Author Topic: Ocascio - Cortez - Entertainment / Socialist - Would hit - thread  (Read 214341 times)

Humble Narcissist

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28024
Re: Ocascio - Cortez - Entertainment / Socialist - Would hit - thread
« Reply #400 on: February 09, 2019, 03:30:41 PM »
For real? :o  Please post a link if there is video of this
Saw it on Mark Dice's video from Friday I believe.

myt1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4275
  • Getbig!
Re: Ocascio - Cortez - Entertainment / Socialist - Would hit - thread
« Reply #401 on: February 09, 2019, 03:45:19 PM »
Saw it on Mark Dice's video from Friday I believe.

Thanks. Found it, and you're right.  It's a meme from a Town Hall meeting quote though....However, it was fact checked, and is accurate.  I'm not sure if I should  ;D or  :'(

Guys, I really thought the "farting cows" thing was a joke.  I thought there was no way a politician would word things like that.  Turns out it was on her FAQ page, but has since been taken down after being mocked. @ :36 in clip



BTW, I'm getting this hoodie 8)
https://teespring.com/LiberalBrainShirt#pid=212&cid=5832&sid=front

polychronopolous

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19041
Re: Ocascio - Cortez - Entertainment / Socialist - Would hit - thread
« Reply #402 on: February 09, 2019, 03:51:31 PM »
NEW YORK DEMOCRATS COULD ELIMINATE OCASIO-CORTEZ’S DISTRICT AFTER 2020



Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez attends a House Financial Services Committee meeting in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 30, 2019. Photo: Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call via AP Images
REP. ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ is prepared for the possibility that Democrats in New York could redraw her district after the 2020 election, she told The Intercept in an interview.  

Following the 2020 census, every state will draw new district boundaries to reflect changes in the population, the political implications of which will stretch for at least the next decade. In 2014, New York approved a constitutional amendment establishing a nonpartisan redistricting commission, which is set to take over the redistricting process starting in 2020. The 10-member commission, meant to be independent from the legislature, is made up of individuals selected by leaders from the state Senate and Assembly, and the original eight members pick two additional members.

But Ocasio-Cortez’s most determined adversaries are not partisan Republicans, but Democrats who say that she has been a disruptive influence. The Hill recently reported that at least one member of Congress has been urging New York party leaders to recruit a Democratic primary challenger to Ocasio-Cortez. But the news led to a surge of donations to Ocasio-Cortez, suggesting that a more efficient means of ousting her might be simply to eliminate her district.

The 29-year-old congressperson noted (accurately) that it’s generally expected that New York will likely lose a seat, despite the city itself growing at a consistent pace. “I don’t know if that means that all of our districts are going to be redrawn dramatically, because they have been historically gerrymandered, or what will happen, but there’s certainly a possibility, if not a guarantee, that my district in the coming years will not look like my district today,” Ocasio-Cortez said. “So I think it’s entirely possible, and New York politics being what it is, we have no idea where things are going to go.”

New York politics are famously insular, with a tight circle controlling major decision-making for years. That began to shift in 2018, not just with Ocasio-Cortez’s victory, but also wins from a number of insurgent candidates against Democrats who had caucused with Republicans in the state Senate.

Ocasio-Cortez, during a podcast interview with The Intercept, was joined by former North Carolina Rep. Brad Miller, who earned his “former” status as a result of statewide redistricting that eliminated his seat in 2012. The 2010 tea party wave handed control of the legislature to Republicans, who drew him out of the district. He decided not to run for re-election. He told The Intercept that his work on the House Financial Services Committee taking on powerful banks “probably” played a role in the redistricting. “And Republicans, it turned out, did not value my service, and they divided my district six different ways, and there was no one piece that was really recognizably the old district. And also it was true on the Democratic side,” he said, noting that his own party leaders weren’t thrilled with his work in a state dominated by financial interests, such as Bank of America.

https://theintercept.com/2019/02/09/ocasio-cortez-district-redistricting-2020/

Humble Narcissist

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28024
Re: Ocascio - Cortez - Entertainment / Socialist - Would hit - thread
« Reply #403 on: February 09, 2019, 03:58:00 PM »
If they eliminate her district she'll get a job with Free Speech t.v. or Link t.v.  Maybe she and Thom Hartmann or Stephanie Miller will have a show together.  It can be called Dumb and Dumber.

