Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Vince G, CSN MFT on July 08, 2011, 11:17:23 AM
-
::)
-
Fine young man.
-
I saw that program with Louies Theroux, great series by the way.
It really disgusting how those people raise their kids. They should be taken away from them.
-
It really disgusting how those people raise their kids. They should be taken away from them.
So you don't think gays should be allowed to adopt and raise kids?
-
Haha give that kid a cookie.
-
So you don't think gays should be allowed to adopt and raise kids?
Funny, I must admit.. :D
-
.
-
At the end he said Obama was the anti-christ lol :D :D :D I think that is Coache's kid :o :o :o
-
Lol, these are the kids that get their asses kicked in school, by blacks, mexicans, gays, etc.
-
Lol, these are the kids that get their asses kicked in school, by blacks, mexicans, gays, etc.
They donīt go to school, they get `at home` education by those schizo ministers and preachers..
-
Terrific.
Hopefully this kid grows up to be attracted to males and has an internal battle that eventually finds him out back his local church giving some local street urchin boy a blowjob. All the while having a wife. Eventually he cannot stomach his "perversions" and therefore kills himself with a single bullett to his brainwashed head.
-
I heard in some schools in America they teach creationism... :-\ :-\
Sometimes I really stop and wonder how this country managed to get a single rocket up from Earth when I hear these crazy stories about them.
-
I heard in some schools in America they teach creationism... :-\ :-\
Sometimes I really stop and wonder how this country managed to get a single rocket up from Earth when I hear these crazy stories about them.
-
At the end he said Obama was the anti-christ lol :D :D :D I think that is Coache's kid :o :o :o
It could have been...was he pushing a car around the parking lot??? ;D
-
It could have been...was he pushing a car around the parking lot??? ;D
Hahah, Vince cracked a good one ;D
-
I'd rather have him than these
-
So you don't think gays should be allowed to adopt and raise kids?
Why not..? There are tons of children out there that don't have families.. Why not give a good person the opportunity to give a child ,a loving home..? Look at how those "straight" people taught and raised this boy..!? It's horrible.. We have to live together,like it or not.. There's enough hate in this world from grown ups,why breed more hate..?
I live in Park Slope.. In my store,most of my business comes from the gay folks,and most of them are the most respectful ,kind people I've ever had the pleasure of doing business with..
I can't speak for all of them ,and their intentions(just like straights)but I can for the ones I've dealt with ..
Yes...I know,I know,I throw the word "Phaggot" around alot.. But it's a funny word ,and I throw it around to be funny..
-
::)
I don't see what the problem is, except the Limey queef needs to get his ass kicked.
-
Why not..? There are tons of children out there that don't have families.. Why not give a good person the opportunity to give a child ,a loving home..? Look at how those "straight" people taught and raised this boy..!? It's horrible.. We have to live together,like it or not.. There's enough hate in this world from grown ups,why breed more hate..?
I live in Park Slope.. In my store,most of my business comes from the gay folks,and most of them are the most respectful ,kind people I've ever had the pleasure of doing business with..
I can't speak for all of them ,and their intentions(just like straights)but I can for the ones I've dealt with ..
Yes...I know,I know,I throw the word "Phaggot" around alot.. But it's a funny word ,and I throw it around to be funny..
So it's okay for a boy to be raised by two daddies or two mommies. The problem with that is the way they will be treated by other kids growing up. It's an unnatural things so people will always have a problem with it. Kids are pretty mean and cruel. Imagine showing up to parent teacher conferences with your two gay fathers.
-
Haha give that kid a cookie.
Give him the whole box !! lol
-
So it's okay for a boy to be raised by two daddies or two mommies. The problem with that is the way they will be treated by other kids growing up. It's an unnatural things so people will always have a problem with it. Kids are pretty mean and cruel. Imagine showing up to parent teacher conferences with your two gay fathers.
Brotha.. In all honesty,who cares..? Good people are good people.. Racists are going to be racists.. I teach my kids better than that.. My children respect everyone and don't judge them... If you say something to them they don't like ,then that's different,but I don't raise my children that way.. They raised that child that way.. When the gent asked him about gays.. He answered as if he had it memorized..? You can see the anger in him..
-
Lol, these are the kids that get their asses kicked in school, by blacks, mexicans, gays, etc.
Nobody gets his ass kicked by gays.
Come on.
-
Lucky the bible says it's wrong otherwise he would have nothing concrete to refer to
-
Brotha.. In all honesty,who cares..? Good people are good people.. Racists are going to be racists.. I teach my kids better than that.. My children respect everyone and don't judge them... If you say something to them they don't like ,then that's different,but I don't raise my children that way.. They raised that child that way.. When the gent asked him about gays.. He answered as if he had it memorized..? You can see the anger in him..
