Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: the trainer on September 14, 2012, 11:49:15 AM
-
After reading that adonis thread i am wondering why so many men have become pussies these days, I am an old school guy if you and i have a problem we take off our watches roll up over sleeves and go to the parking lot and settle it like gentlemen, but these getbiggers have become a bunch of sissies, calling the cops trying to sue and complaining about being bullied, i remember as a kid i was being bullied by a bigger kid so i decided to fight him, i did not win the fight but i showed heart and gain the respect of him and the other kids and i was never bothered again, grow some balls and be men you fucking twats.
-
Why is my name in this? ??? I own firearms therefore I cannot be included in this!
-
your name is in there because i was reading where you are taking a guy to court for cyberbullying.
-
If it were up to me, I`d bring the Code Duello back (circa 1777), but thats not the kind of society we live in anymore.
-
Oh, it's wide spread phenomenon!
And these types even call real men names if they show the real male character; fighting, not-giving-a-fuk etc.
Sick world. Keep safe reading "Men's health" on saturday night in your bed guys Oh brother ::)
-
your name is in there because i was reading where you are taking a guy to court for cyberbullying.
What do you think of libel? ;)
-
If it were up to me, I`d bring the Code Duello back (circa 1777), but thats not the kind of society we live in anymore.
So if i walk up to you in a bar and insult your girl in front of your face i guess you would just walk away.
-
Hey "the trainer" shut up
-
So if i walk up to you in a bar and insult your girl in front of your face i guess you would just walk away.
I don`t frequent those types of establishments so you would never have such an opportunity. Why, are you looking for a fight? Why wouldn`t you just mind your own business?
-
What do you think of libel? ;)
nothing teaches respect more than a beatdown. that person would not talk shit anymore.
-
I don`t frequent those types of establishments so you would never have such an opportunity. Why, are you looking for a fight? Why wouldn`t you just mind your own business?
You could be in the finest establishment and a rude guy decides to insult your girl and you could not defend her honor what kind of man are you.
-
After reading that adonis thread i am wondering why so many men have become pussies these days, I am an old school guy if you and i have a problem we take off our watches roll up over sleeves and go to the parking lot and settle it like gentlemen, but these getbiggers have become a bunch of sissies, calling the cops trying to sue and complaining about being bullied, i remember as a kid i was being bullied by a bigger kid so i decided to fight him, i did not win the fight but i showed heart and gain the respect of him and the other kids and i was never bothered again, grow some balls and be men you fucking twats.
A REAL MAN NEVER LOSES A FIGHT. yOU ARE WEAK, WEAK AND PATHETIC
-
You could be in the finest establishment and a rude guy decides to insult your girl and you could not defend her honor what kind of man are you.
What makes you think that?
-
A REAL MAN NEVER LOSES A FIGHT. yOU ARE WEAK, WEAK AND PATHETIC
True i was a skinny weak kid but i never back down, now i am a 250 pound juiced up monster nobody will fuck with me anymore.
-
What makes you think that?
Because from reading your threads i see that you believe in calling the cops and suing not rolling up your fists.
-
Hey "the trainer" shut up
Spot on
-
True i was a skinny weak kid but i never back down, now i am a 250 pound juiced up monster nobody will fuck with me anymore.
Love the cyber machismo..
-
Can't even order fried catfish in peace:
-
I could understand being a mans man back in the 1400's. Those men were brutal, but they had to be.
We currently live in a civilized society. There is no reason to go walking around with a macho, tough guy attitude. We don't live in the 1400's, nor are we cavemen. I am not saying that men have to be weak and scared. However, this macho, tough guy attitude is such bullshit. Protect yourself and your family when needed, but not because you have to live up to a male persona. If the right authorities (police) could take care of a situation, why would I try to invite harm into my life for no good reason? I have logic and reasoning on my side. I don't need to live up to a certain male image.
-
Can't even order fried catfish in peace:
That is exactly my point look at those pussy men standing doing nothing while a man hits a woman if i was there me and that guy would have a showdown.
-
Can't even order fried catfish in peace:
:D Chickenheads will be chickenheads. :D
-
FUK yea Alpha
-
Dont disturb true anus , he is busy taking care of the house and "lovely dogs" while his whore is working to pay the bills.
-
Because from reading your threads i see that you believe in calling the cops and suing not rolling up your fists.
I do believe in calling the cops first if its possible. If its not possible, I do think defending yourself with force if necessary is justified. Especially on one`s own property. We have what you call Castle Doctrine which enables deadly force to be used to protect your home, any area on your property, your car and even your workplace. I support it and would not hesitate to use it for a second if it was necessary.
-
I could understand being a mans man back in the 1400's. Those men were brutal, but they had to be.
We currently live in a civilized society. There is no reason to go walking around with a macho, tough guy attitude. We don't live in the 1400's, nor are we cavemen. I am not saying that men have to be weak and scared. However, this macho, tough guy attitude is such bullshit. Protect yourself and your family when needed, but not because you have to live up to a male persona. If the right authorities (police) could take care of a situation, why would I try to invite harm into my life for no good reason? I have logic and reasoning on my side. I don't need to live up to a certain male image.
Solid post
-
I could understand being a mans man back in the 1400's. Those men were brutal, but they had to be.
We currently live in a civilized society. There is no reason to go walking around with a macho, tough guy attitude. We don't live in the 1400's, nor are we cavemen. I am not saying that men have to be weak and scared. However, this macho, tough guy attitude is such bullshit. Protect yourself and your family when needed, but not because you have to live up to a male persona. If the right authorities (police) could take care of a situation, why would I try to invite harm into my life for no good reason? I have logic and reasoning on my side. I don't need to live up to a certain male image.
If you dont have street sense and you are used to having the cops solving all your little problems for you, if there comes a time when the cops are not available you will run like a little chicken since you are not used to defending yourself.
-
I could understand being a mans man back in the 1400's. Those men were brutal, but they had to be.
We currently live in a civilized society. There is no reason to go walking around with a macho, tough guy attitude. We don't live in the 1400's, nor are we cavemen. I am not saying that men have to be weak and scared. However, this macho, tough guy attitude is such bullshit. Protect yourself and your family when needed, but not because you have to live up to a male persona. If the right authorities (police) could take care of a situation, why would I try to invite harm into my life for no good reason? I have logic and reasoning on my side. I don't need to live up to a certain male image.
this is cyclical...humans adapt to circonstances, not the oposite...some men will become tough again as the world is entering a global recession that will last for decades and see a lot of people die simply because they will be useless to the preservation of the specie.
-
If you dont have street sense and you are used to having the cops solving all your little problems for you, if there comes a time when the cops are not available you will run like a little chicken since you are not used to defending yourself.
