Author Topic: Bill Clinton Trashes Romney  (Read 7304 times)

Emmortal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5660
Re: Bill Clinton Trashes Romney
« Reply #25 on: October 16, 2012, 12:03:31 PM »
How are those polling numbers relevant to the economy?

Because Mitt Romney has persuaded a certain number of Americans his economic plan would benefit the middle class?

The math in Romney/Ryan economics have been analysed, and it doesn't work.



I don't think it takes magic underwear, but maybe a good liar?



Please outline the Obama economic plan that will radically change the situation we are in and start job growth in the next 12 months.

Also please detail the plan that Obama instituted over the last 4 years as POTUS that has brought economic prosperity to anyone except the rich.  Note: The 1% over the last 4 years have made more money than they have in the previous 4 years under Bush just as an FYI.  So please explain how this economic plan by Obama has helped the middle class, go into precise detail.

ChopperRider

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4767
  • Ugly, bald Shitso scalp for sale = $1
Re: Bill Clinton Trashes Romney
« Reply #26 on: October 16, 2012, 12:43:09 PM »
Unless you're a millionaire or billionaire, do you honestly think Mitt Romney is looking out for your best interest?


Do you think Bill, or any Clinton for that matter, are looking out for your best interest?  ::)

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Bill Clinton Trashes Romney
« Reply #27 on: October 16, 2012, 12:50:33 PM »
Do you think Bill, or any Clinton for that matter, are looking out for your best interest?  ::)
Lol, believing any politician at that level cares about you, epic gullibility.

Natural Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11164
Re: Bill Clinton Trashes Romney
« Reply #28 on: October 16, 2012, 12:51:04 PM »
And I see you still cannot tell 'what's coming'. Vague and cryptic as if anyone is impressed whilst you yourself have no idea. I'll venture a guess. An awakening from the shackles of religion. A war between Islam and the West.
lol you re a moron, i didnt repeat myself cause i mentioned it so many times...

Europe economy is collapsing, usa economy is right behind, then asia/china have nobody to buy their shit anymore. Tons of people lose their jobs but those who work in security, food and clothes production, there's an hyperinflation and bills arent worth the paper they re printed on anymore. Nanny states cant pay retired people and fire most of their employees.. Throw in some muslim headcases, racial/ethnic urban wars in most occidental countries between white and colored middle and lower classes, and you get the picture. And i m not going to develop the fact that tons of youths are formed for jobs that are useless in the west and will be even more useless during a global recession/depression.
Last fatherless , depressed spoiled raised by batshit crazy leftist feminist women generations are used to nanny states and having everything for nothing, playing video games all day long while getting welfare checks, but all this "lalaland"  is built on emptiness, vacuity, and the rich people who are cautious not to let know the morons from down below what's going to hit them are preparing their nests in secure places while the average joe is going to struggle more and more every single day to put food on the table. Lots of angry, frustrated, uneducated people who want to find a scapegoat as hunger grows...who all think they re tough guys cause they spent the last 40 years admiring action movies heroes...

It's has alrdy begun and it's going to last at least one or two decades, but who knows. Basically if you or your parents dont own shit, worse if you have debts, you re screwed.
Most realistic thinkers are now convinced we re going to face a global de-civilization process with no end in sight, basically returning to the middle age for a while before a new kind of society emerges, IF a new society successfuly emerges, but nothing is certain. Obviously, a lot of people wont be part of this new society. Let's not forget that nowadays most people in occident are faithless -but muslims- and would sell their mother to buy the last pair of shoes or videogame... A kind of free for all like we ve never seen before.

Religion actually gave a meaning to people lives, to the past, present, and future , explained their place in the big picture, nowadays people believe in "nothing" but their own self satisfaction and gratification thru material goods and a blind, animalistic race for more money that dont even make them any happier, and as a result dont even reproduce nor take care of their kids if they have any. And they re facing an ever growing number of fanatical islamists worldwide who catter to most of those in the west who are nostalgic of past socialo communist "experiences", andwho swore it is as "announced" their time to "conquer the world".

ChopperRider

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4767
  • Ugly, bald Shitso scalp for sale = $1
Re: Bill Clinton Trashes Romney
« Reply #29 on: October 16, 2012, 12:58:35 PM »
Lol, believing any politician at that level cares about you, epic gullibility.

Like Michelle Obama wouldn't trample over 10,000 starving, homeless kids just to get her man elected, let's be real here folks.
 ::)


Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59693
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Bill Clinton Trashes Romney
« Reply #31 on: October 16, 2012, 01:03:07 PM »
You resort to simple, non-substantive attacks in order to defend your position.

Sounds a lot like Mitt Romney or Paul Ryan.

