Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Pollux on August 05, 2008, 06:32:33 PM
-
... 8)
(http://www.bodybuilding-pics.com/44/images/Flex_Wheeler_205.jpg)
(http://www.bodybuilding-pics.com/44/images/Flex_Wheeler_195.jpg)
(http://www.bodybuilding-pics.com/44/images/Flex_Wheeler_189.jpg)
(http://www.bodybuilding-pics.com/44/images/Flex_Wheeler_163.jpg)
-
That was 9 years ago!! Let it go!!! Nobody says anything about Victor's calves, Darrem's calves, Dillett's delts, etc...EVERY PRO DOES IT!!!!
-
It didn't work and its exactly why he looked better in 1993 than any point past .
-
That was 9 years ago!! Let it go!!! Nobody says anything about Victor's calves, Darrem's calves, Dillett's delts, etc...EVERY PRO DOES IT!!!
Whoa! Calm down there, chief. This is Flex we're talkin' about. ;)
-
Best physique of all time!!!
-
It didn't work and its exactly why he looked better in 1993 than any point past .
'93 Flex was kick-ass! But c'mon...you can't admit that Flex actually looked good using it?
-
It didn't work and its exactly why he looked better in 1993 than any point past .
1998 Arnold!!!! Skinless and dry!!!
-
'93 Flex was kick-ass! But c'mon...you can't admit that Flex actually looked good using it?
He had round muscles to begin with and it was not that obvious. Nobody was cryiing in 1999 that he was using synthol.
-
1998 Arnold!!!! Skinless and dry!!!
I believe this was his '98 Arnold condition...
(http://www.bodybuilding-pics.com/44/images/Flex_Wheeler_104.jpg)
-
>:(
-
'93 Flex was kick-ass! But c'mon...you can't admit that Flex actually looked good using it?
NO I don't think so , I think his 93 physique is the pinnacle of just about all physiques
-
Best physique of all time!!!
Yep.
But his posing is fucking awful in that vid.
-
1998 Arnold!!!! Skinless, oil-filled, and dry!!!
Fixed that for you.
-
his posing is fucking awful in that vid.
Really? ???
I thought that shit was tight. 8)
-
2 Reasons why he got away with it, 1 because he used a little amount but spaced it out in every single tiny muscle not just one big muscle group like the idiots do today and because he was shredded so despite his synthol use he was still striated everywhere, only a few gifted can get away with it.
-
2 Reasons why he got away with it, 1 because he used a little amount but spaced it out in every single tiny muscle not just one big muscle group like the idiots do today and because he was shredded so despite his synthol use he was still striated everywhere, only a few gifted can get away with it.
Flex used more than a little amount in his delts and calves...very obvious.
-
Flex used more than a little amount in his delts and calves...very obvious.
true, but not as much as todays competitors.
-
flex is out of the game, live with that
-
Was in an old mag...he went to a Dr. to give him the shots in the exact muscle belly-insertion....
Any one have the USA pic with the Flex word shaved on the back of his heaed>? He looked very very good there!
-
Was in an old mag...he went to a Dr. to give him the shots in the exact muscle belly-insertion....
Any one have the USA pic with the Flex word shaved on the back of his heaed>? He looked very very good there!
Thats what I was trying to say, I believe Levrone did the same no?
-
NO I don't think so , I think his 93 physique is the pinnacle of just about all physiques
I agree! Another year that Dorian got a gift!
-
I agree! Another year that Dorian got a gift!
ha ha ha 93 was no gift Yates was the clear winner if Flex brought the 93 Arnold Classic physique maybe but the physique he showed up with at the Olympia he was lucky to place second.
-
I will admit the physique flex won the Arnold with in 93 was the best physique of all time on stage, incredible, and i dislike the guy, but he wasnt the same guy come the Olympia and was beaten fairly by Yates. His best weight was around 218 to 227, the rest of his days he came in way to heavy and never got his condition right certainly could never get that dry look of early 93 again, could be the kidney thing same happended with Don Long, looked great once but then just couldnt get dry ever again, who knows but Flex was on at the Arnold that year.
