Author Topic: Seattle murder conviction tossed out over 'racist' comments  (Read 5906 times)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39478
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Seattle murder conviction tossed out over 'racist' comments
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2015279772_overturned10m.html


The state Supreme Court has thrown out a man's murder conviction in a 2006 gang-related shooting in Pioneer Square, ruling that the prosecutor who tried the case resorted to "racist arguments" to attack defense witnesses.

By Jennifer Sullivan

Seattle Times staff reporter

________________________ ________________________ _____

 


The state Supreme Court has thrown out a man's murder conviction in a 2006 gang-related shooting in Pioneer Square, ruling that the prosecutor who tried the case resorted to "racist arguments" to attack defense witnesses.

The court, in an 8-1 ruling, found that James Konat, a veteran King County deputy prosecutor now trying a high-profile murder case, engaged in "prosecutorial misconduct" in questioning witnesses during the trial of Kevin L. Monday Jr., who was convicted in 2007 of first-degree murder and first-degree assault, and sentenced to 64 years in prison.

During the trial, Konat questioned witnesses, many of them black, about a purported street "code" that he claimed prevented some from talking to the police, according to the Supreme Court's majority opinion written by Justice Tom Chambers. In questioning some witnesses, Konat made references to the "PO-leese," the justices found.

During his closing argument to jurors, Konat also said that while witnesses denied the presence of such a code, "the code is black folk don't testify against black folk. You don't snitch to the police," according to the Supreme Court decision.

Monday, 25, is black; Konat is white.

Monday appealed the conviction on a number of grounds, claiming that Konat "made a blatant and inappropriate appeal to racial prejudice and undermined the credibility of African-American witnesses based on their race," according to the Supreme Court.

The state Court of Appeals agreed that Konat had appealed to racial prejudice during the trial, but upheld Monday's conviction.

But the Supreme Court, in Thursday's ruling, cited Konat's comments as grounds for the conviction to be overturned, saying that they cast doubt on the credibility of the witnesses based on their race. One justice called the deputy prosecutor's comments "repugnant."

"Defendants are among the people the prosecutor represents. The prosecutor owes a duty to defendants to see that their rights to a constitutionally fair trial are not violated," Chambers wrote.

"The State repeatedly invoked an alleged African American, anti-snitch code to discount the credibility of his own witnesses ... it is deeply troubling that an experienced prosecutor who, by his own account, had been a prosecutor for 18 years would resort to such tactics," the ruling said.

The justices contend that the only reason that Konat used the pronunciation "PO-leese" was to "subtly, and likely deliberately, call to the jury's attention that the witness was African American."

Justice James M. Johnson, the lone dissenter, said that even if Konat's comments "arguably tainted the jury's impressions," the murder case still was proved beyond a reasonable doubt.

Seattle police said that Monday fired at least 10 shots at Francisco Roche Green near the corner of Yesler Way and Occidental Avenue South in the early hours of April 22, 2006. Monday was also accused of firing gunshots at a vehicle and wounding the driver and a passenger. The incident was caught on video by a street musician who was in the area when shots were fired.

King County Prosecuting Attorney Dan Satterberg said he spoke with Konat after the trial and told him his comments were unacceptable. In response, all deputy prosecutors have been through retraining about potential prosecutorial misconduct, Satterberg said on Thursday.

Konat, 53, could not be reached Thursday to comment.

He is lead prosecutor in the trial of Isaiah Kalebu, who is charged with aggravated murder in the slaying of Teresa Butz and the rape of her partner in their South Park home in July 2009.

A spokesman for Satterberg's office said Konat was not formally disciplined.

Konat's words "do not represent the view of this office. It was regrettable," Satterberg said. He called Konat's method of explaining the so-called "code" in which witnesses don't talk to prosecutors or police "inartful and offensive."

But in response to Monday's appeal in 2008, the Prosecutor's Office maintained that Konat hadn't done anything wrong.

