Parents fume over Black's 'birth control' quip about overcrowding - Ha ha ha!!!

[Soul Crusher]

Updated: Sat., Jan. 15, 2011, 8:46 AM 
Parents fume over Black's 'birth control' quip about overcrowding
By YOAV GONEN Education Reporter
www.nypost.com


________________________ ________________________ ____________-


Now that's Black humor.

Less than two weeks into her new gig, Schools Chancellor Cathie Black has riled parents and public officials by jokingly suggesting that "birth control" was the solution to school overcrowding.

The off-color quip came in response to concerns by public-school dad Eric Greenleaf, who said at a meeting of parents and officials at state Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver's downtown office that there will be "huge shortages" of classroom space in lower Manhattan in coming years.

"Could we just have some birth control for a while?" Black cracked. "It could really help us all out a lot."

The public-service novice, who has spent her entire career in media and publishing, also dropped jaws at the meeting by likening her task of satisfying space-crunch concerns in every neighborhood to making "many Sophie's Choices" -- a reference to the book in which a mother in the Auschwitz death camp is forced to decide which of her two children will live.

"Everybody's face fell. You don't want to hear that reference when you're talking about children," said Tricia Joyce, whose kids attend the perennially overcrowded PS 234 in TriBeCa. "She could have been nervous, it could have been the first thing that came to her mind.

"I just hope she chooses to do something much better than what she says."

Some who were at the meeting said Black's levity was especially inappropriate given that she was addressing a community whose complaints about the scarcity of public-school seats has for years seemed to fall on deaf ears.

They said they came to hear solutions, not stand-up comedy.

"Those kinds of comments show a lack of understanding of what parents are going through," said Julie Menin, chair of Community Board 1.

"The parents I spoke with after the meeting were very concerned about the comments she made because we're grappling with real issues."

After initially declining to comment, Department of Education spokeswoman Natalie Ravitz emphasized that Black takes the issue of crowded schools seriously, which is what prompted her participation in the monthly task-force meeting.

"She regrets if she left a different impression by making an off-handed joke in the course of that conversation," said Ravitz.

Still, the sudden speed bump came just as Black was trying to pick up steam after a rocky appointment process -- and it raised new concerns about her lack of education experience.

"Overcrowding is not a funny subject," said city Councilwoman Letitia James (D-Brooklyn). "Constituents have expressed concerns that Cathie Black is not qualified for this job, and my role is to stand with them always, as I do in this case."

yoav.gonen@nypost.com


________________________ ___________________-


ha ha ha - al the race hustlers are in meltdown mode over this.   

[Slapper]

That's what happens when Joe Klein (a Jew) surrendered his seat to Michael Bloomberg (a Jew), who appointed Cathie Black (a Jew) as the new chancellor. And Cathie lost no time in appointing Shael Polakow-Suransky (a Jew) as the chief academic officer.

Quite a racket huh?

Do you understand now where the problem lies?

[Soul Crusher]

That's what happens when Joe Klein (a Jew) surrendered his seat to Michael Bloomberg (a Jew), who appointed Cathie Black (a Jew) as the new chancellor. And Cathie lost no time in appointing Shael Polakow-Suransky (a Jew) as the chief academic officer.

Quite a racket huh?

Do you understand now where the problem lies?

Slapper - you know where I live - of course I get it.     They, meaning bloomberg, klein, and the others are EXTREMELY arrogant.   

[SAMSON123]

That's what happens when Joe Klein (a Jew) surrendered his seat to Michael Bloomberg (a Jew), who appointed Cathie Black (a Jew) as the new chancellor. And Cathie lost no time in appointing Shael Polakow-Suransky (a Jew) as the chief academic officer.

Quite a racket huh?

Do you understand now where the problem lies?

Obviously not...

[Slapper]

Obviously not...

Let me guess... you're Jewish?

[SAMSON123]

Let me guess... you're Jewish?

You are taking my response in the wrong way... I am actually agreeing with you. My remark was in response to your remark to 3 that the jews have a racket going on in regard to high positions in New York's educational system... and everywhere else for that matter. Nepotism rules amongst them, while they attempt to slander anyone/group/race for any reason, they are the main ones to exercise such games to promote each other into positions they are NOT qualified for with DISASTROUS results, simply because of the jew title.

BTW NO...I am not jewish.

[Slapper]

You are taking my response in the wrong way... I am actually agreeing with you. My remark was in response to your remark to 3 that the jews have a racket going on in regard to high positions in New York's educational system... and everywhere else for that matter. Nepotism rules amongst them, while they attempt to slander anyone/group/race for any reason, they are the main ones to exercise such games to promote each other into positions they are NOT qualified for with DISASTROUS results, simply because of the jew title.

