Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: gracie bjj on January 28, 2013, 11:48:21 PM
-
sucks
-
Back to the Slammer ye goes. :-\
-
Whats the outcome?
-
DUI?
you're a dummy.
-
No respect for cocksuckers who drive drunk. Too bad you didn't crash into a tree and die and thank god you didn't kill anyone else you irresponsible piece of shit.
-
sucks
Hi Mike Arvilla.
-
Where has Mike been?
-
No respect for cocksuckers who drive drunk. Too bad you didn't crash into a tree and die and thank god you didn't kill anyone else you irresponsible piece of shit.
they deserve to die because they engaged in a behavior that can potentially cause the death of others... hmm... so airline pilots deserve to die?
-
Where has Mike been?
He has been sharing a cell and various black cocks with Jamal.
-
No respect for cocksuckers who drive drunk. Too bad you didn't crash into a tree and die and thank god you didn't kill anyone else you irresponsible piece of shit.
Come on don't wish that on him. Yes it was wrong what he did but wishing death is terrible.
-
No update from Gracie
This cant be good!
-
Come on don't wish that on him. Yes it was wrong what he did but wishing death is terrible.
My wife's friend Kerry was hit and killed by a drunk driver in bad crash, along with her son, and her partner was paralyzed, he can't even move from the neck down.. She was 8 months pregnant also. I can't imagine what the poor guy is going through having nothing left, and not even being able to 'move on'.
-
If you were drinking and driving I wish you nothing but ill fucking health and may you get raped by a huge bucknegro while in the pen.
-
My wife's friend Kerry was hit and killed by a drunk driver in bad crash, along with her son, and her partner was paralyzed, he can't even move from the neck down.. She was 8 months pregnant also. I can't imagine what the poor guy is going through having nothing left, and not even being able to 'move on'.
This is devastating.
-
My wife's friend Kerry was hit and killed by a drunk driver in bad crash, along with her son, and her partner was paralyzed, he can't even move from the neck down.. She was 8 months pregnant also. I can't imagine what the poor guy is going through having nothing left, and not even being able to 'move on'.
I have ZERO sympathy for people that drink and drive, ITS NOT THAT FUCKING HARD TO CALL A CAB, fuck these ignorant and egoistic people.
-
My wife's friend Kerry was hit and killed by a drunk driver in bad crash, along with her son, and her partner was paralyzed, he can't even move from the neck down.. She was 8 months pregnant also. I can't imagine what the poor guy is going through having nothing left, and not even being able to 'move on'.
...(http://jpegy.com/images/uploads/2012/12/Pawn-star-cool-story-bro.jpg)
-
This is devastating.
What makes it even worse, is that he was just about to compete for the Guinness world records of stamping on 1000 tomatoes in under a minute, and now his dream is ruined.
-
So, was Gracie posting this from his phone while being given a sobriety test? If so, he won't recover.
-
What makes it even worse, is that he was just about to compete for the Guinness world records of stamping on 1000 tomatoes in under a minute, and now his dream is ruined.
Why not grapes??? Then he could make wine and have a drink.
-
Why not grapes??? Then he could make wine and have a drink.
Well you know what they say about an older woman and fine wine?
-
Not cool. Drive, or get fucked up - it's pretty simple. :-\
-
sucks
You oughta know better considering you have done A LOT of time in prison already. Whats your fucking problem you piece of shit?
-
this is relative, there was a time where nobody gave a fuck-even the law-if you drove drunk.
also depends where, if its was some rural area with no people, so what.
I am not surprised in the slightest that you condone fucking drink driving ::) your argument that it is somewhat "acceptable" / "okay" in rural areas is pretty lame as well ::)
Many things that were condoned a few years ago are not deemed acceptable anymore, for your information, cars got a lot faster the last few years, so there's a clue for you why drink driving maybe wasn't that much of a big deal 50 years ago, I know this must come as a shock to you as well but we have also a LOT more cars on the roads :o so yeah uhmm added risk.
Not to put a finer point to your stupid argument "This is relative blah blah blah" but getting married to underage girls was also common practice in the dark ages, guess what it isn't acceptable these days either.