No, you use your sidearm in those instances if you have to. A wise person will not start trouble in that case.
-
If you dont have street sense and you are used to having the cops solving all your little problems for you, if there comes a time when the cops are not available you will run like a little chicken since you are not used to defending yourself.
Actually, I do have street sense and I have always lived in a big city. I am not saying that cops solve ALL my problems. But I am not going to put my life in harms way either just to live up to a male persona. I will put myself in harms way WHEN needed, but I wont do it just so I could walk around with my lats out, with a macho attitude.
-
No, you use your sidearm in those instances if you have to. A wise person will not start trouble in that case.
Do you even know how to use a gun? :D
-
Pump up the volyme
"Friday night and I need a fight" STRONG !!!11
-
this is cyclical...humans adapt to circonstances, not the oposite...some men will become tough again as the world is entering a global recession that will last for decades and see a lot of people die simply because they will be useless to the preservation of the specie.
Of course we adapt to our circumstances. But we do not adapt to our circumstances to fill a male tough guy persona. You adapt to survive. And surviving could mean physical and mental attributes. Those that will survive will also probably be more intelligent, and this is independent of walking around with the biggest muscles and the biggest tough guy attitude. I am sure its a combination of mental and physical characteristics that make people adapt best. Not someone like Jay Cutler, especially in the 21st century where intelligence is just as important as physical attributes.
-
No, you use your sidearm in those instances if you have to. A wise person will not start trouble in that case.
A wise person does not get themselves into these situations in the first place.
-
If it were up to me, I`d bring the Code Duello back (circa 1777), but thats not the kind of society we live in anymore.
lmao...what a bitch. Can't take a punch so you need to own guns.
-
A wise person does not get themselves into these situations in the first place.
I agree, but sometimes these situations are beyond any one individual`s control and the only thing you can do is hopefully be prepared for it. Violence does not always visit by invitation. It can happen anywhere, anytime and at any place.
-
lmao...what a bitch. Can't take a punch so you need to own guns.
Are you seriously denigrating the United States Constitution-specifically the Second Amendment?
-
I agree, but sometimes these situations are beyond any one individual`s control and the only thing you can do is hopefully be prepared for it. Violence does not always visit by invitation. It can happen anywhere, anytime and at any place.
Sure it can. I have just found that if you handle yourself properly, these types of things rarely, if ever happen.
-
Sure it can. I have just found that if you handle yourself properly, these types of things rarely, if ever happen.
I agree. I have never had a problem either. Some people are looking for confrontation or they are looking to steal from you etc... Best be prepared with a speedy finger......to dial the police.
-
All around, its just best to avoid confrontation when necessary.
-
Of course we adapt to our circumstances. But we do not adapt to our circumstances to fill a male tough guy persona. You adapt to survive. And surviving could mean physical and mental attributes. Those that will survive will also probably be more intelligent, and this is independent of walking around with the biggest muscles and the biggest tough guy attitude. I am sure its a combination of mental and physical characteristics that make people adapt best. Not someone like Jay Cutler, especially in the 21st century where intelligence is just as important as physical attributes.
being smart with no muscles or ammo is as useless as being muscular and carrying tons of ammo but being dumb as rock. Balance is the key to survive and adapt better, instead of being too specialized.
-
You tough guys going around looking for fights are prime candidates for bullets through your bodies. We live in a different world and if you fail to adapt, you will be killed or put in jail, fair or not.
Like Adonis stated and its the same for me. I dont frequent establishments I know there will be high chance of a negative outcome. Just not worth it.
And all these "what ifs" are bullshit. People dont just randomly insult you or your girl unless you hang out where scum does. Then what does that say about you?
-
All around, its just best to avoid confrontation when necessary.
Best advice ever.
-
being smart with no muscles or ammo is as useless as being muscular and carrying tons of ammo but being dumb as rock. Balance is the key to survive and adapt better, instead of being too specialized.
I agree, which is why I said it wasnt all about physical attributes. Its a mixture of mental and physical.
-
Best advice ever.
If i see a fight break out, I cross the street. IF I suspect danger 2 blocks ahead, I go a different route.
I guess people can call me a pussy if they wish. It just seems like the most logical thing to do.
-
Haha! Not enough guys in this thread have been in enough fights.
Want to see how far your fists get you? Go bounce at a strip club frequented by bikers. Then wait for a rival gang to show up with their colors on. Then see how far fighting gets you, or how macho you want to be. I did it, and I can tell you, the guys on the staff who fought were the guys who got fucked up real quick. Guys who spoke well and talked themselves out of trouble lived, earned respect, and made money.
A real man is smart enough to not get himself into a position where he needs to fight, he looks for easy quick ways out of a physical fight so he doesn't get hurt/killed.
You idiots fail to realize: you're the direct descendants of men who knew how to avoid fighting so they didn't lose a leg/arm/life before they were able to reproduce. They were smart. Why insist on being stupid?
Don't fight. Only an idiot lives up to a perceived macho persona. Guys like that get drilled in real life by tougher guys, and usually end up dead, in jail, or at least hurt real bad.
Wanna know what happens to smart guys who don't fight? They make more money, stay out of prison, don't invite retributive justice on themselves and their families from those they hurt in previous fights...
You guys act like it's one punch, done, and everyone shakes hands and goes to have a beer.
Tell that to my friend Howard Gairy. He was bouncing at a bar back home. Got into with this asian kid who wouldn't go thru the metal detector. Howard got up in his face a bit and shoved the kid. The kid took off embarassed. Rerturned, and shot Howard in the stomach. Howard waited on the sidewalk and bled to death waiting for 25 minutes for an ambulance to show up.
Howard could have called the cops. Could have talked to this asian kid instead of getting tough with him. But he didn't. He chose the macho route. Now he's dead.
-
If i see a fight break out, I cross the street. IF I suspect danger 2 blocks ahead, I go a different route.
I guess people can call me a pussy if they wish. It just seems like the most logical thing to do.
Getting the police there as fast as possible is also important.
-
Haha! Not enough guys in this thread have been in enough fights.
Want to see how far your fists get you? Go bounce at a strip club frequented by bikers. Then wait for a rival gang to show up with their colors on. Then see how far fighting gets you, or how macho you want to be. I did it, and I can tell you, the guys on the staff who fought were the guys who got fucked up real quick. Guys who spoke well and talked themselves out of trouble lived, earned respect, and made money.
A real man is smart enough to not get himself into a position where he needs to fight, he looks for easy quick ways out of a physical fight so he doesn't get hurt/killed.
