Ugh, Saturday morning and I'm on the internet..
You've got a point.. somewhat.
I was genuinely curious about what you were saying, so I took a look in photoshop and indeed, I discovered that the total width of Phil is in parity.
What you're seeing below is Phil's width compared to Cutlers (no zoom, in that picture he really is wider, though perspective may be the reason).
The second image is why you are wrong. It is his chest compared with Cutler's. As you can see, he IS more narrow, it's just in the torso (and you can see that I didn't even do Cutler justice, on the right side, I cut him a bit wrong).
Think about that for a second. In that photo he's
wider than cutler yet his chest is significantly less wide. I did not in any way modify the image.
When I look at Phil, I don't see a balanced physique. I see giant, impressive arms, small shoulders compared them and a very narrow chest width.
Hope that lays to rest what you're saying which was valid but not quite the right focus.