Author Topic: TO YOUNG FOR THE MASTERS ? (Read 7699 times)

Karl Kox · « **on:** February 13, 2006, 01:56:22 PM »

Dose anyone think that 40 is to young for the masters ? There are guys who are almost 40 and some that already are that could kill in the Masters div. I think it should be 45 or 50.

SORRY BOB

littleguns · « **Reply #1 on:** February 13, 2006, 02:13:46 PM »

Karl,

Good point but to be honest there are rumblings of the Masters but realistically will it come back? I doubt it. I would love nothing more to see some of the guys from the 80's and 90's make a comeback.

I am salivating at seeing Bob Paris make his debut.....

Karl Kox · « **Reply #2 on:** February 13, 2006, 02:18:35 PM »

whats that masters show that Bob Chick is doing thats what made me think of all of this. I like Bob but I don't think he should be able to compete in that Masters show. It's not fair to all of those old guys

Bob dose that mean you will never compete in the other shows again ?

BayGBM · « **Reply #3 on:** February 13, 2006, 04:41:15 PM »

Quote from: Karl Kox on February 13, 2006, 01:56:22 PM

Dose anyone think that 40 is to young for the masters ? There are guys who are almost 40 and some that already are that could kill in the Masters div. I think it should be 45 or 50.
SORRY BOB

Ditto. 40 is the new 30!

240 is Back · « **Reply #4 on:** February 13, 2006, 06:05:28 PM »

Quote from: littleguns on February 13, 2006, 02:13:46 PM

I am salivating at seeing Bob Paris make his debut.....

Poor Bob Paris doesn't have five years left on this planet $:-\$

Tomanater · « **Reply #5 on:** February 13, 2006, 06:54:21 PM »

Quote from: Matt C on February 13, 2006, 06:00:27 PM

With all the anti aging stuff on the market today I would say it's the new 20.

Bingo..

Hendrix · « **Reply #6 on:** February 13, 2006, 08:27:34 PM »

Must be 50s and over any younger it would not be fair on the older athletes.

Karl Kox · « **Reply #7 on:** February 13, 2006, 10:12:02 PM »

Quote from: Hendrix on February 13, 2006, 08:27:34 PM

Must be 50s and over any younger it would not be fair on the older athletes.

I agree

littleguns · « **Reply #8 on:** February 14, 2006, 09:04:27 AM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on February 13, 2006, 06:05:28 PM

Poor Bob Paris doesn't have five years left on this planet $:-\$

Huh?

Harry R. M. Pitts · « **Reply #9 on:** February 14, 2006, 09:33:50 AM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on February 13, 2006, 06:05:28 PM

Poor Bob Paris doesn't have five years left on this planet $:-\$

Doesn't Bob have the HIV?

Mydavid · « **Reply #10 on:** February 14, 2006, 12:20:33 PM »

When Jan Tana had her Master's show, all over 40 competed together, but then they awarded for over 50 over 60 and so on.

Lisa

hifrommike · « **Reply #11 on:** February 14, 2006, 12:42:27 PM »

39 is too young for the Masters (I assume you mean the April pro show). 40 is prime time--anyone who's 40 & an IFBB pro can compete. Unfortunately, that probably means Kenny Jones, but anyone else who will bring it can do well at this show. It replaces the Masters Olympia, although it's not exactly the same contest. We have an aging population, & more guys will find themselves competing at the masters level as time goes on. Right now the masters IFBB pro cards are the only new ones being given to men. Promoter Gary Udit got 3 new ones approved this last year alone: the card for the masters winner of the North American, a second pro card for the best runner up to the winner at the Masters Nationals (like the USA, which gives 2 cards), & a pro card for the over 60 winner. Charlie Urrego (60 winner) & Nate Wonsley (best runner up) reportedly got pro cards after the fact when the new cards were approved.

240 is Back · « **Reply #12 on:** February 14, 2006, 12:49:29 PM »

Quote from: Harry R. M. Pitts on February 14, 2006, 09:33:50 AM

Doesn't Bob have the HIV?

Sadly, yes.

BayGBM · « **Reply #13 on:** February 14, 2006, 12:59:19 PM »

Quote from: hifrommike on February 14, 2006, 12:42:27 PM

Charlie Urrego (60 winner)

Dig that 60 year old muscle!

Karl Kox · « **Reply #14 on:** February 14, 2006, 06:40:49 PM »

he looks like a fag

Dr.J · « **Reply #15 on:** September 04, 2015, 01:52:29 AM »

Quote from: BayGBM on February 14, 2006, 12:59:19 PM

Dig that 60 year old muscle!

Dude looks insane for 60!!!!

The Ugly · « **Reply #16 on:** September 04, 2015, 03:40:02 AM »

Too much queer font here.

Fortress · « **Reply #17 on:** September 04, 2015, 06:28:35 AM »

TOO Young ...

Hope this helps.

The Ugly · « **Reply #18 on:** September 04, 2015, 07:47:28 AM »

Quote from: Fortress on September 04, 2015, 06:28:35 AM

TOO Young ...

... to Fall?

Dr Dutch · « **Reply #19 on:** September 04, 2015, 12:47:58 PM »

Masters should be over 50.

The Abdominal Snoman · « **Reply #20 on:** September 04, 2015, 01:39:45 PM »

El Diablo Blanco · « **Reply #21 on:** September 04, 2015, 01:43:49 PM »

Did TheUgly get banned for resurrecting this old post?

el numero uno · « **Reply #22 on:** September 04, 2015, 01:43:58 PM »

Quote from: Dr Dutch on September 04, 2015, 12:47:58 PM

Masters should be over 50.

Most pros drop dead at 45.

Dave D · « **Reply #23 on:** September 04, 2015, 01:47:02 PM »

Quote from: The Abdominal Snoman on September 04, 2015, 01:39:45 PM

Cutler has been retired and divorced for at least 3 years and that photo is from a 12 year old magazine.

You are extremely brave or incredibly dense. Either way you're playing with fire bringing up these outdated issues.

Dr Dutch · « **Reply #24 on:** September 04, 2015, 03:43:39 PM »

Quote from: el numero uno on September 04, 2015, 01:43:58 PM

Most pros drop dead at 45.

Only those who survive may claim the Masters moniker.....