" Teh funny thing is that to alter somebodys personality radically = absolutely possible. Desires can be programmed in, confidence can be built, fears and issues can be removed, behavioral patterns can be installed and so on, all with well known techniques + a lot of work."
wrong
you cannot alter personality
you create new ones into the mind through trauma
Definition of personality: Personality can be defined as a dynamic and organized set of characteristics possessed by a person that uniquely influences his or her cognitions, motivations, and behaviors in various situations
Key components of personality includes a persons beliefs, self concepts, values, fears ect (some overlapping definitions here depending on where you seek). All this = concepts from psychology. All these factors are mutable in many ways, and when they are changed, the personality changes.
Beliefs can be seen as an idea about something "attached" to the subconscious with emotional energy. For example, if a person has gone through traumatic experiences in association to public speaking, that person might have a belief that public speaking = dangerous and must be avoided, and when put in such a situation, the person experiences unpleasant emotions like fear.
In this scenario, the personality has been altered by trauma, and on this point you are correct. Trauma often changes personality.
Then you can put this person through EMDR theraphy with a psychologist and strategically desensitize him to the fear by putting him in public speaking situations. Eventually the persons fear goes away, confidence is established, the belief is changed, and the personality = changed according to the definition, but not by using trauma.
The personality can also be altered in many other ways. Experiencing success adds references to a belief about the possiblity for success, and stuff like creative visualization, hypnosis, EMDR, psychotherapy ect. can all help alter it.
Your problem is that you spew around concepts that are neither accepted scientific concepts, nor defined by you. When questioned about then you just do this: "
" or say something like "you know nothing" ect. The only problem with this method of debating is that you really say nothing besides a bunch of fantasies. It seems like you were never taught how to discuss. Read a book on rhetoric
for a clueless person it sounds like fantasy
and u talk about high performance in sports like u would know something about it
Again you claim superiority for your own concepts that has not been proven by you except by your word (all while being a bunch of gibberish) and then try to claim that anybody not believing it = wrong. Great way to debate you educated Romanian devil
And Debussey = 80 pounds. How trained can it be?
Ps: When answering this post, please make proper definitions, refer to scientific facts and adress each argument with a counter argument. We do not want to have the debating power of a 10 year old now, do we SPermballstatste?