BTW NO...I am not jewish.

Ooops! My apologies.

I totally agree with you.

Not only that, a great number of school buildings are actually leased from private hands, most of whom are... just guess.

[Brixtonbulldog]

slapper you need to wake up and pull your head out of your ass

the percentage of jews operating as gov't beureoucrats, appointed officials, and assorted educational system scum are almost nil.  The vast majority are business owners, doctors, lawyers, and generally hard working americans who are a benefit to thier community etc.  the same cannot be said for 'other' groups where huge percentages are criminals, free-loaders, and degenerates and i don't see you saying anything about that 'problem.'  there is no comparison.

i also find it interesting that liberal morons like yourself don't realize that most of the 'jews' that you whine about are, first and foremost, flaming socialist, big government puppet pounding, liberal hypocrits like shmuck schumer and soros.  this aside from all you dirty liberal trash trying to smear conservatives as old white racist rednecks and fascists and here you are practically reciting the protocols of zion. 

the day you stop picking up the dog shit for the same people your pissing your pants on this board to cry about is the day you can talk.  you are the problem and you will never be smart enough to figure that out.

[Slapper]

the percentage of jews operating as gov't beureoucrats, appointed officials, and assorted educational system scum are almost nil.

Not in Jew York.

The vast majority are business owners, doctors, lawyers, and generally hard working americans who are a benefit to thier community etc.

You mean like the following two hard-working fellas:

the same cannot be said for 'other' groups where huge percentages are criminals, free-loaders, and degenerates and i don't see you saying anything about that 'problem.'  there is no comparison.

Name me two Black or Hispanic criminals of the caliber of Madoff or Milken.

i also find it interesting that liberal morons like yourself don't realize that most of the 'jews' that you whine about are, first and foremost, flaming socialist, big government puppet pounding, liberal hypocrits like shmuck schumer and soros.

this aside from all you dirty liberal trash trying to smear conservatives as old white racist rednecks and fascists and here you are practically reciting the protocols of zion.

 

Fuck you and the liberal bullshit! Don't deviate from what's being talked about jerk-off.

the day you stop picking up the dog shit for the same people your pissing your pants on this board to cry about is the day you can talk.  you are the problem and you will never be smart enough to figure that out.

Huh???

[Lundgren]

Not in Jew York.

You mean like the following two hard-working fellas:



Name me two black or hispanic criminals of the caliber of Madoff or milken.

Lol way to true, madoff alone swindled half the gdp of mexico.

[Slapper]

Or this guy:

[Brixtonbulldog]

Not in Jew York.

You mean like the following two hard-working fellas:



Name me two black or hispanic criminals of the caliber of Madoff or Milken.

  

Fuck you and the liberal bullshit! Don't deviate from what's being talked about jerk-off.

Huh???

oh so this is just in NYC.. ok  :-/

black and hispanic criminals never get that far.. it's not whites/jews faults that we earned our way to a level where the bad apples are able to commit crimes on a wide scale.  are you saying every junk shooting, gang banging, drug slinging, thieving rapist wouldn't be doing the same thing if they had the means?  how would them committing a hundred similar crimes on a small scale be less of a problem versus your one or two jews?  it's fucking laughable that you actually single out like the most law-abiding, docile, and isolated group in the country just to fuel another misplaced liberal guilty pleasure- blaming problems YOU are causing on someone else. while you're at it go to a jewish community and find me exactly ONE criminal.  you won't because they aren't there.  could you do the same in a black neighborhood?  you couldn't piss without hitting ten of them.

yes, liberals (you) are the real problem here.  calling out the source of the problem (again.. YOU) isn't deviating- you dirty liberal scumbag.  

[Slapper]

oh so this is just in NYC.. ok  :-/

No, it's obviously not only in NYC, it's everywhere. BUT the title of the thread is "Parents fume over Black's 'birth control' quip about overcrowding - Ha ha ha!!!". Since Black is the new schools Chancellor in NYC then it makes sense that we keep it to NYC. If you want to open up a thread about how good Jews are and how everyone else is bad and all of that, feel free, but don't take this thread into the gutter.

black and hispanic criminals never get that far.. it's not whites/jews faults that we earned our way to a level where the bad apples are able to commit crimes on a wide scale.

My question is simple: Name me two Black or Hispanic criminals of Madoff's or Milken's caliber.
 

are you saying every junk shooting, gang banging, drug slinging, thieving rapist wouldn't be doing the same thing if they had the means?  how would them committing a hundred similar crimes on a small scale be less of a problem versus your one or two jews?  it's fucking laughable that you actually single out like the most law-abiding, docile, and isolated group in the country just to fuel another misplaced liberal guilty pleasure- blaming problems YOU are causing on someone else. while you're at it go to a jewish community and find me exactly ONE criminal.  you won't because they aren't there.  could you do the same in a black neighborhood?  you couldn't piss without hitting ten of them.

