd anyway?
so yates could win again?
-
and from the back he held his own against 2 of the best backs in the history of the sport..
No he's not lol
-
why did nasser get dq'd anyway?
so yates could win again?
because he failed a diuretic test.. the same test jay cutler failed in 2001 but was not dq'd :-\
this is why team nasser doesnt accept this disqualification 8) ;D
-
No he's not lol
in the RLS he did.. actually imo he beat ronnie in this pose in 96.. check the comparison video again..
-
Nasser 95-98 was an amazing BB, one of the greatest ever
never has there been such a combination of massive size, tiny waist, ripped conditioning and hardness, shape and symmetry.
Nasser was not blocky, he had an incredible V taper and aesthetic shape.
Nasser's back in those years was as thick and wide as Yates but just not as dry hence looked slightly less detailed.
It is erroneous to say nasser had a weak back, Paul Dillet had a weak back
-
Nasser 95-98 was an amazing BB, one of the greatest ever
never has there been such a combination of massive size, tiny waist, ripped conditioning and hardness, shape and symmetry.
Nasser was not blocky, he had an incredible V taper and aesthetic shape.
Nasser's back in those years was as thick and wide as Yates but just not as dry hence looked slightly less detailed.
It is erroneous to say nasser had a weak back, Paul Dillet had a weak back
Nasser admitted he had a weak back , it's blatantly obvious to anyone who doesn't purchase his underwear. His back sucked
Great bodybuilder from the front though
-
Cartoon character. That's a true freak.
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=108131.0;attach=129286;image)
-
because he failed a diuretic test.. the same test jay cutler failed in 2001 but was not dq'd :-\
this is why team nasser doesnt accept this disqualification 8) ;D
The difference being Jay fought it and had an angle to work with , Nasser didn't.
Even if you don't accept it he was still behind Yates and Ray 8)
-
in the RLS he did.. actually imo he beat ronnie in this pose in 96.. check the comparison video again..
Ronnie even in 96 was awesome , he didn't beat Ronnie in any back pose nevermind held his own with Dorian
You can make a case from the front in certain poses , but ain't happening from the back
-
Nasser admitted he had a weak back , it's blatantly obvious to anyone who doesn't purchase his underwear. His back sucked
Great bodybuilder from the front though
LOL, so true ....but here we go again with team Nasser trying to get one fucking person to agree that Nasser's back "wasn't that bad" ;D
-
why did nasser get dq'd anyway?
so yates could win again?
There was no actual diuretics testing in the 96 O
Matarazzo snitched to De milia that Nasser had used some diuretic. De milia wanted to make an example out of someone after the death of Munzer to show the public the IFBB was "testing". Unfortunately because of Snitch Matarazzo .Nasser was the victim.
repeat, there was NO testing for any drugs @ teh 96 O
Levrone alludes to the whole situation in Nasser on the Way Part 7- he states "Nasser,you still have the 3rd place trophy! i would have done excatly the same thing as you if they had done that to me, i would have kept the trophy!"
-
Nasser did not have a great v taper. His back was terrible and 3 inches of his upper arm size was oil.
-
Nasser 95-98 was an amazing BB, one of the greatest ever
never has there been such a combination of massive size, tiny waist, ripped conditioning and hardness, shape and symmetry.
Nasser was not blocky, he had an incredible V taper and aesthetic shape.
Nasser's back in those years was as thick and wide as Yates but just not as dry hence looked slightly less detailed.
It is erroneous to say nasser had a weak back, Paul Dillet had a weak back
x2!
-
There was no actual diuretics testing in the 96 O
Matarazzo snitched to De milia that Nasser had used some diuretic. De milia wanted to make an example out of someone after the death of Munzer to show the public the IFBB was "testing". Unfortunately because of Snitch Matarazzo .Nasser was the victim.
repeat, there was NO testing for any drugs @ teh 96 O
Levrone alludes to the whole situation in Nasser on the Way Part 7- he states "Nasser,you still have the 3rd place trophy! i would have done excatly the same thing as you if they had done waht they did that to me, i would have kept the trophy!"
Prove there was no test , don't type there was no test.
-
LOL, so true ....but here we go again with team Nasser trying to get one fucking person to agree that Nasser's back "wasn't that bad" ;D
Absurd as defending Ronnies calves or Dorians torn up arm.
-
Absurd as defending Ronnies calves or Dorians torn up arm.
Or Kevin's ever changing luggage size.
Or Jay's jaw.
-
Absurd as defending Ronnies calves or Dorians torn up arm.
Well in both cases these flaws were less of a liability than having one of the biggest and complex muscle groups being missing in action
They say ' Hey his back is wide it's just not as detailed ' when in reality it's lacking some much more
Nasser was an outstanding bodybuilder from the front , he will get credit for that. Guy was a monster and competing near 300 in contest condition before anyone
-
Ronnie even in 96 was awesome , he didn't beat Ronnie in any back pose nevermind held his own with Dorian
You can make a case from the front in certain poses , but ain't happening from the back
yes ronnie was very good in 96 but his back at this point was still not one of the best ever.. not only nasser but also kevin was better than ronnie in the RLS.. check the comparison again..