You idiots fail to realize: you're the direct descendants of men who knew how to avoid fighting so they didn't lose a leg/arm/life before they were able to reproduce. They were smart. Why insist on being stupid?
Don't fight. Only an idiot lives up to a perceived macho persona. Guys like that get drilled in real life by tougher guys, and usually end up dead, in jail, or at least hurt real bad.
Wanna know what happens to smart guys who don't fight? They make more money, stay out of prison, don't invite retributive justice on themselves and their families from those they hurt in previous fights...
You guys act like it's one punch, done, and everyone shakes hands and goes to have a beer.
Tell that to my friend Howard Gairy. He was bouncing at a bar back home. Got into with this asian kid who wouldn't go thru the metal detector. Howard got up in his face a bit and shoved the kid. The kid took off embarassed. Rerturned, and shot Howard in the stomach. Howard waited on the sidewalk and bled to death waiting for 25 minutes for an ambulance to show up.
Howard could have called the cops. Could have talked to this asian kid instead of getting tough with him. But he didn't. He chose the macho route. Now he's dead.
what happened to the Asian kid?
-
Getting the police there as fast as possible is also important.
Well, yeah. I was just talking about the actions I would take to avoid imminent risk. Why walk into trouble if you dont have to? :/
-
Are you seriously denigrating the United States Constitution-specifically the Second Amendment?
Why aren't you challenging my first claim? Or are you agreeing with my assumption that you cannot take a punch and therefore must resort to using guns for self defense regardless of location?
-
Actually, I do have street sense and I have always lived in a big city. I am not saying that cops solve ALL my problems. But I am not going to put my life in harms way either just to live up to a male persona. I will put myself in harms way WHEN needed, but I wont do it just so I could walk around with my lats out, with a macho attitude.
Because you're 5'-4" tall and weigh 135 lbs.....now take a seat over there at the kiddy table while the adults argue. ;D
-
Haha! Not enough guys in this thread have been in enough fights.
Want to see how far your fists get you? Go bounce at a strip club frequented by bikers. Then wait for a rival gang to show up with their colors on. Then see how far fighting gets you, or how macho you want to be. I did it, and I can tell you, the guys on the staff who fought were the guys who got fucked up real quick. Guys who spoke well and talked themselves out of trouble lived, earned respect, and made money.
A real man is smart enough to not get himself into a position where he needs to fight, he looks for easy quick ways out of a physical fight so he doesn't get hurt/killed.
You idiots fail to realize: you're the direct descendants of men who knew how to avoid fighting so they didn't lose a leg/arm/life before they were able to reproduce. They were smart. Why insist on being stupid?
Don't fight. Only an idiot lives up to a perceived macho persona. Guys like that get drilled in real life by tougher guys, and usually end up dead, in jail, or at least hurt real bad.
Wanna know what happens to smart guys who don't fight? They make more money, stay out of prison, don't invite retributive justice on themselves and their families from those they hurt in previous fights...
You guys act like it's one punch, done, and everyone shakes hands and goes to have a beer.
Tell that to my friend Howard Gairy. He was bouncing at a bar back home. Got into with this asian kid who wouldn't go thru the metal detector. Howard got up in his face a bit and shoved the kid. The kid took off embarassed. Rerturned, and shot Howard in the stomach. Howard waited on the sidewalk and bled to death waiting for 25 minutes for an ambulance to show up.
Howard could have called the cops. Could have talked to this asian kid instead of getting tough with him. But he didn't. He chose the macho route. Now he's dead.
Good post
-
Why aren't you challenging my first claim? Or are you agreeing with my assumption that you cannot take a punch and therefore must resort to using guns for self defense regardless of location?
I do believe its fair to use a firearm after you are assaulted.
-
Haha! Not enough guys in this thread have been in enough fights.
Want to see how far your fists get you? Go bounce at a strip club frequented by bikers. Then wait for a rival gang to show up with their colors on. Then see how far fighting gets you, or how macho you want to be. I did it, and I can tell you, the guys on the staff who fought were the guys who got fucked up real quick. Guys who spoke well and talked themselves out of trouble lived, earned respect, and made money.
A real man is smart enough to not get himself into a position where he needs to fight, he looks for easy quick ways out of a physical fight so he doesn't get hurt/killed.
You idiots fail to realize: you're the direct descendants of men who knew how to avoid fighting so they didn't lose a leg/arm/life before they were able to reproduce. They were smart. Why insist on being stupid?
Don't fight. Only an idiot lives up to a perceived macho persona. Guys like that get drilled in real life by tougher guys, and usually end up dead, in jail, or at least hurt real bad.
Wanna know what happens to smart guys who don't fight? They make more money, stay out of prison, don't invite retributive justice on themselves and their families from those they hurt in previous fights...
You guys act like it's one punch, done, and everyone shakes hands and goes to have a beer.
Tell that to my friend Howard Gairy. He was bouncing at a bar back home. Got into with this asian kid who wouldn't go thru the metal detector. Howard got up in his face a bit and shoved the kid. The kid took off embarassed. Rerturned, and shot Howard in the stomach. Howard waited on the sidewalk and bled to death waiting for 25 minutes for an ambulance to show up.
Howard could have called the cops. Could have talked to this asian kid instead of getting tough with him. But he didn't. He chose the macho route. Now he's dead.
Different case you attack somebody you are asking for trouble, if i have a problem with somebody i asked them if they want to roll up their sleeves and settle it if they said yes we do it if they say no then i leave it alone i am not going to attack them.
-
After reading that adonis thread i am wondering why so many men have become pussies these days, I am an old school guy if you and i have a problem we take off our watches roll up over sleeves and go to the parking lot and settle it like gentlemen, but these getbiggers have become a bunch of sissies, calling the cops trying to sue and complaining about being bullied, i remember as a kid i was being bullied by a bigger kid so i decided to fight him, i did not win the fight but i showed heart and gain the respect of him and the other kids and i was never bothered again, grow some balls and be men you fucking twats.
he owns guns damn it , forget this pic and the fact he bakes mint juleps
-
what happened to the Asian kid?
http://www.allianceentertainment.org/Dteflon/howard.html
-
he owns guns damn it , forget this pic and the fact he bakes mint juleps
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=441085.0;attach=484363;image)
The hilarious thing about that Halloween Picture- see the date - is that my friend on the right is friends with a lot of famous people and was also an Army veteran.
-
Haha! Not enough guys in this thread have been in enough fights.
Want to see how far your fists get you? Go bounce at a strip club frequented by bikers. Then wait for a rival gang to show up with their colors on. Then see how far fighting gets you, or how macho you want to be. I did it, and I can tell you, the guys on the staff who fought were the guys who got fucked up real quick. Guys who spoke well and talked themselves out of trouble lived, earned respect, and made money.