First of all, what does what I have to say have anything to do with liberalism? Are you a retard? Were you dropped on your head when you were little? How are you connecting those two dots?

Second of all, I really have no idea where you live, but here in New York the appointment/selection of Black as the new school chancellor is something that set something off. The fact that the majority of the upper echelon of the management team in the DoE is made up of Jews is an UN-SUS-TAI-NA-BLE situation. They know it. Most of us know it. So if the Black bitch wants to start giving birth control advise... maybe she ought to start going to the hasidic communities. They surely give Mexicans a run for their money!

yes, liberals (you) are the real problem here.  calling out the source of the problem (again.. YOU) isn't deviating- you dirty liberal scumbag. 

There we go again with the liberal crap.

You know, you're just a retard with a mission to become more ignorant by the word.

And you're doing a good job too.

[Brixtonbulldog]

No, it's obviously not only in NYC, it's everywhere. BUT the title of the thread is "Parents fume over Black's 'birth control' quip about overcrowding - Ha ha ha!!!". Since Black is the new schools Chancellor in NYC then it makes sense that we keep it to NYC. If you want to open up a thread about how good Jews are and how everyone else is bad and all of that, feel free, but don't take this thread into the gutter.

My question is simple: Name me two Black or Hispanic criminals of Madoff's or Milken's caliber.
 
First of all, what does what I have to say have anything to do with liberalism? Are you a retard? Were you dropped on your head when you were little? How are you connecting those two dots?

Second of all, I really have no idea where you live, but here in New York the appointment/selection of Black as the new school chancellor is something that set something off. The fact that the majority of the upper echelon of the management team in the DoE is made up of Jews is an UN-SUS-TAI-NA-BLE situation. They know it. Most of us know it. So if the Black bitch wants to start giving birth control advise... maybe she ought to start going to the hasidic communities. They surely give Mexicans a run for their money!

There we go again with the liberal crap.

You know, you're just a retard with a mission to become more ignorant by the word.

And you're doing a good job too.

your entire post is an massive meltdown of avoidance.  you ignored every point i made because you either cannot comprehend what i said or you are desperate not to acknowledge your own stupid and pointless anti-semetic crusade.  trying to say we should only talk about the initial subject of the thread because you either get scared of further digging yourself in your little hate-filled witch hunt/scapegoat hole or you don't want look a little deeper into the very problems you were complaining about tells me you aren't smart enough to learn anything from what anyone on here has to teach you.  if the dirty liberal wants to not discuss the real problem and just whine about the elusive, child stealing, terrible jew monsters of legend knock yourself out.   

[Brixtonbulldog]

My question is simple: Name me two Black or Hispanic criminals of Madoff's or Milken's caliber.

im not wasting an hour on the net digging up characters unless you want to spend the rest of the week looking through the list of black/hispanic criminals that committed heinous crimes in baltimore over the course of only one week.  but i will give you one man-

[Slapper]

your entire post is an massive meltdown of avoidance.

Buddy, listen to me: If you want to talk about things that do not pertain to the threat title I will not participate in it. It's not because I'm trying to avoid you, it's because it's unpolite to everyone here.

you ignored every point i made because you either cannot comprehend what i said or you are desperate not to acknowledge your own stupid and pointless anti-semetic crusade.

Oh, I see, pointing out the Jewish criminals is anti-semitic.

Go fuck yourself.

trying to say we should only talk about the initial subject of the thread because you either get scared of further digging yourself in your little hate-filled witch hunt/scapegoat hole or you don't want look a little deeper into the very problems you were complaining about[...]

Well, that's called thread protocol. It's well known through the internet forums. Many of them actually enforce it, meaning if you do not stick to the subject your comment is deleted. It's not that I do not want to answer your questions, it's that you're talking the thread in a different direction. The reason I say Black is insinuating not having kids as an solution to the educational problems in the city is just a laughable concept is because she's not fit for the job. And let's be honest, the reason she's saying such a thing is because she is intentionally trying to insult the Black and Hispanic communities of the City of New York.

Imagine Obama went to public and said "well, if we want to solve the Social Security problems the Old Timers have to die sooner". I mean, it's just a horrible thing to say. And the politicians are so dettached from people's everyday's struggles that they say the fucking dummest things without any remorse whatsoever.

