Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Robert the Bruce on February 07, 2007, 11:23:58 AM

Title: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: Robert the Bruce on February 07, 2007, 11:23:58 AM
Would you rather be a HUGE AND SHREDDED NASSER or a PROPORTIONED, AESTHETIC FLEX  ???

The 1997 AC says it all...two polars of bodybuilding  :o

I prefer Flex's physique myself, his abs ain't so crisp here, tho he still has massive guns, although Nasser has an 8 pack  :o
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: alexxx on February 07, 2007, 11:25:53 AM
Symmetry and proportions are what bodybuilding is about not size at the expanse of the latter.
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: Dipadidu on February 07, 2007, 11:28:30 AM
In this pic nasser owns flex in every way even in proportion and aesthetics
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: Robert the Bruce on February 07, 2007, 11:28:56 AM
yeah probably....about beauty and proportion and shape and symmetry....not mass, not too much anyway

This is what bodybuilding is about...proportions and aesthetics
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: XFACTOR on February 07, 2007, 11:29:58 AM
yeah probably....about beauty and proportion and shape and symmetry....not mass, not too much anyway

This is what bodybuilding is about...proportions and aesthetics

Stop posting pics of this dude.  He's so damn cheesy looking.  Weird face.
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: Robert the Bruce on February 07, 2007, 11:30:16 AM
In this pic nasser owns flex in every way even in proportion and aesthetics

hardly....his quads have no separation and are just hunks of beef and he's almost too big, like freaky big, scary big....Flex could walk down the street and not scare people, Nasser never could
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: Robert the Bruce on February 07, 2007, 11:31:51 AM
Stop posting pics of this dude.  He's so damn cheesy looking.  Weird face.

cheesy eh??? ok whats one word to describe him lol

But seriously, he's like a smaller version of Flex, just not as good shape and separation, but BB is all about devloping a physique that is pretty too look at, not freaky massive ronnie style
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: alexxx on February 07, 2007, 11:38:12 AM
yeah probably....about beauty and proportion and shape and symmetry....not mass, not too much anyway

This is what bodybuilding is about...proportions and aesthetics

That is not bodybuilding. That is homoerotic material which should not been seen by any man.
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: 210 and growing on February 07, 2007, 11:41:31 AM
robert the bruce, you suck cock  >:(
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: Mars on February 07, 2007, 11:42:46 AM
Gayer than remembering a girls name after your fucked her.
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: kiwiol on February 07, 2007, 11:43:04 AM
cheesy eh??? ok whats one word to describe him lol

But seriously, he's like a smaller version of Flex, just not as good shape and separation, but BB is all about devloping a physique that is pretty too look at, not freaky massive ronnie style

Robert the bruce, you're gayer than the cum-scented ball glitter that Richard Simmons probably puts on before hitting The Oyster bar.


Gayer than remembering a girls name after your fucked her.

Hahahahahaha f*cking classic 8)
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: Mars on February 07, 2007, 11:51:47 AM
gayer than saying no to racism.
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: jaejonna on February 07, 2007, 11:53:46 AM
gayer than women's rights
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: Mars on February 07, 2007, 11:56:17 AM
gayer than merci chocolats.
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: jaejonna on February 07, 2007, 11:58:42 AM
gayer than hurricane Katrina
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: Mars on February 07, 2007, 11:59:46 AM
gayer than the red cross.
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: Robert the Bruce on February 07, 2007, 12:18:50 PM
That is not bodybuilding. That is homoerotic material which should not been seen by any man.

he looks twice as good as you alexxx  :-\
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: Robert the Bruce on February 07, 2007, 12:19:35 PM
robert the bruce, you suck cock  >:(

whatever you say, 210 and growing, I mean 160 and shrinking  ;)
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: 210 and growing on February 07, 2007, 12:20:08 PM
he looks twice as good as you alexxx  :-\

Havent you got bumming to be doing
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: alexxx on February 07, 2007, 12:21:37 PM
he looks twice as good as you alexxx  :-\

lol not even half!
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: kiwiol on February 07, 2007, 12:21:48 PM
he looks twice as good as you alexxx  :-\

