Trump = Winning

[illuminati]

If so, then so were the courts, which includes the Supreme Court and  judges Trump appointed himself all of which who ruled against Trump's claims of election interference at least sixty-two times. In fact, the Trump campaign and other mislead groups seeking his reelection collectively lost multiple cases in six states in a single day. Among other things these Trump and company's lawsuits were frivolous and without merit according to most legal experts except those he hires… that is until he avoids paying them, then they change their tune.

Your personal dogma is a classic example of true insanity wherein you think the entire world is crazy or wrong except you. Guess what? Not even Trump believes his own lies.

Do you Know Donald personally ?
How do you know what he does & doesn't believe.

[LurkerNoMore]

Still defending pedojoe, says a lot about you!

Still melting down over facts, says a lot about you!

[LurkerNoMore]

In that case, you have a really poor sense of smell. You should have this checked out by an ENT as soon as possible, because dogs rely on having a good sense of smell.

That's going to leave a mark.

[loco]

Biden vs. Trump on the economy

Trump wins on stock market performance, real-income growth, and low inflation.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/biden-vs-trump-on-the-economy-and-the-winner-is-164241570.html


Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

"Let’s look at the Trump record:

Under Donald Trump the economy, pre-COVID, boomed, like no time since the 1950s. Look at your 401(k) over the past three years.

Unemployment for Black Americans is lower than it has ever been, under any president of either party.

Under Mr. Trump, our trade relationships have vastly improved and our trade deals have been rewritten. Thanks to him, middle America is on the map again and the Appalachian and hourly worker has some hope.

This newspaper has not supported a Republican for president since 1972. But we believe Mr. Trump, for all his faults, is the better choice this year. We respect and understand those who feel otherwise."
https://www.post-gazette.com/opinion/editorials/2020/10/31/editorial-donald-trump-joe-biden-mike-pence-kamala-harris-presidential-candidate-endorsement/stories/202010310021


At this point in his term — about 910 days in — Joe Biden is the second-most-unpopular president in modern U.S. history. As of July 18, Biden’s average job-approval rating, according to the poll aggregators at FiveThirtyEight, is a paltry 39.1%; his average disapproval rating is 55.4%. That means his “net approval rating” is -16.3%, which is well “underwater,” as pollsters like to say.

Negative 16.3% is also really bad historically speaking. In fact, the only president with weaker numbers than Biden was Jimmy Carter, who hit -28.6% on day 910. At the time, just 29% of Americans approved of Carter’s performance on average, while 57.6% disapproved.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/why-is-joe-biden-so-unpopular-170442363.html

[Soul Crusher]

Deranged TDS'ers like Prime, lurker et all are completely obsessed and cracked over Trump

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2024/03/04/trump-supreme-court-colorado-ballot-super-tuesday/72838766007

[Coach is Back!]

If so, then so were the courts, which includes the Supreme Court and  judges Trump appointed himself all of which who ruled against Trump's claims of election interference at least sixty-two times. In fact, the Trump campaign and other mislead groups seeking his reelection collectively lost multiple cases in six states in a single day. Among other things these Trump and company's lawsuits were frivolous and without merit according to most legal experts except those he hires… that is until he avoids paying them, then they change their tune.

Your personal dogma is a classic example of true insanity wherein you think the entire world is crazy or wrong except you. Guess what? Not even Trump believes his own lies.

See, here's where your dishonesty comes in, it's blatant and it'S on purpose and I'm sure, like Lurker and Agnostic, your online persona is a complete reflection of your character and lack of integrity in real life. How many times has it been said that in all of the cases that were brought forth and even to SCOTUS, that no one would even look at the evidence? yet you want to keep spewing the same lies over and over again "that he lost 60+ cases". You can't lose cases if nothing has even began.

As for Agnostic, I guaranty if this guy was a cop, he was dirty just based on his own postings and repeatedly violated his oath to uphold the Constitution FIRST.

