Author Topic: CRACKING THE CODE: Inside story on dog food  (Read 1193 times)

~flower~

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3597
  • D/s
CRACKING THE CODE: Inside story on dog food
« on: December 20, 2007, 06:00:32 AM »
Old news, repeat, blah blah blah.............. ::)


www.chicagotribune.com/features/lifestyle/health/chi-1216_health1_r_n_ddec16,1,2287048.story
chicagotribune.com

CRACKING THE CODE: Inside story on dog food
Largely self-regulated, manufacturers aren't on the tightest of leashes

By Leslie Mann

Special to the Tribune

December 16, 2007
*

Years ago, you didn't hear the words "natural," "organic," "raw" or " human-grade" in the same sentence as "dog food." But now the market for healthful dog food is growing faster than a Great Dane pup, and the lexicon has greatly expanded. The only problem: What does it all mean?

"It's basically a multibillion-dollar industry that's self-regulated," warned Ann N. Martin, who has written books on the topic, including "Food Pets Die For: Shocking Facts About Pet Food" (NewSage, $13.95).

A handbook from the Association of American Feed Control Officials defines a "uniform code" that most manufacturers use, but AAFCO isn't a government agency; it's an independent organization with members that include pet food manufacturers.

The Food and Drug Administration, according to its Web site, "ensures that the ingredients used in pet food are safe," but headlines earlier this year proved that this isn't always so. And it bases its regulations on the AAFCO code, which is voluntary.

State departments of agriculture randomly test the food to make sure the ingredients correspond with the labels, according to a spokesman for the Illinois agency.

Terms such as "natural" are meaningless. In fact, this word was on many of the packages recalled starting last March, when pet food from China was found to be contaminated with an industrial chemical.

"Human-grade" means the dog food has met government regulations for human food, and "raw" means it is uncooked, but are these products nutritional for dogs?

A dog food can meet the U.S. Department of Agriculture's definition of "organic" for human food but may lack nutrients that dogs need. "Made with organic ingredients" doesn't necessarily mean all ingredients are organic.

"Poop is organic!" said Debra Thomas of Chicago-based Animal Affinity, which provides dog owners with nutritional counseling. "Beware of that term. Look for the food with the least amount of ingredients and ingredients that you recognize."

Understanding ingredient labels takes homework, too, but Martin's "Food" book walks you through it.

"Meat" (or the animal name, such as "chicken") means "clean flesh from slaughtered animals." This, Martin said, is what you find in better dog foods.

"Meat byproducts" are parts other than the "clean flesh," such as feet, beaks, heads and animal carcasses deemed unfit for humans.

"Meat meal" is rendered animals and can include roadkill, diseased livestock, livestock found dead, rotten meat from grocery stores, restaurant grease and -- brace yourself, dog lovers -- dead pets and the barbiturates used to euthanize them.

"Pet-food companies deny that any of their products contain rendered companion animals," Martin wrote in "Food." "They claim to ask their suppliers not to include cats and dogs; however, I have yet to find a pet food company that actually tests the raw material that it receives from a rendering plant to ascertain the sources of the protein."

Other common protein sources in dog foods, all blessed by AAFCO, include hydrolyzed hair (hair from slaughtered livestock), food-processing waste from institutions such as hospitals, and dried swine and poultry excreta.

Even the grains in commercial dog food aren't as pure as some dog owners believe, Martin said. They can contain herbicides and pesticides, she explained in "Food." If a label says "no additives or preservatives," Martin explained, that means only that the pet food maker didn't add them. Most pet food companies farm out their manufacturing. Wheeling-based Evanger's, she said, is one of the few exceptions.

Equally troubling is the claim "hormone- and antibiotic-free." To verify this, look for foods such as Pet Promise that are "source-verified." This, explained its co-founder, Dave Carter, means the company works directly with farmers who don't use hormones or antibiotics.

To research foods, Thomas suggested that you "buy from a store where you can ask a lot of questions. And go to the [food manufacturer's] Web site and read about the company and its food contents."

"Education is part of our job," said Dr. Phil Brown, corporate veterinarian for Newman's Own Organics. "If you see an ingredient on the label you don't understand, ask."

Or, consult a nutritionist through the American College of Veterinary Nutrition, suggested Dr. Edward Moser, a nutritionist and a spokesman for Wellness dog foods.

"He can help you determine which food is best for your dog's age, type, etc., and if your dog has allergies to any ingredients," Moser said.