This coming from a fag who wins the 'Best sucker' award in the local gloryhole.
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: benjamin pearson on February 07, 2007, 12:22:29 PM
Robert go suck a cock you fucking homo.... quit spamming the boards with your homo erotic tendencies
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: Robert the Bruce on February 07, 2007, 12:23:01 PM
lol not even half!

lets me a pic then, little boy  ;)
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: kiwiol on February 07, 2007, 12:23:39 PM
Robert go suck a cock you fucking homo.... quit spamming the boards with your homo erotic tendencies

Are you saying Robert took to cock when he was about 7 with the same smoothness a duck takes to water, BP?
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: Robert the Bruce on February 07, 2007, 12:23:49 PM
Robert go suck a cock you fucking homo.... quit spamming the boards with your homo erotic tendencies

I'm not gay, I'm bi-curious, how many times do I have to tell you  ;)
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: Mars on February 07, 2007, 12:24:21 PM
thats even worser than being gay alone.
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: Robert the Bruce on February 07, 2007, 12:25:07 PM
whys that  ??? best of both worlds
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: benjamin pearson on February 07, 2007, 12:25:59 PM
Quote
Are you saying Robert took to cock when he was about 7 with the same smoothness a duck takes to water, BP?

Im saying this fag was being pounded by his dad/uncle/brother and loving it his whole childhood Kiwiol

Quote
thats even worser than being gay alone.

AHAHAHAHA agreed
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: Robert the Bruce on February 07, 2007, 12:29:33 PM
I'm not a fag, I'm not seriously  :-\

Has my credibility been destroyed because of my past threads, will I ever regain my credibility  :-\ ??? :(
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: 210 and growing on February 07, 2007, 12:31:56 PM
I'm not a fag, I'm not seriously  :-\

Has my credibility been destroyed because of my past threads, will I ever regain my credibility  :-\ ??? :(

this is defo a gimmick account guys, just ignore the turd burglar
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: Mydavid on February 07, 2007, 12:32:32 PM
If anyone's wondering, i'd rather have huge and shredded...huge and ugly with muscles is great, too.

Lisa
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: Knives on February 07, 2007, 12:32:41 PM
In this pic nasser owns flex in every way even in proportion and aesthetics

agreed.  i'm a flex fan, but nasser looks a lot better there
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: 20inch calves on February 07, 2007, 04:04:58 PM
in the pic flex is not crunched down yet but nasser still has a better mid section. i prefer nassers look myself. he still had a relatively small waist. also his quads aren't extended so you can't say he has no seperation..he has some of the best legs in the buisness
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: Army of One on February 07, 2007, 04:29:52 PM
Are you saying Robert took to cock when he was about 7 with the same smoothness a duck takes to water, BP?

HAHA Yes Kiwiol, I think Robert is the kind of "man" who goes to the public bathrooms in the hope of meeting a hot young twink and when he gets told he's too much of a fag for the local Musclebear Restroom gang, he spends hours wiping his 2 incher round the urinals in the in anticipation of going to the Local STD clinic and getting his package examined for 10 seconds by the Burly Stud who works there HAHAHAHA Gayer than Lance Bass, Elton John, George Michael, Richard Simmons and Liberace forming a one night only tribute to the Village People at a Homosexual Nudist Colony.
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: Voice of Doom on February 07, 2007, 04:37:04 PM
I wouldnt want to look like either one of those synthol fooks.   I want to look like this:

Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: Parker on February 07, 2007, 04:38:31 PM
In this pic nasser owns flex in every way even in proportion and aesthetics

Ha, Flex even won the "Most Muscluar " award and he was 224. Actually his abs were crisper than Nasser. Nasser is crunching down, Flex is about to crunch his abs.