[B_B_C]

How many times has it been said that in all of the cases that were brought forth and even to SCOTUS, that no one would even look at the evidence?

Are you saying the courts, including the supreme court, are refusing to look at the evidence presented to them?

[LurkerNoMore]

See, here's where your dishonesty comes in, it's blatant and it'S on purpose and I'm sure, like Lurker and Agnostic, your online persona is a complete reflection of your character and lack of integrity in real life. How many times has it been said that in all of the cases that were brought forth and even to SCOTUS, that no one would even look at the evidence? yet you want to keep spewing the same lies over and over again "that he lost 60+ cases". You can't lose cases if nothing has even began.

As for Agnostic, I guaranty if this guy was a cop, he was dirty just based on his own postings and repeatedly violated his oath to uphold the Constitution FIRST.

The cases were began. And they were tossed.  The courts did look at the evidence and found it frivolous, lacking, and without merit.  Which is why it was tossed.  And he lost 60+ cases because of lack of evidence quality.

[deadz]

The cases were began. And they were tossed.  The courts did look at the evidence and found it frivolous, lacking, and without merit.  Which is why it was tossed.  And he lost 60+ cases because of lack of evidence quality.

”History in the Making”  “Big Win”  Demturds dumbest people on the planet. Also, some deviant fucks supporting what this Administration is pushing.

[Primemuscle]

Deranged TDS'ers like Prime, lurker et all are completely obsessed and cracked over Trump

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2024/03/04/trump-supreme-court-colorado-ballot-super-tuesday/72838766007

Wrong kemosabe. The Supreme Court Justices had no other viable option than to rule as they did even though their ruling just passed the buck to Congress. No one should be surprised at the results of Super Tuesday's vote. It is what everyone should have expected. I neither cracked nor am I obsessing over it.

If you want to see someone who is completely cracked and obsessed, look in the mirror.

[loco]

Boy did that backfire 😂

[loco]

Nikki Haley drops out of Republican presidential race, clearing path for Trump vs. Biden in November

[deadz]

Nikki Haley drops out of Republican presidential race, clearing path for Trump vs. Biden in November

Fake Republican c unt never had a chance!

[Coach is Back!]

Are you saying the courts, including the supreme court, are refusing to look at the evidence presented to them?

That's EXACTLY what I'm saying!!

[B_B_C]

That's EXACTLY what I'm saying!!

 bad move by  Mr Trump to load the SCOTUS with never Trumpers

[Coach is Back!]

bad move by  Mr Trump to load the SCOTUS with never Trumpers

In 2020 SCOTUS never even took the case. They were afraid of how the public might react.

[Grape Ape]

You ride into battle on the horse you have.

That did actually happen though.

People have conflated "no evidence" with courts refusing to try a case.

[Coach is Back!]

That did actually happen though.

People have conflated "no evidence" with courts refusing to try a case.

Yet Prime, Lurker and Agnostic will keep on repeating their lies like good little Alinski-ites

[LurkerNoMore]

In 2020 SCOTUS never even took the case. They were afraid of how the public might react.

Wrong.  As usual.  They did not take the case because there was no compelling evidence to do warrant them to.  There is really no point trying to explain anything to someone as stupid as you are. 

---
After the 2020 United States presidential election, the campaign for incumbent President Donald Trump and others filed 62 lawsuits contesting election processes, vote counting, and the vote certification process in 9 states (including Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin) and the District of Columbia.[1][2]

Nearly all the suits were dismissed or dropped due to lack of evidence or lack of standing,[3] including 30 lawsuits that were dismissed by the judge after a hearing on the merits.[4] Among the judges who dismissed the lawsuits were some appointed by Trump himself.[5] Judges, lawyers, and other observers described the suits as "frivolous"[6] and "without merit".[7][8] In one instance, the Trump campaign and other groups seeking his reelection collectively lost multiple cases in six states on a single day.[9] Only one ruling was initially in Trump's favor: the timing within which first-time Pennsylvania voters must provide proper identification if they wanted to “cure” their ballots. This ruling affected very few votes,[10] and it was later overturned by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.[11]
---

[loco]

[Soul Crusher]

If Trump is reelected, Americans are planning to flee in droves
MSN ^ | 3.6.2024 | Paul Starobin
Posted on 3/6/2024, 10:01

…….. Every four years, as Americans gird themselves to choose a president, there's talk, mainly among Democrats, of leaving the country. I'm off for Canada if unacceptable candidate X wins! And every four years, the promised exodus fails to materialize. It's mostly just therapeutic venting.

