Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Bodybuilding Boards => Positive Bodybuilding Discussion & Talk => Natural Bodybuilding => Topic started by: 8 INCH not biceps on January 23, 2006, 08:33:13 AM

Title: Natural sucks
Post by: 8 INCH not biceps on January 23, 2006, 08:33:13 AM

 Natural bodybuilders sucks nobody is going to pay money to see natural bodybuilders if i want to see what i natural lifter looks like i will look in the mirror.
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: GET_BIGGER on January 23, 2006, 08:35:40 AM
Natural bodybuilders sucks nobody is going to pay money to see natural bodybuilders if i want to see what i natural lifter looks like i will look in the mirror.

You will look in the mirror?  So your a Natural Bodybuilder?  Hmmmmmmmm.......I see.
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: 8 INCH not biceps on January 23, 2006, 08:38:04 AM

 The question is would you pay $400 to watch the natural mr o i think not.
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: Prime on January 23, 2006, 09:32:01 AM
The question is would you pay $400 to watch the natural mr o i think not.
would you pay $400 to watch the regular MrO? :-\

Natural bodybuilding can be just as entertaining as assisted. 
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: gibberj2 on January 23, 2006, 10:03:08 AM
it's really stupid to say they suck. how do they suck? they know how to train and eat better than the ones on drugs. they also don't get as fat in the off-season or winter (if you don't compete) because to take off the fat and keep your muscle is hard when you're not ON.
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: Bear03 on January 23, 2006, 10:41:32 AM
There's plenty of hating on naturals on every other board here, why don't you take the negativity somewhere else?
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: GET_BIGGER on January 23, 2006, 10:50:04 AM
There's plenty of hating on naturals on every other board here, why don't you take the negativity somewhere else?

I would agree with the negativity.  Post probably should have been deleted. 
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: Borracho on January 23, 2006, 11:07:04 AM
There's plenty of hating on naturals on every other board here

Where?

I've only seen it the other way around. BTW, I'm also natural...till further notice.
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: Bear03 on January 23, 2006, 02:11:58 PM
Where?

I've only seen it the other way around. BTW, I'm also natural...till further notice.

I guess you're right, people make fun of the pros for using copious amounts of gear.  But i checked out the thread on the gossip board that this natural board would be starting, and it was beset (for the most part) with responses about how natural training was gay and people who trained naturally were wasting time, etc.  The usual insecurity crap. 
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: Jr. Yates on January 23, 2006, 02:23:02 PM
yup! i expected that when i went to go read that.
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: HowDog on January 23, 2006, 03:26:30 PM
Natural BB will never engaged the public like regular bb, true.  I don't think anybody is trying to replace regular BB, the public wants the freaks and it is simple as that, but the guys who go the natural way should be praised and not belittled which is why I see a divison between natual and anabolic bb, either way we are still bodybuilding brothers.   
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: Oliver Klaushof on January 23, 2006, 05:08:40 PM
Natural BB will never engaged the public like regular bb, true.  I don't think anybody is trying to replace regular BB, the public wants the freaks and it is simple as that, but the guys who go the natural way should be praised and not belittled which is why I see a divison between natual and anabolic bb, either way we are still bodybuilding brothers.   

I agree. Natural training is more about self-satisfaction and good health. It's not a circus like pro BB - and I am a fan.
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: alexxx on January 23, 2006, 05:34:48 PM
Natural training is what you make of it. Small minds have small bodies.  ;)
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: brianX on January 23, 2006, 06:40:27 PM
Lots of people admired Steve Reeves and John Grimek, both of whom were natural.
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: gibberj2 on January 23, 2006, 06:41:47 PM
bodybuilders on drugs look bigger, sometimes better and always will get more fans but that's not the point. people bodybuild as a PERSONAL thing and nothing sucks about that.
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: an123 on January 23, 2006, 06:54:58 PM
Two streams of bodybuilders.

One stream competes, one just does it for the love of the iron/health benefits/asthetics.