A real man is smart enough to not get himself into a position where he needs to fight, he looks for easy quick ways out of a physical fight so he doesn't get hurt/killed.
You idiots fail to realize: you're the direct descendants of men who knew how to avoid fighting so they didn't lose a leg/arm/life before they were able to reproduce. They were smart. Why insist on being stupid?
Don't fight. Only an idiot lives up to a perceived macho persona. Guys like that get drilled in real life by tougher guys, and usually end up dead, in jail, or at least hurt real bad.
Wanna know what happens to smart guys who don't fight? They make more money, stay out of prison, don't invite retributive justice on themselves and their families from those they hurt in previous fights...
You guys act like it's one punch, done, and everyone shakes hands and goes to have a beer.
Tell that to my friend Howard Gairy. He was bouncing at a bar back home. Got into with this asian kid who wouldn't go thru the metal detector. Howard got up in his face a bit and shoved the kid. The kid took off embarassed. Rerturned, and shot Howard in the stomach. Howard waited on the sidewalk and bled to death waiting for 25 minutes for an ambulance to show up.
Howard could have called the cops. Could have talked to this asian kid instead of getting tough with him. But he didn't. He chose the macho route. Now he's dead.
Yikes, he was a Michigan Tech Husky alum just like me.
RIP
-
After reading that adonis thread i am wondering why so many men have become pussies these days, I am an old school guy if you and i have a problem we take off our watches roll up over sleeves and go to the parking lot and settle it like gentlemen, but these getbiggers have become a bunch of sissies, calling the cops trying to sue and complaining about being bullied, i remember as a kid i was being bullied by a bigger kid so i decided to fight him, i did not win the fight but i showed heart and gain the respect of him and the other kids and i was never bothered again, grow some balls and be men you fucking twats.
Adonis is the typical american: "Touch me and I'll sue you!" .. bitch ;D
-
Yikes, he was a Michigan Tech Husky alum just like me.
RIP
Yep. I mixed up my story though...he was talking to the asian kid, who went back and got his other buddy (not asian - black) who did the shooting. The black kid got second degree murder.
There's a wrestling tournament in Howard's honor every year. He was a great guy, very good football player, but even better wrestler.
-
I do believe its fair to use a firearm after you are assaulted.
So you would pull out your gun if someone pushed you in a bar or by accident on a street corner? Why would you immediately jump to using deadly force,
-
So you would pull out your gun if someone pushed you in a bar or by accident on a street corner? Why would you immediately jump to using deadly force,
Doesn't make much sense to me either. We still haven't determined if TA even knows how to use a gun. :-\
-
Doesn't make much sense to me either. We still haven't determined if TA even knows how to use a gun. :-\
Adam is a smart guy , if he owns guns you can assume he knows exactly how to properly use them and the ramifications of doing so.
-
So you would pull out your gun if someone pushed you in a bar or by accident on a street corner? Why would you immediately jump to using deadly force,
Why would anyone use deadly force if it was purely an accident?
-
ta using intellect in the face of trolling = win
-
nothing teaches respect more than a beatdown. that person would not talk shit anymore.
Maybe? In an ideal world, the guy would accept his beatdown if both sides greed to settle it that way.
I used to be a bouncer/doorman at a large rock and roll club in the mid 80's.
I'm no super bad ass , but can hold my own against the avg slob.
The world is full of crazy maniacs who will use a gun whenever they feel the need.
I'm NOT talking about self defense here , more like gangster/thug intimidation.
Despite what some "men of macho honor" might prefer, bar fights have no real rules or regulations.
If the cops get involved after a brawl, you can bet someone is going off in cuffs and law suits may be filed.
FYI, when I was an active duty marine , I got n a fight over a girl ( of course).
I psuhed him off his bar stool and he hit me with a beer pitcher. That slowed me down but I managed to tackle him and get in
a couple shots before they broke it up. Being white marine in the south ( 30 yrs ago) against a black civillian who used a "weopon " ( beer pitcher),
the desk sgt asked me to press charges for assault with a weopon. I did that to go home to avoid more trouble with my unit commander.
At the hearing, I dropped the charges and simply told the judge it was a silly fight over a girl and we both got a few licks in, but nothing serious.
The judge was all too happy to dismiss the case and move fwd.
The black guy I fought was in shock and came over to thank me . I told him, we both got in our licks and nobody got injured.
I shook his hand and wished him well. That was it.
-
Why would anyone use deadly force if it was purely an accident?
Exactly! I actually had a deadly force card when was an MSG guard in the marines.
FYI, I never fired my weopon the whole yr on this duty :o
-
Why would anyone use deadly force if it was purely an accident?
Okay, but then what about the first case. A drunk guy runs into/pushes you in a bar. What are you going to do besides withdrawing your weapon?
-
Exactly! I actually had a deadly force card when was an MSG guard in the marines.
FYI, I never fired my weopon the whole yr on this duty :o
whut is that :o
Gives you the right to shoot people outside the war-zone also?
I never got license to kill during my time in army :-\
-
Okay, but then what about the first case. A drunk guy runs into/pushes you in a bar. What are you going to do besides withdrawing your weapon?
I wouldn`t do anything. Why would I if it was just something as minor as that?
-
Okay, but then what about the first case. A drunk guy runs into/pushes you in a bar. What are you going to do besides withdrawing your weapon?
true anus goes to bars where it s normal for men to touch each others, drunk or not.
-
some people are cut out to be badasses, some aren't... lots of "logic" in this thread ::)
-
whut is that :o
Gives you the right to shoot people outside the war-zone also?
I never got license to kill during my time in army :-\
This was 30 yrs ago and actually required if you were in a security post and had to guard something.
Ok, the card was an actual lamenated card with the 10 basic rules and examples of when you could use deadly force while on duty.
It is NOT a 007 type license to kill, more like a reminder of the guidelines and regulations you had to follow.
I even fired or drew my weopon during my enture yr of MSG duty. I did get quite bored gaurding the left rear entrance of the US embassy in Japan however. Nothing ever happened, but, I got to open the door for a few big wigs when they had a meeting.
