I have as much access to confidential documents as you do. So telling me to "prove it" is hysterical. But I do know people (family) who does have access but I will never know. But let's start here...
http://www.newsmax.com/US/barack-obama-president-2008/2011/03/28/id/390952/
If I wanted to be like you I would simply say that newsmax is not credible and then I would not address anything in the article.
Here's an example of how you do that when you want can't dispute something:
Because Maddow is as credible as Obama and will spin anything he can to make him look good. Neither have one redeeming good quality about them.
I won't bother to do that with you though I could and you of course would have no problem with it since you do that yourself.
The author of the article just rehashes the same old tired nonsense that right wing morons tell each other. Note by the way that he says that the 2008 candidates were vetted by the press and since Obama was a candidate in 2008 he was therefore vetted in the exact same way as all other candidates. Of course in Obama's case the press took the extra step of making up lies, slandering him, attacking him and his family, etc... So yes, Obama was vetted in the same way as any other candidate and more than most.
Since you've brought up the concept that Obama "was never vetted" why don't you explain to all of us what the official and proper vetting process is for a candidate for POTUS. Most people of normal intelligence will tell you that his/her party will vet the candidate to make sure he has no skeletons and then the opposition and the press further vet the candidate through the media over the course of an election. That is what most people of normal intelligence will tell you the process is in the country. Now, if you think there is some other process please tell us what that is.
Now let's move on to your vetting as a legitimate coach
As for my "vetting" every school district I or my other coaches work in must go through a background check whether as a stipend coach, a volunteer or as an outside contractor. Even as an AAU sponsored gym I can't nor can my employees, interns or coaches be in the AAU until they go through a background check as with the school districts, both are through a live scan process. I personally don't hire without a live scan process.
Wow - you had a background check.
How does that prove you are a legitimate coach
BTW - aren't you the one who is constantly reminding us how fucked up in every way the state of California is due to liberal politicians. Do you really think they can even conduct an adequate background check? Would you like me to list all of your fellow coaches and teachers in CA who in recent years have been arrested on various charges related to molesting children, child porn, drugs, etc... Seriously, I'll be glad to start listing them if you'd like. It's a pretty simple google search.
Clearly those background checks are basically worthless and they certainly don't prove you are a legitimate coach so thanks for actually providing the proof that you are in fact not a legitimate coach