Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Iceman1981 on October 29, 2012, 09:05:51 AM
-
This was Lee's second Mr. Olympia win. He came in fuller than the year before which filled out his frame and made his separation stand out even more. In my opinion, this was the year Lee took "back development" to the next level after the Lion Of Lebanon Samir Bannout.
Over 30 Pics -----> Lee Haney 1985 Mr Olympia DVD PICS (http://www.legendsofbodybuilding.com/2012/10/lee-haney-1985-mr.html) (Drag pics to new tab and it will open to original size)
(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-P6pf58pBebc/UI1zjwQmY8I/AAAAAAAAD2A/w8L6JHZCxnI/s1600/vlcsnap-00128.jpg)
-
easily maintainable without a lot of drugs.
-
OMG OMG THAT'S SO FUCKING AWESOME BLURRY PICTURES A BLACK MAN IN'A RED THONG!!!!! :o :o :o :o :o
-
good old Haney, perfection.
-
good old Haney, perfection.
And remember, this is pre-celltech
-
This was Lee's second Mr. Olympia win. He came in fuller than the year before which filled out his frame and made his separation stand out even more. In my opinion, this was the year Lee took "back development" to the next level after the Lion Of Lebanon Samir Bannout.
Over 30 Pics -----> Lee Haney 1985 Mr Olympia DVD PICS (http://www.legendsofbodybuilding.com/2012/10/lee-haney-1985-mr.html) (Drag pics to new tab and it will open to original size)
(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-P6pf58pBebc/UI1zjwQmY8I/AAAAAAAAD2A/w8L6JHZCxnI/s1600/vlcsnap-00128.jpg)
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-I9NPSrx_HE0/UI1zkjnCVeI/AAAAAAAAD2I/IIspDqmyrAw/s1600/vlcsnap-00129.jpg)
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-jXj2SSK8R78/UI1zqRiwk2I/AAAAAAAAD3w/t5eIWGZvZYM/s1600/vlcsnap-00145.jpg)
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-oL1tUsU7Ybk/UI10JlsWKfI/AAAAAAAAD5I/RAYSedVqPVA/s1600/vlcsnap-00159.jpg)
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-7ruz-Ngm1Iw/UI10KxTZBBI/AAAAAAAAD5g/hu8yhA0cAYI/s1600/vlcsnap-00162.jpg)
actually imo samir's back in 83 beats any version of haney's back even at his very best.. lee's back was wider and thicker but was never as dry and detailed as samir's in 83..
-
actually imo samir's back in 83 beats any version of haney's back even at his very best.. lee's back was wider and thicker but was never as dry and detailed as samir's in 83..
oh brother(hood of Arabs).
-
oh brother(hood of Arabs).
no at all.. overall i prefer lee at his best over samir in 83 but as for the back i think lee's is kinda overrated.. very great indeed but was never conditioned enough.. just my opinion..
-
Even arms looked great there.
-
Great shots , thanks for posting.
-
And remember, this is pre-celltech
Liar, celltech has been around since 1950's with Bill Pearl using it. It was underground, labs in Romania and Pennsylvania. Only pharma quality and it used cadaver creatine. Today's cell tech is nothing like original.
-
samir's back 83 vs. lee's back 91..
-
Liar, celltech has been around since 1950's with Bill Pearl using it. It was underground, labs in Romania and Pennsylvania. Only pharma quality and it used cadaver creatine. Today's cell tech is nothing like original.
Lee said he only took celltech in 91, because he knew everyone else was on it
-
that arab blows the black out of the water
Haney had a fantastic back, but Sherief is right, not as conditioned as Samir
For one day in his life, Samir peaked, and was the most complete bber around
Great physique, not big, but everything flowed, proportionally perfect.
Before haters jump in, I am a Haney fan, Samirs legs were good enough for the time, he was not a midget, and his elbows weren't too pointy.
-
samir's back 83 vs. lee's back 91..
Tough one... Haney on lats, Samir on traps and arms. Rest is about equal...
-
good old Haney, perfection.
all drugs and gay for pay
-
For comparisons sake. Haney '85 vs. Arnold '80...
-
For comparisons sake. Haney '85 vs. Arnold '80...
Difficult to compare
Haney is holding his arms out with flared lats
Arnold is squeezing his scapulae and showing his xmas tree
-
Difficult to compare
Haney is holding his arms out with flared lats
Arnold is squeezing his scapulae and showing his xmas tree
More accurate... '75 vs '85... :)