Thin Lizzy

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18452
  • It’s all a fraud
Re: Ocascio - Cortez - Entertainment / Socialist - Would hit - thread
« Reply #404 on: February 09, 2019, 04:08:17 PM »
These are the people that vote based on what's trending on Social, and who has the most followers.  Sadly, when it comes to AOC they don't realize that probably 85%+ of her followers are the news media waiting for stories, and those who oppose her and are waiting for a pic or vid to turn into a meme

I would say it was more a matter of those people voting by ethnicity.

Her opponent was an old-school Irish politician. The demographics of that district changed to the point where he didn’t have much of a base to depend on.

myt1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4275
  • Getbig!
Re: Ocascio - Cortez - Entertainment / Socialist - Would hit - thread
« Reply #405 on: February 09, 2019, 04:43:54 PM »
NEW YORK DEMOCRATS COULD ELIMINATE OCASIO-CORTEZ’S DISTRICT AFTER 2020



Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez attends a House Financial Services Committee meeting in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 30, 2019. Photo: Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call via AP Images
REP. ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ is prepared for the possibility that Democrats in New York could redraw her district after the 2020 election, she told The Intercept in an interview.  

Following the 2020 census, every state will draw new district boundaries to reflect changes in the population, the political implications of which will stretch for at least the next decade. In 2014, New York approved a constitutional amendment establishing a nonpartisan redistricting commission, which is set to take over the redistricting process starting in 2020. The 10-member commission, meant to be independent from the legislature, is made up of individuals selected by leaders from the state Senate and Assembly, and the original eight members pick two additional members.

But Ocasio-Cortez’s most determined adversaries are not partisan Republicans, but Democrats who say that she has been a disruptive influence. The Hill recently reported that at least one member of Congress has been urging New York party leaders to recruit a Democratic primary challenger to Ocasio-Cortez. But the news led to a surge of donations to Ocasio-Cortez, suggesting that a more efficient means of ousting her might be simply to eliminate her district.

The 29-year-old congressperson noted (accurately) that it’s generally expected that New York will likely lose a seat, despite the city itself growing at a consistent pace. “I don’t know if that means that all of our districts are going to be redrawn dramatically, because they have been historically gerrymandered, or what will happen, but there’s certainly a possibility, if not a guarantee, that my district in the coming years will not look like my district today,” Ocasio-Cortez said. “So I think it’s entirely possible, and New York politics being what it is, we have no idea where things are going to go.”

New York politics are famously insular, with a tight circle controlling major decision-making for years. That began to shift in 2018, not just with Ocasio-Cortez’s victory, but also wins from a number of insurgent candidates against Democrats who had caucused with Republicans in the state Senate.

Ocasio-Cortez, during a podcast interview with The Intercept, was joined by former North Carolina Rep. Brad Miller, who earned his “former” status as a result of statewide redistricting that eliminated his seat in 2012. The 2010 tea party wave handed control of the legislature to Republicans, who drew him out of the district. He decided not to run for re-election. He told The Intercept that his work on the House Financial Services Committee taking on powerful banks “probably” played a role in the redistricting. “And Republicans, it turned out, did not value my service, and they divided my district six different ways, and there was no one piece that was really recognizably the old district. And also it was true on the Democratic side,” he said, noting that his own party leaders weren’t thrilled with his work in a state dominated by financial interests, such as Bank of America.

