Author Topic: Top Carson Aide Wants Taxpayers To Fund Farrakhan  (Read 340 times)

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Top Carson Aide Wants Taxpayers To Fund Farrakhan
« on: October 26, 2015, 07:36:48 PM »
Ben Carson says a Muslim should not be president.

But his key adviser, Armstrong Williams, has, unbeknownst to the good doctor’s supporters, been praising Louis Farrakhan — even urging Chicago to hire Nation of Islam security guards to fight crime.

Quite the Farrakhan aficionado, Williams had promised to broadcast his radio show live from the hate monger’s 20th anniversary Million Man March last Saturday, recalling to the Washington Times that, “It was a moving experience [in 1995], so I want to be there again.”

In a little-noticed Times column the day after the march, “To Curb Chicago Violence Bring in Nation of Islam,” Williams argued that only NOI toughs can help stem the tide of killings there and temper other inner-city pathologies by fostering greater self-respect among residents. 

The Hill published Williams’s piece on October 6 under the headline, “The Nation of Islam Could Be Chicago’s Savior.”

If taxpayers foot the bill, of course.

Williams, apparently a big fan of government contracts since he received $240,000 from the George W. Bush Department of Education to promote “No Child Left Behind,” argued that the “NOI brings to the table things other private security firms and the police don’t — credibility within the community. The NOI is one of the few community-based organizations that actually recruit in prisons and also offer transitional services to ex-offenders.”

Williams opined that starting in the late 1980s NOI guards, known as the “Fruit of Islam,” successfully patrolled housing projects in New York, Chicago and Washington. The Department of Housing and Urban Development awarded the Fruit multi-million dollar contracts but they were eventually nixed after a nationwide controversy and congressional hearings in the mid-1990s.

In 1995, “HUD abruptly canceled an NOI-affiliated firm’s contract to secure Baltimore public housing buildings — citing bidding irregularities and other violations that were widely viewed as a smoke screen for a political battle over the group’s anti-Semitic rhetoric.”

Uh, yeah, Armstrong, what about all that hateful NOI rhetoric? Never mind Chicago residents. It seems that journalists, whites and cops are the ones who need guards—to protect against Farrakhan.

The hatemonger famously tried to incite his followers to kill the Washington Post reporter who exposed Jesse Jackson’s “Hymietown” slur in the 1980s. More recently, Farrakhan urged blacks to “rise up and kill those who kill us” unless the federal government intercedes on their behalf.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2015/10/17/top-carson-aide-wants-taxpayers-to-fund-farrakhan/#ixzz3pjRIGqsL

Irongrip400

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21161
  • Pan Germanism, Pax Britannica
Re: Top Carson Aide Wants Taxpayers To Fund Farrakhan
« Reply #1 on: October 26, 2015, 08:10:17 PM »
NOI is t the same as Sunni and Shia moslems right?

I think that black folks should be able to police themselves. It's a predominantly black area, so the police should be black. See how it works, it couldn't be worse.

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59670
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Top Carson Aide Wants Taxpayers To Fund Farrakhan
« Reply #2 on: October 26, 2015, 09:06:43 PM »
Understand that 240 picks and chooses his propaganda all of his posting are propaganda, make no mistake about that.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Top Carson Aide Wants Taxpayers To Fund Farrakhan
« Reply #3 on: October 26, 2015, 09:24:37 PM »
Understand that 240 picks and chooses his propaganda all of his posting are propaganda, make no mistake about that.

the fuccked up ideology of obama's "advisors" sure as shit mattered.

suddenly, it's not longer relevant, huh?

Now that you're done attacking the messenger, do you care to address the actual article?