Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Palpatine Q on October 19, 2007, 08:34:52 PM
-
The audience is flipping out and he went into the seats himself and tossed some people.
It was crazy
-
The audience is flipping out and he went into the seats himself and tossed some people.
It was crazy
what happend? were there neo-cons in the audience or something?
-
what happend? were there neo-cons in the audience or something?
I think it was 240.
The guy was screaming something about Building 7...no shit
-
Here's the video clip you speak of:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8403741864603265979&q=wtc7+new&total=600&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=3
-
FYI - the official story is that w small fires did what you see there.
Nothing else.
A recent Zogby poll says that 67% of Americans support a new 9/11 investigation because they think that building was brought down with explosives - like a 'controlled demolition'.
It's interesting. What do you think?
-
I posted about this in the R&P section. It was surprising, to say the least. Maher was pissed.
-
FYI - the official story is that w small fires did what you see there.
Nothing else.
A recent Zogby poll says that 67% of Americans support a new 9/11 investigation because they think that building was brought down with explosives - like a 'controlled demolition'.
It's interesting. What do you think?
anyone who thinks that building 7 was anything BUT a controlled explosion is delusional and a puppet to their stinken corrupt ass government
how come there's nothing about building 7 in that joke called the 9/11 report.
-
Didn't ABC fire Maher over some 911 stuff?
-
FYI - the official story is that w small fires did what you see there.
Nothing else.
A recent Zogby poll says that 67% of Americans support a new 9/11 investigation because they think that building was brought down with explosives - like a 'controlled demolition'.
It's interesting. What do you think?
You f"ing liberal hippies make me laugh! haha. sure, and George Bush is also an evil genius. He also somehow self made hurricane Katrina and directed it straight to new orleans. you liberal tree huggers, get a job and quit living off my paycheck!
-
240 and cohorts,
I thought this was settled in the previous thread wherein I addressed the inconsistencies in the physics underlying these conspiracy theories...
For the record, there have been some very serious in-depth investigations into this by European journalists and news agencies... Building 7 collapsed because it was spattered by flying rubble (some pieces the size of trucks) from the collapse of the Twin Towers, adding to this fires within the building weakened the structure (I think it was petrol/diesel powered generators burning). Fire brigades attending the emergency were unable to deliver water to the burning floors (about a hundred feet above street level) and didn't have ladders capable of going that high... hence the decision was made to let the building burn.
The only part of 9/11 that is still open to debate is who was responsible for the attacks... there seems to be some evidence hinting that perhaps Mossad or even members of the American Political/Industrial/Military Complex could have been behind the operation.
You won't hear American conspiracy nuts discussing this however... they simply don't know enough history (or geography for that matter). They don't understand the political/economic/historical/big-picture backdrop and they are too lazy to edumacate themselves.
240, put down the militia pamphlet and read a book written by an qualified academic.
The Luke
-
Yeah...I really don't understand the major malfunction of conspiracy theorists. Of alllllll the things this government could have done to justify going to war with Iraq, why would they elect to throw two passenger planes into our money capital without 100% tying Iraq with it? It was Saudi terrorists on the planes, Osama Bin Laden masterminded it and now Al-Qaeda is our target but we chose Iraq to ship the tanks to. Besides, an operation like that requires too many knowledgeable people and no one is coming forward to "confess." I could go on, but I won't....
-
Yeah...I really don't understand the major malfunction of conspiracy theorists. Of alllllll the things this government could have done to justify going to war with Iraq, why would they elect to throw two passenger planes into our money capital without 100% tying Iraq with it? It was Saudi terrorists on the planes, Osama Bin Laden masterminded it and now Al-Qaeda is our target but we chose Iraq to ship the tanks to. Besides, an operation like that requires too many knowledgeable people and no one is coming forward to "confess." I could go on, but I won't....
the point isn't that our government planned the attacks themselves
the idea is that our government simply ignored threats to serve their own agenda...if history has taught us anything, its that the government doesn't give two shits about the people as long as they get their way
-
240, put down the militia pamphlet and read a book written by an qualified academic.