I don't know man kids growing up need both male and female figures in their lifes. I would be a completely different person If I was raised by two gay men not for the better I bet.
-
.
Thats some ugly white trash right there - fucking rednecks and there Tom Sawyer looking fashion sense ::)
-
.
what the fuck
is that
-
I'd rather have him than these
This is genuinely pathetic. These people are not too far removed from jungle creatures swinging from trees and eating ants off one another.
-
I heard in some schools in America they teach creationism... :-\ :-\
Sometimes I really stop and wonder how this country managed to get a single rocket up from Earth when I hear these crazy stories about them.
this is a stupid and uneducated comment. why wouldn't you teach creationism? how about teaching creationism AND evolution.i think that it you should teach a child both sides and as they grow up they will chose what they believe. If anything evolution has as many holes as creationism. so being taught one way is just as wrong..its like the school, goverment ect is chosing what they want you to believe. there is nothing wrong with both of them being taught IMO
-
I don't know man kids growing up need both male and female figures in their lifes. I would be a completely different person If I was raised by two gay men not for the better I bet.
true. i know its not poltically correct to say but i can't agree with a gay couple raising a child. i don't hate gays..i really could care less what consenting adult do in the privacy of there own home but i agree they need both figures in there lifes
-
this is a stupid and uneducated comment. why wouldn't you teach creationism? how about teaching creationism AND evolution.i think that it you should teach a child both sides and as they grow up they will chose what they believe. If anything evolution has as many holes as creationism. so being taught one way is just as wrong..its like the school, goverment ect is chosing what they want you to believe. there is nothing wrong with both of them being taught IMO
If Creationism is to be taught in schools it should NOT be taught in a science class because it is not Science! You want to teach Creationism in school? That is fine, but they should make a class specifically for religious studies. Creationism is NOT science and should not be taught along biology, chemistry, astronomy or physics, etc.
-
true. i know its not poltically correct to say but i can't agree with a gay couple raising a child. i don't hate gays..i really could care less what consenting adult do in the privacy of there own home but i agree they need both figures in there lifes
Actually, research has shown that a gay couple can raise a kid just as good as a heterosexual couple can. From what I know, there is no definitive evidence that a straight couple can raise a child better than a gay couple. Sorry, I go with the evidence, not with my emotions. You might agree that they need both figures in their lives, but this is not what the research says. Follow the facts, not your emotions.
-
If Creationism is to be taught in schools it should NOT be taught in a science class because it is not Science! You want to teach Creationism in school? That is fine, but they should make a class specifically for religious studies. Creationism is NOT science and should not be taught along biology, chemistry, astronomy or physics, etc.
well you could argue that evolution is not REAL science if you don't believe in it. all i am saying is that you are wrong if you are only giving one side of an opinion. which is really what both of them are. both say that they have facts backing them up....so?
-
Actually, research has shown that a gay couple can raise a kid just as good as a heterosexual couple can. From what I know, there is no definitive evidence that a straight couple can raise a child better than a gay couple. Sorry, I go with the evidence, not with my emotions. You might agree that they need both figures in their lives, but this is not what the research says. Follow the facts, not your emotions.
IT IS MY OPINION. i never tried to back it up with scientific research or facts. i stick by what i said. i couldn't care less what some quack that sets these studies up says. i know that i benefited from having a mother and father in my life
-
IT IS MY OPINION. i never tried to back it up with scientific research or facts. i stick by what i said. i couldn't care less what some quack that sets these studies up says. i know that i benefited from having a mother and father in my life
But you dont know if you would have benefited equally or more if you had gay parents. Unless they had you living with a homosexual couple for a portion of your life. Maybe Bay can adopt you :D :D ;D ;D
-
well you could argue that evolution is not REAL science if you don't believe in it. all i am saying is that you are wrong if you are only giving one side of an opinion. which is really what both of them are. both say that they have facts backing them up....so?
Perhaps; however, the closest thing we have to achieving accurate results is the scientific method. Science = following a set of rules and guidelines. Science is nothing more than a set of procedures which Creationism does not follow. Evolution follows this method, Creationism does not. That is what makes Evolution much more of a Science than Creationism because it follows this method.
(http://halfmanhalfgreek.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/science-vs-faith.jpg)
-
Perhaps; however, the closest thing we have to achieving accurate results is the scientific method. Science = following a set of rules and guidelines. Evolution follows this method, Creationism does not.