The numbers don't lie, get the facts.





Mmmm, if you've been paying attention since that debate, Ryan's numbers were pretty much right on. Biden's lies in that debate already came back to bite him in his ass....even the lib media tore him up.





 

dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum
Re: Bill Clinton Trashes Romney
« Reply #32 on: October 16, 2012, 01:05:08 PM »
Well, he's hardly gonna trash Barack. Plus, he's using the spotlight to continue to burnish himself/his legacy. Shrewd. 

bike nut

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4239
  • Desperation is a stinky cologne
Re: Bill Clinton Trashes Romney
« Reply #33 on: October 16, 2012, 01:14:42 PM »
Well, he's hardly gonna trash Barack. Plus, he's using the spotlight to continue to burnish himself/his legacy. Shrewd. 

Trying to keep his ugly fucking wife out of jail for her fuckup at the Consulate in Libya....

dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum
Re: Bill Clinton Trashes Romney
« Reply #34 on: October 16, 2012, 01:15:53 PM »
Trying to keep his ugly fucking wife out of jail for her fuckup at the Consulate in Libya....
Out of nowhere it's bike nut with some crazy. Never know what you're gonna get, folks.    ;D

bike nut

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4239
  • Desperation is a stinky cologne
Re: Bill Clinton Trashes Romney
« Reply #35 on: October 16, 2012, 01:22:09 PM »
Out of nowhere it's bike nut with some crazy. Never know what you're gonna get, folks.    ;D

Shillary Covering for the Chocolate Failure....

http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/15/us/clinton-benghazi/index.html

I know you're slow, try to keep up....mmmkay?

dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum
Re: Bill Clinton Trashes Romney
« Reply #36 on: October 16, 2012, 01:25:11 PM »
Shillary Covering for the Chocolate Failure....

http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/15/us/clinton-benghazi/index.html

I know you're slow, try to keep up....mmmkay?
Not bad. She's falling on her sword. Pretty sure reduced security for US consulates, worldwide, was a Republican 'budgetary' policy initiative. But that was a while ago, so I'm sure you've forgotten.    ;)

Lord Humungous

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4673
  • REVOLUTION CALLING!
Re: Bill Clinton Trashes Romney
« Reply #37 on: October 16, 2012, 01:26:27 PM »
Romney wont be any worse than the Kenyan, give him the keys for a while
X

bike nut

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4239
  • Desperation is a stinky cologne
Re: Bill Clinton Trashes Romney
« Reply #38 on: October 16, 2012, 01:33:29 PM »
Not bad. She's falling on her sword. Pretty sure reduced security for US consulates, worldwide, was a Republican 'budgetary' policy initiative. But that was a while ago, so I'm sure you've forgotten.    ;)

Joe Biden: "We weren't told they wanted more security. We did not know they wanted more security."

The facts:

On Wednesday, the State Department's former point man on security in Libya told the House Oversight Committee that he asked for additional security help for the Benghazi facility months before the attack, but was denied.

Various communications dating back a year asked for three to five diplomatic security agents, according to testimony at Wednesday's hearing. But Eric Nordstrom, the one-time regional security officer, said he verbally asked for 12 agents.

The request for 12 agents was rebuffed by the regional director of the State Department's Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs, Nordstrom testified.

"For me and my staff, it was abundantly clear that we were not going to get resources until the aftermath of an incident," Nordstrom said.

Under Secretary of State for Management Patrick Kennedy responded, at the hearing, to suggestions the State Department was responsible for a lack of preparedness: "We regularly assess risk and resource allocation, a process involving the considered judgments of experienced professionals on the ground and in Washington, using the best available information."

Conclusion: It's unclear how high Nordstrom's request got in the administration, but he did ask the State Department's Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs for more security help at the Benghazi post.

Spin it all you want Chimp.....the Chocolate Failure takes full blame.

dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum
Re: Bill Clinton Trashes Romney
« Reply #39 on: October 16, 2012, 01:38:08 PM »
Joe Biden: "We weren't told they wanted more security. We did not know they wanted more security."

The facts:

On Wednesday, the State Department's former point man on security in Libya told the House Oversight Committee that he asked for additional security help for the Benghazi facility months before the attack, but was denied.

Various communications dating back a year asked for three to five diplomatic security agents, according to testimony at Wednesday's hearing. But Eric Nordstrom, the one-time regional security officer, said he verbally asked for 12 agents.

The request for 12 agents was rebuffed by the regional director of the State Department's Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs, Nordstrom testified.

"For me and my staff, it was abundantly clear that we were not going to get resources until the aftermath of an incident," Nordstrom said.