Yeah, an academic like a 30 year old unemployed midget with a ponytail who lives in "his" parents' basement and plays dungeons and dragons in his spare time. ::)
-
Yeah, an academic like a 30 year old unemployed midget with a ponytail who lives in "his" parents' basement and plays dungeons and dragons in his spare time. ::)
yes luke is a qualified physicist ::) do you have an undergrad luke? if thats all your not qualified, sorry.
-
PANDAEMONIUM,
Didn't know you were a gimmick! Who's are you?
The '..."his"...' dispersion on my gender (which isn't in doubt) would seem to indicate one of the so-called Squad, that would also explain the irrational hatred of me... especially seeing as most people on here enjoy the novelty of my adventuring.
So that, added to the 'dundgeons and dragons' reference, reminds me of the vitriol I invoked from Sarcasm/Squadfather's gimmicks when I outed him as being a disturbed 15-year-old shut-in. Sarcasm/Squadfather kept accusing me of being a Dungeons and Dragons player... as if that false allegation would would somehow cast dispersion on the character of someone who openly admits to monster and treasure hunting.
So I'm going to guess... Sarcasm/Squadfather.
But then again, the "parents'..." misuse of the apostrophe is practically diagnostic of Adam "True Adonis" Abeles... and then again Adonis did have access to the Sarcasm username (and holds a grudge like an non-medicated schizophrenic), so maybe it was him making Dundgeons and Dragons jibes pretending to be Sarcasm...
Hhmmm...
I'm going to change my guess to... Adonis, and that's my final answer Regis.
Sorry Adam, the "parents'..." gave it away... you can change your username, but you can't hide the stoopid.
The Luke
-
PANDAEMONIUM,
Didn't know you were a gimmick! Who's are you?
The '..."his"...' dispersion on my gender (which isn't in doubt) would seem to indicate one of the so-called Squad, that would also explain the irrational hatred of me... especially seeing as most people on here enjoy the novelty of my adventuring.
So that, added to the 'dundgeons and dragons' reference, reminds me of the vitriol I invoked from Sarcasm/Squadfather's gimmicks when I outed him as being a disturbed 15-year-old shut-in. Sarcasm/Squadfather kept accusing me of being a Dungeons and Dragons player... as if that false allegation would would somehow cast dispersion on the character of someone who openly admits to monster and treasure hunting.
So I'm going to guess... Sarcasm/Squadfather.
But then again, the "parents'..." misuse of the apostrophe is practically diagnostic of Adam "True Adonis" Abeles... and then again Adonis did have access to the Sarcasm username (and holds a grudge like an non-medicated schizophrenic), so maybe it was him making Dundgeons and Dragons jibes pretending to be Sarcasm...
Hhmmm...
I'm going to change my guess to... Adonis, and that's my final answer Regis.
Sorry Adam, the "parents'..." gave it away... you can change your username, but you can't hide the stoopid.
The Luke
No offense "bro", but you take the internet wayyyyyyy too seriously.
P.S. funny how you go on and on about how it should be written "parents'"....I did write it that way, you moron. ::)
-
FYI - the official story is that w small fires did what you see there.
Nothing else.
A recent Zogby poll says that 67% of Americans support a new 9/11 investigation because they think that building was brought down with explosives - like a 'controlled demolition'.
It's interesting. What do you think?
Hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahaha....."controlled demolition".......hahahahahahahahah ahahahahahahahahaha!!
http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons
-
pandemonium is the heckler obviously
you'd have to be a moron not to see it
-
240 and cohorts,
I thought this was settled in the previous thread wherein I addressed the inconsistencies in the physics underlying these conspiracy theories...
For the record, there have been some very serious in-depth investigations into this by European journalists and news agencies... Building 7 collapsed because it was spattered by flying rubble (some pieces the size of trucks) from the collapse of the Twin Towers, adding to this fires within the building weakened the structure (I think it was petrol/diesel powered generators burning). Fire brigades attending the emergency were unable to deliver water to the burning floors (about a hundred feet above street level) and didn't have ladders capable of going that high... hence the decision was made to let the building burn.