-
I honestly think it was EISCELENE and not SYNTHOL.....
I read an Article somewhere where Flex admitted Buying Huge Amounts of Eiscelene coming up to shows....
He also admitted that he once got Extremely Ill in his Hotel Room and his wife saved him.....
-
Looks like shit. And what's up with his teeth?
-
In my opinion, like ND saying,93version is better. So to speak,without oil.
-
I honestly think it was EISCELENE and not SYNTHOL.....
I read an Article somewhere where Flex admitted Buying Huge Amounts of Eiscelene coming up to shows....
He also admitted that he once got Extremely Ill in his Hotel Room and his wife saved him.....
He has spoken candidly about his escline usage... he said the only person pumping more of that shit in themselves than him was Kevin Levrone.
-
Flex was 10lbs heavier in 98 and his condition was spot on
1998 ASC was his best ever, Flex even says so
-
I honestly think it was EISCELENE and not SYNTHOL.....
He has admitted to both many times.
-
Flex did used to look incredible. Pre-synthol he is one of my favourite physiques
-
it was escicline in the early days before synthol, and later on still in his back, if you notice in 93 his arm defintion is very good as escicline doesn't make the muscle appear smooth,as i believe its water based. Synthol is a much different look,or better still any bodypart that has been injected alot with any type of oil over a period of time, will start to lose its definition as he did around 97, his arms were huge and still shapely but the feathers were gone. Flex was known to put up to 60ampules of Escicline into himself prior to competing and inject all the muscles of his back, no bullshit, lots of guys used heaps of the stuff, Flex is one of the only guys i know used like GH15 says, infact for a long time i thought he was GH15, still could be, As Flex looked great, but he took heaps of gear and still wasnt huge, and GH 15 thinks anyone over 180 has to be on something, which is bullshit, but flex s body was a work of art and chemistry of the highest degree.
-
Looks like shit.
idiot ::)
-
It didn't work and its exactly why he looked better in 1993 than any point past .
I concur. '93 Flex Wheeler...one of the best physiques, ever! Period.
-
ha ha ha 93 was no gift Yates was the clear winner if Flex brought the 93 Arnold Classic physique maybe but the physique he showed up with at the Olympia he was lucky to place second.
Naaaaaaar. You're pushing it there. >:(
-
I honestly think it was EISCELENE and not SYNTHOL.....
Esiclene in the early years. Synthol in the later. Straight from the horse's mouth.
-
Flex used more than a little amount in his delts and calves...very obvious.
Its also very obvious you swallow loads of man fluids a day.
-
it was escicline in the early days before synthol, and later on still in his back, if you notice in 93 his arm defintion is very good as escicline doesn't make the muscle appear smooth,as i believe its water based. Synthol is a much different look,or better still any bodypart that has been injected alot with any type of oil over a period of time, will start to lose its definition as he did around 97, his arms were huge and still shapely but the feathers were gone. Flex was known to put up to 60ampules of Escicline into himself prior to competing and inject all the muscles of his back, no bullshit, lots of guys used heaps of the stuff, Flex is one of the only guys i know used like GH15 says, infact for a long time i thought he was GH15, still could be, As Flex looked great, but he took heaps of gear and still wasnt huge, and GH 15 thinks anyone over 180 has to be on something, which is bullshit, but flex s body was a work of art and chemistry of the highest degree.
yeah, he admitted to having the Escilene injected in a "T" formation on his delts. I believe he said he did it himself. He even said that he did the synthol for the delts as well.
-
idiot ::)
(http://www.bodybuilding-pics.com/44/images/Flex_Wheeler_189.jpg)
idiot.
-
Best physique of all time!!!
Agree 100000% Flex was off the chain. How he never won the O is beyond belief ???
-
1998 Arnold!!!! Skinless and dry!!!
0% bodyfat. :o ::)
-
Esiclene in the early years. Synthol in the later. Straight from the horse's mouth.
