Author Topic: Jay Cutler - real or photoshopped pre-Olympia pic? (Read 5823 times)

goomba420 · « **on:** December 06, 2011, 07:44:13 PM »

why would anyone take the time to do something like this

Hurricane Beef ! · « **Reply #1 on:** December 06, 2011, 07:53:27 PM »

If that was Jay the day of, he`d still have the Sandow.

THE BEEF

delta9mda · « **Reply #2 on:** December 06, 2011, 07:55:17 PM »

prove the shopping

Benoitlapierre · « **Reply #3 on:** December 06, 2011, 08:32:48 PM »

im not a jay fan per say but this

,,,, damn

,,, that a mr olympia

galain · « **Reply #4 on:** December 06, 2011, 11:22:37 PM »

I thought he had it in the bag the first time I saw this.

nzmusclemonster · « **Reply #5 on:** December 07, 2011, 12:51:10 AM »

Right sweep looks terrible $:-\$

MAXX · « **Reply #6 on:** December 07, 2011, 03:24:08 AM »

think it's slightly enhanced in some areas. his waist is not that narrow for example.

this is what his waist looks like in that mm pose.

notsureifsrs · « **Reply #7 on:** December 07, 2011, 03:37:45 AM »

Quote from: MAXX on December 07, 2011, 03:24:08 AM

think it's slightly enhanced in some areas. his waist is not that narrow for example.

this is what his waist looks like in that mm pose.

Ofc the photos taken in different angles

purenaturalstrength · « **Reply #8 on:** December 07, 2011, 03:46:42 AM »

his waist aint that narrow his legs arent that thick his shoulders arent that wide

photoshop if u ask me

hench · « **Reply #9 on:** December 07, 2011, 03:50:41 AM »

looks pretty much the same but slightly different angle. Vascularity is better though.

Benny B · « **Reply #10 on:** December 07, 2011, 04:07:43 AM »

Quote from: hench on December 07, 2011, 03:50:41 AM

looks pretty much the same but slightly different angle. Vascularity is better though.

lighting

mass243 · « **Reply #11 on:** December 07, 2011, 04:36:19 AM »

Looks like Mr O to me...

Swede! · « **Reply #12 on:** December 07, 2011, 04:44:49 AM »

No. Different angle, different lights. And a nice pump.

lol @ posting one photo taken from above, and one from below angle to compare.

ksa_triceps · « **Reply #13 on:** December 07, 2011, 04:45:47 AM »

Hulkotron · « **Reply #14 on:** December 07, 2011, 06:10:03 AM »

Mis-timed his carb-up.

purenaturalstrength · « **Reply #15 on:** December 07, 2011, 02:08:00 PM »

Quote from: ksa_triceps on December 07, 2011, 04:45:47 AM

is this a getbigger?

wow strong arms

Dr Dutch · « **Reply #16 on:** December 07, 2011, 02:09:51 PM »

Quote from: mass243 on December 07, 2011, 04:36:19 AM

Looks like Mr NO to me...

fixed

dyslexic · « **Reply #17 on:** December 07, 2011, 02:12:10 PM »

You guys making the judgement calls... do you even Photoshop? Do you actually know what to look for?

That pic hasn't been touched as far as his size is concerned. After the photo was shot, it was enhanced with the typical photographers tools like lighting, color, brightness and contrast.

Like I said before, would you like me to Photoshop it for you and then show you what to look for?

It's all in the angle and the lighting in that photo. No size enhancement through software. At least not in THAT pic.

Dr Dutch · « **Reply #18 on:** December 07, 2011, 02:13:38 PM »

Quote from: dyslexic on December 07, 2011, 02:12:10 PM

Like I said before, would you like me to Photoshop it for you and then show you what to look for?

please do so, sir....

sway · « **Reply #19 on:** December 07, 2011, 02:32:52 PM »

I believe its at a tanning bed. Its right after he tanned thats why he's red and more vascular than normal.