The only part of 9/11 that is still open to debate is who was responsible for the attacks... there seems to be some evidence hinting that perhaps Mossad or even members of the American Political/Industrial/Military Complex could have been behind the operation.
You won't hear American conspiracy nuts discussing this however... they simply don't know enough history (or geography for that matter). They don't understand the political/economic/historical/big-picture backdrop and they are too lazy to edumacate themselves.
240, put down the militia pamphlet and read a book written by an qualified academic.
The Luke
I love people who inform you and insult you at the same time. It's just nice. ::)
-
FYI - the official story is that w small fires did what you see there.
Nothing else.
A recent Zogby poll says that 67% of Americans support a new 9/11 investigation because they think that building was brought down with explosives - like a 'controlled demolition'.
It's interesting. What do you think?
Too bad 99% of Americans don't know shit about what they are talking about and are just jumping on a bandwagon. Public opinion means nothing in proving scientific facts, only the experts can really determine what happened and how.
-
No offense "bro", but you take the internet wayyyyyyy too seriously.
P.S. funny how you go on and on about how it should be written "parents'"....I did write it that way, you moron. ::)
I don't take it as seriously as taking on an alter ego...
By the way, you did spell it p-a-r-e-n-t-s followed by an apostrophe... no point trying to edit your way out of it Adonis... just accept that you haven't mastered genitive syntax... apostrophes are only used in conjunction with proper nouns.
Go back to your gravity suit.
The Luke
-
By the way, you did spell it p-a-r-e-n-t-s followed by an apostrophe...
Uh yeah, I know I did. "parents'" is the proper form because it's the plural possessive ;) Some of us are able to be educated AND have gainful employment, others of us (hi, Teh Luke!) have minimal education, are unemployed, and are forced to live in their parents' basement. ;)
-
Plural possessive... is that what they tell illiterate Urmericans who can't pronounce the word "genitive"?
For your information Adam, the apostrophe is NEVER used to denote possession with normal nouns... only with proper nouns (or to denote a contraction):
Adam's a retard... denotes "Adam is a retard" with the apostrophe replacing the missing 'I'
Adam's grammar primer is lost... denotes "The grammar primer OF/BELONGING TO Adam is lost".
Luke lives in his parent's basement... IS GRAMMATICALLY INCORRECT ("Parents" is not a proper noun)
Luke lives in his parents basement... IS GRAMMATICALLY SOUND
Luke lives in his parents' basement... IS JUST PLAIN RETARDED
...similarly...
Luke owns Adam's mind... IS GRAMMATICALLY CORRECT, as "Adam" is a proper noun... despite the fact that Adam himself is not considered a proper human being.
Write these mistakes out ten times each children...
The Luke
-
Plural possessive... is that what they tell illiterate Urmericans who can't pronounce the word "genitive"?
For your information Adam, the apostrophe is NEVER used to denote possession with normal nouns... only with proper nouns (or to denote a contraction):
Adam's a retard... denotes "Adam is a retard" with the apostrophe replacing the missing 'I'
Adam's grammar primer is lost... denotes "The grammar primer OF/BELONGING TO Adam is lost".
Luke lives in his parent's basement... IS GRAMMATICALLY INCORRECT ("Parents" is not a proper noun)
Luke lives in his parents basement... IS GRAMMATICALLY SOUND
Luke lives in his parents' basement... IS JUST PLAIN RETARDED
...similarly...
Luke owns Adam's mind... IS GRAMMATICALLY CORRECT, as "Adam" is a proper noun... despite the fact that Adam himself is not considered a proper human being.
Write these mistakes out ten times each children...