-
I was in a car accident once was in the emergency room and the cop come in the area I was in and said he thought I had been drinking so they did a blood test, so he charged me with a DUI so I go to court and two things the cop wasn't supposed to be back in the area when they were working with me on injuries and the blood test came back negative case dismissed. He fucked up I sue for the aggravation.
-
Bad luck for you, actually.....VERY bad luck, considering the average drunk driver averages several trips across the country and back in miles before actually getting pulled over and caught.....UNLESS you were swerving all over the road.
The President and the legislature need to do something about automobiles, aka death machines. These 4000+ pound monstrosities kill thousands of people every YEAR. Why do people even need their 300+ horsepower sports cars or leather-clad pickup trucks that don't even haul anything? Their needs to be a mandate where it is required to have to ride a bicycle or take public transportation....failin g that, only the Chevrolet Volt and Toyota Prius should be made available to the public, and at hefty government-mandated prices at that.
-
wow you are so progressive and up to date.
::)
in couple years or decades cars will be driving by themselves or they wont be at all and nobody will give a fuck anymore.
Progressive? Up to date? If I wouldn't see a battered 45ish year old grey man in your avatar I would say based on your "argument" you are about 12 years old
-
My wife's friend Kerry was hit and killed by a drunk driver in bad crash, along with her son, and her partner was paralyzed, he can't even move from the neck down.. She was 8 months pregnant also. I can't imagine what the poor guy is going through having nothing left, and not even being able to 'move on'.
Fuck...
I have zero tolerance for drunk (or otherwise impaired) driving. If it were up to me, the first offence would be serious jail-time, followed by life-long probation and a permanent ban on operating any vehicles.
-
they deserve to die because they engaged in a behavior that can potentially cause the death of others... hmm... so airline pilots deserve to die?
While I agree Matty is wayyy out of line, you're stretching that a bit much. He also engaged in something illegal.
-
the vast magority of people here have driven drunk. Im not familiar with Bjj's past but it sounds like a problem for him. learn your lesson already numb nut
-
Update
-
Update
I don't think they allow emails and or internet in county jails.
-
You oughta know better considering you have done A LOT of time in prison already. Whats your fucking problem you piece of shit?
Better a drunk driver than a retarded racist alden wearing son of a bitch baby
-
No respect for cocksuckers who drive drunk. Too bad you didn't crash into a tree and die and thank god you didn't kill anyone else you irresponsible piece of shit.
have you ever once texted anyone ever while behind the wheel? i bet you have. and that is as dangerous or more than driving under the influence. as long as one isn't 4 times over the legal limit.
-
Bad luck for you, actually.....VERY bad luck, considering the average drunk driver averages several trips across the country and back in miles before actually getting pulled over and caught.....UNLESS you were swerving all over the road.
The President and the legislature need to do something about automobiles, aka death machines. These 4000+ pound monstrosities kill thousands of people every YEAR. Why do people even need their 300+ horsepower sports cars or leather-clad pickup trucks that don't even haul anything? Their needs to be a mandate where it is required to have to ride a bicycle or take public transportation....failin g that, only the Chevrolet Volt and Toyota Prius should be made available to the public, and at hefty government-mandated prices at that.
::)
Obvious troll is obvious.
-
You oughta know better considering you have done A LOT of time in prison already. Whats your fucking problem you piece of shit?
Hahahaha
-
Bad luck for you, actually.....VERY bad luck, considering the average drunk driver averages several trips across the country and back in miles before actually getting pulled over and caught.....UNLESS you were swerving all over the road.
The President and the legislature need to do something about automobiles, aka death machines. These 4000+ pound monstrosities kill thousands of people every YEAR. Why do people even need their 300+ horsepower sports cars or leather-clad pickup trucks that don't even haul anything? Their needs to be a mandate where it is required to have to ride a bicycle or take public transportation....failin g that, only the Chevrolet Volt and Toyota Prius should be made available to the public, and at hefty government-mandated prices at that.
Cars don't kill people.
-
Ban cars!
-
Ban cars!