Correct. How do I know? I'm the one that sold him the esiclene. I got it from Max @ Gold's Venice, by the shoe box. ;)
-
at that point 96 on ,flex had such a cartoonish look to his muscle it looked flexed and full when relaxed ,his already full bellies were swelled to the max.93 unreal build and exteme muscularture,96 and up thick delts and arms full to capacity and loss of sharpness all round,still a legend.
-
The bullshit outcome at the '99 Olympia. >:(
-
It didn't work and its exactly why he looked better in 1993 than any point past .
Bullshit... '98 Arnold & this show blows '93 version away.. He may have been a bit more ripped in '93, but size counts..
-
The audience had every right to boo. >:(
-
ha ha ha 93 was no gift Yates was the clear winner if Flex brought the 93 Arnold Classic physique maybe but the physique he showed up with at the Olympia he was lucky to place second.
Agreed
-
I honestly think it was EISCELENE and not SYNTHOL.....
I read an Article somewhere where Flex admitted Buying Huge Amounts of Eiscelene coming up to shows....
He also admitted that he once got Extremely Ill in his Hotel Room and his wife saved him.....
Correct.. The only reason Synthol was used by the majority of pros was that ESICLENE was discontinued.. The biggest user of ESICLENE was Jean Pierre Fuchs--remember that FLEX cover with Nasser?? Look what happened to him when he started using Synthol...
-
Correct.. The only reason Synthol was used by the majority of pros was that ESICLENE was discontinued.. The biggest user of ESICLENE was Jean Pierre Fuchs--remember that FLEX cover with Nasser?? Look what happened to him when he started using Synthol...
But look what happened to Flex when he started using it - awesome! 8)
-
But look what happened to Flex when he started using it - awesome! 8)
Point was that Jean Pierre really relied on esiclene, and then when he tried to utilize the same levels with synthol--it backfired.. His body really did look like it was dripping oil...
-
Long live Flex "I look good with synthol" Wheeler! 8)
(http://www.bodybuilding-pics.com/44/images/Flex_Wheeler_122.jpg)
-
Bullshit... '98 Arnold & this show blows '93 version away.. He may have been a bit more ripped in '93, but size counts..
No size doesn't count at least not when its even size lol Flex looked more aesthetic lighter , someone nailed it right on the head when they said Flex looked worse the heavier he became , very few people can pull off real extra size , Flex's frame was to light for this
-
Flex surely looked better lighter. The size game wasn't for him - except for '99 Olympia.
(http://www.bodybuilding-pics.com/44/images/Flex_Wheeler_312.jpg)
-
Flex surely looked better lighter. The size game wasn't for him - except for '99 Olympia.
(http://www.bodybuilding-pics.com/44/images/Flex_Wheeler_312.jpg)
Size at the expense of condition is exactly why he lost in 1998 & 1999 Ronnoe basically won because of hams & glutes in 98
-
Long live Flex "I look good with synthol" Wheeler! 8)
(http://www.bodybuilding-pics.com/44/images/Flex_Wheeler_122.jpg)
Doesn't look too good to me. Especially the funky-looking CALVES/delts/triceps oh and elbows :-\
I prefer his earlier look.
-
Size at the expense of condition is exactly why he lost in 1998 & 1999 Ronnoe basically won because of hams & glutes in 98
And back.
If flex would have won it - why would he have won it? Delts? Chest?
-
And back.
If flex would have won it - why would he have won it? Delts? Chest?
Flex had a great back , he wasn't as wide as Ronnie and didn't need to be to beat him
-
Flex had a great back , he wasn't as wide as Ronnie and didn't need to be to beat him
This is your opinion.
Do not try and pass it off as fact
-
Flex had a great back , he wasn't as wide as Ronnie and didn't need to be to beat him
Ronnie had a better back than dorian.
-
Ronnie had a better back than dorian.
And Flex had a better back than Ronnie in the '99 Olympia. But let me just clarify that this is my opinion before Sculpture gets worked up. :D
-
This is your opinion.
Do not try and pass it off as fact
NO it is a fact , Flex's back is great and it isn't as wide as Ronnie's thats a fact if you have proof to the contrary feel free to post it until then refrain from commenting on the subject ;)
-
Ronnie had a better back than dorian.