Or, like Martin, cook your own food. Cooking one hour a week yields enough food for her 160-pound Newfoundland, she said. A good recipe, said Martin, consists of one-third each of meat, whole grains and ground fruits and vegetables, plus a little oil.

Butterbean

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19326
Re: CRACKING THE CODE: Inside story on dog food
« Reply #1 on: December 20, 2007, 11:15:27 AM »
I recently read this and was surprised and kind of horrified by what you have in a larger font especially the dead pets used as feed part :P    Isn't that how mad cow got started  ???
R

~flower~

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3597
  • D/s
Re: CRACKING THE CODE: Inside story on dog food
« Reply #2 on: December 20, 2007, 11:57:27 AM »
I recently read this and was surprised and kind of horrified by what you have in a larger font especially the dead pets used as feed part :P    Isn't that how mad cow got started  ???


yes, that was how mad cow got started in cows, by making them cannibals! But I believe that mad cow can't be transferred to dogs and cats, the prions can't pass the blood/brain barrier (I'm trying to recall so I could be way off there)?   

~flower~

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3597
  • D/s
Re: CRACKING THE CODE: Inside story on dog food
« Reply #3 on: December 20, 2007, 12:03:49 PM »
Pet food may lead to mad cow
Ranchers warned not to feed it to cattle despite rising hay costs
By Dawn House
The Salt Lake Tribune
Article Last Updated: 12/17/2007 11:44:39 PM MST

Ranchers struggling with high hay costs and burned out ranges are being warned that feeding cattle cheap pet food could cause an outbreak of mad cow disease.
    Some pet foods contain animal byproducts that if fed to beef or dairy cows pose the threat of bovine spongiform encephalopathy, or mad cow disease, says state veterinarian Earl Rogers.
    "It is possible that some pet food manufacturers who have heard of the depletion of feed sources in Utah because of drought and fire may offer their scrap material to Utah ranchers," said Rogers. "Both buyers and sellers must know that any pet food containing cattle or other ruminant material cannot be fed to other cattle."
    Feeding pet food to cattle, which is banned under state and federal law, could result in the slaughter of an entire herd, he said.
    Government inspectors regularly visit feed manufacturers to ensure that animal byproducts are not being mixed with feed destined for cattle. And any food source containing ruminant protein must be clearly labeled.
    State officials, however, are worried that some farmers may be tempted to supplement cattle feed with the banned material because pet food scraps are commonly fed to swine and poultry.
    "We're just being cautious," said state field veterinarian Wyatt Frampton of the warning.
    In humans, there is strong epidemiologic and laboratory data linking a rare, degenerative, fatal brain disorder called variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease to the consumption of contaminated beef, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
    More than 140 cases of Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease have been reported in the United Kingdom, where mad cow disease was first detected. Federal officials said one case has been reported in the United States, but the young woman probably contracted the disease while living in the United Kingdom.
    In Utah, Brent Tanner, executive vice president of the state's Cattlemen's Association, acknowledges that ranchers are under financial pressures but added that "ranching is a lifetime commitment. People care - and they are in this for the long haul."
    Farmers and ranchers who are struggling are able to take out low-cost loans, but emergency funding for natural disasters is tied up in the farm bill, which expired in September. The Senate is debating the legislation after an earlier filibuster.
    Hay prices in the state have more than doubled from last year, sometimes selling for as much as $300 per ton. In addition, Utah this summer suffered massive rangeland fires that blackened more than 600,000 acres, the largest in state history.
    Tim Munns, who runs cattle in Box Elder County, said a severe drought is squeezing ranches even more.
    "If we don't get snow in the mountains, it'll put us in a bind next year," he said, "and so far, it isn't starting out too good."
    November was especially dry in Box Elder and Uintah counties, with little precipitation and almost no mountain snow, according to the National Statistics Service.
    Box Elder and Emery counties report great shortages of hay, and in Uintah County cattle are grazing on crop stubble.
    Statewide, drought conditions persist. Grazing conditions are listed as fair to very poor. Only 38 percent of the ranges and pastures are listed as good, and none is in excellent condition.

~flower~

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3597
  • D/s
Re: CRACKING THE CODE: Inside story on dog food
« Reply #4 on: December 20, 2007, 12:08:24 PM »
Mad cow from Canada made it into pet food in 2003:

Mad Cow Prompts Dog Food Recall
May 27, 2003(CBS) U.S. consumers are being asked to return dog food that may have come from a Canadian cow that tested positive for mad cow disease.