Ban people!
-
-
gracie must be another taser victim
-
I was in a car accident once was in the emergency room and the cop come in the area I was in and said he thought I had been drinking so they did a blood test, so he charged me with a DUI so I go to court and two things the cop wasn't supposed to be back in the area when they were working with me on injuries and the blood test came back negative case dismissed. He fucked up I sue for the aggravation.
That totally sucks.
-
this is relative, there was a time where nobody gave a fuck-even the law-if you drove drunk.
also depends where, if its was some rural area with no people, so what.
This town agrees
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2013/01/24/ireland-wont-ease-drunken-driving-law-for-farmers/
-
every fucking body frequently drives seriously impaired in some way - drugs legal/illegal, drink, mentally fuked up (from serious mental disease to having had a fight with gf) , old, effectively blind, on the phone, etc-
focus on drink driving is for fools
-
the vast magority of people here have driven drunk. Im not familiar with Bjj's past but it sounds like a problem for him. learn your lesson already numb nut
So true...I've known many people who would bash anyone who drives after drinking but then do it themselves. The Ego is always in control.
-
Glad you made it out the night club before the fire bro
(http://media.salon.com/2013/01/brazil-nightclub-fire.jpeg18-1280x960.jpg)
-
If I had to choose between the two, I'd rather be a passenger with a guy who drank 8 beers then with some douchebag who wont stop texting while he's driving.
-
If I had to choose between the two, I'd rather be a passenger with a guy who drank 8 beers then with some douchebag who wont stop texting while he's driving.
I wouldn't get in a car with either, personally. But in theory, I'd take the texter. While I don't like texting and driving and think that it clearly causes impairment, the fact is that the impairment only exists when actually texting and toying with the phone. The impairment caused by booze, on the other hand, lasts a lot longer and won't just go away.
So true...I've known many people who would bash anyone who drives after drinking but then do it themselves. The Ego is always in control.
I don't think that everyone does it. I know that every time I've gone out drinking, I made sure to have plans for getting back home that did not involve a car. And the one time I didn't have a chance to do that and drank (quite a bit too) I was lucid and rational enough to keep my keys in my pocket and pay for a taxi.
every fucking body frequently drives seriously impaired in some way - drugs legal/illegal, drink, mentally fuked up (from serious mental disease to having had a fight with gf) , old, effectively blind, on the phone, etc-
That is, of course true. But what does that have to do with anything? Let's see...
focus on drink driving is for fools
Oh, I see... so just because other things are also distracting and cause impairment, we shouldn't focus on anything that is distracting and causes impairment. That's just brilliant! You, sir, are a brilliant thinker! ::)
-
logic reasoning is not your strong point so u should not attempt it
my argument is that since there are x,y,w..z causes of impaired driving it is bs to focus on a single one
that statement does not imply you should not focus on any of them
it implies that if you are going to talk about impaired driving then you should focus on all of them
-
logic reasoning is not your strong point so u should not attempt it
It's not? Hmm... and here I thought that years of philosophy, logic, math and computer science courses had honed my logical reasoning skills to be razor sharp. But hey, if some guy on the Internet says they aren't, I guess it must be true! ::)
my argument is that since there are x,y,w..z causes of impaired driving it is bs to focus on a single one
The only thing that's bullshit is your argument. You can't lump state of mind (something that cannot be reasonably and objectively evaluated) along with BAC, which can be. While it's true that we should focus on reducing all factors that impair drivers, but we can and should focus only on those that we can do something about. More than that, we should only focus on those where we can reasonably expect our focus and attention to have a positive impact.
that statement does not imply you should not focus on any of them
it implies that if you are going to talk about impaired driving then you should focus on all of them
Then the statement is bullshit. As an example, it's silly to focus on people's state of mind while driving, because there is no way to someone's evaluate state of mind.
-
did he died?
-
dwi's are all about money, giving police more pensionable hours ect..
-
lol @ the people in Denny's at 2:20 AM every night, eating greasy moon over my hammy, trying to sober up.
-
Id venture to say that in the near future, more people will be killed by drivers busy updating their Facebook status.
