Author Topic: Romano believes Mike Ohearn is natural  (Read 26025 times)

joswift

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25313
Re: Romano on Mike Ohearn
« Reply #75 on: April 16, 2021, 02:36:47 PM »
With Ronnie, he just genuinely doesn't seem very intelligent. Remember on the Joe Rogan show he said that on the off season he was 3% body fat and on stage around 1%?

its possible to be lower in bodyfat off season than onstage
Onstage you have no water weight and as such your overall bodyfat as a percentage is more

A dry competitor at 7% could be 5% if he carried more water...

pellius

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22827
  • RIP Keith Jones aka OnlyMe/NoWorries. 1/10/2011
Re: Romano on Mike Ohearn
« Reply #76 on: April 16, 2021, 02:39:01 PM »
Are you suggesting that Ronnie Coleman was drug-free during his college football career, or during the early part of his competitive bodybuilding career? Because there is a big difference between those two periods of his life, in terms of size and conditioning.


Another example of Ronnie's lack of intelligence was when he said that anabolics didn't give him any more size but only helped with conditioning. He said this with a straight face pretty much right after he said how he slowly but steadily grew bigger and bigger every year.

Van_Bilderass

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14981
  • "Don't Try"
Re: Romano on Mike Ohearn
« Reply #77 on: April 16, 2021, 03:23:43 PM »
With Ronnie, he just genuinely doesn't seem very intelligent. Remember on the Joe Rogan show he said that on the off season he was 3% body fat and on stage around 1%?

I thought he said he was at negative bf%  :D

I don't even care about these kinds of exggerations. Depending on the method used they might say someone was at 0% so it's not even a complete lie. I think Flex was calipered at 0% at some point.
Ronnie doesn't care, he doesn't take this kind baloney seriously himself. It's just run of the mill BS these kinds of people say. Kind of like saying you have a 12 inch dong without showing proof, something to laugh about.


Another example of Ronnie's lack of intelligence was when he said that anabolics didn't give him any more size but only helped with conditioning. He said this with a straight prett right after he said how he slowly but steadily grew bigger and bigger every year.

Just more baloney, I don't think he expects anyone to take it seriously  :D

It might be that Ronnie, as he pumped ungodly number of CCs, felt that he wasn't really getting a good return of investment. Maybe it was the GH and insulin that added the size, or eating more precontest, whatever, so it comes out as that kind of statement.

BB

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16475
  • I hope I'm not boring you.
Re: Romano on Mike Ohearn
« Reply #78 on: April 16, 2021, 03:54:34 PM »
I thought he said he was at negative bf%  :D

I don't even care about these kinds of exggerations. Depending on the method used they might say someone was at 0% so it's not even a complete lie. I think Flex was calipered at 0% at some point.

Supposedly tested by Billy Smith, witnessed by Jim Quinn a few weeks before the '93 Olympia :). Hilarious stuff.



Van_Bilderass

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14981
  • "Don't Try"
Re: Romano on Mike Ohearn
« Reply #79 on: April 16, 2021, 04:00:07 PM »
Supposedly tested by Billy Smith, witnessed by Jim Quinn a few weeks before the '93 Olympia :). Hilarious stuff.

I'm embarrassed to know this type of useless trivia  :D

Here's some more: World Record squatter Fred Hatfield had the weakest quads Arthur Jones ever tested!

WalterWhite

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8648
Re: Romano on Mike Ohearn
« Reply #80 on: April 16, 2021, 05:48:32 PM »
Romana is the poster girl for a wannabe in his field  annoying as fuck- not even close & less than zero cigar.
O'Hearm has excellent genetics but a human body looking like this at any age would be a hormonal miracle.

Fixed

I don't know how these videos get any views- especially with Romano.


MCWAY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19253
  • Getbig!
Re: Romano on Mike Ohearn
« Reply #81 on: April 16, 2021, 06:39:44 PM »


He also had a segment on American Muscle where he would prep some meals for contest bodybuilders. I have one episode where he makes fat-free chocolate cheesecake. On another episode, he makes turkey breasts.

pellius

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22827
  • RIP Keith Jones aka OnlyMe/NoWorries. 1/10/2011
Re: Romano on Mike Ohearn
« Reply #82 on: April 16, 2021, 07:48:55 PM »
its possible to be lower in bodyfat off season than onstage
Onstage you have no water weight and as such your overall bodyfat as a percentage is more

A dry competitor at 7% could be 5% if he carried more water...

