You didn't understand that the words mocking and sarcasm were not necessarily synonymous. I'm glad you now understand they are not.
No, I never said that the words were "not necessarily synonymous." What I said was that in the very specific case of you using sarcasm, they weren't distinct. You posted a sarcastic statement, then for some reason, claimed it wasn't sarcasm, it was just mocking. If you use sarcasm to mock something, that doesn't stop it from being sarcasm. You incorrectly used the word.
The "circumstances" that change was Trump won the election. Whenever a new president wins his first term, I give him the benefit of the doubt and hope for success. You might struggle with that concept, because you have blind allegiance to your party.
So, like I said, the circumstances
influenced your feelings on Trump. Just like other circumstances, like... oh, I don't know, the leaked emails you were talking about in the post I was referencing... might
influence other voters.
Do you agree with this? If not, please walk me through exactly how these "seedy ties" to Russia resulted in Trump getting elected president and how this whole conspiracy is supposed to work.
When people investigate suspicious issues/activities, why do you think they do it? Do you think it is because they have all of the answers before the investigation and the investigation is just for fun? Or do you think it is to gain a level of clarity on seedy activity?
Your exact words:
My EXACT WORDS:
I find it hard to believe that the nomination is a lock for him. However, there's no denying that he has a ton of momentum. Posted in a thread
I started asking how the Republican party will change if he clinches the nomination.