Under Secretary of State for Management Patrick Kennedy responded, at the hearing, to suggestions the State Department was responsible for a lack of preparedness: "We regularly assess risk and resource allocation, a process involving the considered judgments of experienced professionals on the ground and in Washington, using the best available information."

Conclusion: It's unclear how high Nordstrom's request got in the administration, but he did ask the State Department's Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs for more security help at the Benghazi post.

Spin it all you want Chimp.....the Chocolate Failure takes full blame.
Took you long enough to cobble that together. And the source? 

Hulkotron

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28218
  • I read at least a dozen primary sources a day
Re: Bill Clinton Trashes Romney
« Reply #40 on: October 16, 2012, 01:40:44 PM »
Yes, no source = suspicious

bike nut

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4239
  • Desperation is a stinky cologne
Re: Bill Clinton Trashes Romney
« Reply #41 on: October 16, 2012, 01:47:05 PM »
Took you long enough to cobble that together. And the source? 

CNN Fact Check.....

http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/12/politics/fact-check-benghazi-security/index.html

But nice attempt at the liberal "blame Bush" fallback position.

dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum
Re: Bill Clinton Trashes Romney
« Reply #42 on: October 16, 2012, 01:58:25 PM »
CNN Fact Check.....

http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/12/politics/fact-check-benghazi-security/index.html

But nice attempt at the liberal "blame Bush" fallback position.
Blame Bush!? Where did that come from?  Wait, I can guess.   


Same article:

The facts:

According to Democratic House Oversight Committee staff, the amount that the GOP-led House passed for two accounts that pay for embassy security in fiscal 2012 ($2.311 billion) was $330 million less than the Obama administration had requested ($2.641 billion).

A GOP House Appropriations Committee aide confirmed the House bill had less in these accounts than what the administration requested.

However, the final bill, after being worked on by the Democratic-led Senate, put in more money than what had passed in the House. The final bill, which passed with bipartisan support, gave a total of $2.37 billion to these accounts for fiscal 2012 -- about $270 million less than what the administration had requested.

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59693
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Bill Clinton Trashes Romney
« Reply #43 on: October 16, 2012, 02:09:37 PM »
Blame Bush!? Where did that come from?  Wait, I can guess.   


Same article:

The facts:

According to Democratic House Oversight Committee staff, the amount that the GOP-led House passed for two accounts that pay for embassy security in fiscal 2012 ($2.311 billion) was $330 million less than the Obama administration had requested ($2.641 billion).

A GOP House Appropriations Committee aide confirmed the House bill had less in these accounts than what the administration requested.

However, the final bill, after being worked on by the Democratic-led Senate, put in more money than what had passed in the House. The final bill, which passed with bipartisan support, gave a total of $2.37 billion to these accounts for fiscal 2012 -- about $270 million less than what the administration had requested.


Sorry Chimps, but you lost me at "According to DEMOCRATIC House Oversite Committee Staff". Regardless, they claim they didn't have enough for security but they found a way to pay for hundreds of millions of dollars for Chevy Volt charging stations throughout all of the US Consulates?

dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum
Re: Bill Clinton Trashes Romney
« Reply #44 on: October 16, 2012, 02:12:41 PM »
Sorry Chimps, but you lost me at "According to DEMOCRATIC House Oversite Committee Staff". Regardless, they claim they didn't have enough for security but they found a way to pay for hundreds of millions of dollars for Chevy Volt charging stations throughout all of the US Consulates?
Hi Coach. Actually, I was quoting from an article that bike nut cited (see above). Take it up with him.      ;D 

The_Hammer

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4423
  • President Barack Obama -- 2 Term U.S. President
Re: Bill Clinton Trashes Romney
« Reply #45 on: October 16, 2012, 02:16:22 PM »
Please outline the Obama economic plan that will radically change the situation we are in and start job growth in the next 12 months.



Agnostic007

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15002
Re: Bill Clinton Trashes Romney
« Reply #46 on: October 16, 2012, 02:17:07 PM »
Didn't see but....who cares. The entire left lost credibility a loooooong time.ago.

and the right is credible?

The_Hammer

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4423
  • President Barack Obama -- 2 Term U.S. President

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Bill Clinton Trashes Romney
« Reply #48 on: October 16, 2012, 02:22:45 PM »

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Bill Clinton Trashes Romney
« Reply #49 on: October 16, 2012, 02:23:27 PM »
Outline of President Obama's strategy Vs. Mitt Romney's.


http://www.barackobama.com/plans?source=OM2012_LB_YT_20120926_table_vid_URL&subsource=youtube&utm_medium=video&utm_source=youtube&utm_campaign=20120926_table_vid_URL

You realize that link has no specifics, right? Same as Romney. You're just parroting talking points.