-
I'm too scared to drive hours after having a beer. Drunk driving laws are in place to keep people from fucking killing and destroying lives, and I can respect that. People who drive around shit faced deserve to be used as crash test dummies.
My friend passed away from a MVA this past Friday due to poor road conditions. That's shitty enough as it is. But it's amplified when it's due to a drunk driver, galavanting in a drunken stupor and endangering the lives of so many innocent people. People who are caught drinking and driving should have a permanent driving ban. There's no excuse for it. Driving is a privilege and if you're too fucking stupid to do it properly then you shouldn't be allowed to endanger others.
-
I'm too scared to drive hours after having a beer. Drunk driving laws are in place to keep people from fucking killing and destroying lives, and I can respect that. People who drive around shit faced deserve to be used as crash test dummies.
My friend passed away from a MVA this past Friday due to poor road conditions. That's shitty enough as it is. But it's amplified when it's due to a drunk driver, galavanting in a drunken stupor and endangering the lives of so many innocent people. People who are caught drinking and driving should have a permanent driving ban. There's no excuse for it. Driving is a privilege and if you're too fucking stupid to do it properly then you shouldn't be allowed to endanger others.
It is a slippery slope though. I'd venture to say 80% of Getbig has driven while intoxicated before. We just have not been caught.
-
It's not? Hmm... and here I thought that years of philosophy, logic, math and computer science courses had honed my logical reasoning skills to be razor sharp. But hey, if some guy on the Internet says they aren't, I guess it must be true! ::)
The only thing that's bullshit is your argument. You can't lump state of mind (something that cannot be reasonably and objectively evaluated) along with BAC, which can be. While it's true that we should focus on reducing all factors that impair drivers, but we can and should focus only on those that we can do something about. More than that, we should only focus on those where we can reasonably expect our focus and attention to have a positive impact.
Then the statement is bullshit. As an example, it's silly to focus on people's state of mind while driving, because there is no way to someone's evaluate state of mind.
buddy lets get something out of the way: when in the internetz do not try to argue by pulling academic rank, unless you are going to provide proof. It is extremely unlikely you can claim a better academic cv than mine regarding logic related disciplines, but i am not willing to expose myself so my previous statement itself is worth shit.
if we now focus on what matters, i.e . the fact that u think you are a know it all little k unt, lets see what has been said
my original argument was: since there are many commonplace ways to drive impaired that cause similar impairment to being drunk it is bs to focus on drink driving
your answer was: "Oh, I see... so just because other things are also distracting and cause impairment, we shouldn't focus on anything that is distracting and causes impairment. That's just brilliant! You, sir, are a brilliant thinker"
my answer was: "my argument ..does not imply you should not focus on any of them. It implies that if you are going to talk about impaired driving then you should focus on all of them"
Now- my argument is airtight logically speaking and that is the end of it
the problem is that your 2nd post is a clear example of muddled thinking as you go on from avoiding to recognize that logically speaking your 1st objection was not valid, to challenge my argument in a totally different way. namely you made up your mind about which factors can be influenced and argue that factors that cannot be influenced are not worth focusing on- and go on to accuse me of having a bs argument
Now (again)
- who told your little head that my defense of taking into account all factors is in anyway concerned with getting the most effective outcome in terms of reducing deaths while driving? why do you even assume that reducing these deaths is what i consider to be the objective of the discussion. no one. you assumed
-you argue that since we cant do anything about the other factors we should focus on drink driving. Why?. there is no proof that 1) drink driving is responsible for a significant fraction of deaths compared with the other factors, 2) you cant do anything about the other factors of that. again you just assumed
you see , your problem is that you assume too much
now go fuck your community college self , and stay out of my way
-
It is a slippery slope though. I'd venture to say 80% of Getbig has driven while intoxicated before. We just have not been caught.
What I'm talking about is being over the legal limit. If it's a c-unt hair over, maybe there should be a stiff first penalty and a severe warning. But for a second offence I think you need to be banned for life. I've seen papers reporting MVAs from people who've had more than 50 violations including DUIs. How in the absolute fuck can those sorts of people be allowed to drive!?
