Author Topic: great biceps  (Read 3986 times)

Moosejay

  • Guest
Re: great biceps
« Reply #25 on: February 01, 2008, 01:50:20 PM »
The photo looks to be taken outside of the Beacon Theater in NY...he was probably competing in the NOC

m8

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10794
Re: great biceps
« Reply #26 on: February 01, 2008, 01:57:45 PM »
1988 NOC


MAXX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16946
  • MAGA
Re: great biceps
« Reply #27 on: February 01, 2008, 01:58:52 PM »
what are you talking about dude looks great. good arms

Sharma

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2321
  • TEAMNASSER4LIFE
Re: great biceps
« Reply #28 on: February 01, 2008, 02:00:56 PM »
you forgot weak and ugly.
I thought you said it is gay to call them ugly and comment on there looks?

Matt C

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12752
  • The White Vince Goodrum
Re: great biceps
« Reply #29 on: February 01, 2008, 02:01:12 PM »
Bodybuilding Pro.com

kyomu

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16407
  • トホカミエミタメ ハラヒタマヒ キヨメタマフ
Re: great biceps
« Reply #30 on: February 01, 2008, 02:12:21 PM »
Is this Phill Hill? If he is, i am really surprised. Cus he was a mass monster But he looks so tiny here!



Sharma

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2321
  • TEAMNASSER4LIFE
Re: great biceps
« Reply #31 on: February 01, 2008, 02:15:15 PM »
The racism on this thread is representative of the racism in the sport of bodybuilding. No wonder Nasser was shafted and his titles given to a tattooed thug with convictions for racial violence.

swilkins1984

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3420
Re: great biceps
« Reply #32 on: February 01, 2008, 02:26:54 PM »
what are you talking about dude looks great. good arms

I agree

Julio Ceasar

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4143
Re: great biceps
« Reply #33 on: February 01, 2008, 02:29:21 PM »
Is this Phill Hill? If he is, i am really surprised. Cus he was a mass monster But he looks so tiny here!

Tiny and narrow shoulder width is two different things!
About the biceps shot, thats fucking unbelievable!!! Among the best I've seen for a long time.

kyomu

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16407
  • トホカミエミタメ ハラヒタマヒ キヨメタマフ
Re: great biceps
« Reply #34 on: February 01, 2008, 02:33:00 PM »
Tiny and narrow shoulder width is two different things!
About the biceps shot, thats fucking unbelievable!!! Among the best I've seen for a long time.
Yeah. But can you imagine that this mass can fit in his cloth like this?
BBing is very interesting.

SteelePegasus

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7829
  • Life, death, in between is getbig.com
Re: great biceps
« Reply #35 on: February 01, 2008, 02:44:10 PM »
Yes, I'm sure you outmass him by at least 60lbs of pure ol fat..

massive...
Here comes the money shot

Rudee

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6088
Re: great biceps
« Reply #36 on: February 01, 2008, 03:08:51 PM »
Brutal 5" wrists.

dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum
Re: great biceps
« Reply #37 on: February 01, 2008, 03:18:33 PM »
The racism on this thread is representative of the racism in the sport of bodybuilding. No wonder Nasser was shafted and his titles given to a tattooed thug with convictions for racial violence.
No, it is 'representative' of some Getbig's idiot posters. Your inference can't be substantiated. Fark, you're an idiot.  ::)

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: great biceps
« Reply #38 on: February 01, 2008, 03:31:01 PM »
That kinda cut up athletic muscularity's by far the best chick magnet. In person he would've been considerably bigger than the pic might suggest.

That looks to be somewhere around 57th and 5th ave near the Plaza Hotel.


Quote
Brutal 5" wrists.

lol true but that actually makes the muscles look better.

The Squadfather

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25840
Re: great biceps
« Reply #39 on: February 01, 2008, 03:55:15 PM »
I thought you said it is gay to call them ugly and comment on there looks?
go eat a dick "sharma". :D

OneMoreRep

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14076
Re: great biceps
« Reply #40 on: February 01, 2008, 04:29:58 PM »
That black boy has very nice arms..

Knoxville865

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 53
  • David
Re: great biceps
« Reply #41 on: February 01, 2008, 08:57:39 PM »
He looks better than 90% of the people we see he seems to be homeless or a shekk of what he used to be!

JohnnyVegas

  • Guest
Re: great biceps
« Reply #42 on: February 01, 2008, 09:09:33 PM »
Yes he looks positively anaemic compared to todays standard but his arms are amazing in this shot

[img]

I have known Paul for over 20 years, and he has the best SHAPE I have ever seen on a BBer. A smaller version of Flex Wheeler. Trained at Gold's San Diego since 87/88, have not seen him for sometime now.

You have to see his arms, and his LEGS, in person to get a true idea of how awesome they are. Unreal.

BEAST 8692

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: great biceps
« Reply #43 on: February 02, 2008, 06:10:59 AM »
Is this Phill Hill? If he is, i am really surprised. Cus he was a mass monster But he looks so tiny here!




yep, that's phil.

don't know what you were expecting but when these guys cut up and wear baggy clothes they all look a lot less massive. that is, unless their name is marcus ruhl.

phil had thick traps, narrow clavicles and a whole lot of dense muscle on his frame. btw, he was not a mass monster, but a very good bber. when you think 'mass monster' of that time you think of a guy like jim quinn or vic richards, not phil hill.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79359
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: great biceps
« Reply #44 on: February 02, 2008, 06:23:19 AM »
yep, that's phil.

don't know what you were expecting but when these guys cut up and wear baggy clothes they all look a lot less massive. that is, unless their name is marcus ruhl.

phil had thick traps, narrow clavicles and a whole lot of dense muscle on his frame. btw, he was not a mass monster, but a very good bber. when you think 'mass monster' of that time you think of a guy like jim quinn or vic richards, not phil hill.

Phill was short too like 5'7" he was massive though