But when they turned around, Flex owned him. Nasser's back was  "as flat as a pancake" as Flex put it.
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: pumpster on February 07, 2007, 04:39:20 PM
I wouldnt want to look like either one of those synthol fooks.   I want to look like this:



Obviously doesn't bother you that the second shot's clearly intended for homos.
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: hipolito mejia on February 07, 2007, 04:40:19 PM
In this pic nasser owns flex in every way even in proportion and aesthetics

Exactly, no a good pic for that question.

but I like Aesthetic no matter what.
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: delta9mda on February 07, 2007, 10:10:05 PM
Symmetry and proportions are what bodybuilding is about not size at the expanse of the latter.
nasser has all 3 in this pic. flex is tooooo narrow, and his legs and arms are way too big for the torso(or his torso was to damn small)
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: Mr. Intenseone on February 07, 2007, 10:12:22 PM
I'd rather be smaller and aesthetic, anyone can get big!!!
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: GoneAway on February 07, 2007, 10:19:04 PM
Alot of people think just because someone is smaller that they have better proportions and aesthetics. How wrong that is alot of the time. Nasser was equally, if not MORE proportioned than Flex at the 97 Arnold and just as aesthetic.

I'd rather be huge and aesthetic, myself. :)
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: tu_holmes on February 07, 2007, 11:35:31 PM
Alot of people think just because someone is smaller that they have better proportions and aesthetics. How wrong that is alot of the time. Nasser was equally, if not MORE proportioned than Flex at the 97 Arnold and just as aesthetic.

I'd rather be huge and aesthetic, myself. :)

True... there should be some medium that is the real ideal.
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: phreak on February 08, 2007, 04:03:12 AM
Flex could walk down the street and not scare people
If people aren't scared of you when you walk down the street, you are not big enough.
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: benjamin pearson on February 08, 2007, 06:24:17 AM
Quote
Flex could walk down the street and not scare people

The only place you want to scare guys is into your bed queer bait
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: alexxx on February 08, 2007, 06:56:00 AM
nasser has all 3 in this pic. flex is tooooo narrow, and his legs and arms are way too big for the torso(or his torso was to damn small)

Yeah Flex didn't have a big torso and that was probably one of the biggest drawbacks to his physique. If he had the torso of Lee Haney then he would have been the best bodybuilder ever!
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: jaejonna on February 08, 2007, 06:59:26 AM
Gayer than an NBA center with an Italian name
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: GoneAway on February 08, 2007, 07:00:36 AM
Yeah Flex didn't have a big torso and that was probably one of the biggest drawbacks to his physique. If he had the torso of Lee Haney then he would have been the best bodybuilder ever!

Small chest on a long torso = not the best thing. But he made up for it in other areas.
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: alexxx on February 08, 2007, 07:06:49 AM
Small chest on a long torso = not the best thing. But he made up for it in other areas.

I said the torso not the muscles. If he had a 56 inch chest with the muscle shape he has that would have been incredible to believe.
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: GoneAway on February 08, 2007, 07:10:16 AM
I said the torso not the muscles. If he had a 56 inch chest with the muscle shape he has that would have been incredible to believe.

Exactly my point. His chest was small and looked even smaller on his long torso. Arnold is an example of a big chest on a regular size torso.
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: alexxx on February 08, 2007, 07:11:54 AM
Exactly my point. His chest was small and looked even smaller on his long torso. Arnold is an example of a big chest on a regular size torso.

Arnold had a big chest on a big torse. His ribcage was second to none. Not one guy today has a rib box that big!
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: GoneAway on February 08, 2007, 07:14:59 AM
Arnold had a big chest on a big torse. His ribcage was second to none. Not one guy today has a rib box that big!

Oh ok, I was talking about length of torso. Yeah, he had a killer ribcage.
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: alexxx on February 08, 2007, 07:28:26 AM
Oh ok, I was talking about length of torso. Yeah, he had a killer ribcage.

I see. Arnold had length too just his shoulders we never on par with his chest. I don't think he ever went to heavy for them either. I think he actually injured them.
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: Parker on February 10, 2007, 02:22:22 PM
Small chest on a long torso = not the best thing. But he made up for it in other areas.

