WHAT?
I dont know whether to laugh or face palm in sadness that you even think like that. Im fairly certain you never attended college now and if you did you never took a stats class...Lack of evidence in your mind doesnt prove that God doesnt exist...Even if no evidence existed what so ever wouldnt disprove God you need evidence that disproves God to say he doesnt exist not pointing to a lack of evidence and saying seee no God...idiocy.
How do you know what I believe about God? Ive have my own beliefs and as such believe the Bible is skewed as it was written and translated by MAN that doesnt disprove GOD...
so again necrosis what proof do you have THAT GOD DOESNT EXIST?
i am 100% certain i know more about statistics then you, as i did advanced level in university
. You took my quote out of context, there is no evidence whatsoever of god, therefore i do not believe in a god. It is both irrational and illogical to believe in something without proof.
however, logically we view a world that goes from simple to complex, never the reverse what relgious folk suggest is the complete opposite, that hypercomplex was at the start and made the simple. Also, to defend my suggestion that lack of evidence is evidence, we would expect to find some evidence of a loving, hyperintelligent being in our existence. The fact that all signs point to the opposite is in fact evidence.just like i cant prove gravity always works, i can point to the evidence that it does.the fact that no one has witnessed the law of gravity reversed or sidestepped gives us pretty strong inclination that it always occurs everywhere. However, this cannot be proven. It is reasonable to make assumptions like this when faced with overwhelming evidence or lack thereof.
For instance, if an intelligent being made this world we would expect it to be orderly and logical. however, it is not. Natural disasters occur at random, the eye is a poor design, child malformations and a star that will obliterate us, point to no intelligence behind it all. Why can i make this assumption? because i also am intelligent and can see that these things make no sense in a rational context. Also, one cannot know the future while being all loving in this existence. God in terms of the bible created people knowing they would go to hell, makes no sense and is logically impossible to reconcile.Hell also goes against an all loving god, another contradiction that cannot be rectified.
also, Never once have we seen god, pictures, a change in the physical laws, a miracle even. A complete lack of evidence for something that created everything and is claimed to be involved with it. Perhaps you should go back to stats class because probability is on my side, not yours. Not once have we found a god, or supernatural explanation for any discovery, out of the millions. This indicates that the trend will most likely continue and no god will be found. However, there could be.unicorns may exist but the overwhelming lack of evidence would suggest they do not, just like god. So i cannot prove a negative but i can make safe assumptions based on the evidence and the claims made, if a god existed surely some evidence would exist.
You think you are safe in your belief that you cannot prove a negative, as if that should make you more comfortable in your irrationality. Meanwhile the criteria you present or anyone presents of a god is impossible to measure in the first place making it a total non starter and irrelavant.
Now my question to you is what is your evidence for god?