Also, my criticism of Black is not only from what I read. One of my very significant others actually works for the DoE and tells me about what is being whispered amongst the employees of the DoE. And what is being whispered is that the upper echelons of the DoE is Jewish "infested". I believe the difference between what YOU and I say is in this very point: You say it is "infested" because they're brilliant people and I say it is "infested" because they're too Jewish-centric.

I mean, it you think about it... Bloomberg has trippled his fortune ever since he became mayor of the city. If you innocently think they do not have a racket going... you're either blind of Jew-centric.

if the dirty liberal wants to not discuss the real problem and just whine about the elusive, child stealing, terrible jew monsters of legend knock yourself out.

But... what does liberalism have to do with what I'm saying?

WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU???

[Slapper]

im not wasting an hour on the net digging up characters unless you want to spend the rest of the week looking through the list of black/hispanic criminals that committed heinous crimes in baltimore over the course of only one week.  but i will give you one man-

Ok, so you mean to say that Tyrone and José carjacking an innocent white person, multiplied by 10,000, is worst that Madoff's 65+ billion shopping spree?

Seriously, GO FUCK YOURSELF!

[Brixtonbulldog]

Buddy, listen to me: If you want to talk about things that do not pertain to the threat title I will not participate in it. It's not because I'm trying to avoid you, it's because it's unpolite to everyone here.

Oh, I see, pointing out the Jewish criminals is anti-semitic.

Go fuck yourself.


Well, that's called thread protocol. It's well known through the internet forums. Many of them actually enforce it, meaning if you do not stick to the subject your comment is deleted. It's not that I do not want to answer your questions, it's that you're talking the thread in a different direction. The reason I say Black is insinuating not having kids as an solution to the educational problems in the city is just a laughable concept is because she's not fit for the job. And let's be honest, the reason she's saying such a thing is because she is intentionally trying to insult the Black and Hispanic communities of the City of New York.

Imagine Obama went to public and said "well, if we want to solve the Social Security problems the Old Timers have to die sooner". I mean, it's just a horrible thing to say. And the politicians are so dettached from people's everyday's struggles that they say the fucking dummest things without any remorse whatsoever.

Also, my criticism of Black is not only from what I read. One of my very significant others actually works for the DoE and tells me about what is being whispered amongst the employees of the DoE. And what is being whispered is that the upper echelons of the DoE is Jewish "infested". I believe the difference between what YOU and I say is in this very point: You say it is "infested" because they're brilliant people and I say it is "infested" because they're too Jewish-centric.

I mean, it you think about it... Bloomberg has trippled his fortune ever since he became mayor of the city. If you innocently think they do not have a racket going... you're either blind of Jew-centric.


But... what does liberalism have to do with what I'm saying?

WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU???

almost every thread on this board goes off in multiple directions so cut the shit.

and pointing out crimials in any racial group isn't racist until you only focus on a miniscule segment in one population and a rampant criminal culture in another.  there is no comparison.

but ON your topic i will add that obama does exactly that with national health care.  when the gov't decides who can get treatment and who can't based on things like age part of that trade off is allowing people to die because some beureaucrat makes a decision in the gov't interest.  happens in EVERY national health care system where decsions are made for the populace instead of BY the populace.  in effect obama is supporting letting some people die because it's 'thier time' or 'they have lived a full life so let's just treat the pain and get them off treatment.'  spend some time learning about it.. it was a very large part of the anti-HC talking points when obama was pushing this monsterous travesty through.

and as far as black is concerned it looks more like she's trying to reason with a segment of the american population in which teen pregnancy and sexual activity is out of control.  i could easily see someone in her position getting real tired of 'urban' schools where the parents are absent or indifferent and all the girls are getting pregnant because, let's face it, they're fucking stupid. 

[Brixtonbulldog]

Ok, so you mean to say that Tyrone and José carjacking an innocent white person, multiplied by 10,000, is worst that Madoff's 65+ billion shopping spree?

Seriously, GO FUCK YOURSELF!

this is why being liberal has warped you pea-sized brain.  your politics are at the heart of your problem.  as a liberal you think that anyone who makes money is evil to begin with and if they did so by ripping people off then i guess it makes rapists and murderers not really look so bad, huh?  so let's just round up all the jews (since even the law-abiding ones have money they must be bad to begin with) and persecute them.  to hell with problems that affect people everywhere in this country.  it doesn't matter because the jews are still taking everyone's money.. OH NO!!!

apparently you can't read.. the point is how many tyrones and joses there are AND WHAT CRIMES THEY ARE COMMITTING ON TOP OF THAT. 

madoff ripping off investors (most of whom are successful, well established, and secure investors) is nothing compared to widespread and continual rape, murder, theft, burglary, arson, assault, drug distribution, fraud, etc. etc. etc.