https://theintercept.com/2019/02/09/ocasio-cortez-district-redistricting-2020/

Bolded = Hilarious!!! ;D

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39653
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Ocascio - Cortez - Entertainment / Socialist - Would hit - thread
« Reply #406 on: February 09, 2019, 05:06:45 PM »
It’s astonishing to see libfags in my FB feed defend her

Thin Lizzy

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18452
  • It’s all a fraud
Re: Ocascio - Cortez - Entertainment / Socialist - Would hit - thread
« Reply #407 on: February 09, 2019, 05:31:09 PM »
It’s astonishing to see libfags in my FB feed defend her

This is my Congresswoman. Can you believe this shit?

This week, I was proud to join Rep. AlexandriaOcasio-Cortez and Sen. Ed Markey as they introduced the Green New Deal legislation. This program of investments in clean-energy jobs and infrastructure will not only transform the energy sector, but our entire economy. Climate change is one of the most dangerous threats we currently face, and we need to get serious about combatting it now. I am proud to be an original co-sponsor of this legislation and to stand with my colleagues as we take on this challenge.

Carolyn B. Maloney
Member of Congress

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39653
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Ocascio - Cortez - Entertainment / Socialist - Would hit - thread
« Reply #408 on: February 09, 2019, 05:39:53 PM »
This is my Congresswoman. Can you believe this shit?

This week, I was proud to join Rep. AlexandriaOcasio-Cortez and Sen. Ed Markey as they introduced the Green New Deal legislation. This program of investments in clean-energy jobs and infrastructure will not only transform the energy sector, but our entire economy. Climate change is one of the most dangerous threats we currently face, and we need to get serious about combatting it now. I am proud to be an original co-sponsor of this legislation and to stand with my colleagues as we take on this challenge.

Carolyn B. Maloney
Member of Congress

Mine is Nita Lowey.   Another freak.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39653
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Ocascio - Cortez - Entertainment / Socialist - Would hit - thread
« Reply #409 on: February 09, 2019, 05:45:55 PM »
Trump- I think it is very important for the Democrats to press forward with their Green New Deal
Twitter ^ | 2-9-2019 | Donald Trump


I think it is very important for the Democrats to press forward with their Green New Deal. It would be great for the so-called “Carbon Footprint” to permanently eliminate all Planes, Cars, Cows, Oil, Gas & the Military - even if no other country would do the same. Brilliant!

(Excerpt) Read more at mobile.twitter.com ...



Lol.

myt1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4275
  • Getbig!
Re: Ocascio - Cortez - Entertainment / Socialist - Would hit - thread
« Reply #410 on: February 09, 2019, 07:34:00 PM »
I would say it was more a matter of those people voting by ethnicity.

Her opponent was an old-school Irish politician. The demographics of that district changed to the point where he didn’t have much of a base to depend on.

Seems as though we might have been making the same point with different wording. ;)

Moontrane

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5897
  • a Harris administration, together with Joe Biden
Re: Ocascio - Cortez - Entertainment / Socialist - Would hit - thread
« Reply #411 on: February 09, 2019, 08:43:09 PM »
This is my Congresswoman. Can you believe this shit?

This week, I was proud to join Rep. AlexandriaOcasio-Cortez and Sen. Ed Markey as they introduced the Green New Deal legislation. This program of investments in clean-energy jobs and infrastructure will not only transform the energy sector, but our entire economy. Climate change is one of the most dangerous threats we currently face, and we need to get serious about combatting it now. I am proud to be an original co-sponsor of this legislation and to stand with my colleagues as we take on this challenge.

Carolyn B. Maloney
Member of Congress

Charlie Rangel was mine for years.  You have my sympathies.