"The prosecutor's comment in final argument that 'Black folk don't testify against black folk' was nothing more than a summary of evidence in the case, consistent with the realities of the lack of cooperation and hostility by most of the transactional witnesses who testified. This was not prosecutorial misconduct," according to the filing written by now-retired Senior Deputy Prosecutor Lee Yates.

Satterberg said Monday will be retried, but a different deputy prosecutor will be assigned to the case.

Sarah Dunne, legal director for the American Civil Liberties Union of Western Washington, which filed a brief in support of Monday's appeal, said Konat's "behavior undermined the right to a fair trial."

Defense attorney Nancy Collins, who represented Monday in his appeals, said in an email Thursday that it's "unfortunate that any prosecutor needed to be reminded of these basic principles in our justice system."

Jennifer Sullivan: 206-464-8294 or jensullivan@seattletimes.com



________________________ ___________________-


Only in a failed legal system do ludicrous appeals like this win.  

Funny - thing the incident is caught on tape, no one disputes that this savage and wild dog committed the murder and rape, but now everyone is upset that the DA used a term and argumment that everyone knows to be the truth.  

Unreal.  

Vince G, CSN MFT

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25737
  • GETBIG3.COM!
Seattle murder conviction tossed out over 'racist' comments
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2015279772_overturned10m.html


The state Supreme Court has thrown out a man's murder conviction in a 2006 gang-related shooting in Pioneer Square, ruling that the prosecutor who tried the case resorted to "racist arguments" to attack defense witnesses.

By Jennifer Sullivan

Seattle Times staff reporter

________________________ ________________________ _____

 


The state Supreme Court has thrown out a man's murder conviction in a 2006 gang-related shooting in Pioneer Square, ruling that the prosecutor who tried the case resorted to "racist arguments" to attack defense witnesses.

The court, in an 8-1 ruling, found that James Konat, a veteran King County deputy prosecutor now trying a high-profile murder case, engaged in "prosecutorial misconduct" in questioning witnesses during the trial of Kevin L. Monday Jr., who was convicted in 2007 of first-degree murder and first-degree assault, and sentenced to 64 years in prison.

During the trial, Konat questioned witnesses, many of them black, about a purported street "code" that he claimed prevented some from talking to the police, according to the Supreme Court's majority opinion written by Justice Tom Chambers. In questioning some witnesses, Konat made references to the "PO-leese," the justices found.

During his closing argument to jurors, Konat also said that while witnesses denied the presence of such a code, "the code is black folk don't testify against black folk. You don't snitch to the police," according to the Supreme Court decision.

Monday, 25, is black; Konat is white.

Monday appealed the conviction on a number of grounds, claiming that Konat "made a blatant and inappropriate appeal to racial prejudice and undermined the credibility of African-American witnesses based on their race," according to the Supreme Court.

The state Court of Appeals agreed that Konat had appealed to racial prejudice during the trial, but upheld Monday's conviction.

But the Supreme Court, in Thursday's ruling, cited Konat's comments as grounds for the conviction to be overturned, saying that they cast doubt on the credibility of the witnesses based on their race. One justice called the deputy prosecutor's comments "repugnant."

"Defendants are among the people the prosecutor represents. The prosecutor owes a duty to defendants to see that their rights to a constitutionally fair trial are not violated," Chambers wrote.

"The State repeatedly invoked an alleged African American, anti-snitch code to discount the credibility of his own witnesses ... it is deeply troubling that an experienced prosecutor who, by his own account, had been a prosecutor for 18 years would resort to such tactics," the ruling said.

The justices contend that the only reason that Konat used the pronunciation "PO-leese" was to "subtly, and likely deliberately, call to the jury's attention that the witness was African American."

Justice James M. Johnson, the lone dissenter, said that even if Konat's comments "arguably tainted the jury's impressions," the murder case still was proved beyond a reasonable doubt.