The Luke
You continue to show your ignorance. But hey, I'll go ahead and humor you. The following, found on dictionary.com, was obtained after 5 seconds of googling:
http://dictionary.reference.com/help/faq/language/s24.html
The apostrophe is used when leaving out a letter or number in a contraction, e.g., can't, wouldn't. The apostrophe is used for omitted letters, e.g., rock 'n' roll, and for omitted numbers, such as the class of '72, the '20s. The apostrophe is used for plurals of letter abbreviations with periods and single letters, e.g., p's and q's; two A's and four B's. Plurals of multi-letter combinations and plurals of numerals end in s with no apostrophe, e.g., VIPs, 1000s. The possessive of singular nouns ending in s, including nouns ending in s, x, z, ch, or sh, is formed by adding 's, e.g., witness's affidavit. However, if the next word begins with s, then add only an apostrophe, e.g., witness' story. The possessive of singular nouns not ending in s is formed by adding 's, e.g., VIP's seat, baby's food. The apostrophe follows the s of a word with two sibilant sounds, e.g., Kansas', Moses'. The apostrophe is added for the possessive of a noun that is plural in form but singular in meaning, e.g., mathematics' formulas. The apostrophe follows the s for the possessive of plural nouns that end in s, e.g., girls' movies. [GEE, Teh Luke, I guess the word "parents" qualifies here?] For the possessive of a plural noun that does not end in s, add 's, e.g., women's rights. For singular proper nouns, add only an apostrophe for the possessive, e.g., Achilles' heel. No apostrophe is used for personal pronouns, such as: hers, his, its, mine, ours, theirs, whose, your, yours. Indefinite pronouns require an apostrophe, e.g., one's lover. For other pronouns like another and others, follow the rule for singular and plural, e.g., another's and others. For joint possession, the 's is added to the word nearest the object of possession, e.g., Francis and Kucera's book. The apostrophe is not used in names of organizations unless actually part of the legal name. The apostrophe is not used in plurals of numerals or multiple-letter combinations.
P.S. I'm neither TA nor Squadfather. ;)
-
Plural possessive... is that what they tell illiterate Urmericans who can't pronounce the word "genitive"?
For your information Adam, the apostrophe is NEVER used to denote possession with normal nouns... only with proper nouns (or to denote a contraction):
Adam's a retard... denotes "Adam is a retard" with the apostrophe replacing the missing 'I'
Adam's grammar primer is lost... denotes "The grammar primer OF/BELONGING TO Adam is lost".
Luke lives in his parent's basement... IS GRAMMATICALLY INCORRECT ("Parents" is not a proper noun)
Luke lives in his parents basement... IS GRAMMATICALLY SOUND
Luke lives in his parents' basement... IS JUST PLAIN RETARDED
...similarly...
Luke owns Adam's mind... IS GRAMMATICALLY CORRECT, as "Adam" is a proper noun... despite the fact that Adam himself is not considered a proper human being.
Write these mistakes out ten times each children...
The Luke
::)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostrophe#Possessive_apostrophe
Hope this helps.
-
::)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostrophe#Possessive_apostrophe
Hope this helps.
lol, isn't it hilarious that this pseudo-scientist and pseudo-intellectual gets humiliated like this? "He" seems to be a bitter little man. I mean, to sit around and obsess over internet personalities in his parents' basement like "he" does....poor "guy".
-
lol, isn't it hilarious that this pseudo-scientist and pseudo-intellectual gets humiliated like this? "He" seems to be a bitter little man. I mean, to sit around and obsess over internet personalities in his parents' basement like "he" does....poor "guy".
I doubt he is very educated.
-
I doubt he is very educated.
Yeah, I don't think "he" is very educated either. In fact, I think "he" has a Bachelor's and that's it. No great accomplishment these days, as MOST people have a BA. Besides, "he" hasn't had a continuous, well paying job in years, and "he" lives with "his" parents. No wonder "he" is so bitter.
-
That's the bastardised Microsoft Word version of Amurikan... I was referring to the English language.
Notice that I spelled "bastardised" with an S, as is proper... not with the vulgar Z my spell check suggested.
I'm going to sit myself down to a big plate of "Freedom Fries" drenched with "Freedom Dressing" and hope the pesticides; heavy metals and chemical residues might stifle my senses to the point that I can learn to spell in a manner befitting such great authors/intellectuals as John Grisham and Dr Phil.