-
You could be in the finest establishment and a rude guy decides to insult your girl and you could not defend her honor what kind of man are you.
you cant defend yourself physically from people using harshwords to you and your girlfriend
be a non-confrontational white man and you will see, next step after that is pyramid shits
-
And all these "what ifs" are bullshit. People dont just randomly insult you or your girl unless you hang out where scum does. Then what does that say about you?
i disaggree with the last statement you havent walked in the shoes of a gentleman like the falcon so i understand
-
guns should be illegal its the right thing, that would mean less guns in hands of thugs garanteed, if you get caught with one youre arrested and fined big time
just like everyone should not eat meat, its the right thing
-
guns should be illegal its the right thing, that would mean less guns in hands of thugs garanteed, if you get caught with one youre arrested and fined big time
just like everyone should not eat meat, its the right thing
What about protection from dangerous animals? :D
-
guns should be illegal its the right thing, that would mean less guns in hands of thugs garanteed, if you get caught with one youre arrested and fined big time
just like everyone should not eat meat, its the right thing
2nd Amendment my friend. It would be Unconstitutional.
-
2nd Amendment my friend. It would be Unconstitutional.
unconstitutional so what, i wouldnt stick by the constitutional like its some religious artifact if i were you. You gotta go with your heart on this one (no homo) and clearly see its best for all if we dont have guns
-
Ta is too ugly to punch. Be like hittin a pug. :-\
-
unconstitutional so what, i wouldnt stick by the constitutional like its some religious artifact if i were you. You gotta go with your heart on this one (no homo) and clearly see its best for all if we dont have guns
I don`t think so. Sometimes you need the best protection for yourself, family and property and a firearm is precisely it.
-
.
-
I don`t think so. Sometimes you need the best protection for yourself, family and property and a firearm is precisely it.
what "family", i thought kids were "disgusting" adam?
-
.
-
We currently live in a civilized society. There is no reason to go walking around with a macho, tough guy attitude. We don't live in the 1400's, nor are we cavemen. I am not saying that men have to be weak and scared. However, this macho, tough guy attitude is such bullshit.
We've got the same physical and cognitive equipment as those cavemen, and have had it for 100,000 years or so. If you took a child from that time period and raised it here, it would be no different than any of us, and vice versa if one of us was raised back then. So, I think it's somewhat misleading to claim we are all that different from cavemen. We happen to have formed cultural and institutional structures that make us behave more 'civilized,' but we still have the same underlying nature.
You idiots fail to realize: you're the direct descendants of men who knew how to avoid fighting so they didn't lose a leg/arm/life before they were able to reproduce. They were smart. Why insist on being stupid?
I don't think so. As I've just said, we are the same creatures as those violent beings we call 'cave men' and other such derogatory terms. If anything, history indicates that extreme violence has been the primary means for usurping control and dominating. Now, maybe that's changed and it is now most logical to cooperate and navigate society tactfully in order to dominate -- in fact, it almost certainly is. But that doesn't change the historical fact that violence has been an extremely effective tool.
-
I could understand being a mans man back in the 1400's. Those men were brutal, but they had to be.
We currently live in a civilized society. There is no reason to go walking around with a macho, tough guy attitude. We don't live in the 1400's, nor are we cavemen. I am not saying that men have to be weak and scared. However, this macho, tough guy attitude is such bullshit. Protect yourself and your family when needed, but not because you have to live up to a male persona. If the right authorities (police) could take care of a situation, why would I try to invite harm into my life for no good reason? I have logic and reasoning on my side. I don't need to live up to a certain male image.
::)
guns should be illegal its the right thing, that would mean less guns in hands of thugs garanteed, if you get caught with one youre arrested and fined big time
just like everyone should not eat meat, its the right thing
::)
-
::)
::)
This.
-
::)
::)
X3
-
::)
::)
most people are all talk about how macho and manly they are. Whole different story when you have to put your money where your mouth is.
-
We've got the same physical and cognitive equipment as those cavemen, and have had it for 100,000 years or so. If you took a child from that time period and raised it here, it would be no different than any of us, and vice versa if one of us was raised back then. So, I think it's somewhat misleading to claim we are all that different from cavemen. We happen to have formed cultural and institutional structures that make us behave more 'civilized,' but we still have the same underlying nature.
I don't think so. As I've just said, we are the same creatures as those violent beings we call 'cave men' and other such derogatory terms. If anything, history indicates that extreme violence has been the primary means for usurping control and dominating. Now, maybe that's changed and it is now most logical to cooperate and navigate society tactfully in order to dominate -- in fact, it almost certainly is. But that doesn't change the historical fact that violence has been an extremely effective tool.
That may be inaccurate regarding the same cognitive development as cavemen. Modern man may have developed a more sophisticated prefrontal cortex over time, which is the area of reasoning and logic.
-
haha Apenis ... it does not make you less of a fag if the guy is in the army or knows famous people ... you know what they say: you can know a thousand famous people or fought a thousand battles in the army...but you suck one cock and you'll forever be known as gay ;D
-
That may be inaccurate regarding the same cognitive development as cavemen. Modern man may have developed a more sophisticated prefrontal cortex over time, which is the area of reasoning and logic.
These documentaries are paying off..you actually know what you are talking about. So I believe you now when you say you knew all about crocs. :P
-
guns should be illegal its the right thing, that would mean less guns in hands of thugs garanteed, if you get caught with one youre arrested and fined big time
just like everyone should not eat meat, its the right thing
go fuck yourself.
Guns and meat should both be legal you vegan pussy. For gods man what happened to you...you used to look like Thor, the white god of kickass and now you turned into some fat whiny bitch who gets high and posts some weird dribble about aliens and pyramid shits. Man the fuck up, get some fucking test, clen and hgh and go maximum motherfucking falcon mode.
I don`t think so. Sometimes you need the best protection for yourself, family and property and a firearm is precisely it.
This. A gun is still the motherfuckin law and a well placed bullet makes every man equal.
-
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=441085.0;attach=484363;image)
The hilarious thing about that Halloween Picture- see the date - is that my friend on the right is friends with a lot of famous people and was also an Army veteran.
You're certainly full of surprises!!!
-
I don`t think so. Sometimes you need the best protection for yourself, family and property and a firearm is precisely it.
you wouldnt need guns if guns were illegal (and there were no guns but of course a seldom few illegal guns would be circulating )
-
lethal force by gun would be unecessary and non existant in a land that didnt allow any guns whatsoever
there would be less criminals, criminals are pussys and need guns criminals wont fight and the max they could carry is a knife wich you could still defend some and or get away but you cant outrun a bullet
people are always wanting to keep guns legalized because they are pussies from hell always scared of everything, it would be a less scary world if there werent any guns around?
-
most people are all talk about how macho and manly they are. Whole different story when you have to put your money where your mouth is.
Is that a challenge, sport?
-
Is that a challenge, sport?
Yes, your exact location! ;) ;)
-
why is it so cool to have a gun? wouldnt it be better if guns were illegal and there would be less chance of death like gettin shot by some little fella cause your owning him with your mass?
id hate to get shot by chaos cause im 6feet6 with full head of hair he might feel owned and trick alex and steal his weapon and shoot me
id rather take the chance of getting beat up by chaos with a headbutts to the face and deadly ankle lock r
-
Yes, your exact location! ;) ;)
Meridian Sports Center, Fullerton CA
Come to me, bro!!!!