-
nasser was good... but not Mr. O
-
put him beside nasser :o ;D
seriously nasser in 96 carried huge amounts of hard muscles,.. may be the biggest in the history of the sport, even bigger than markus in 2002 and of course much better in shape.. also bigger than ronnie in 2003 who was at nearly 300 pounds not as dry and hard as nasser in 96..
You're missing the whole point as well , Nasser made Yates and Ray look small but still consistently lost to them. congrats he was bigger lol here's a bronze medal for your effort
-
Well in both cases these flaws were less of a liability than having one of the biggest and complex muscle groups being missing in action
They say ' Hey his back is wide it's just not as detailed ' when in reality it's lacking some much more
Nasser was an outstanding bodybuilder from the front , he will get credit for that. Guy was a monster and competing near 300 in contest condition before anyone
but this contradicts your previous claim that his built was not made to compete at over 260 pounds hahaha..
typical ND,.. changing his opinions according to each thread..
-
yes ronnie was very good in 96 but his back at this point was still not one of the best ever.. not only nasser but also kevin was better than ronnie in the RLS.. check the comparison again..
Ronnie's back 1996 infinitely better than Nasser , Nasser does NOT hold his own with this he just doesn't
-
prove that anything written in Flex mag, which you accept as gospel truth, is true.
when you have met with BB's and people on the inside, in the industry, you know the truth
when you havent ,you are jsut another one of the ignorant blind sheep
-
but this contradicts your previous claim that his built was not made to compete at over 260 pounds hahaha..
typical ND,.. changing his opinions according to each thread..
Typical Sherief can NOT remember what I typed. I NEVER claimed he was not made to compete over 260 , just like I NEVER typed he didn't have the structure to be a mass monster. You can't back up these erroneous claims when I pushed you on proving I said them , nothings changed.
I've ALWAYS maintained Nasser carried his size very well , one of the few who could. I said PLAYING mass monster never worked out for him ultimately because his back suffered for it. He thought all I have to do is be bigger than Dorian and I would beat him , which shows where his mentality was and it's exactly why he lost to Yates and to a 205lb Shawn Ray
-
prove that anything written in Flex mag, which you accept as gospel truth, is true.
when you have met with BB's and people on the inside, in the industry, you know the truth
when you havent ,you are jsut another one of the ignorant blind sheep
Again , prove there was no test , don't type there was no test.
And my ' Cousins , Uncle's , sister's , aunt , told a dear friend of mine ' is NOT proof.
You have your excuses for Nasser's failures , keep clinging to them it's all you have.
-
in the RLS he did.. actually imo he beat ronnie in this pose in 96.. check the comparison video again..
why so agitated, tiny?
-
Ronnie's back 1996 infinitely better than Nasser , Nasser does NOT hold his own with this he just doesn't
sure ronnie's RDB was great but his RLS was not the same level at all.. nasser and levrone both beat him in this pose in this year..
-
sure ronnie's RDB was great but his RLS was not the same level at all.. nasser and levrone both beat him in this pose in this year..
We'll agree to disagree
-
We'll agree to disagree
plz take the RLS comparison shots from that video and post here.. if this is possible for you..
-
why so agitated, tiny?
go and wash your ass well then be ready to take this :-X
-
go and wash your ass well then be ready to take this :-X
are you going to destroy the sphinx like your mullah asked you to, tiny?
-
go and wash your ass well then be ready to take this :-X
-
I'm talking about his prime years. Nasser from 98 on completely fell apart, palumboism and synthol are a bad combination ;D
Agree on that. I believe he might have been the first pro to showcase 4 deltoids. I know Kevin English pulled that off a few times before his popular 202lbs showings. I guess they confused side delts with biceps.
MDN
-
There was no actual diuretics testing in the 96 O
Matarazzo snitched to De milia that Nasser had used some diuretic. De milia wanted to make an example out of someone after the death of Munzer to show the public the IFBB was "testing". Unfortunately because of Snitch Matarazzo .Nasser was the victim.
repeat, there was NO testing for any drugs @ teh 96 O
Levrone alludes to the whole situation in Nasser on the Way Part 7- he states "Nasser,you still have the 3rd place trophy! i would have done excatly the same thing as you if they had done that to me, i would have kept the trophy!"
are you implying that everyone onstage was using diuretics? :o wow i thought nasser was the only one. ::)
-
Sure Sheriff Salami, but you will never look like your idol Nascar El Somebody.
He is/was massive, you're not.
-
Sure Sheriff Salami, but you will never look like your idol Nascar El Somebody.
He is/was massive, you're not.
"Nascar El Somebody"..LOL
that and "Time Westcock" are the best getbig names ever
-
Sure Sheriff Salami, but you will never look like your idol Nascar El Somebody.
He is/was massive, you're not.
nasser is not my idol and i dont want to look like him or like any pro...
-
uncrowned mr. o, no doubt
Tier 1 for sure! :P
-
"Nascar El Somebody"..LOL
that and "Time Westcock" are the best getbig names ever
;D