(http://halfmanhalfgreek.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/science-vs-faith.jpg)
i am not really going to debate creationism with you. your opinion is just that..your opinion. however there have been many, many artifacts that have been found throughout history that backs up what the bible says.
-
i am not really going to debate creationism with you. your opinion is just that..your opinion. however there have been many, many artifacts that have been found throughout history that backs up what the bible says.
Perhaps, but there has also been A LOT of inaccuracy in the bible. Not to mention how many times its been re-written.
Drop a ball from a building, it falls to the ground. Mix the same 2 chemicals and you get the same reaction. The brain contains neurons which are constantly firing. This is all science. They can be proven time and time again without fail. You can replicate results repeatedly. You can't say the same for the bible.
I am not debating you on the existence of God or whether or not Creationism is true. That is not the argument. My argument is whether or not it should be taught in a science class. It shouldn't be. Creationism does not have the predictive validity of physics, chemistry, math, or even biology. Therefore, it should not be taught in a science class. It should have its OWN class.
-
what the fuck
is that
this guy fucks him in the ass
-
Perhaps, but there has also been A LOT of inaccuracy in the bible. Not to mention how many times its been re-written.
Drop a ball from a building, it falls to the ground. Mix the same 2 chemicals and you get the same reaction. The brain contains neurons which are constantly firing. This is all science. They can be proven time and time again without fail. You can replicate results repeatedly. You can't say the same for the bible.
I am not debating you on the existence of God or whether or not Creationism is true. That is not the argument. My argument is whether or not it should be taught in a science class. It shouldn't be. Creationism does not have the predictive validity of physics, chemistry, math, or even biology. Therefore, it should not be taught in a science class. It should have its OWN class.
whatever. they are not going to dedicate a class for creation. Creation has scientific points to some people so IMO it should be taught right along with evolution.
-
Drop a ball from a building, it falls to the ground. Mix the same 2 chemicals and you get the same reaction. The brain contains neurons which are constantly firing. This is all science. They can be proven time and time again without fail. You can replicate results repeatedly. You can't say the same for the bible.
This is a common "trick" evolutionists use to discredit creationism. Namely, they discredit creationism by definition, not because it can't provide a perfectly reasonable explanation for observed phenomenon in nature. You see, the vast majority of evolutionists are atheists. And the way they've defined science and the way they utilize the scientific method is that they require that all observable phenomena in nature have a NATURALISTIC explanation. In essence, they have excluded God a priori based on their own definition of science. They don't even consider God a possible explanation to begin with because that would be in the realm of the "supernatural," which to them isn't possible because, well, they're atheists. Thus, creationism is discredited not on its scientific merits but because it posits a deity that they don't believe in to begin with. So when an evolutionist tells you that evolution is "fact," what he's really saying is that of all possible naturalistic explanations, evolution is all we got. But if you asked that same evolutionist to debate someone like, say, Duane Gish, he'd cower in fear because he knows damn well he couldn't win. I actually used to work with a very famous evolutionist as an undergrad, and he was frequently asked to debate Gish and some of the other guys from the creation research institute, but he always declined, stating he "knew he would lose."
All observable phenomena that evolutionists cite as "clear" evidence for evolution can be explained from a creationist standpoint. And that's the ugly secret evolutionists don't want out there. Take something like the similarity in genetic code between various species. This is commonly cited as strong evidence for evolution. And, indeed, I don't debate the fact that an evolutionary model certainly would have predicted that all living species, having descended from common ancestors, would share a good proportion of their genetic code. But this finding in no way excludes God, and it in no way disproves creationism. One could simply argue that naturally the genetic code is similar among species because God worked with a common template and made minor adjustments to create a diversity of species. Why re-invent the wheel with each new species you create?
Don't ever let an evolutionist tell you that everything is nature has to be "testable" and explained through naturalistic means. There is a lot in science which isn't testable, which in my mind almost begs for a supernatural explanation. Take your example of neurons. Yes, we can test electrical conductivity in nerves. Yes, we know about sodium channels, NA/K pumps, and all the machinery that a cell uses to produce and conduct an impulse. But those are just physical phenomena. Tell me: how in the world does a voltage potential across a neuron translate into sentience, into conscious thought? Can you devise a naturalistic explanation for that? If you ask me, I find a supernatural explanation for that MORE intellectually satisfying that a naturalistic one.
-
why are these religious nutjobs always busy with homosexuality? they most probably like to ingest the cock as well?
always reminds me of that movie american beauty where the guy who is so fervently anti gay turns out to be gay as well.