Moontrane

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5897
  • a Harris administration, together with Joe Biden
Re: Ocascio - Cortez - Entertainment / Socialist - Would hit - thread
« Reply #412 on: February 09, 2019, 09:17:54 PM »

SOMEPARTS

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15884
Re: Ocascio - Cortez - Entertainment / Socialist - Would hit - thread
« Reply #413 on: February 09, 2019, 10:03:36 PM »
Remember the media making fun of Sarah Palin over a couple gaffes? This lady is a veritable cornucopia of quotables.

illuminati

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20924
  • The Strongest Shall Survive.- - Lest we Forget.
Re: Ocascio - Cortez - Entertainment / Socialist - Would hit - thread
« Reply #414 on: February 09, 2019, 10:37:13 PM »


That’s fooking Hilarious & Likely about as Coherent as she can manage

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

chaos

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 57698
  • Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan
Re: Ocascio - Cortez - Entertainment / Socialist - Would hit - thread
« Reply #415 on: February 10, 2019, 08:10:00 AM »
Has anyone posted the line from her Green Deal that would have men pissing in gallon jugs, then leave them outside for 6 hours before using them to save water?
Liar!!!!Filt!!!!

Kazan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6803
  • Sic vis pacem, parabellum
Re: Ocascio - Cortez - Entertainment / Socialist - Would hit - thread
« Reply #416 on: February 10, 2019, 04:46:48 PM »
She needs to be taken seriously, found this on another site and it makes you think

"I'll echo the thought of taking her seriously for a variety of reasons (and as hard as it when such stupid twaddle comes out of her on a regular basis. . . ). She is currently the most prominent millennial politician. Second prize in the Intel international science fair when she was in high school does not describe a dumb kid. Graduating cum laude from BU is not a dumb kid. I've talked with some of her teachers at BU (joy of being partially in the higher ed racket in Mass) and her biology and chemistry professors remember her as being quick and bright. This is not an objectively dumb person.

If you've worked with and taught millennials her behavior is exactly representative of a sheltered and ideologically driven bright millennial. They mispeak all of the time and the tendency to mentally stutter and say stupid shit happens all of the time to them. I have to teach my new research associates the gift of marshaling their thoughts and not say something dumb in a conference room. There is a real tendency to speak off of the cuff. And she is unused to a national stage and that leads to tongue tied behavior. I'd also point out that I think Donald Trump is pretty damned smart and he has said similarly stupid shit all of the time. People can say stupid shit without being stupid when under pressure or in a new environment.


So you have a Puerto Rican female who is an outspoken social justice advocate and loves promising free stuff. She checks so many leftist boxes its scary. She also is a politician who every millennial can recognize based on speaking and behavior (we laugh at her taking a week off afteer the election, I guarantee you the average millennial looks at that and thinks "right on") and be one of them. We remember the millennial generation; they're the ones that the Republicans pray stay home at election time so that they can win? I'm not saying that she will be president in 2021 but I'm saying if we don't think she'll have an audience who listen to her in future election cycles we're fooling ourselves. And honestly, she isn't even the dumbest member of the House or senate. . .

Put more bluntly, people laughed a lot at Trump once he came down the escalator. How'd that work out for his opponents? And I would suggest that Pelosi and all are being fools, they think they can take advantage of all of these poorly functionally educated far left millennials to vote for them while not giving them what they want or explaining why its dumb. That works until they have some of these freshman Democrats who can act as leaders and figureheads. How many revolutions happened because the old guard thought they could keep the stupid young punks in their place? What does Pelosi and company do when they realize that their base in large part actually want an ill defined socialism, believe in destroying their perceived enemies on the right by any means, and will not vote for the establishment Democrats if they don't deliver on all this? Does anyone think that the Democratic establishment will behave honorably and lose with dignity? Or will they say and do whatever they need to in order to stay in power? Note the Green Deal crap is blathering nonsense and every serious candidate for the Democratic nomination has embraced it. And if they beat a weakened Trump will feel they have to enact at least some of it if they want to get elected for a second term. That's what we're facing."
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

loco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19097
  • loco like a fox
Re: Ocascio - Cortez - Entertainment / Socialist - Would hit - thread
« Reply #417 on: February 10, 2019, 06:10:44 PM »
She needs to be taken seriously, found this on another site and it makes you think

