there can be made arguments against the idea that you even exist. every assertion, whether true or not, can be argued against. this applies both to the assertion that there is a god, and the assertion that there isnt one.
The question isn't whether arguments can be made. The question is whether the arguments make sense. You can argue I don't exist; you'd be stupid to do it, but you could.
lol. i did not know that logic is based upon what people think.
Logic can decide whether a particular belief is rational or not; oftentimes it can even prove or disprove that belief. Unfortunately those who value belief don't also value reason - and, conversely, those who value logic don't value belief.
quantum physics= an object can be in two different places at the same time.. among other things.. yes, it is "logically inconsistent"
The problem isn't quantum mechanics. The problem is your
flawed understanding. Quantum mechanics doesn't say that an object is in two places at once - and if you think it does, I challenge you to provide a reference to a physics book that states that quantum mechanics allows an object to exist in two places at once.
And please, don't be confused by the fact that under quantum mechanics an object's position (before you observe it) is described by a probability/density function. That is
not stating that an object can exist in two places at once anymore than replying "somewhere between The Venetian and The Luxor" in answer to the question "where will avxo be tomorrow at 11:30pm?" implies that I will be both at the Venetian and the Luxor.
tbombz, I know you fancy yourself a philosopher and fancy yourself am intellectual and a deep thinker. And maybe, just maybe, your incoherent babblings have managed to convince some that that is truly the case. Shouldn't you quit while you're ahead?