This time is different.

The alarm over Trump's potential triumph in November is far starker than the fears stoked by past presidents. "A Trump dictatorship is increasingly inevitable," a recent Washington Post headline warned. The Atlantic devoted an entire issue to the authoritarian horrors in store for America "If Trump Wins." Every four years or so, Gallup asks Americans ages 15 and up: "Ideally, if you had the opportunity, would you like to move PERMANENTLY to another country?" At the end of George W. Bush's presidency, the number responding "yes" was 11%. During Barack Obama's tenure, it was 10%. During Trump's presidency, it hit 16%. That's some 40 million Americans who wanted to leave their country behind, for good.

……….

In fairness, those who flee America to escape MAGA may find themselves confronted by a host of unpleasant surprises. The headaches start with the red tape. On any given day, my Expats in Italy Facebook group teems with the sort of questions that can drive a novice foreign-property owner batty. Why won't my Italian utility company let me pay my bill with a US credit card? (Answer: Because it won't.) Property bidders must have their offers officially registered with the local municipality and verified by the godlike person known as the "notaio," an official of ancient standing who drafts and authenticates the raft of documents for a fair-size fee.

(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...

[loco]

[Humble Narcissist]

If Trump is reelected, Americans are planning to flee in droves
MSN ^ | 3.6.2024 | Paul Starobin
Posted on 3/6/2024, 10:01

…….. Every four years, as Americans gird themselves to choose a president, there's talk, mainly among Democrats, of leaving the country. I'm off for Canada if unacceptable candidate X wins! And every four years, the promised exodus fails to materialize. It's mostly just therapeutic venting.

This time is different.

The alarm over Trump's potential triumph in November is far starker than the fears stoked by past presidents. "A Trump dictatorship is increasingly inevitable," a recent Washington Post headline warned. The Atlantic devoted an entire issue to the authoritarian horrors in store for America "If Trump Wins." Every four years or so, Gallup asks Americans ages 15 and up: "Ideally, if you had the opportunity, would you like to move PERMANENTLY to another country?" At the end of George W. Bush's presidency, the number responding "yes" was 11%. During Barack Obama's tenure, it was 10%. During Trump's presidency, it hit 16%. That's some 40 million Americans who wanted to leave their country behind, for good.

……….

In fairness, those who flee America to escape MAGA may find themselves confronted by a host of unpleasant surprises. The headaches start with the red tape. On any given day, my Expats in Italy Facebook group teems with the sort of questions that can drive a novice foreign-property owner batty. Why won't my Italian utility company let me pay my bill with a US credit card? (Answer: Because it won't.) Property bidders must have their offers officially registered with the local municipality and verified by the godlike person known as the "notaio," an official of ancient standing who drafts and authenticates the raft of documents for a fair-size fee.

(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...

We can only hope.

[LurkerNoMore]

Another day, another lawsuit, another loss, another fine/penalty/judgement to figure out how to pay. 

This is almost as funny as him having to pay $900K+ for the failed lawsuit against Clinton. 

---
Donald Trump told to pay six-figure costs of firm he sued
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=Donald+Trump+told+to+pay+six-figure+costs+of+firm+he+sued

Donald Trump has been told to pay the six-figure legal costs of a company he sued over claims of "perverted" sex acts and bribes to Russian officials.

Mrs Justice Steyn threw out the case against Orbis Business Intelligence, a consultancy founded by former MI6 officer Christopher Steele, last month.

