Author Topic: Barkley The New Tebbow!!!! (Read 9672 times)

Option D · « **Reply #75 on:** August 31, 2009, 02:28:51 PM »

Quote from: divcom on August 31, 2009, 02:10:25 PM

i'm assuming this is about rankings, thought it was about sec teams with bcs championships. tenn in 1999, which is true statement.

usc only pac-10 team

sec w/3 teams

I Was talkin about this decade

regmac · « **Reply #76 on:** August 31, 2009, 03:40:08 PM »

Quote from: Earl1972 on August 31, 2009, 12:57:37 PM

at the time everybody was saying florida shouldn't have been there

usc would've taken florida's place, if they didn't choke against a bad ucla team

E

Yeah like Florida didn't choke against a sorry ass Missippi team last year?

Earl1972 · « **Reply #77 on:** August 31, 2009, 03:41:23 PM »

Quote from: regmac on August 31, 2009, 03:40:08 PM

Yeah like Florida didn't choke against a sorry ass Missippi team last year?

usc had two losses in 06

E

regmac · « **Reply #78 on:** August 31, 2009, 03:43:14 PM »

Quote from: big_mal on August 31, 2009, 01:02:21 PM

no argument from me on that one...but i was sayin that OU shouldnt have been there.

Whats scary is the football people were TRYING to put Texas Tech in vs Florida but the beating the Sooners gave the Red Raiders changed all that. Just imagine Florida's secondary getting punked by Crabtree Longhorn style. I have nothing against Florida neither but I know SC would spank them....Its the bowl game everyone is waiting for.

regmac · « **Reply #79 on:** August 31, 2009, 03:47:11 PM »

Quote from: The Showstoppa on August 31, 2009, 01:20:07 PM

no a cupcake is any team that traditionally sucks....at it doesn't matter about the 1-aa opponents since the BCS came into existence it doesn't help teams to load up on them. When is the last time a team other than USC, and maybe oregon, in the Pac=10 had ANY national relevance? SEC has 3 different natl champs (should have been 4 as Auburn was robbed) since the BCS started. Can the Pac 10 match that? $:-\$

WHo cares about the Pac 10....it is to USC like the LH division was for Roy Jones in the 90's. Too ez but he still everybody. Oregon and Cal are good but I only focus on TOP 10 teams not Pac 10 teams. FYI in college football terms a cupcake is a team from a LOWER division....face is USC does NOT play cupcakes. Carroll hates sweets.

regmac · « **Reply #80 on:** August 31, 2009, 03:49:28 PM »

Quote from: big_mal on August 31, 2009, 01:47:52 PM

Ok i got florida and LSU...who else won?

He's claiming Auburn should have gone that year they played nothing but cupcakes...like Tennessee TECH!!!!!!!!!! and La Monroe and Furman!!!!! I wish SC can play Azuza Pacific and NAU and Oregon Tech!!!!

regmac · « **Reply #81 on:** August 31, 2009, 03:52:40 PM »

Quote from: divcom on August 31, 2009, 01:56:08 PM

ten after manning left.

1 Tennessee (SEC) 23 2 Florida State (ACC) 16

Becaause the NCAA hates SC and the rest of the Pac10, the Rose Bowl is basically the only Bowl game that matters. They know SC will smack the blue off the gators so they won't let SC have that National Championship at home. So it will be Michigan States turn to get whipped by SC on New Years!!!

regmac · « **Reply #82 on:** August 31, 2009, 03:54:04 PM »

Quote from: big_mal on August 31, 2009, 02:04:33 PM

10 AFTER MANNING LEFT. Thats just a false statement

Maybe he/she means both Mannings or all 4 Archie, Cooper, Payton and Eli!!!! I duno!!!

regmac · « **Reply #83 on:** August 31, 2009, 03:55:49 PM »

Quote from: Earl1972 on August 31, 2009, 03:41:23 PM

usc had two losses in 06

E

And?

? Florida lossed to Michigan that year........and I think that game was in FLORIDA!!!!!

regmac · « **Reply #84 on:** August 31, 2009, 04:00:10 PM »

Quote from: regmac on August 31, 2009, 03:55:49 PM

And?? Florida lossed to Michigan that year........and I think that game was in FLORIDA!!!!!