-
Adonis strikes me through his posts as an intelligent and weird guy; little too self obsessed but nothing that would make me hate him. He has vast knowledge about training and what I like the most, he approaches it in scientific, logical way. This may though drive morons crazy and make them throw arguments like "scientifically bees cant fly" which shows their ignorance and eventually just go after him in fury.
I do not understand what is this whole "lets find random information about a guy and post weird pictures of him".
-
Meridian Sports Center, Fullerton CA
Come to me, bro!!!!
::)
literally, you're a bigger fag than "1", asking men on getbig to meet with you and rub nuts.
-
Adonis strikes me through his posts as an intelligent and weird guy; little too self obsessed but nothing that would make me hate him. He has vast knowledge about training and what I like the most, he approaches it in scientific, logical way. This may though drive morons crazy and make them throw arguments like "scientifically bees cant fly" which shows their ignorance and eventually just go after him in fury.
I do not understand what is this whole "lets find random information about a guy and post weird pictures of him".
Adonis is the kind of guy that beats his wife if the labels on the herbs and spices are not alphabetized and facing outward.
-
Adonis is the kind of guy that beats his wife if the labels on the herbs and spices are not alphabetized and facing outward.
:D
That kind of thing actually bothers me to no end.
-
::)
literally, you're a bigger fag than "1", asking men on getbig to meet with you and rub nuts.
I'd love to beat meet you one day.
-
Adonis is the kind of guy that beats his wife if the labels on the herbs and spices are not alphabetized and facing outward.
Yes, exactly my thughts. Couldn't really express it better. Is there any word in English to describe such person?
Obessive-compulsive personality maybe, but it doesnt exactly grasp the essence of it.
-
:D
That kind of thing actually bothers me to no end.
Somehow I knew that. :D
-
That may be inaccurate regarding the same cognitive development as cavemen. Modern man may have developed a more sophisticated prefrontal cortex over time, which is the area of reasoning and logic.
If by 'cavemen' you mean something like Neanderthal, then there may well be substantive differences in cognitive equipment between them and us. But if you mean cavemen, i.e., early humans, then there can't be much difference, because by definition we've got the same genes as them (being the same species and all), and genes determine traits. Additionally, 100k years is a blink of an eye in evolutionary terms and, given that it tends to work very gradually, there are almost certainly no significant differences between us and the earliest humans.
Also, in my original post I said cognitive "equipment," not cognitive "development." Perhaps we've reached a higher level of cognitive development due to non-evolutionary factors like better nutrition and higher living standards, but it's still true that this is being eked out of the very same "equipment," or mental machinery, that the cavemen had.
So really, we're cavemen who are squeezing a bit more performance out of our brains than our old friends were able to, not fundamentally different beings than they.
-
Yes, exactly my thughts. Couldn't really express it better. Is there any word in English to describe such person?
Obessive-compulsive personality maybe, but it doesnt exactly grasp the essence of it.
autistic
-
But if you mean cavemen, i.e., early humans, then there can't be much difference, because by definition we've got the same genes as them (being the same species and all), and genes determine traits.
Welllll, epigenetics, and more particularly the role of diet on epigenetic influences on evolution and germ line changes, almost certainly plays a role that is almost as important as genetics itself. It definitely can't be glossed over, but given the fact that it's impossible to quantify the effects of differential methylation and higher order chromatin changes on brain functions of 75,000 year old skeletons, it's a bit of a black hole left open to conjecture.
-
Welllll, epigenetics, and more particularly the role of diet on epigenetic influences on evolution and germ line changes, almost certainly plays a role that is almost as important as genetics itself. It definitely can't be glossed over, but given the fact that it's impossible to quantify the effects of differential methylation and higher order chromatin changes on brain functions of 75,000 year old skeletons, it's a bit of a black hole left open to conjecture.
why does a 75,000 year old skeleton have a functioning brain?
-
After reading that adonis thread i am wondering why so many men have become pussies these days, I am an old school guy if you and i have a problem we take off our watches roll up over sleeves and go to the parking lot and settle it like gentlemen.
I see legal proceedings, fines, restrictions on your movements in your future.
-
I see legal proceedings, fines, restrictions on your movements in your future.
i just see more gimmickry on getbig in his future.
-
why does a 75,000 year old skeleton have a functioning brain?
You're missing something there.
-
Meridian Sports Center, Fullerton CA
Come to me, bro!!!!
I'm your huckleberry...... ;D
Come to me bro!
-
Welllll, epigenetics, and more particularly the role of diet on epigenetic influences on evolution and germ line changes, almost certainly plays a role that is almost as important as genetics itself.
As far as I'm aware, there is zero evidence that epigenetic influence survives across even a few generations of humans, let alone across evolutionary time (in any organism).* So on the face of it, positing genes as the causal variable responsible for mental mechanisms is the only sensible thing to do.
Once upon a time, there was an embryo named nefario. The reason the embryo developed into a human being capable of posting on getbig and not into a worm -- or a human being with the intelligence of a worm, ala Coach -- is certainly not due to environmental influence (nutrition, etc.). It is because of genes -- finite chunks of DNA that epigenitic processes can't change.
Given the ubiquity of human mental mechanisms, they have almost certainly been selected for. And it is genes that produce traits that are selected for and that are thus co-extensive with them. Given that we have the same genes as the cavemen, it follows we ought to have the same mental mechanisms. We may be wringing more computational work out of them now due to environmental factors, but they are still the same mechanisms.
*If you can PM me links to papers indicating otherwise I'd be happy to be wrong.
-
I'd love to beat your meat one day.
::)
homo convict
-
::)
homo convict
Fake cuban. ::)
-
I could understand being a mans man back in the 1400's. Those men were brutal, but they had to be.
We currently live in a civilized society. There is no reason to go walking around with a macho, tough guy attitude. We don't live in the 1400's, nor are we cavemen. I am not saying that men have to be weak and scared. However, this macho, tough guy attitude is such bullshit. Protect yourself and your family when needed, but not because you have to live up to a male persona. If the right authorities (police) could take care of a situation, why would I try to invite harm into my life for no good reason? I have logic and reasoning on my side. I don't need to live up to a certain male image.
Perfect post from a metrosexual and perfect example of male pussification.
The trainer is right and making excellent points.
Question: If your ass was getting beatdown, would you want someone to pull the person off of you then call the cops or call the cops then try and pull the person off of you?