Pet Pantry International of Carson City, Nev., which issued the request Monday, said customers should search for two products: "Maintenance Diet" with a "use by" date of "17FEB04" and "Beef with Barley" with a date of "05MAR04.

If found, the food should be held for pickup. The company's products are purchased by phone or e-mail and delivered by franchises to consumers' homes.

There is no known risk to dogs and no evidence that dogs could transmit the disease to humans, the Food and Drug Administration said. The voluntary return is a precaution to prevent discarded dog food from getting mixed with feed for cattle, goats or sheep.

Customers who purchased dog food since February should check their supplies and, if found, should call the company at 1-800-381-7387. Pet Pantry also is using sales records to contact consumers.

The suspect food, in 50 pound bags, was produced in Canada by Champion Pet Food of Morinville, Alberta.

The Canadian government already has prevented meat from the single diseased cow to be processed for human food.

Meanwhile, nearly 400 head of cattle have been killed to test their brains for mad cow disease and to conduct genetic sampling to try to trace the origin of the infected cow found in Canada, officials said.

All 192 animals that comprised the entire herd of the infected cow have tested negative for bovine spongiform encephalopathy, or BSE, agriculture officials said Monday.

North America's first mad cow case in a decade, detected last week, caused the United States and other countries to close their markets to Canadian beef products and raised questions about industry regulation.

Besides the 192 cows that tested negative, another 180 have been slaughtered for testing and genetic tracing to find where and when the infected cow was born, Brian Evans, chief veterinary officer for the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, said Monday.

"It may ultimately not be possible to determine the source herd with absolute certainty," Evans said. "We will not stop until we're absolutely clear the trail has gone cold."

All cattle killed for testing come from five of the 17 farms or feed lots quarantined in the investigation trying to trace all movement and feed sources of the infected cow, which was slaughtered in January.

Four of those farms are in Alberta, the heart of Canada's cattle country, including the one where the infected cow last lived, and another farm is in Saskatchewan where the animal spent four years, Evans said.

Cattle feed from animal sources contaminated with BSE is considered the most likely cause of the infection, and officials want to trace all sources of feed that the cow received throughout its life.

That means figuring out where the cow was born, where it lived and what food sources it received, Evans said.

"In all likelihood, this animal was exposed (to BSE) fairly early in life," Evans said. "It's an extensive investigation."

So far, officials cannot say with certainty which farm the cow was born on and whether it is 6 or 8 years old. Canada banned the use of ruminant animal-based feed for cattle in 1997, meaning the infected cow could have eaten infected food before the ban took effect.

Mad cow disease was first diagnosed in Britain in 1986 and is thought to have spread through cow feed made with protein and bone meal from mammals.

The human form of BSE is the fatal brain-wasting illness, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, which causes paralysis and death. Scientists believe humans develop new variants of Creutzfeldt-Jakob when they eat meat from infected animals. More than 130 people have died of the disease, mostly in Britain.

Since the announcement of the BSE case in Canada, the United States, Japan, Australia, South Korea, Singapore, New Zealand, Indonesia and Barbados banned all beef imports from Canada, despite reassurances from government and industry officials that the beef is safe.

Officials are visiting the slaughtering plant, feed mill and labs that handled material from the infected cow to ensure that correct procedures were followed. The search involves 200 farms that may have gotten feed from 10 mills, they said.

Early indications showed the infected cow might have been born on a Canadian farm, which would make it the first case of a North American-born animal contracting the illness known as mad cow disease which decimated the British beef industry in the 1990s.

The only previous case of BSE in North America was in 1993, involving a bull imported from Britain. The animal and its herd were slaughtered, but no trade bans resulted.

While Canadian authorities and farmers say the lone case of BSE presents minimal public risk, the closing of major foreign markets to Canada's beef products brought immediate cuts in production and uncertainty to a US$22 billion industry.

"It's really put the industry in a tailspin," said Greg Hawkwood, who runs a cattle operation in Cochrane, Alberta. Sales have been canceled, leaving farmers with no market for their product, he said.

Some U.S. legislators have called for Canada to improve its testing and monitoring of the cattle industry before the ban on Canadian beef imports gets lifted.

Canadian officials have said they would consider whatever changes were needed to restore confidence in the industry.


http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/02/28/health/main542336.shtml