Actually that loss to sorry Michigan was in '07!!!! I think Fla lost to someone else that year for the fact that was the 3rd world CAPITAL ONE BOWL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Doug_Steele · « **Reply #85 on:** August 31, 2009, 04:00:43 PM »

I was at that game, good game too! RR is getting fired! I will feel relieved when he is out!

regmac · « **Reply #86 on:** August 31, 2009, 04:04:22 PM »

Quote from: Doug_Steele on August 31, 2009, 04:00:43 PM

I was at that game, good game too! RR is getting fired! I will feel relieved when he is out!

MIchigan will be back soon ....if you mean Rich Rodriguez. He's still cleaning out the cob webs. But via strog recruiting and tradition,they will be back.

divcom · « **Reply #87 on:** August 31, 2009, 04:13:23 PM »

Quote from: regmac on August 31, 2009, 03:40:08 PM

Yeah like Florida didn't choke against a sorry ass Missippi team last year?

nope. very good ole miss squad, stronger a season moved on. probably 2nd best in pac-10 last season.

Aug. 30, 2008   Memphis   W   41-24   1-0
Sept. 6, 2008   at Wake Forest (ABC)   L   30-28   1-1
Sept. 13, 2008   Samford   W   34-10   2-1
Sept. 20, 2008   Vanderbilt   L   23-17   2-2 (0-1)
Sept. 27, 2008   at Florida (Ray/Com)   W   31-30   3-2 (1-1)
Oct. 4, 2008   South Carolina   L   31-24   3-3 (1-2)
Oct. 18, 2008   at Alabama (CBS)   L   24-20   3-4 (1-3)
Oct. 25, 2008   at Arkansas (PPV)   W   23-21   4-4 (2-3)
Nov. 1, 2008   Auburn (Ray/Com)   W   17-7   5-4 (3-3)
Nov. 15, 2008   La.-Monroe   W   59-0   6-4
Nov. 22, 2008   at LSU (CBS)   W   31-13   7-4 (4-3)
Nov. 28, 2008   Miss. State (Ray/Com)   W   45-0   8-4 (5-3)
Jan. 2, 2009   at Texas Tech   W   47-34   9-4

less than 7 pts every loss. solid coach at helm.

regmac · « **Reply #88 on:** August 31, 2009, 05:34:04 PM »

Quote from: divcom on August 31, 2009, 04:13:23 PM

nope. very good ole miss squad, stronger a season moved on. probably 2nd best in pac-10 last season.

Aug. 30, 2008   Memphis   W   41-24   1-0
Sept. 6, 2008   at Wake Forest (ABC)   L   30-28   1-1
Sept. 13, 2008   Samford   W   34-10   2-1
Sept. 20, 2008   Vanderbilt   L   23-17   2-2 (0-1)
Sept. 27, 2008   at Florida (Ray/Com)   W   31-30   3-2 (1-1)
Oct. 4, 2008   South Carolina   L   31-24   3-3 (1-2)
Oct. 18, 2008   at Alabama (CBS)   L   24-20   3-4 (1-3)
Oct. 25, 2008   at Arkansas (PPV)   W   23-21   4-4 (2-3)
Nov. 1, 2008   Auburn (Ray/Com)   W   17-7   5-4 (3-3)
Nov. 15, 2008   La.-Monroe   W   59-0   6-4
Nov. 22, 2008   at LSU (CBS)   W   31-13   7-4 (4-3)
Nov. 28, 2008   Miss. State (Ray/Com)   W   45-0   8-4 (5-3)
Jan. 2, 2009   at Texas Tech   W   47-34   9-4

less than 7 pts every loss. solid coach at helm.

Sc, Cal, and Oregon would never give up 10 pts to Samford!!!!!!!! Or lose to Wake Forest!!!!!

thelamefalsehood · « **Reply #89 on:** August 31, 2009, 06:28:46 PM »

Quote from: regmac on August 31, 2009, 03:52:40 PM

Becaause the NCAA hates SC and the rest of the Pac10, the Rose Bowl is basically the only Bowl game that matters. They know SC will smack the blue off the gators so they won't let SC have that National Championship at home. So it will be Michigan States turn to get whipped by SC on New Years!!!