-
Fake cuban. ::)
"1" wants me to be fake so bad, but fortunately, i'm 1 of 4 children of two wonderful immigrates and their extended families. try again, boss. :)
-
Why is my name in this? ??? I own firearms therefore I cannot be included in this!
you're the biggest fucking queer of all
pussy
-
"1" wants me to be fake so bad, but fortunately, i'm 1 of 4 children of two wonderful immigrates and their extended families. try again, boss. :)
You're a wanna be Brazilian/Cuban/Afrikan/Mexican/whatever is popular at the moment.....you have no self identity and no self worth. You are nothing on the inside except a confused little boy looking for acceptance in some racial idiology that you don't really fit into because you refuse to accept the fact that you are just an American, nothing more. And you can thank your parents for that because they immigrated here then hatched you here. :(
-
You're a wanna be Brazilian/Cuban/Afrikan/Mexican/whatever is popular at the moment.....you have no self identity and no self worth. You are nothing on the inside except a confused little boy looking for acceptance in some racial idiology that you don't really fit into because you refuse to accept the fact that you are just an American, nothing more. And you can thank your parents for that because they immigrated here then hatched you here. :(
Someone needs an e-hug.......you should PM Will Grant! ;D
-
Someone needs an e-hug.......you should PM Will Grant! ;D
You're closer, why not come over and e-hug me right around the waist. :-*
-
You're closer, why not come over and e-hug me right around the waist. :-*
You're on tire flipper....I'll be in your neck of the woods soon. I will gladly swing by and pick up heavy things with a handsome man such as yourself
-
Is anybody going to ship Josh a puppy to cuddle? ;D
-
you're the biggest fucking queer of all
pussy
careful he might call the cops on you ;D
He doesn't know why his name is in this thread, what an idiot.
-
Adonis is the kind of guy that beats his wife if the labels on the herbs and spices are not alphabetized and facing outward.
;D
-
you wouldnt need guns if guns were illegal (and there were no guns but of course a seldom few illegal guns would be circulating )
Please tell me this is a put on. Do you live in the USA? If so you must live in some large liberal city like San Fran or New York. You think people would give up there guns and ammo to the govt? lololol If this topic even got talked about seriously in Congress, would be a revolution. 310 million privately owned guns in USA according to Huffington Post, news outlet I'm sure you frequent.
Another thought, City with toughest gun laws in USA?? (answer Chicago) city with most murders so far in 2012?? (answer Chicago 284 as of sept 1st)
-
Please tell me this is a put on. Do you live in the USA? If so you must live in some large liberal city like San Fran or New York. You think people would give up there guns and ammo to the govt? lololol If this topic even got talked about seriously in Congress, would be a revolution. 310 million privately owned guns in USA according to Huffington Post, news outlet I'm sure you frequent.
Another thought, City with toughest gun laws in USA?? (answer Chicago) city with most murders so far in 2012?? (answer Chicago 284 as of sept 1st)
Spot on. Johnny Falcon is a Prada glasses wearing, prius driving hipster who lives in SF.
-
you're the biggest fucking queer of all
pussy
you rank a close second
-
you rank a close second
you don't even live in murica, gtfo.
-
Please tell me this is a put on. Do you live in the USA? If so you must live in some large liberal city like San Fran or New York. You think people would give up there guns and ammo to the govt? lololol If this topic even got talked about seriously in Congress, would be a revolution. 310 million privately owned guns in USA according to Huffington Post, news outlet I'm sure you frequent.
Bullshit. A tiny minority MAY become violent. The vast, vast majority would say "yes massa!" and give up their guns. There would be massive amounts of outraged bloggers, but people willing to take on armed forces just to stand up for what is [edit: in their eyes] right? Maybe 10,000. The rest will grumble, bitch, and then slink back to the TV with a bag of fast food under their flabby arms.
-
Bullshit. A tiny minority MAY become violent. The vast, vast majority would say "yes massa!" and give up their guns. There would be massive amounts of outraged bloggers, but people willing to take on armed forces just to stand up for what is [edit: in their eyes] right? Maybe 10,000. The rest will grumble, bitch, and then slink back to the TV with a bag of fast food under their flabby arms.
haha yes, it seems most gun fanatics i know are huge pussies...
-
you don't even live in murica, gtfo.
pipe down, Mango ...
-
Bullshit. A tiny minority MAY become violent. The vast, vast majority would say "yes massa!" and give up their guns. There would be massive amounts of outraged bloggers, but people willing to take on armed forces just to stand up for what is [edit: in their eyes] right? Maybe 10,000. The rest will grumble, bitch, and then slink back to the TV with a bag of fast food under their flabby arms.
70% of population have been passive pussies since USA became a nation. If you do the research only 30% at time of US revolution wanted to stand up to England, other 70% were like todays liberals. Give King what he wants, we just want peace, can live under Englands rule. Same thing today, you do not understand how powerful NRA is my friend.
-
2nd Amendment my friend. It would be Unconstitutional.
constitution can always be amended.. democracy.. its a great thing
-
constitution can always be amended.. democracy.. its a great thing
Getting rid of the 2nd will never happen and its important that it never is ended.
-
Getting rid of the 2nd will never happen and its important that it never is ended.
its entirely possible. taking a hardline position in favor of it doesnt seem very wise to me. what defines "arms"? why even assume it means firearms? of course i think the authors did intend for it to protect the right to own a gun, but to what extent does that apply ? does it refer only to the kinds of firearms that were available when the constitution was authored ? or does it allow for advances in firearm technologu to also be under protection ? since the authors intended the 2nd amendment to protect the ability of the citizenry to revolt against the government in case it became tyrannical, shouldnt it cover the right to own any kind of weaponry that the government possesses? Fully automatic M-16's ? hand held rocket launchers? jets equipped with heat seeking missiles ? Nuclear and biological weapons ?? If the 2nd amendment protects ones right to bear arms , doesnt it also protect the right to own those types of weaponry as well? how could one possibly hope to rebel against a tyrannical government without them?
-
its entirely possible. taking a hardline position in favor of it doesnt seem very wise to me. what defines "arms"? why even assume it means firearms? of course i think the authors did intend for it to protect the right to own a gun, but to what extent does that apply ? does it refer only to the kinds of firearms that were available when the constitution was authored ? or does it allow for advances in firearm technologu to also be under protection ? since the authors intended the 2nd amendment to protect the ability of the citizenry to revolt against the government in case it became tyrannical, shouldnt it cover the right to own any kind of weaponry that the government possesses? Fully automatic M-16's ? hand held rocket launchers? jets equipped with heat seeking missiles ? Nuclear and biological weapons ?? If the 2nd amendment protects ones right to bear arms , doesnt it also protect the right to own those types of weaponry as well? how could one possibly hope to rebel against a tyrannical government without them?
