This argument about "you had to be there". Don't really buy it.
I may be wrong, but if you know, how could it be sooo unbelievably different to view live from video?
I would rather think that several hundred of people's close review of a set of pictures, where you can dissect a pose in every detail (competitors only hold it for a couple of seconds live) from different angles and video over an extended period of time... would actually outweigh what 9 individuals think on one occasion when they're watching these guys compare for a couple of minutes. Who knows what they are looking at, probably at Phil's arms all the time.
Again I may be wrong about how they judge, but I don't think they review pictures between prejudging and night show.
Add to the point that they have an internal influence on each other as I heard the judges can talk with each other during the competition
. And apparently they even meet the competitors off stage and hang out (!) so how wouldn't that influence what they think and what they think they see? Especially in a competition as heavily subjective as bb.
It is common knowledge that accounts in police hearings shows that human memory is not very reliable - at all.
Pics and video can't be that off.