The Luke
-
That's the bastardised Microsoft Word version of Amurikan... I was referring to the English language.
Notice that I spelled "bastardised" with an S, as is proper... not with the vulgar Z my spell check suggested.
I'm going to sit myself down to a big plate of "Freedom Fries" drenched with "Freedom Dressing" and hope the pesticides; heavy metals and chemical residues might stifle my senses to the point that I can learn to spell in a manner befitting such great authors/intellectuals as John Grisham and Dr Phil.
The Luke
You've been owned.
Deal with it and move along. :-*
-
Adam, don't you mean:
"""You'v'e' be'en own'ed'
Deal wi'th it and mo'v'e al'ong' ""?
-
Adam, don't you mean:
"""You'v'e' be'en own'ed'
Deal wi'th it and mo'v'e al'ong' ""?
Why do you keep calling me "Adam"? Earlier you were calling me Squadfather. Can't you make up your mind? ::) Oh, that's right, we're all basically the gimmicks of one person, right? ::)
-
Adam, don't you mean:
"...the gimmic'k''s''' of one person..." it's the "possessive" remember.
The Luke
-
Here's the video clip you speak of:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8403741864603265979&q=wtc7+new&total=600&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=3
fuckin 240. I wanted to see Maher ejecting people, not some goddam bldg falling for the millionth time.
you can be a huge disappointment sometimes, 240.
-
I'm going to sit myself down to a big plate of "Freedom Fries" drenched with "Freedom Dressing" and hope the pesticides; heavy metals and chemical residues might stifle my senses to the point that I can learn to spell in a manner befitting such great authors/intellectuals as John Grisham and Dr Phil.
The Luke
Maybe that will help you grow taller than 5'1'' Woooooosh!!!!!!1
-
Maybe that will help you grow taller than 5'1'' Woooooosh!!!!!!1
impossible, "the luke" is only 4'7".
-
Adam, don't you mean:
"...the gimmic'k''s''' of one person..." it's the "possessive" remember.
The Luke
Why do you keep making yourself look like a fool?
Let's see...you staked your entire Getbig persona on fabricating a tall-tale about Squadfather being a 14 year old kid. The Getbig mods publicly called you a "village idiot". Squadfather is everything he claimed to be, a big dude who looks like he lifts a lot of weight. Yet you still call him a 14 year old, desperately clinging to your ridiculous lies. In all seriousness, you are a sad, sad little man. Get a life. But get a job first. ;)
-
Hahahaha Didn't the Irish start dying out because of a potato famine?
-
Why do you keep making yourself look like a fool?
Let's see...you staked your entire Getbig persona on fabricating a tall-tale about Squadfather being a 14 year old kid. The Getbig mods publicly called you a "village idiot". Squadfather is everything he claimed to be, a big dude who looks like he lifts a lot of weight. Yet you still call him a 14 year old, desperately clinging to your ridiculous lies. In all seriousness, you are a sad, sad little man. Get a life. But get a job first. ;)
That's slander good Sir. Expect a call from Luke's lawyer. :D
"I actually am a physicist, not an Adonis physicist... a real one." -The Luke ::)
-
That's slander good Sir. Expect a call from Luke's lawyer. :D
"I actually am a physicist, not an Adonis physicist... a real one." -The Luke ::)
hahahaha!!!!!
-
Hi Adam...
Hi Squadfather...
Hi Adonis' gimmicks...
Hi Squadfather's gimmicks...
Monster having everything I've ever written saved to your hard drive; I own your minds...
The Luke
-
Hi Adam...
Hi Squadfather...
Hi Adonis' gimmicks...
Hi Squadfather's gimmicks...
Monster having everything I've ever written saved to your hard drive; I own your minds...
The Luke
Like I said, you're a complete weirdo. Everyone on here agrees.
-
Your gimmicks don't qualify as "everyone".
The Luke
-
Like I said, you're a complete weirdo. Everyone on here agrees.
I think people feel the exact same way about you also, outside of your small bunch of groupies. You are a douche bag and annoying as shit, 99% of the board agrees.
