Answer the question for fucks sake.
I am trying to have a reasonable debate with you, no trolling. You are jumping from topic to topic without teasing them apart.
Let's just stick with the finances, you are saying Obama is really bad for the US economically, let's look at the facts (stats) to see if you are correct.
http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000The first graph shows UE rate by year, note the sharp increase beginning in 08, the height of the great recession, at least the fallout of it's effects were starting to be realized.
UE jumped to roughly 10% in 09-10 and has decreased quite rapidly, currently sitting near all time lows in the last twenty years (approaching 99-00 rates).
So if you are crediting Obama with the economy, it appears his policies (or sheer coincidence) has reduce UE faster then any predictions, Romney, said it would take two terms, Obama did what Romney claimed in 2 years.
Compared to the other G7 nations, another indicator of economic policy (US is atypical, it's way ahead), shows the US recovered the best (save Germany, that;s another complicated issue) as in, the figures by which recession is claimed, also show great recovery, it can't be both can it Joe? if so, explain how to me?
From the link
"The National Bureau of Economic Research declared the official start date of the recession to be December 2007 and the end date to be June 2009. For the purposes of our analysis—in which quarterly data will be used rather than monthly data—the fourth quarter of 2007 will be used as the start date and the second quarter of 2009 will be used as end date".
Obama took office at the PEAK of the GREAT recession.
Productivity is increasing (it did so during the recession however, likely the result of things not effected as much be productivity, ie automation), this automation will continue to reduce participation rate.
On to the deficit (this is different from debt, it is more closely related to the policies of the president.), sometimes deficits are good, ever need cash flow in a small business? Maybe to invest in marketing, which will cause short term money loss with high potential return. So you go in debt and a deficit, your losing money, then the marketing works, your deficits turn to surplus, ahh profits.. you still have debt to pay, this can turn that surplus to a deficit and so on...
http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/federal_deficit_chart.htmlIt peaked recently during 09-11, which makes sense, in attempt to recover from the great recession, you don't hold back money (the gov is the biggest mover in the economy, it's idiotic in fact), however, it is now dropping at record pace, it has slowed recently, but there was a significant drop.
What evidence do you have Joe?