Seattle police said that Monday fired at least 10 shots at Francisco Roche Green near the corner of Yesler Way and Occidental Avenue South in the early hours of April 22, 2006. Monday was also accused of firing gunshots at a vehicle and wounding the driver and a passenger. The incident was caught on video by a street musician who was in the area when shots were fired.

King County Prosecuting Attorney Dan Satterberg said he spoke with Konat after the trial and told him his comments were unacceptable. In response, all deputy prosecutors have been through retraining about potential prosecutorial misconduct, Satterberg said on Thursday.

Konat, 53, could not be reached Thursday to comment.

He is lead prosecutor in the trial of Isaiah Kalebu, who is charged with aggravated murder in the slaying of Teresa Butz and the rape of her partner in their South Park home in July 2009.

A spokesman for Satterberg's office said Konat was not formally disciplined.

Konat's words "do not represent the view of this office. It was regrettable," Satterberg said. He called Konat's method of explaining the so-called "code" in which witnesses don't talk to prosecutors or police "inartful and offensive."

But in response to Monday's appeal in 2008, the Prosecutor's Office maintained that Konat hadn't done anything wrong.

"The prosecutor's comment in final argument that 'Black folk don't testify against black folk' was nothing more than a summary of evidence in the case, consistent with the realities of the lack of cooperation and hostility by most of the transactional witnesses who testified. This was not prosecutorial misconduct," according to the filing written by now-retired Senior Deputy Prosecutor Lee Yates.

Satterberg said Monday will be retried, but a different deputy prosecutor will be assigned to the case.

Sarah Dunne, legal director for the American Civil Liberties Union of Western Washington, which filed a brief in support of Monday's appeal, said Konat's "behavior undermined the right to a fair trial."

Defense attorney Nancy Collins, who represented Monday in his appeals, said in an email Thursday that it's "unfortunate that any prosecutor needed to be reminded of these basic principles in our justice system."

Jennifer Sullivan: 206-464-8294 or jensullivan@seattletimes.com



________________________ ___________________-


Only in a failed legal system do ludicrous appeals like this win.  

Funny - thing the incident is caught on tape, no one disputes that this savage and wild dog committed the murder and rape, but now everyone is upset that the DA used a term and argumment that everyone knows to be the truth.  

Unreal.  


Stupid thing for Konat to do and an 8-1 Supreme Court Ruling speaks volumes since that includes Republican appointed justices.  You can't prejudice the jury in any form or fashion in order to get a conviction and you certainly cannot attack defense witnesses accusing them of racial improperity...period.

Now he'll be set free and won't be tried again because of double jeopardy.  Konat didn't need to say that but he thought he could sneak it in to seal the deal.  Big mistake
A

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39478
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
 ::) ::)   ::)


Right so instead, if he only used the term :   "the code in the hood", than that would be ok? 


Whatever.  I hope you sympathize with the family of the next victim of this savage once he's freed.

Vince G, CSN MFT

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25737
  • GETBIG3.COM!
::) ::)   ::)


Right so instead, if he only used the term :   "the code in the hood", than that would be ok? 


Whatever.  I hope you sympathize with the family of the next victim of this savage once he's freed.


You don't get it do you.  He implied that everyone in the neighborhood followed the "no snitching" code to rebute the defense witnesses which in fact is the part that was not only racist but incorrect.  Fact is that a lot of gang members snitch when faced with lengthy prison sentence or reward money.  In addition to that, the witnesses in the case are NOT ON TRIAL.


If there's another victim, then its Konat's fault.  He knew that doing something like that would likely get the case overturned.
A

Butterbean

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19326



If there's another victim, then its Konat's fault.  

 ??? What percentage of fault would you ascribe to the actual murderer?
R

dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum
Wow. Another post about Blacks from the resident racist. What a surprise.  ::)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39478
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

You don't get it do you.  He implied that everyone in the neighborhood followed the "no snitching" code to rebute the defense witnesses which in fact is the part that was not only racist but incorrect.  Fact is that a lot of gang members snitch when faced with lengthy prison sentence or reward money.  In addition to that, the witnesses in the case are NOT ON TRIAL.