-
why are these religious nutjobs always busy with homosexuality? they most probably like to ingest the cock as well?
always reminds me of that movie american beauty where the guy who is so fervently anti gay turns out to be gay as well.
Kevin Spacey was a true getbigger after he quit his job ans worked out in the garage smoking weed...
-
This is a common "trick" evolutionists use to discredit creationism. Namely, they discredit creationism by definition, not because it can't provide a perfectly reasonable explanation for observed phenomenon in nature. You see, the vast majority of evolutionists are atheists. And the way they've defined science and the way they utilize the scientific method is that they require that all observable phenomena in nature have a NATURALISTIC explanation. In essence, they have excluded God a priori based on their own definition of science. They don't even consider God a possible explanation to begin with because that would be in the realm of the "supernatural," which to them isn't possible because, well, they're atheists. Thus, creationism is discredited not on its scientific merits but because it posits a deity that they don't believe in to begin with. So when an evolutionist tells you that evolution is "fact," what he's really saying is that of all possible naturalistic explanations, evolution is all we got. But if you asked that same evolutionist to debate someone like, say, Duane Gish, he'd cower in fear because he knows damn well he couldn't win. I actually used to work with a very famous evolutionist as an undergrad, and he was frequently asked to debate Gish and some of the other guys from the creation research institute, but he always declined, stating he "knew he would lose."
All observable phenomena that evolutionists cite as "clear" evidence for evolution can be explained from a creationist standpoint. And that's the ugly secret evolutionists don't want out there. Take something like the similarity in genetic code between various species. This is commonly cited as strong evidence for evolution. And, indeed, I don't debate the fact that an evolutionary model certainly would have predicted that all living species, having descended from common ancestors, would share a good proportion of their genetic code. But this finding in no way excludes God, and it in no way disproves creationism. One could simply argue that naturally the genetic code is similar among species because God worked with a common template and made minor adjustments to create a diversity of species. Why re-invent the wheel with each new species you create?
Don't ever let an evolutionist tell you that everything is nature has to be "testable" and explained through naturalistic means. There is a lot in science which isn't testable, which in my mind almost begs for a supernatural explanation. Take your example of neurons. Yes, we can test electrical conductivity in nerves. Yes, we know about sodium channels, NA/K pumps, and all the machinery that a cell uses to produce and conduct an impulse. But those are just physical phenomena. Tell me: how in the world does a voltage potential across a neuron translate into sentience, into conscious thought? Can you devise a naturalistic explanation for that? If you ask me, I find a supernatural explanation for that MORE intellectually satisfying that a naturalistic one.
I love you guys who walk through life with eyes wide shut it makes living so much easier for me without boundaries
-
If I had told an adult to shut up when I was a kid I would have gotten a boot up my ass...my how things have changed in thirty years
-
If I had told an adult to shut up when I was a kid I would have gotten a boot up my ass...my how things have changed in thirty years
can you imagine how bad that kid is fed up
-
I don't know man kids growing up need both male and female figures in their lifes. I would be a completely different person If I was raised by two gay men not for the better I bet.
I guess brotha..? But we were lucky.. Some kids have their parents,and both parents are pieces of sh!ts.. Some children have no one,or anything,at least someone wants them, and is willing to give them a shot at being loved,and get them out of the system..?
-
i am not really going to debate creationism with you. your opinion is just that..your opinion. however there have been many, many artifacts that have been found throughout history that backs up what the bible says.
Yea, like Noah's ark they found with all those fossilized dinosaurs on it... ;D
-
what the fuck
is that
Looks like his cousins have been fertilizing each other since the Civil War...
-
Nobody gets his ass kicked by gays.
Come on.
(http://fun-gallery.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Donald-Trump-Hairstyle-640x610.jpg)
-
homos want to raise kids to produce even more homosexuals. To beat heteros -because it's a war- make them become homos. For the minority to become the majority.
To them heterosexuals are untermensch and a mistake of evolution, they think they are the man of tomorow. Make no mistake in their paradigm they re the best and everyone else has to be converted or replaced. Exactly like muslims think.
-
homos want to raise kids to produce even more homosexuals. To them heterosexuals are untermensch and a mistake of evolution, they think they are the man of tomorow. Make no mistake in their paradigm they re the best and everyone else has to be converted or replaced. Exactly like muslims think.
Really..? They run the fashion industry,and are the best designers.. Can you make someone who doesn't like c0ck,suddenly like c0ck..? I agree with you on your Muslim comment,100%..
-
homos want to raise kids to produce even more homosexuals. To beat heteros -because it's a war- make them become homos. For the minority to become the majority.