3%? And 1% onstage?

Dave D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15979
Re: Romano on Mike Ohearn
« Reply #83 on: April 16, 2021, 08:40:18 PM »
Supposedly tested by Billy Smith, witnessed by Jim Quinn a few weeks before the '93 Olympia :). Hilarious stuff.

Are we talking about flex wheeler registering 0.0% body fat?

Taffin

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15878
  • Training out my gay penor...
Re: Romano on Mike Ohearn
« Reply #84 on: April 16, 2021, 08:41:46 PM »
Are we talking about flex wheeler registering 0.0% body fat?

Close.

0.00%
T

BB

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16475
  • I hope I'm not boring you.
Re: Romano on Mike Ohearn
« Reply #85 on: April 16, 2021, 08:45:09 PM »
Are we talking about flex wheeler registering 0.0% body fat?

Close.

0.00%

Who would doubt these men?! -

.

Bevo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18724
  • Middle Urinal at Buc-ee’s
Re: Romano on Mike Ohearn
« Reply #86 on: April 16, 2021, 10:08:41 PM »
Was it doug Miller? Aka Drug Miller

“Big nose ach” swore that he is natural

Humble Narcissist

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 27849
Re: Romano on Mike Ohearn
« Reply #87 on: April 17, 2021, 10:14:06 AM »
Close.

0.00%
The ninjas had to take him out for a reason.

pamith

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8516
Re: Romano on Mike Ohearn
« Reply #88 on: April 17, 2021, 11:05:29 AM »
I'm not 100% sure but I think Mike admitted to taking DHEA which means he is NOT natty

MCWAY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19253
  • Getbig!
Re: Romano on Mike Ohearn
« Reply #89 on: April 17, 2021, 11:05:44 AM »
How do you end up with a negative dosage?  ;D

I was addressing two different people.

The latter part of that post was about the video's mentioning of Kai Greene. I have an issue of "All Natural Muscular Development, that features Greene in it.

It's basically the gist of the tail-end of that video, namely how big some of these guys were BEFORE they started taking anabolics.
Aceto claims that Greene gained 40 lbs in a year using steroids, after training a decade plus naturally. Priest states after he turned pro by winning Mr. Australia for the 3rd time, he got on "gear" and slapped on 20 lbs in six weeks.

If that's the case, how could something similar not be the case for Mr. "Ain't Nothin' But a Peanut", especially considering his decent size during his college football years, unless one is implying that Ronnie was a 150-lb weakling before hitting the weights?


Here is the issue of All-Natural Muscular Development with that article on Kai Greene.


Van_Bilderass

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14981
  • "Don't Try"
Re: Romano on Mike Ohearn
« Reply #90 on: April 17, 2021, 04:26:17 PM »
Here is the issue of All-Natural Muscular Development with that article on Kai Greene.



Regarding the post you quoted. I'm not sure but you're not a drug user correct? Have you seen a lot of guys use steroids?
You can use steroids for years and then suddenly make large gains while claiming you just recently started using. I could explain how it works. But the logic in your post doesn't necessarily work.

Ronnie's biggest gains came before he started competing. Nothing extra drastic happened when Ronnie had "the talk" with Flex and then started to work with Chad. It was simply a few small adjustments and deciding put in the next gear.

honest

  • Competitors
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 3225
Re: Romano on Mike Ohearn
« Reply #91 on: April 17, 2021, 07:41:07 PM »
, Ohearn is a genetic freak using small dosages over a long period of time with a very confidential medical practice in LA. Ronnie placed at the USA or nationals drug free but never won a national level show clean. Placing at a national level show whilst clean is something only he could do, Priest is a genetic freak, but fact is he still failed a drug test for nandrolone while competing under 70 kilos at the ifbbworld level.


Taffin

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15878
  • Training out my gay penor...
Re: Romano on Mike Ohearn
« Reply #92 on: April 17, 2021, 07:47:29 PM »
, Ohearn is a genetic freak using small dosages over a long period of time with a very confidential medical practice in LA. Ronnie placed at the USA or nationals drug free but never won a national level show clean. Placing at a national level show whilst clean is something only he could do, Priest is a genetic freak, but fact is he still failed a drug test for nandrolone while competing under 70 kilos at the ifbbworld level.

