I dont give a shit either way but do you really think Layne spent $23000 going after Blaha?
Of course I doubt it.
The difference is, I'm not an idiot and I realise that absence of proof does not give me permission to publicly state, without question (read the video title) that I have been defrauded (ie, had a crime committed on me by Layne). Layne said he would provide the proof to Jason - Jason then posted a video saying he's been defrauded. Wrong. He's just not been provided proof. Can you see how that is a giant leap in logic that doesn't actually fly?
Look at the big picture - and it is this. If Jason is allowed to pull the bullshit he is trying to get away with - You have the job I want. I'll just tell management you raped a kid, last night.
Just because most of us think Layne is not natural (at least pro hormoned up) does not mean we should abandon supporting the system that prevents all of us from having malicious claims made to us by our enemies/ those who want to gain an advantage over us?
That's why I don't respect Jason - because he claims to be intelligent, but he's too fucking stupid to see where the line was, twice now. He brought this on himself. Read the news tonight - you'll hear a lot of the expression "the suspect". That's not for shits and giggles - it's because in the world we live in, we have to give the onus of proof on the one making the damaging claims. If we don't, chaos reigns.