I don't see the long torso. Lee Preist has long torso. And Dex does, due to having ligh lats. Flex's lats were pretty mid range, but his V taper was excellent.
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: GoneAway on February 10, 2007, 10:21:22 PM
I don't see the long torso. Lee Preist has long torso. And Dex does, due to having ligh lats. Flex's lats were pretty mid range, but his V taper was excellent.

It's not freaky long and I agree about the V taper. Just looks too long for his chest in some shots or maybe his chest looks too small.
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: Parker on February 11, 2007, 09:47:15 AM
It's not freaky long and I agree about the V taper. Just looks too long for his chest in some shots or maybe his chest looks too small.

Chest too small. If he had a JOJ chest with more lats, Flex would have been damn near perfect.

But I wouldn't mind looking like this:
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: rudylrichards on February 11, 2007, 11:10:05 AM
Yeah Flex didn't have a big torso and that was probably one of the biggest drawbacks to his physique. If he had the torso of Lee Haney then he would have been the best bodybuilder ever!
Does that make Haney the best of all time then?

I'd rather be huge, shredded and Aesthetic.  Like Haney, Ronnie, Levrone. etc
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: alexxx on February 11, 2007, 11:15:01 AM
Does that make Haney the best of all time then?

I'd rather be huge, shredded and Aesthetic.  Like Haney, Ronnie, Levrone. etc

Haney's track record speaks for itself so anything I add won't make a difference. I definetly put him in the top 5 best bodybuilders of all time. His upperbody was unmatched at his time (chest,shoulders,back,ribcage,waist). A few men have managed a more impressive build and to me they are Arnold and Sergio.
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: rudylrichards on February 11, 2007, 11:27:48 AM
You're absolutely right, his accomplishments speaks for itself.  I personally think he's the best of all time. I wouldn't argue with someone who might have Sergio, Arnold or Ronnie as number one either.  You mentioned Sergio and Arnold, who are the other two in your top five.
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: benjamin pearson on February 11, 2007, 11:29:22 AM
I dont think lee haney looked very good...... sorry I just dont get what people thought was so special about him
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: alexxx on February 11, 2007, 11:36:45 AM
You're absolutely right, his accomplishments speaks for itself.  I personally think he's the best of all time. I wouldn't argue with someone who might have Sergio, Arnold or Ronnie as number one either.  You mentioned Sergio and Arnold, who are the other two in your top five.

Flex purely because of genetics. Serge Nubret and Steve Reeves. Yeah I know it is 6 but the last two are just undeniable.
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: rudylrichards on February 11, 2007, 11:45:15 AM
I dont think lee haney looked very good...... sorry I just dont get what people thought was so special about him
emmmmmm, where do I start.  I don't think i've ever heard anyway say Haney didn't look very good.  He was the bigest guy around during his era. Next to Buchanan he had the best chest to waist ratio, arguably the best symetry, every bodypart (except his hamstring and bicep peak) was a strong point.  Even without a great peak he was untouchable in the double bicep pose. I think if you take the same physique that he won his 8th olypia with he'd still place top 6 today.
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: alexxx on February 11, 2007, 11:49:55 AM
This photo speaks for itself.
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: rudylrichards on February 11, 2007, 11:51:08 AM
Flex purely because of genetics. Serge Nubret and Steve Reeves. Yeah I know it is 6 but the last two are just undeniable.
Well, for Haney's sake, I'm gonna end it here with you.  Two posts ago he was top 5 two post later he's down to 6th  ;D ;D 
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: alexxx on February 11, 2007, 11:53:15 AM
Well, for Haney's sake, I'm gonna end it here with you.  Two posts ago he was top 5 two post later he's down to 6th  ;D ;D 

I never gave him a number. ;)
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: benjamin pearson on February 11, 2007, 11:54:41 AM
Quote
This photo speaks for itself.

WOW.... Haney does look amazing there...... Alexx just interested where would you place Shawn Ray and Dorian Yates???
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: mesmorph78 on February 11, 2007, 11:58:58 AM
Chest too small. If he had a JOJ chest with more lats, Flex would have been damn near perfect.