If there's another victim, then its Konat's fault.  He knew that doing something like that would likely get the case overturned.

Yeah, not the murderer of course whose caught on tape killing soeone and will now again be free to pillage society.  

And again - why is it racist?

The ghetto thug culture you make excuses for endlessly promote "stop snitching" campaigns, shirts, hats, lyrics in songs "snitches end up in ditches", etc etc.  

The DA was trying to get at why no one would testify.   You dont think this was a reasoanable question to ask?  

 

  
 

wes

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 65622
  • What Dire Mishap Has Befallen Thee
Wow. Another post about Blacks from the resident racist. What a surprise.  ::)
I knew that was coming !!  ;D

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39478
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Wow. Another post about Blacks from the resident racist. What a surprise.  ::)

Did you read the story?   Wouldyou want this murderer living next to you?  

I'll bet these judges wont have to worry about that.    

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39478
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
I knew that was coming !!  ;D


Yeah, cause in USA 2011 and with Mr. Hope & Change in office, unless you are black, you have no right to EVER say a word, criticize, discuss, or comment on anything that possibly brings bad light on blacks. 

And how did the DA's statements prejudice anything?   The guy was caught on tape murdering someone and they never even disputed that.   

Reeves

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1922
Wow. Another post about Blacks from the resident racist. What a surprise.  ::)

You do realize, don't you that you are merely pandering to us "peepses of color" when you capitalize "blacks"?  Oh wait!  I am a mulatto, i.e., one that has be created by adding a little mocha to the latte' and as such have no say in this matter.   ;)  The "One Drop Rule" is only enforced when it's to the benefit of liberalism.

The only question that needs answering is did the person do the crime they were tried for?  This is a matter of humanity or inhumanity, not skin color.  FTN.
No matter the color of our skin, we all bleed in red.  But people forget that or at the least pretend to.  I suggest you do not go there.   Again, was the defendant guilty of the crime or not? 


dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum
You do realize, don't you that you are merely pandering to us "peepses of color" when you capitalize "blacks"?  Oh wait!  I am a mulatto, i.e., one that has be created by adding a little mocha to the latte' and as such have no say in this matter.   ;)  The "One Drop Rule" is only enforced when it's to the benefit of liberalism.

The only question that needs answering is did the person do the crime they were committed of?  This is a matter of humanity or inhumanity, not skin color.  FTN.
No matter the color of our skin, we all bleed in red.  But people forget that or at the least pretend to.  I suggest you do not go there.   Again, was the defendant guilty of the crime or not?  
Black is people. black is a colour.    ;)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39478
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
You do realize, don't you that you are merely pandering to us "peepses of color" when you capitalize "blacks"?  Oh wait!  I am a mulatto, i.e., one that has be created by adding a little mocha to the latte' and as such have no say in this matter.   ;)  The "One Drop Rule" is only enforced when it's to the benefit of liberalism.

The only question that needs answering is did the person do the crime they were committed of?  This is a matter of humanity or inhumanity, not skin color.  FTN.
No matter the color of our skin, we all bleed in red.  But people forget that or at the least pretend to.  I suggest you do not go there.   Again, was the defendant guilty of the crime or not?  



He was caught on film doing it.  

Vince G, CSN MFT

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25737
  • GETBIG3.COM!
Yeah, not the murderer of course whose caught on tape killing soeone and will now again be free to pillage society.  

And again - why is it racist?

The ghetto thug culture you make excuses for endlessly promote "stop snitching" campaigns, shirts, hats, lyrics in songs "snitches end up in ditches", etc etc.  

The DA was trying to get at why no one would testify.   You dont think this was a reasoanable question to ask?  

 

  
 


He pretty much said that every black person follows a "no snitching street code".  That's why the Supreme Court overturned it in a vast majority.  You can't single out a group of people to do a certain thing.  That would be no different than me saying that all white people eat a Applebee's and listen to Nickelback. ::)
A

Vince G, CSN MFT

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25737
  • GETBIG3.COM!
He was caught on film doing it.  