-
What I'm talking about is being over the legal limit. If it's a c-unt hair over, maybe there should be a stiff first penalty and a severe warning. But for a second offence I think you need to be banned for life. I've seen papers reporting MVAs from people who've had more than 50 violations including DUIs. How in the absolute fuck can those sorts of people be allowed to drive!?
Thats the problem. There are plenty of people who drive after having a few beers. I'm sure they would be over the limit, but many do it anyway. We should ask ourselves why bars look the other way, when there is a place full of drunk people? How the fuck do the y think they are getting home? Hypocrites.
-
I would never drive drunk and have never once done it.
But there are a lot of people who drive impaired in some way as mentioned.
Some legally. Take all the people on prescription painkillers and benzos for example.
What is the law regarding someone who has a medical marijuana card? Can
they drive at all? I think if you smoke chronically but only in the evenings
there is some, maybe small, impairement the next day. I'm sure many will
say they drive better even while totally stoned, but then again many say they
drive better after a couple of beers.
I don't text while driving but many friends do and it's dangerous.
Driving while really tired is comparable to some degree of alcohol intoxication and
I'm sure there's been studies on this.
-
buddy lets get something out of the way: when in the internetz do not try to argue by pulling academic rank, unless you are going to provide proof. It is extremely unlikely you can claim a better academic cv than mine regarding logic related disciplines, but i am not willing to expose myself so my previous statement itself is worth shit.
Aww... and here I thought we could compare degrees!
if we now focus on what matters, i.e . the fact that u think you are a know it all little k unt, lets see what has been said
My my, you sure did ace the ad hominem class!
my original argument was: since there are many commonplace ways to drive impaired that cause similar impairment to being drunk it is bs to focus on drink driving
You can focus only things you can't objectively quantify or measured, but I'm not sure that gets you anywhere. You, being the non-measuring type, may see things differently I guess. ::)
your answer was: "Oh, I see... so just because other things are also distracting and cause impairment, we shouldn't focus on anything that is distracting and causes impairment. That's just brilliant! You, sir, are a brilliant thinker"
my answer was: "my argument ..does not imply you should not focus on any of them. It implies that if you are going to talk about impaired driving then you should focus on all of them"
Now- my argument is airtight logically speaking and that is the end of it
Your "argument" - such as it is - is about as air-tight as goatse-man's asshole: it assumes that all causes of impairment are equivalent and pairwise indistinguishable. Clearly they are not.
the problem is that your 2nd post is a clear example of muddled thinking as you go on from avoiding to recognize that logically speaking your 1st objection was not valid, to challenge my argument in a totally different way. namely you made up your mind about which factors can be influenced and argue that factors that cannot be influenced are not worth focusing on- and go on to accuse me of having a bs argument
Your argument is bullshit, no matter how you cut, slice or dice it. See above.
Now (again)
Yes?
- who told your little head that my defense of taking into account all factors is in anyway concerned with getting the most effective outcome in terms of reducing deaths while driving? why do you even assume that reducing these deaths is what i consider to be the objective of the discussion. no one. you assumed
My objection doesn't concern itself with whether your approach aims to reduce or increase deaths; the goals of your approach are irrelevant. My objection concerns itself with the fact that you think that every cause of impairment is indistinguishable from every other cause of impairment and that all deserve equal consideration. That is clearly not the case.
-you argue that since we cant do anything about the other factors we should focus on drink driving. Why?. there is no proof that 1) drink driving is responsible for a significant fraction of deaths compared with the other factors, 2) you cant do anything about the other factors of that. again you just assumed
No. I argue that since we can objectively quantify and measure only some factors of impairment we should focus on them. I see no point in focusing on what I can neither measure nor quantify.
you see , your problem is that you assume too much
My problem is that I think that rational debate is possible with people like you. I guess that is an assumption of sorts...
now go fuck your community college self , and stay out of my way
Ouchie!
-
here in Maryland, you will be charged with DUI if you're driving Buzzed......wow, a man can't even take a couple shots and drive anymore....that's fucked up