She found that Mr Trump's compensation claim was "bound to fail".

In a new ruling she also ordered Mr Trump to pay Orbis's costs "of the entire claim".

The order, obtained by the PA news agency on Thursday, also said Mr Trump has made no attempt to bring an appeal.

Mr Steele, who previously ran the Secret Intelligence Service's Russia desk, was the author of the so-called Steele dossier.

This included uncorroborated intelligence claims, denied by Mr Trump, that the former US president had been "compromised" by the Russian security service, the FSB.

The High Court was told last year that Mr Trump was bringing a data protection claim over two memos in the dossier which claimed he had taken part in "sex parties" in St Petersburg and engaged in "golden showers" with prostitutes in Moscow.

Mrs Justice Steyn said Orbis has estimated its costs to be more than £600,000.

She said £300,000 should be paid by Mr Trump before the total costs are decided by a specialist judge.

The dossier, made up of more than a dozen memos, was produced by Orbis in 2016 before Mr Trump won the election that year to become US president. It was later leaked to and published by BuzzFeed in 2017.

At the hearing in October 2023, Hugh Tomlinson KC, for Mr Trump, described the allegations in the memos - which included a claim that the 77-year-old had "defiled" a bed previously used by former president Barack Obama and his wife - as "egregiously inaccurate".

Dismissing the claim, Mrs Justice Steyn said the "mere fact" that Orbis had held copies of the memos could not cause Mr Trump distress.

Orbis welcomed the ruling last month, saying "we feel strongly that Mr Trump brought this claim in an attempt to exact revenge on Orbis and to chill free speech".
---

[Soul Crusher]

Remember the Steele Dossier hoax you bought in to?   

Another day, another lawsuit, another loss, another fine/penalty/judgement to figure out how to pay. 

This is almost as funny as him having to pay $900K+ for the failed lawsuit against Clinton. 

---
Donald Trump told to pay six-figure costs of firm he sued
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=Donald+Trump+told+to+pay+six-figure+costs+of+firm+he+sued

Donald Trump has been told to pay the six-figure legal costs of a company he sued over claims of "perverted" sex acts and bribes to Russian officials.

Mrs Justice Steyn threw out the case against Orbis Business Intelligence, a consultancy founded by former MI6 officer Christopher Steele, last month.

She found that Mr Trump's compensation claim was "bound to fail".

In a new ruling she also ordered Mr Trump to pay Orbis's costs "of the entire claim".

The order, obtained by the PA news agency on Thursday, also said Mr Trump has made no attempt to bring an appeal.

Mr Steele, who previously ran the Secret Intelligence Service's Russia desk, was the author of the so-called Steele dossier.

This included uncorroborated intelligence claims, denied by Mr Trump, that the former US president had been "compromised" by the Russian security service, the FSB.

The High Court was told last year that Mr Trump was bringing a data protection claim over two memos in the dossier which claimed he had taken part in "sex parties" in St Petersburg and engaged in "golden showers" with prostitutes in Moscow.

Mrs Justice Steyn said Orbis has estimated its costs to be more than £600,000.

She said £300,000 should be paid by Mr Trump before the total costs are decided by a specialist judge.

The dossier, made up of more than a dozen memos, was produced by Orbis in 2016 before Mr Trump won the election that year to become US president. It was later leaked to and published by BuzzFeed in 2017.

At the hearing in October 2023, Hugh Tomlinson KC, for Mr Trump, described the allegations in the memos - which included a claim that the 77-year-old had "defiled" a bed previously used by former president Barack Obama and his wife - as "egregiously inaccurate".

Dismissing the claim, Mrs Justice Steyn said the "mere fact" that Orbis had held copies of the memos could not cause Mr Trump distress.

Orbis welcomed the ruling last month, saying "we feel strongly that Mr Trump brought this claim in an attempt to exact revenge on Orbis and to chill free speech".
---