Hope this helps.
-
FYI - the official story is that w small fires did what you see there.
Nothing else.
A recent Zogby poll says that 67% of Americans support a new 9/11 investigation because they think that building was brought down with explosives - like a 'controlled demolition'.
It's interesting. What do you think?
I really enjoy Bill Maher's real time.
The 9/11 self demolition theory ingonres a lot of hard basic priciples of physics and engineering.
The temp from the explosion was NOT hot enough to melt the metal supports, BUT at the temp it did make would be more than enough to weaken the itegrity of the metal and allow for collapse.
I saw Discovery channel show where a group of engineers take apart the basic explosion theroies pc by pc.
Now, the fact that 15 of the 19 hijackers were Suadi's is interesting.
Funny how we invaded Iraq after the Taliban in Afg. ?
The claim of we finally had to for democracy??????
Consider that the 5 countries we trade with in the middle east are run by KINGS or Sultans and never were elected:
Saudi Arabia, The UAE, Kuwaitt, Qutar and Jordon. Shoot the ports were almost sold out to the Dubai , EAU.The smae country that wanted to buy out 20% of NASDAQ and had tentative whitehouse approval.
Former chair of the Fed reserve Greenspan already said in his book .
" the war in Iraq was all about oil...and EVERYBODY knows it"
Howard
-
240 and cohorts,
I thought this was settled in the previous thread wherein I addressed the inconsistencies in the physics underlying these conspiracy theories...
For the record, there have been some very serious in-depth investigations into this by European journalists and news agencies... Building 7 collapsed because it was spattered by flying rubble (some pieces the size of trucks) from the collapse of the Twin Towers, adding to this fires within the building weakened the structure (I think it was petrol/diesel powered generators burning). Fire brigades attending the emergency were unable to deliver water to the burning floors (about a hundred feet above street level) and didn't have ladders capable of going that high... hence the decision was made to let the building burn.
The only part of 9/11 that is still open to debate is who was responsible for the attacks... there seems to be some evidence hinting that perhaps Mossad or even members of the American Political/Industrial/Military Complex could have been behind the operation.
You won't hear American conspiracy nuts discussing this however... they simply don't know enough history (or geography for that matter). They don't understand the political/economic/historical/big-picture backdrop and they are too lazy to edumacate themselves.
240, put down the militia pamphlet and read a book written by an qualified academic.
The Luke
Well said, I agree
-
FYI - the official story is that w small fires did what you see there.
Nothing else.
A recent Zogby poll says that 67% of Americans support a new 9/11 investigation because they think that building was brought down with explosives - like a 'controlled demolition'.
It's interesting. What do you think?
What is really interesting is that today we, human society - sprung from universal chaos, initial carbon bonds and other contingencies, infinitesimal random groupings and sperm selection, etc. - still have nutjobs that believe that their has to be logic(usually evil) behind every disaster/occurrence. People want to believe in conspiracies becasue they a)can't handle loose ends and b)want to exert some kind of control over their lives in a universe where their role is insignificant. ::)
-
I think people feel the exact same way about you also, outside of your small bunch of groupies. You are a douche bag and annoying as shit, 99% of the board agrees.
Hope this helps.
What some anonymous 21 year old skinny bodybuilder wannabe on an internet forum thinks about me is ever so important ::)
-
What is really interesting is that today we, human society - sprung from universal chaos, initial carbon bonds and other contingencies, infinitesimal random groupings and sperm selection, etc. - still have nutjobs that believe that their has to be logic(usually evil) behind every disaster/occurrence. People want to believe in conspiracies becasue they a)can't handle loose ends and b)want to exert some kind of control over their lives in a universe where their role is insignificant. ::)
I agree
-
One problem, fellahs.
Many NYPD, FDNY, EMTs, and other govt employees have come fwd and said that there was a 20-second denolition countdown to WTC7's collapse.
How come we haven't heard about any of this? Not saying your theory is wrong, because frankly when it comes to the gov't who knows what to believe, but you would think this kind of thing would be more publicized.