Ronnie doesn't think so and neither do I :)
-
Anyone who doesn't think Flex has a great back is a fucking idiot
-
;)
-
Anyone who doesn't think Flex has a great back is a fucking idiot
You got that right.
(http://www.bodybuilding-pics.com/44/images/Flex_Wheeler_287.jpg)
-
;)
-
The real question is, could Flex Wheeler stop Michael Dudakoff if he tried to jack his car?
-
The real question is, could Flex Wheeler stop Michael Dudakoff if he tried to jack his car?
>:(
-
>:(
Yeah, but it michael frickin' Dudukoff!!! He killed like what? At least a couple of hundred rainbow colored ninjas!
(http://www.moviecube.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/americanninja.jpg)
-
Yeah, but it michael frickin' Dudukoff!!! He killed like what? At least a couple of hundred rainbow colored ninjas!
(http://www.moviecube.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/americanninja.jpg)
LMFAO Flex has 0.0% bodyfat if that can't kill him nothing can
-
NO it is a fact , Flex's back is great and it isn't as wide as Ronnie's thats a fact if you have proof to the contrary feel free to post it until then refrain from commenting on the subject ;)
I wasn't referring to wheelers back being great or not as wide - that is obvious.
I was referring to you saying "he didnt need to be to beat him"
-
Wheeler > Coleman in '99 Olympia 8)
-
I wasn't referring to wheelers back being great or not as wide - that is obvious.
I was referring to you saying "he didnt need to be to beat him"
Again how is that not a fact? all Flex needed to beat Ronnie was equal or better conditioning most of the time thats why Flex lost to Ronnie
-
After reading the thread title :
Why Synthol worked great for FLEX WHEELER...
I sort of expected, you know like, an actual reason inside of WHY.
Like why it worked great for him and not others.
-
After reading the thread title :
Why Synthol worked great for FLEX WHEELER...
I sort of expected, you know like, an actual reason inside of WHY.
Like why it worked great for him and not others.
His '99 Olympia physique speaks for itself. If you need further explanation then you're losing the point.
-
it was escicline in the early days before synthol, and later on still in his back, if you notice in 93 his arm defintion is very good as escicline doesn't make the muscle appear smooth,as i believe its water based. Synthol is a much different look,or better still any bodypart that has been injected alot with any type of oil over a period of time, will start to lose its definition as he did around 97, his arms were huge and still shapely but the feathers were gone. Flex was known to put up to 60ampules of Escicline into himself prior to competing and inject all the muscles of his back, no bullshit, lots of guys used heaps of the stuff, Flex is one of the only guys i know used like GH15 says, infact for a long time i thought he was GH15, still could be, As Flex looked great, but he took heaps of gear and still wasnt huge, and GH 15 thinks anyone over 180 has to be on something, which is bullshit, but flex s body was a work of art and chemistry of the highest degree.
It can make it smooth, it causes so much inflammation and PAIN + PAIN. But when your already 4% bf and dieted down, once you start the carb loading process, it actually makes you real hot, and your veins sart to just pop out like no other, but you can't really breathe cause it has effects on the lungs as well since when your shooting it, some can get into the bloodstream, and it just sucks. Some people with just .5 cc can get 2 inches in 30 munutes, most need about 1.5 cc for that effect.
-
His '99 Olympia physique speaks for itself. If you need further explanation then you're losing the point.
No, you are losing the point of the thread title.
A better - grammatically correct - title would have been : Synthol worked great for FLEX WHEELER.
Not "Why".
-
It is a travesty that Ronnie won the 1999 Olympia. He deserved to win in 1998, but not 1999. Flex was fuller, bigger and in slightly better conditioning in 1999 than in the previous year, while Ronnie had lost that crips conditioning he had the previous year. But Wheeler looked his best ever at the 1993 Ironman and not at any Olympia presentation or even at the Arnold.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
-
No, you are losing the point of the thread title.
A better - grammatically correct - title would have been : Synthol worked great for FLEX WHEELER.
Not "Why".
Yeeeeah. I can see you're reading too much into this. Have a good day. :)