Exactly, so there was no need for Konat to make that comment.  He would have been convicted anyway.
A

Tito24

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20638
  • I'm a large man but.. one with a plan

dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum

He pretty much said that every black person follows a "no snitching street code".  That's why the Supreme Court overturned it in a vast majority.  You can't single out a group of people to do a certain thing.  That would be no different than me saying that all white people eat a Applebee's and listen to Nickelback. ::)
Dead man posting.    >:(       ;D

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39478
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

He pretty much said that every black person follows a "no snitching street code".  That's why the Supreme Court overturned it in a vast majority.  You can't single out a group of people to do a certain thing.  That would be no different than me saying that all white people eat a Applebee's and listen to Nickelback. ::)

He was questioning why no witnesses who were there would testify and trying to find out why.  Considering the multitude of "stop snitching" campaigns in the media, and most likely that 995 of those who were there at the scene were black and youths,  I don't see how or why this is just an outrageousthng to question.    

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39478
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

Montague

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14614
  • The black degelation does not know this nig - V.G.
If there's another victim, then its Konat's fault.


Come on, man...
Yeah - stupid mistake on Konat's part, but if there's another murder/shooting, the guy who pulls the trigger gets the primary blame!


Vince G, CSN MFT

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25737
  • GETBIG3.COM!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_Snitchin'





That was nothing but some promotional video for a hip hop group that got blown way out of proportion.  Like I said, the majority of gang members out there would snitch on each other for reduced sentences.  
A

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39478
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

That was nothing but some promotional video for a hip hop group that got blown way out of proportion.  Like I said, the majority of gang members out there would snitch on each other for reduced sentences.  

This was about witnesses at the site and the DA trying to as other witnsses why no one else would testify.  Di the guy use poor choice of language given our pc society?  yes. 

But to toss a murder conviction when you have the guy on tape committing the murder?  Come on.     

Reeves

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1922
So class, or at the very least those among you that possess class.  What have we learned here?

That the color of ones skin, so long as it has "color" raises a person above the law?  That to question the "reasoning" of even one person of color is to question and thereby implant in the minds of a jury, suspicion about an entire "race" of peoples?  That to be a "person of color" is deemed far more important than it is to be human and all that humanity entails?  Allow me to explain.

For example, Italians, by way of their relatively paler shade of skin tone and subsequent classification as persons of non-color can be maligned in both print and film because they are eeeeeeeevile "whitey" and as such are deserving of our hatred.  Additionally, only people of Germanic (i.e., totally pale males) can be hated for no reason or any reason or unreasonable reason and all because they are obviously of Nazi ("Nuzi"  ;D as Daffy Duck would say) origin and as everyone knows, its fine and dandy to be a "male oriented racist".  I've met racists of all color.  They hate the human race, except for the female side of the coin.

Gots to give de womens yo' good blood. 

Fuck that noise.  If you believe this decision was right and that the perp should be freed, you are a retard.  Let my peepses go, no matter what.  Let my peepses go.

Do not go there because the majority of you that are liberal haven't the IQ to stand up for genuine Civil Rights let alone against one that is so obviously your mental and perhaps moral superior.   ;D

Fuck the noise of liberalism.

In closing I suggest you search for and read my missive on what I would term 'moral limbo".   ;D And so that all may know it is really I that am writing this...Fuck islam. ;D

Vince G, CSN MFT

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25737
  • GETBIG3.COM!
This was about witnesses at the site and the DA trying to as other witnsses why no one else would testify.  Di the guy use poor choice of language given our pc society?  yes. 

But to toss a murder conviction when you have the guy on tape committing the murder?  Come on.     

Yep, because it prevented due process.  That's why district attorneys need to go by the book.
A

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39478
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Yep, because it prevented due process.  That's why district attorneys need to go by the book.

What?  Are you kidding?   The guy is on tape!