Natural competitive bodybuilding wont interest many, since those that watch bodybuilding just want to see a freakshow.  But natural bodybuilding does not suck, it simply doesn't produce the results people want to see (well the small cohort of the population that actually wants to see a bunch of greased up men in thongs "pose").
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: 8 INCH not biceps on January 24, 2006, 11:05:42 AM

 all i am saying is that natural bodybuilding is for lifting in the gym on stage its better to look at roid freak and marvel at the extreme possiblities of the human body.
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: alexxx on January 24, 2006, 11:08:20 AM
all i am saying is that natural bodybuilding is for lifting in the gym on stage its better to look at roid freak and marvel at the extreme possiblities of the human body.

Ya we all know what you wonder about on those freak physiques !  ;D
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: Acerimmer1 on January 28, 2006, 07:38:36 PM
Natural bodybuilders sucks nobody is going to pay money to see natural bodybuilders if i want to see what i natural lifter looks like i will look in the mirror.

I thought Ronnie Coleman was natural.
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: bmacsys on January 28, 2006, 08:42:58 PM
all i am saying is that natural bodybuilding is for lifting in the gym on stage its better to look at roid freak and marvel at the extreme possiblities of the human body.

Dude, this thread is about as dumb as the one where you stated at 6' 170 pounds you could full squat 455 pounds for 13 reps. Even though you could only bench 195 pounds. Fuck man, your amazing.
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: brianX on February 08, 2006, 01:30:40 AM
Let us know when you crack the 200 lb barrier on benches, "8 Inch". hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahaha!!!
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: sarcasm on February 08, 2006, 01:54:12 PM
i've benched 200..................... ..............pound dumbbells.
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: gibberj2 on February 08, 2006, 02:13:56 PM
lies
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: myseone on March 13, 2006, 09:24:27 PM
Natural bodybuilders sucks nobody is going to pay money to see natural bodybuilders if i want to see what i natural lifter looks like i will look in the mirror.


So your saying you suck?
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: Oliver Klaushof on March 13, 2006, 10:16:16 PM
This thread is dumb because most people that train naturally do it to look better than the people around them, and also to stay healthy.

Steroid user usually have other motivations. They have fantasies of being the next Mr. O or self-esteem issues.

Bottom line is...most natural trainers don't plan on getting on stage but good luck to the folks that do.
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: brianX on July 25, 2006, 01:01:54 PM
i've benched 200..................... ..............pound dumbbells.

hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahaha
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: Bast000 on July 25, 2006, 01:41:27 PM
This thread is dumb because most people that train naturally do it to look better than the people around them

Exactly right.    Only the delusional idiots compare themselves to the pros and big steroid users.  And the vast majority of the ones that are somewhat comparable in size and strength are Fat, which to me defeats the purpose of bodybuilding, because they look bad.
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: Tier on July 26, 2006, 12:25:01 AM
arnold and levrone are my ideal bbing 'heroes' so to say.........i find it hard to idolise any high up naturals cos every mofo is like 'natural my ass!'     

bast u seem clued up , who do u think is a good natural these days?  skip?  this john hansen dude?........
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: jaejonna on July 26, 2006, 04:53:06 PM
Being natural sucks, but you can go to the store and get enough supplements legally, eat right, train hard and stay consistent enough to create a physique that 99% of the planet would envy and condsider freaky. Remember how many people are in the world!!!
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: Oliver Klaushof on July 26, 2006, 04:54:30 PM
What looks like shit on Getbig can be impressive to regular people.
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: Bast000 on July 26, 2006, 04:57:18 PM
arnold and levrone are my ideal bbing 'heroes' so to say.........i find it hard to idolise any high up naturals cos every mofo is like 'natural my ass!'     

bast u seem clued up , who do u think is a good natural these days?  skip?  this john hansen dude?........

John Hansen used to take steroids so he is not natural.  Who even knows if Skip is natural either.

I would say Dan Decker is the best, that I believe is natural.  You never know for sure.