But I wouldn't mind looking like this:
that pic... is what i would strive for....
thats a wicked pic...
takin nothing from nasser he was phenomenal..
but...that pic of flx in the towel.. perfect physique...
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: alexxx on February 11, 2007, 12:01:22 PM
WOW.... Haney does look amazing there...... Alexx just interested where would you place Shawn Ray and Dorian Yates???

Top 10 ;D
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: rudylrichards on February 11, 2007, 12:04:43 PM
WOW.... Haney does look amazing there...... Alexx just interested where would you place Shawn Ray and Dorian Yates???
Though you just said you didn't think he looked that good.

Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: rudylrichards on February 11, 2007, 12:08:15 PM
I never gave him a number. ;)
You're right, but if you have someone as #1, 2, 3 or 4 you wouldn't say they're in you top 5.  I was going on the theory that top 5 means 5th.  Whatever the case may be, I think it's fair to say we both would agree that he's "Totallee Awesome"
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: The Squadfather on February 11, 2007, 12:08:59 PM
i wouldn't put Haney anywhere near the top 5, arms and legs way too small for that.
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: pobrecito on February 11, 2007, 12:11:18 PM
i wouldn't put Haney anywhere near the top 5, arms and legs way too small for that.

1. Yates
2. Coleman
3. Arnold
4. Wheeler (93)
5. Ray
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: alexxx on February 11, 2007, 12:13:32 PM
You're right, but if you have someone as #1, 2, 3 or 4 you wouldn't say they're in you top 5.  I was going on the theory that top 5 means 5th.  Whatever the case may be, I think it's fair to say we both would agree that he's "Totallee Awesome"

You are right. It is very hard to answer a question like this because they never stood side by side on a contest stage at their all time best conditions. Nevertheless let us just say that I hold Lee Haney at the highest respect and almost a black equivalent to Arnold.
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: The Squadfather on February 11, 2007, 12:13:45 PM
1. Yates
2. Coleman
3. Arnold
4. Wheeler (93)
5. Ray
exactly, but as crazy as this might sound i'd put Shawn ahead of Arnold, Shawn was far more complete and better conditioned.
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: benjamin pearson on February 11, 2007, 12:18:02 PM
Quote
Though you just said you didn't think he looked that good.

I said that was a good pic of him.... not that i think he was a great bodybuilder...... I dont have him top 5.... just my opinion on the subject
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: rudylrichards on February 11, 2007, 12:31:19 PM
exactly, but as crazy as this might sound i'd put Shawn ahead of Arnold, Shawn was far more complete and better conditioned.
So Haney's not top 5 because of his arms and legs.  Wouldn't you have to eliminate Arnold for his legs and Dorian for having small arm also  ???.  Haney's legs looked great from the front and his triceps were second only to Mike Christian. It's his hamstrings and bicep peak that were weak. Not arguing with you list just the logic.
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: rudylrichards on February 11, 2007, 12:40:05 PM
I said that was a good pic of him.... not that i think he was a great bodybuilder...... I dont have him top 5.... just my opinion on the subject
My response wasn't based on you no having him in the top 5. my response was based on this response:

"I dont think lee haney looked very good...... sorry I just dont get what people thought was so special about him"

You later said "Haney looks amaging" since we judge bb by looks and picture's my point is, pic's like that and other are "what people thought was so special about him"
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: flex933 on February 11, 2007, 01:06:25 PM
i also wasnt much into how haney looked, but hey i guess everyone has there favorites. i think shawn was awesome.but theres many others that are great. kevin was the shit big yet was symetrical. hard to do both.
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: benjamin pearson on February 11, 2007, 03:32:57 PM
I just felt that he ddint deserve al;l the Olympias he won is all....... asepeciall his las one which I felt belonged to Yates
Title: Re: Would you rather be HUGE AND SHREDDED...or...SMALLER AND AESTHETIC??????????
Post by: Hugo Chavez on February 11, 2007, 03:39:59 PM
yeah probably....about beauty and proportion and shape and symmetry....not mass, not too much anyway

This is what bodybuilding is about...proportions and aesthetics
will you stop posting that pic :(