"I'll echo the thought of taking her seriously for a variety of reasons (and as hard as it when such stupid twaddle comes out of her on a regular basis. . . ). She is currently the most prominent millennial politician. Second prize in the Intel international science fair when she was in high school does not describe a dumb kid. Graduating cum laude from BU is not a dumb kid. I've talked with some of her teachers at BU (joy of being partially in the higher ed racket in Mass) and her biology and chemistry professors remember her as being quick and bright. This is not an objectively dumb person.

If you've worked with and taught millennials her behavior is exactly representative of a sheltered and ideologically driven bright millennial. They mispeak all of the time and the tendency to mentally stutter and say stupid shit happens all of the time to them. I have to teach my new research associates the gift of marshaling their thoughts and not say something dumb in a conference room. There is a real tendency to speak off of the cuff. And she is unused to a national stage and that leads to tongue tied behavior. I'd also point out that I think Donald Trump is pretty damned smart and he has said similarly stupid shit all of the time. People can say stupid shit without being stupid when under pressure or in a new environment.


So you have a Puerto Rican female who is an outspoken social justice advocate and loves promising free stuff. She checks so many leftist boxes its scary. She also is a politician who every millennial can recognize based on speaking and behavior (we laugh at her taking a week off afteer the election, I guarantee you the average millennial looks at that and thinks "right on") and be one of them. We remember the millennial generation; they're the ones that the Republicans pray stay home at election time so that they can win? I'm not saying that she will be president in 2021 but I'm saying if we don't think she'll have an audience who listen to her in future election cycles we're fooling ourselves. And honestly, she isn't even the dumbest member of the House or senate. . .

Put more bluntly, people laughed a lot at Trump once he came down the escalator. How'd that work out for his opponents? And I would suggest that Pelosi and all are being fools, they think they can take advantage of all of these poorly functionally educated far left millennials to vote for them while not giving them what they want or explaining why its dumb. That works until they have some of these freshman Democrats who can act as leaders and figureheads. How many revolutions happened because the old guard thought they could keep the stupid young punks in their place? What does Pelosi and company do when they realize that their base in large part actually want an ill defined socialism, believe in destroying their perceived enemies on the right by any means, and will not vote for the establishment Democrats if they don't deliver on all this? Does anyone think that the Democratic establishment will behave honorably and lose with dignity? Or will they say and do whatever they need to in order to stay in power? Note the Green Deal crap is blathering nonsense and every serious candidate for the Democratic nomination has embraced it. And if they beat a weakened Trump will feel they have to enact at least some of it if they want to get elected for a second term. That's what we're facing."

They are taking from Trump's playbook.  She's getting a lot of attention and free publicity.  This very thread is an example of that.  There is a good chance she'll be president of the US one day, winning against all odds.



myt1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4275
  • Getbig!
Re: Ocascio - Cortez - Entertainment / Socialist - Would hit - thread
« Reply #418 on: February 10, 2019, 07:27:18 PM »
Kazan and Loco......very interesting posts.

Here's the thing, I know she's not really dumb.  I was aware of some of that stuff, and other things in what Kazan posted.  I'm also aware that more things are coming out, and that her background is not what her followers were led to believe.  I'm trying to be more concise here for a change....she is smart, went to good h.s., respected U, was not poor, was not simply a bartender/waitress, grew up in $900K home, and her mom flat out said that she did not clean homes as AOC has claimed...her grandma did.  One of the dangers with her is that she doesn't know what she knows at times, but she also knows what she doesn't know so well...if that made sense.  With all of that said, how will her "peeps" feel about her when they realize she's not A-OC from the B-Loc?