To them heterosexuals are untermensch and a mistake of evolution, they think they are the man of tomorow. Make no mistake in their paradigm they re the best and everyone else has to be converted or replaced. Exactly like muslims think.
So that's why gays and muslims like each other so much...
-
So that's why gays and muslims like each other so much...
Are you trying to say that the future will be nothing but gay muslims and women will be hoarded as cattle for reproductive purposes until we can create a race of impregnable men with penises that can give birth from a gooch cavity?
-
Why does everyone see creationism and evolution as separate entities? Wasn't evolution sprung from the creation? Could it be that the Creator had evolution in his tool bag and allowed life to progress where it is now on it's own?
People really need to think more with an open mind. Too much tunnel vision going on around here.
Evolution is a design in it's own right. Just as your body is a design and the Corvette driving down the street is a design. You can't have a design without a designer.
As for the little white kid, I have to watched the video but just looking at a picture of him compared to the chimps w8m8 posted I would choose him. We need more of that! That way we can have a part in shaping evolution!
-
Why does everyone see creationism and evolution as separate entities? Wasn't evolution sprung from the creation? Could it be that the Creator had evolution in his tool bag and allowed life to progress where it is now on it's own?
People really need to think more with an open mind. Too much tunnel vision going on around here.
Evolution is a design in it's own right. Just as your body is a design and the Corvette driving down the street is a design. You can't have a design without a designer.
As for the little white kid, I have to watched the video but just looking at a picture of him compared to the chimps w8m8 posted I would choose him. We need more of that! That way we can have a part in shaping evolution!
You can't have a designer without a designer is an argument that has been crushed numerous times.
Plus, I ask you this: who created the Designer? Basically, who created God? You can't say everything has a Designer, then say the Designer (God) is excluded from this? Who created the Designer, that created that Designer, that created that Designer, and ad infinitum.
-
You can't have a designer without a designer is an argument that has been crushed numerous times.
Plus, I ask you this: who created the Designer? Basically, who created God? You can't say everything has a Designer, then say the Designer (God) is excluded from this? Who created the Designer, that created that Designer, that created that Designer, and ad infinitum.
Yes, that is the ultimate question. Who created the designer? Nobody knows. It is such a great mystery and crazy concept to try and grasp that 911 as an "inside job" pales in comparison.
But in general, when you see something with structure and order, don't you see the work of a designer in front of you?
-
Yes, that is the ultimate question. Who created the designer? Nobody knows. It is such a great mystery and crazy concept to try and grasp that 911 as an "inside job" pales in comparison.
But in general, when you see something with structure and order, don't you see the work of a designer in front of you?
To be honest, no I don't. And if I did see a Designer, it wouldnt be the typical god found in the bible. Ya know, long white beard, who punishes and reward creatures of his own creation.
-
To be honest, no I don't. And if I did see a Designer, it wouldnt be the typical god found in the bible. Ya know, long white beard, who punishes and reward creatures of his own creation.
Believe what you want about God...but for heaven's sake, nowhere in the Bible does it say He has a long white beard.
-
homos want to raise kids to produce even more homosexuals. To beat heteros -because it's a war- make them become homos. For the minority to become the majority.
To them heterosexuals are untermensch and a mistake of evolution, they think they are the man of tomorow. Make no mistake in their paradigm they re the best and everyone else has to be converted or replaced. Exactly like muslims think.
So u come on here with your analysis of humans and how they act and you don't even know how being a homosexual is programmed before birth? Keeping talking stupid no-one listens.
-
Yea, like Noah's ark they found with all those fossilized dinosaurs on it... ;D
you are funny,,ha ha ha. actually if you knew anything about creationism it actually teaches that there were dinasours before man was even made by god...ha ha ha
you see this is why i hate debating religon, polictics, homosexuality abortion, ect....the list goes on. because people believe what they want without really knowing the facts. truthfully dutchguy you know nothing about creationism. i could care less what you believe but this is my point about it being taught in schools. you were obviously taught evolution but had you been taught creation in school you could at least appear smart if only for a moment while discussing this subject ;)
-
you are funny,,ha ha ha. actually if you knew anything about creationism it actually teaches that there were dinasours before man was even made by god...ha ha ha
you see this is why i hate debating religon, polictics, homosexuality abortion, ect....the list goes on. because people believe what they want without really knowing the facts. truthfully dutchguy you know nothing about creationism. i could care less what you believe but this is my point about it being taught in schools. you were obviously taught evolution but had you been taught creation in school you could at least appear smart if only for a moment while discussing this subject ;)
Well.....if you really have 20 inch calves you have my respect for that..