[ Invalid YouTube link ]
-
its entirely possible. taking a hardline position in favor of it doesnt seem very wise to me. what defines "arms"? why even assume it means firearms? of course i think the authors did intend for it to protect the right to own a gun, but to what extent does that apply ? does it refer only to the kinds of firearms that were available when the constitution was authored ? or does it allow for advances in firearm technologu to also be under protection ? since the authors intended the 2nd amendment to protect the ability of the citizenry to revolt against the government in case it became tyrannical, shouldnt it cover the right to own any kind of weaponry that the government possesses? Fully automatic M-16's ? hand held rocket launchers? jets equipped with heat seeking missiles ? Nuclear and biological weapons ?? If the 2nd amendment protects ones right to bear arms , doesnt it also protect the right to own those types of weaponry as well? how could one possibly hope to rebel against a tyrannical government without them?
It is the Supreme Court that interprets the Constitution. Read some case law to cure your curiosity.
-
[ Invalid YouTube link ]
is that really what you want to use to reply ? ;D
It is the Supreme Court that interprets the Constitution. Read some case law to cure your curiosity.
the supreme courts interpretation of the constitution is the one that becomes law, sure. but as an individual making up their mind about policy issues we all have an obligation to think through these issues on our own. and of course, and supreme court decision can always be overturned via vote of the people to secure a constitutional amendment. i wasnt asking those questions because im curious about them personally. i was asking them to display the complicated issue that stands behind such a "right to bear arms". adonis posted a video os jesse ventura, and his main argument goes right back to that point about the right to bear arms to ensure the people can rebel against tyranny. but the people have absolutely no ability to rebel against tyranny if the right to bear arms is limited to guns and rifles when the government has jets and drones and bombs and missiles and biological and nuclear weapons.
-
but as an individual making up their mind about policy issues we all have an obligation to think through these issues on our own. and of course, and supreme court decision can always be overturned via vote of the people to secure a constitutional amendment. i wasnt asking those questions because im curious about them personally. i was asking them to display the complicated issue that stands behind such a "right to bear arms".
The Supreme Court has answered some of the questions you asked. Thus, they have made the "issue that stands behind such a 'right to bear arms,'" less complicated of an issue.
-
LOL
did you not read my point about the supreme court making legal decisions but every individual having an obligation to think it through on their own ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ??
-
LOL
did you not read my point about the supreme court making legal decisions but every individual having an obligation to think it through on their own ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ??
I read it and understood it. I found it laughable that you believe that "every individual" has the ability to understand the 2nd Amendment as it is written...better than the most elite legal minds in the world.
Accordingly, I focused on the questions you have asked. Many of those questions have already been interpreted by the Supreme Court.
-
ah, so we best just shut our mouths and let the supreme court make up our minds for us. and what they decide, well thats infallible !
;D
the point is that if someone is going to say "I believe in the 2nd amendment!!!" then they should be able to talk about the issue in a manner that addresses all of the possible interpretations and implications of that amendment and make a logical argument as to why they believe the amendment protects ownership of one kind of weapon and not another (assuming they do believe that certain kind sof weapons ought to be illegal to possess
-
ah, so we best just shut our mouths and let the supreme court make up our minds for us. and what they decide, well thats infallible !
;D
the point is that if someone is going to say "I believe in the 2nd amendment!!!" then they should be able to talk about the issue in a manner that addresses all of the possible interpretations and implications of that amendment and make a logical argument as to why they believe the amendment protects ownership of one kind of weapon and not another (assuming they do believe that certain kind sof weapons ought to be illegal to possess
Again, refer to the Supreme Court. YOU... nor anybody else... can come up with credible "possible interpretations" of the 2nd Amendment without reading Supreme Court decisions/Federalist Papers/any documents written by our Founding Fathers that discussed the 2nd Amendment.
-
ah, so we best just shut our mouths and let the supreme court make up our minds for us. and what they decide, well thats infallible !
;D
the point is that if someone is going to say "I believe in the 2nd amendment!!!" then they should be able to talk about the issue in a manner that addresses all of the possible interpretations and implications of that amendment and make a logical argument as to why they believe the amendment protects ownership of one kind of weapon and not another (assuming they do believe that certain kind sof weapons ought to be illegal to possess
2nd amendment has been already butchered as it is. As a private citizen you should be legally able to own figher jets and tanks assuming that you can afford it. Everyone but weapons of mass destruction, whether they are chemical, nuclear or biological.
-
Again, refer to the Supreme Court. YOU... nor anybody else... can come up with credible "possible interpretations" of the 2nd Amendment without reading Supreme Court decisions/Federalist Papers/any documents written by our Founding Fathers that discussed the 2nd Amendment.
LOL .. are you fucking serious.. you seriously can NOT mean what you just said.. "nobody can come up with possible interpretations of the second amendment without reading supreme court decisions and other documents written by people of the goverment"... WTF??!!!??!!??!! DO YOU REALLY THINK THAT IS TRUE ?? ;D ;D ;D do you think those possible interpretations that i cam up with in my previous comments were derived from readings of those nature, or (the only other option you have) do you not think they are possible interpretations?? ;D ;D i assure you, i didnt come up with those by reading any types of documents.. ;D ;D
2nd amendment has been already butchered as it is. As a private citizen you should be legally able to own figher jets and tanks assuming that you can afford it. Everyone but weapons of mass destruction, whether they are chemical, nuclear or biological.
on what basis would you allow ownership of tanks and fighter jets but disallow biological, chemical, and nuclear weapons?? if the 2nd amendment applies to one, then surely it applies to the other
-
LOL .. are you fucking serious.. you seriously can NOT mean what you just said.. "nobody can come up with possible interpretations of the second amendment without reading supreme court decisions and other documents written by people of the goverment"... WTF??!!!??!!??!! DO YOU REALLY THINK THAT IS TRUE ?? ;D ;D ;D do you think those possible interpretations that i cam up with in my previous comments were derived from readings of those nature, or (the only other option you have) do you not think they are possible interpretations?? ;D ;D i assure you, i didnt come up with those by reading any types of documents.. ;D ;D
Yes, I am serious. However, you misquoted me. I said, "...credible 'possible interpretations'..."
Also, I am well aware that you did not derive your previous comments from reading Supreme Court decisions, the Federalist Papers, or any other document written by the Founding Fathers. Moreover, it is abundantly clear that you did not "come up with those by reading any types of documents."
-
LOL.. alright einstein ;D
-
Just remember, "Gun Control" is being able to hit your intended target! :D