Fu#king hell, you are dumb. From the Cowgirls being your superbowl pick, to USC not playing cupcakes. The PAC-1 is a GD pastry shop as many cupcakes as they have. The mighty Trojans lose every year to an unranked, seemingly overmatched team. Their is no bias against USC by the pollsters, if anything, they have the biggest hardon for your overpaid athletes. And as for the Cowgirls, they havent won a playoff game in over 10 years. Seriously, you gotta be 16 and semi retarded. Nobody could be this dumb on purpose.

regmac · « **Reply #90 on:** August 31, 2009, 06:31:13 PM »

Quote from: thelamefalsehood on August 31, 2009, 06:28:46 PM

Fu#king hell, you are dumb. From the Cowgirls being your superbowl pick, to USC not playing cupcakes. The PAC-1 is a GD pastry shop as many cupcakes as they have. The mighty Trojans lose every year to an unranked, seemingly overmatched team. Their is no bias against USC by the pollsters, if anything, they have the biggest hardon for your overpaid athletes. And as for the Cowgirls, they havent won a playoff game in over 10 years. Seriously, you gotta be 16 and semi retarded. Nobody could be this dumb on purpose.

And your point..........your funny!!!!!

polychronopolous · « **Reply #91 on:** August 31, 2009, 06:32:07 PM »

Quote from: thelamefalsehood on August 31, 2009, 06:28:46 PM

Fu#king hell, you are dumb. From the Cowgirls being your superbowl pick, to USC not playing cupcakes. The PAC-1 is a GD pastry shop as many cupcakes as they have. The mighty Trojans lose every year to an unranked, seemingly overmatched team. Their is no bias against USC by the pollsters, if anything, they have the biggest hardon for your overpaid athletes. And as for the Cowgirls, they havent won a playoff game in over 10 years. Seriously, you gotta be 16 and semi retarded. Nobody could be this dumb on purpose.

I personally enjoy reading alot of regmac's others posts but sometimes I wonder if most of his stuff concerning the Cowboys is just for laughs. I mean, I love the Cowboys as much as the next fan but this guy is WAY out there with some of his cheer leading statements.

regmac · « **Reply #92 on:** August 31, 2009, 06:33:46 PM »

Quote from: polychronopolous on August 31, 2009, 06:32:07 PM

I personally enjoy reading alot of regmac's others posts but sometimes I wonder if most of his stuff concerning the Cowboys is just for laughs. I mean, I love the Cowboys as much as the next fan but this guy is WAY out there with some of his cheer leading statements.

THIS IS THE YEAR BUUDY!!!!!! I mean it!!!!!!

polychronopolous · « **Reply #93 on:** August 31, 2009, 06:35:56 PM »

Quote from: regmac on August 31, 2009, 06:33:46 PM

THIS IS THE YEAR BUUDY!!!!!! I mean it!!!!!!

I like their team too, Romo has looked great, although depth might be an issue but you probably said the same exact thing the last 10 years in a row, "This is THE year"

regmac · « **Reply #94 on:** August 31, 2009, 06:37:42 PM »

Quote from: polychronopolous on August 31, 2009, 06:35:56 PM

I like their team too, Romo has looked great, although depth might be an issue but you probably said the same exact thing the last 10 years in a row, "This is THE year"

Yeah I have but this year unlike last year and the year before (which was the year) will be THE YEAR!!!!!!

polychronopolous · « **Reply #95 on:** August 31, 2009, 06:42:23 PM »

Quote from: regmac on August 31, 2009, 06:37:42 PM

Yeah I have but this year unlike last year and the year before (which was the year) will be THE YEAR!!!!!!

You are SOOOO full of shit but you make me laugh so it's all good.

Armstrong · « **Reply #96 on:** August 31, 2009, 07:02:09 PM »

Tebow staying in college because he wont do anything in the NFL.

regmac · « **Reply #97 on:** August 31, 2009, 07:04:18 PM »

Quote from: polychronopolous on August 31, 2009, 06:42:23 PM

You are SOOOO full of shit but you make me laugh so it's all good.

Fans like me probably are FOS. Likewise!!!!!

regmac · « **Reply #98 on:** August 31, 2009, 07:06:51 PM »

Quote from: Armstrong on August 31, 2009, 07:02:09 PM

Tebow staying in college because he wont do anything in the NFL.

The NFL needs guys like Tebbow more than Tebbow need the NFL. He's a Aikman guy.....good character....yet cocky!!!!! You won't see him driving around in a Bentley yet you also won't see him arrested for a shooting out side a strip club either.

JimmyJam1974 · « **Reply #99 on:** August 31, 2009, 07:07:02 PM »

Quote from: Armstrong on August 31, 2009, 07:02:09 PM

Tebow staying in college because he wont do anything in the NFL.

Still undecided about this one. I gues we'll see. But right now, Teabag doesb't give a shit about the NFL - just worries bout being one of the best CFB players in history.