As for the video:  she'd be best served if she spoke like a rational person as she did in that vid.  Her over-exuberance in declaring all these crazy ideas makes her open to mockery from everyone, even those on her "side".  The average person watching that video is going to have a much better view of her.  The "thinker" types (i.e. crazy people like me that over-analyze things...which can serve us well at times) are going to learn a lot of scary things from that clip.  Essentially, we are at a point where an ideology/agenda/cause/movement found a person to represent what they want vs. a candidate with their own true beliefs establishing their agenda, finding a cause, or starting a movement themselves....she's a puppet, but one that cares.....she just doesn't know what she truly cares about yet.  

Her talking about how she came to think about running, and then decided "yeah, that sounds like fun" is scary.  Her statement about it not mattering if she's a one-term representative gives a good perspective on how she's behaving.  She really doesn't give a fuck about politics.  Sure she cares about some of the things she's saying, but she is smart enough to know that no matter what she now has a spotlight and some level of fame (something all millennials love) which will provide her many opportunities and directions to go with whatever her career turns out to be.  Like it or not, I don't think she's going away even if she loses in 2020.  In fact, I actually think that she is going to end up being sickened by her own party and how politics really works, and she will use her new found fame to probably expose a lot of shit.....if someone doesn't "put a stop to it".  Somewhere down the line some guy is going to fall for her, and she's going to get preggers and at 6 months while getting an ultra-sound this late-term abortion stuff is going to smash her skull in as to what it really is....infanticide.

One final thought: I said this in regard to Abrams doing the SOTU rebuttal for the Dems.  Chuck and Nancy have the power, but are smart enough to know they invigorate no one under 50 (even anyone over 50 is questionable), and can not/wil not battle Trump head on as they will be exposed as stuttering numb skulls.  Abrams and AOC have been picked to rile up, and pick up certain demographics.  They're useful, but expendable when it's time.  They're both being used.  AOC being the face of the New Green Deal (whatever it ends up being), but not picked for the committee by Pelosi is a perfect illustration of that.

That was me trying to be concise ;D  How'd I do? :-[

Moontrane

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5897
  • a Harris administration, together with Joe Biden
Re: Ocascio - Cortez - Entertainment / Socialist - Would hit - thread
« Reply #419 on: February 10, 2019, 08:14:14 PM »
She needs to be taken seriously, found this on another site and it makes you think

"I'll echo the thought of taking her seriously for a variety of reasons (and as hard as it when such stupid twaddle comes out of her on a regular basis. . . ). She is currently the most prominent millennial politician. Second prize in the Intel international science fair when she was in high school does not describe a dumb kid. Graduating cum laude from BU is not a dumb kid. I've talked with some of her teachers at BU (joy of being partially in the higher ed racket in Mass) and her biology and chemistry professors remember her as being quick and bright. This is not an objectively dumb person.

If you've worked with and taught millennials her behavior is exactly representative of a sheltered and ideologically driven bright millennial. They mispeak all of the time and the tendency to mentally stutter and say stupid shit happens all of the time to them. I have to teach my new research associates the gift of marshaling their thoughts and not say something dumb in a conference room. There is a real tendency to speak off of the cuff. And she is unused to a national stage and that leads to tongue tied behavior. I'd also point out that I think Donald Trump is pretty damned smart and he has said similarly stupid shit all of the time. People can say stupid shit without being stupid when under pressure or in a new environment.


So you have a Puerto Rican female who is an outspoken social justice advocate and loves promising free stuff. She checks so many leftist boxes its scary. She also is a politician who every millennial can recognize based on speaking and behavior (we laugh at her taking a week off afteer the election, I guarantee you the average millennial looks at that and thinks "right on") and be one of them. We remember the millennial generation; they're the ones that the Republicans pray stay home at election time so that they can win? I'm not saying that she will be president in 2021 but I'm saying if we don't think she'll have an audience who listen to her in future election cycles we're fooling ourselves. And honestly, she isn't even the dumbest member of the House or senate. . .