With a homosexual MD who specialises in TRT and proctology...  ;)
T

Van_Bilderass

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14981
  • "Don't Try"
Re: Romano on Mike Ohearn
« Reply #93 on: April 17, 2021, 08:27:21 PM »
With a homosexual MD who specialises in TRT and proctology...  ;)

Can't have been very confidential since you guys know about it. Loose sphincters sink ships.

The Scott

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21530
  • I'm a victim of soicumcision!!
Re: Romano on Mike Ohearn
« Reply #94 on: April 17, 2021, 08:36:12 PM »
O'Hearn is the "male" version of Monica Brant.

Dave D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15979
Re: Romano on Mike Ohearn
« Reply #95 on: April 17, 2021, 08:37:23 PM »
O'Hearn is the "male" version of Monica Brant.

Who do you think has aged better though?

The Scott

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21530
  • I'm a victim of soicumcision!!
Re: Romano on Mike Ohearn
« Reply #96 on: April 17, 2021, 09:02:58 PM »
Who do you think has aged better though?

If by that you mean who has survived the PEDs and Botox injections "better", right now I would say it is Mike.  But that's like saying who won the shit eating contest?   ;D

MCWAY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19253
  • Getbig!
Re: Romano on Mike Ohearn
« Reply #97 on: April 17, 2021, 09:53:10 PM »
Regarding the post you quoted. I'm not sure but you're not a drug user correct? Have you seen a lot of guys use steroids?
You can use steroids for years and then suddenly make large gains while claiming you just recently started using. I could explain how it works. But the logic in your post doesn't necessarily work.

Ronnie's biggest gains came before he started competing. Nothing extra drastic happened when Ronnie had "the talk" with Flex and then started to work with Chad. It was simply a few small adjustments and deciding put in the next gear.

That magazine has the article about Kai Greene. I should have cropped out the part about Ronnie.

So, who supposedly gave Ronnie his roids at Grambling or in high school?

Dobson has gone on record, stating that Ronnie was natural. So have Kevin and Flex, two of his good friends. The motive for them to embellish for him after all these years would be what?

It goes back to how big was Ronnie before he started using anabolics. One would then have to infer that Dobson was so sophisticated that he knew how to help Ronnie get past the test at the Universe, while his contemporaries with their respective gurus could not....so they have to wait until 1992 to go after that next batch of pro cards.

Van_Bilderass

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14981
  • "Don't Try"
Re: Romano on Mike Ohearn
« Reply #98 on: April 17, 2021, 11:01:28 PM »
That magazine has the article about Kai Greene. I should have cropped out the part about Ronnie.

So, who supposedly gave Ronnie his roids at Grambling or in high school?

Dobson has gone on record, stating that Ronnie was natural. So have Kevin and Flex, two of his good friends. The motive for them to embellish for him after all these years would be what?

It goes back to how big was Ronnie before he started using anabolics. One would then have to infer that Dobson was so sophisticated that he knew how to help Ronnie get past the test at the Universe, while his contemporaries with their respective gurus could not....so they have to wait until 1992 to go after that next batch of pro cards.

Consider this: Levrone is on record, recently, saying he thinks O'Hearn is a lifetime natural. Do you think O'Hearn is natural? Do you think Levrone actually believes that BS? He doesn't.
They do this kind of shit for a laugh.

I have commented on the "tests" at the IFBB Universe. If you're not in the know you don't know how corrupt the org is. I've said that there is effectively no testing at the Universe. Milos has detailed the corruption at this show. This is the truth: practically NO contestant goes into that show even attempting to beat the test, they all go in fully loaded. Yet each year some go pro. How come? Yes a few may be made examples of so it looks good on paper. I've known competitors at this show, was at the Universe coaching one athlete a few years back. Fully loaded. There was no need for Dobson or whoever to be "sophisticated."

All these serious discussions regarding what these guys have said in magazines are sad. It's all bullshit. These guys sit discussing the things they said and sit there laughing among themselves.

What someone like Flex says about Ronnie, come on, it's not meant to be taken at face value. When they say Ronnie was natural they mean he wasn't taking things seriously, not that he was actually natural.

As an aside, fucking Flex is now selling fucking smilax to poor kids. He may have lost his kidneys and leg but there's no excuse for that shit.

Zillotch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever
Re: Romano on Mike Ohearn
« Reply #99 on: April 18, 2021, 01:49:48 AM »
Consider this:

how come so many have so little trust in the authorities

tards will tard