(http://www.graphicmuscle.com/images/gmPgesFeb06-SUBSCRIBE.jpg)
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: Tier on July 26, 2006, 10:42:39 PM
yeah i was always skeptical on dan decker , damn tho if i could look like him id never even be tempted by roids  :o
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: GoneAway on July 27, 2006, 06:52:08 AM
(to the original poster) So, you're repulsed by your own body? I think you might need psychological help.

Anyway, I would pay to see a natural BBing show if the contestants were worthy of watching. Not saying they have to be as big as the pros, but just some incentive to cheer and respect the person 'more' for achieving a better body than watching a skinny natural competitor. But, if you simply can't get a better body, then so be it, but in most cases it's down to how much effort you put into it.

That Dan Decker guy is huge, natural or not.
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: Bast000 on July 27, 2006, 08:08:59 AM
Decker is 5' 11" and competes at 215lbs.

Jeff Willett is 5' 7-8" and competes at 215lbs. 

Big difference really.
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: texasRUSH on July 27, 2006, 08:20:37 AM
my problem with decided on wether or not i want to use gear again is kinda two fold....


one...i'm afraid of losing all the gains i make on gear...though i have yet to lose any from my first cycle..i dont want to end up being a levrone  :-\

two...i'm bigger and stronger than most people i've met and have only used 500mg of test a week for 12 weeks once...

all i'm wanting is the size to go with my strength....it's either be patient..or spend the cash.
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: Bast000 on July 27, 2006, 11:26:29 AM
my problem with decided on wether or not i want to use gear again is kinda two fold....


one...i'm afraid of losing all the gains i make on gear...though i have yet to lose any from my first cycle..i dont want to end up being a levrone  :-\

two...i'm bigger and stronger than most people i've met and have only used 500mg of test a week for 12 weeks once...

all i'm wanting is the size to go with my strength....it's either be patient..or spend the cash.

How many pounds did you gain from the cycle that you kept?  Are you lean or "bulking"?
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: texasRUSH on July 27, 2006, 11:32:05 AM
i work out and eat...i'm not sure what that curtails :D


but i gained 10 lbs and have kept it all....i just dont' want my physique relying strickly on juice.
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: candidate2025 on July 27, 2006, 07:01:14 PM
yeah i was always skeptical on dan decker , damn tho if i could look like him id never even be tempted by roids  :o
if i built a atural base up to wherehe is...i would definitely take roids....from what i hear the longer you wait to take roids..9the bigger the natural base)...youll grow exponentially faster.   so with a few small doses he could be ronnie size...and even bigger.
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: Nathan on August 06, 2006, 07:14:59 AM
I'd easly pay to see the best natural BB in the world compeat!
Title: Re: Natural sucks
Post by: Nathan on August 06, 2006, 07:30:26 AM
I'd easly pay to see the best natural BB in the world compeat!
if i built a atural base up to wherehe is...i would definitely take roids....from what i hear the longer you wait to take roids..9the bigger the natural base)...youll grow exponentially faster.   so with a few small doses he could be ronnie size...and even bigger.

You mean witha bunch of small doses that turn into big doses cause ur body stops making its own test, then when u quit all ur size starts to go away at a very rapid pace.
what do u do then ??? let all ur size just melt away or keep doing more? Not to metion all the mental and phsycal side effects. And if u already are prone to slight metal disorders such as manic depreshion or cyclo thymia it could make u totaly psycotic. (seen this happen to a freind who had a minor disorder, end up getting hospitalized and put in a padded cell for a while) Drugs of any kind aways end up creating a chain reaction, where in they cause a problem that can only be fixed by doing more.
Why not stay natural, stay happy and keep it forever? Even when ur 90?
(This guy I met here in Van is 90 220lbs 6'1 with tight skin, and runs 5km per day np, thats my goal)

And I'd easly pay to see nattys compeat, a lot sooner than seeing bb compeat in the MR O, cause what can be learned form them? None of it applies to normal ppl, I'd rather see what can really be done.