Put more bluntly, people laughed a lot at Trump once he came down the escalator. How'd that work out for his opponents? And I would suggest that Pelosi and all are being fools, they think they can take advantage of all of these poorly functionally educated far left millennials to vote for them while not giving them what they want or explaining why its dumb. That works until they have some of these freshman Democrats who can act as leaders and figureheads. How many revolutions happened because the old guard thought they could keep the stupid young punks in their place? What does Pelosi and company do when they realize that their base in large part actually want an ill defined socialism, believe in destroying their perceived enemies on the right by any means, and will not vote for the establishment Democrats if they don't deliver on all this? Does anyone think that the Democratic establishment will behave honorably and lose with dignity? Or will they say and do whatever they need to in order to stay in power? Note the Green Deal crap is blathering nonsense and every serious candidate for the Democratic nomination has embraced it. And if they beat a weakened Trump will feel they have to enact at least some of it if they want to get elected for a second term. That's what we're facing."

She’s not the problem.  Obama was never the problem.  Progressivism is the problem,
and she’s the current standard bearer.  Bad ideas have to be met with good ones. 
We don’t need to wonder how ever greater socialistic approaches to government would
work here; we just need to consider how they work in Canada and Western Europe. 
The socialism of medicine is why there are fewer MRIs in all of Canada than there are in the city of Pittsburgh.

Humble Narcissist

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28024
Re: Ocascio - Cortez - Entertainment / Socialist - Would hit - thread
« Reply #420 on: February 11, 2019, 02:47:44 AM »
She's pretty dumb that's why she's never had a job besides bartender and congresswoman in a district full of morons.  She's a typical millennial twat who thinks she is a genius.

chaos

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 57698
  • Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan
Re: Ocascio - Cortez - Entertainment / Socialist - Would hit - thread
« Reply #421 on: February 11, 2019, 09:31:10 AM »
What are these "Justice Democrats" that back her? Some extreme offshoot of the democratic party?
Liar!!!!Filt!!!!

polychronopolous

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19041
Re: Ocascio - Cortez - Entertainment / Socialist - Would hit - thread
« Reply #422 on: February 11, 2019, 01:30:54 PM »
What are these "Justice Democrats" that back her? Some extreme offshoot of the democratic party?

I think the roots of it started with The Young Turks, Jimmy Dore and that whole crowd tired of being used for their votes and later sold out by the DNC.

The basic premise being that Justice Democrats do not take corporate donations and as such, are not "compromised"

Of course, with these groups you get the common leftist agenda as well but the fact that they do not take donations seems to be the biggest factor.

myt1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4275
  • Getbig!
Re: Ocascio - Cortez - Entertainment / Socialist - Would hit - thread
« Reply #423 on: February 11, 2019, 01:53:10 PM »
I think the roots of it started with The Young Turks, Jimmy Dore and that whole crowd tired of being used for their votes and later sold out by the DNC.

The basic premise being that Justice Democrats do not take corporate donations and as such, are not "compromised"

Of course, with these groups you get the common leftist agenda as well but the fact that they do not take donations seems to be the biggest factor.

Well, AOC didn't have a lot of total money this time around....why would she, she was an unknown, but her 4th largest donor was Apple

polychronopolous

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19041
Re: Ocascio - Cortez - Entertainment / Socialist - Would hit - thread
« Reply #424 on: February 11, 2019, 03:19:58 PM »
Well, AOC didn't have a lot of total money this time around....why would she, she was an unknown, but her 4th largest donor was Apple

I have to hand it to those groups in regards to Cortez.

She was very well known and supported in those progressive circles and she did become seated in Congress. I can remember her being mentioned quite often on The Young Turks, Jimmy Dore and Kyle Kulinski months before the election.

I think it's ultimately to the detriment of the Democratic party and their net gains have been very little but they have moved the needle slightly in regards to changing the conversation on that side of the aisle.